A Regional Model Simulation of the 1991 Severe Precipitation Event over the Yangtze–Huai River Valley. Part II: Model Bias

Wei Gong Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, University of Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York

Search for other papers by Wei Gong in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Wei-Chyung Wang Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, University of Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York

Search for other papers by Wei-Chyung Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This is the second part of a study investigating the 1991 severe precipitation event over the Yangtze–Huai River valley (YHRV) in China using both observations and regional model simulations. While Part I reported on the Mei-yu front and its association with large-scale circulation, this study documents the biases associated with the treatment of the lateral boundary in the regional model. Two aspects of the biases were studied: the driving field, which provides large-scale boundary forcing, and the coupling scheme, which specifies how the forcing is adopted by the model. The former bias is defined as model uncertainty because it is not related to the model itself, while the latter bias (as well as those biases attributed to other sources) is referred to as model error. These two aspects were examined by analyzing the regional model simulations of the 1991 summer severe precipitation event over YHRV using different driving fields (ECMWF–TOGA objective analysis, ECMWF reanalysis, and NCEP–NCAR reanalysis) and coupling scheme (distribution function of the nudging coefficient and width of the buffer zone). Spectral analysis was also used to study the frequency distribution of the bias.

The analyses suggest that the 200-hPa winds, 500-hPa geopotential height, and 850-hPa winds and water vapor mixing ratio, which have dominant influences on Mei-yu evolution, are sensitive to large-scale boundary forcing. In particular the 500-hPa geopotential height, and 850-hPa water vapor mixing ratio near the Tibetan Plateau and over the western Pacific Oceans are highly dependent on the driving field. On the other hand, the water vapor in the lower troposphere, wind at all levels, and precipitation pattern are much more affected by the treatment of nudging in the coupling scheme. It is interesting to find that the two commonly used coupling schemes, the lateral boundary coupling and the spectral coupling, provide similar large-scale information to the simulation domain when the former scheme used a wider buffer zone and stronger nudging coefficient. Systematical model errors, existing in the north of the simulation domain, are caused by the overprediction of low-level inversion stratiform clouds.

The analyses further indicate that the model mesoscale signal is not significantly influenced by the different treatments of the nudging procedure. However, it is also shown that the model performance, especially the monthly mean precipitation and its spatial pattern, is substantially improved with the increase of buffer zone width and nudging coefficient.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Wei-Chyung Wang, Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, SUNY at Albany, 251 Fuller Rd., Albany, NY 12203.

Abstract

This is the second part of a study investigating the 1991 severe precipitation event over the Yangtze–Huai River valley (YHRV) in China using both observations and regional model simulations. While Part I reported on the Mei-yu front and its association with large-scale circulation, this study documents the biases associated with the treatment of the lateral boundary in the regional model. Two aspects of the biases were studied: the driving field, which provides large-scale boundary forcing, and the coupling scheme, which specifies how the forcing is adopted by the model. The former bias is defined as model uncertainty because it is not related to the model itself, while the latter bias (as well as those biases attributed to other sources) is referred to as model error. These two aspects were examined by analyzing the regional model simulations of the 1991 summer severe precipitation event over YHRV using different driving fields (ECMWF–TOGA objective analysis, ECMWF reanalysis, and NCEP–NCAR reanalysis) and coupling scheme (distribution function of the nudging coefficient and width of the buffer zone). Spectral analysis was also used to study the frequency distribution of the bias.

The analyses suggest that the 200-hPa winds, 500-hPa geopotential height, and 850-hPa winds and water vapor mixing ratio, which have dominant influences on Mei-yu evolution, are sensitive to large-scale boundary forcing. In particular the 500-hPa geopotential height, and 850-hPa water vapor mixing ratio near the Tibetan Plateau and over the western Pacific Oceans are highly dependent on the driving field. On the other hand, the water vapor in the lower troposphere, wind at all levels, and precipitation pattern are much more affected by the treatment of nudging in the coupling scheme. It is interesting to find that the two commonly used coupling schemes, the lateral boundary coupling and the spectral coupling, provide similar large-scale information to the simulation domain when the former scheme used a wider buffer zone and stronger nudging coefficient. Systematical model errors, existing in the north of the simulation domain, are caused by the overprediction of low-level inversion stratiform clouds.

The analyses further indicate that the model mesoscale signal is not significantly influenced by the different treatments of the nudging procedure. However, it is also shown that the model performance, especially the monthly mean precipitation and its spatial pattern, is substantially improved with the increase of buffer zone width and nudging coefficient.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Wei-Chyung Wang, Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, SUNY at Albany, 251 Fuller Rd., Albany, NY 12203.

Save
  • Anthes, R. A., E. Y. Hsie, and Y. H. Kuo, 1987: Description of the Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model version 4 (MM4). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-282+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, 66 pp. [Available from NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • ——, Y. H. Kuo, E. Y. Hsie, S. Low-Nam, and T. W. Bettge, 1989: Estimation of episodic and climatological skill and uncertainty in regional numerical models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,115, 763–806.

  • Bony, S., Y. Sud, K.-M. Lau, J. Susskind, and S. Saha, 1997: Comparison and satellite assessment of NASA/DAO and NCEP–NCAR reanalyses over tropical ocean: Atmospheric hydrology and radiation. J. Climate,10, 1441–1462.

  • Davies, H. C., 1976: A lateral boundary formulation for multilevel prediction models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,102, 405–418.

  • Dickinson, R. E., R. M. Errico, F. Giorgi, and G. T. Bates, 1988: Modeling of historic, prehistoric and future climates of the Great Basin. NCAR Final Rep. to USGS/NNWSI, 46 pp. [Available from NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • Ding, Y.-H., 1993: Research on the 1991 Persistent, Severe Precipitation over Yangtze–Huai River Valley (in Chinese). Chinese Meteorological Press, 255 pp.

  • Dudek, M. P., X.-Z. Liang, and W.-C. Wang, 1996: A regional climate model study of the scale dependence of cloud–radiation interactions. J. Climate,9, 1221–1234.

  • Errico, R. M., 1985: Spectra computed from a limited area grid. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 1554–1562.

  • ——, and D. Baumhefner, 1987: Predictability experiments using a high-resolution limited-area model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 488–504.

  • Giorgi, F., 1990: On the simulation of regional climate using a limited area model nested in a general circulation model. J. Climate,3, 941–963.

  • ——, and L. O. Mearns, 1991: Approaches to the simulation of regional climate change: A review. Rev. Geophys.,29, 191–216.

  • ——, G. T. Bates, and S. Nieman, 1993a: The multiyear surface climatology of a regional atmospheric model over the western United States. J. Climate,6, 75–95.

  • ——, M. R. Marinucci, and G. T. Bates, 1993b: Development of a second-generation regional climate model (RegCM2). Part II: Convective processes and assimilation of lateral boundary conditions. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 2814–2832.

  • Kida, H., T. Koide, H. Sasaki, and M. Chiba, 1991: A new approach for coupling a limited area model to a GCM for regional climate simulations. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,69, 723–728.

  • Kiehl, J. T., 1994: Sensitivity of a GCM climate simulation to differences in continental versus maritime cloud drop size. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 23 107–23 115.

  • Liang, X.-Z., and W.-C. Wang, 1995: A GCM study of the climatic effect of 1979–1992 ozone trend. Atmospheric Ozone as a Climate Gas, NATO ASI Series, W.-C. Wang and I. S. A. Isaksen, Eds., Springer-Verlag, 259–288.

  • Leung, L. R., S. J. Ghan, Z.-C. Zhao, Y. Luo, W.-C. Wang, and H.-L. Wei, 1999: Intercomparison of regional climate simulations of the 1991 summer monsoon in East Asia: Special issue on “New Development and Applications in Regional Climate Models.” J. Geophys. Res.,104, 6425–6454.

  • Min, W., and S. Schubert, 1997: The climate signal in regional moisture fluxes: A comparison of three global data assimilation products. J. Climate,10, 2623–2642.

  • Mo, K. C., J. N. Paegle, and J. Paegle, 1995: Physical mechanisms of the 1993 summer floods. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 879–895.

  • Pan, Z.-T., E. Takle, W. Gutowski, and R. Turner, 1999: Long simulation of regional climate as a sequence of short segments. Mon. Wea. Rev.,127, 308–321.

  • Sasaki, H., H. Kida, T. Koide, and M. Chiba, 1995: The performance of long-term integrations of a limited area model with the spectral boundary coupling method. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,73, 165–181.

  • Slingo, A., and J. M. Slingo, 1991: Response of the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model to improvements in the representation of clouds. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 15 341–15 347.

  • Tao, S.-Y., and L.-X. Chen, 1987: A review of recent research on the East Asian summer monsoon in China. Monsoon Meteorology, C.-P. Chang and T. N. Krishnamurti, Eds., Oxford University Press, 60–92.

  • Tatsumi, Y., 1986: A spectral limited-area model with time-dependent lateral boundary conditions and its application to a multi-level primitive equation model. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,64, 637–663.

  • Trenberth, K. E., and C. J. Guillemot, 1995: Evaluation of the global atmospheric moisture budget as seen from analyses. J. Climate,8, 2255–2272.

  • Trendon, R. E., and R. A. Petersen, 1993: Domain size sensitivity experiments using the NMC Eta model. Preprints, 13th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, Vienna, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 176–177.

  • Vukicevic, T., and R. M. Errico, 1990: The influence of artificial and physical factors upon predictability estimates using a complex limited-area model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 1460–1482.

  • Waldron, K. M., J. Paegle, and J. D. Horel, 1996: Sensitivity of a spectrally filtered and nudged limited-area model to outer model options. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 529–547.

  • Walsh, K., and I. G. Watterson, 1997: Tropical cyclone-like vortices in a limited area model: Comparison with observed climatology. J. Climate,10, 2240–2259.

  • Wang, W.-C., W. Gong, and H. Wei, 2000: A regional model simulation of 1991 severe precipitation event over the Yangtze–Huai River Valley. Part I: Precipitation and circulation statistics. J. Climate,13, 74–92.

  • Warner, T. T., R. A. Peterson, and R. E. Treadon, 1997: A tutorial on lateral boundary conditions as a basic and potentially serious limitation to regional numerical weather prediction. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,78, 2599–2617.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 452 136 10
PDF Downloads 80 21 0