Low Cloud Type over the Ocean from Surface Observations. Part III: Relationship to Vertical Motion and the Regional Surface Synoptic Environment

Joel R. Norris National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Joel R. Norris in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Stephen A. Klein Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, NOAA, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Stephen A. Klein in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Composite large-scale dynamical fields contemporaneous with low cloud types observed at midlatitude Ocean Weather Station (OWS) C and eastern subtropical OWS N are used to establish representative relationships between low cloud type and the synoptic environment. The composites are constructed by averaging meteorological observations of surface wind and sea level pressure from volunteering observing ships (VOS) and analyses of sea level pressure, 1000-mb wind, and 700-mb pressure vertical velocity from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP–NCAR) reanalysis project on those dates and times of day when a particular low cloud type was reported at the OWS.

VOS and NCEP results for OWS C during summer show that bad-weather stratus occurs with strong convergence and ascent slightly ahead of a surface low center and trough. Cumulus-under-stratocumulus and moderate and large cumulus occur with divergence and subsidence in the cold sector of an extratropical cyclone. Both sky-obscuring fog and no-low-cloud typically occur with southwesterly flow from regions of warmer sea surface temperature and differ primarily according to slight surface convergence and stronger warm advection in the case of sky-obscuring fog or surface divergence and weaker warm advection in the case of no-low-cloud. Fair-weather stratus and ordinary stratocumulus are associated with a mixture of meteorological conditions, but differ with respect to vertical motion in the environment. Fair-weather stratus occurs most commonly in the presence of slight convergence and ascent, while stratocumulus often occurs in the presence of divergence and subsidence.

Surface divergence and estimated subsidence at the top of the boundary layer are calculated from VOS observations. At both OWS C and OWS N during summer and winter these values are large for ordinary stratocumulus, less for cumulus-under-stratocumulus, and least (and sometimes slightly negative) for moderate and large cumulus. Subsidence interpolated from NCEP analyses to the top of the boundary layer does not exhibit such variation, but the discrepancy may be due to deficiencies in the analysis procedure or the boundary layer parameterization of the NCEP model. The VOS results suggest that decreasing divergence and subsidence in addition to increasing sea surface temperature may promote the transition from stratocumulus to trade cumulus observed over low-latitude oceans.

Corresponding author address: Joel R. Norris, GFDL/NOAA, Princeton University, P.O. Box 308, Princeton, NJ 08542.

Email: jnorris@ucar.edu

Abstract

Composite large-scale dynamical fields contemporaneous with low cloud types observed at midlatitude Ocean Weather Station (OWS) C and eastern subtropical OWS N are used to establish representative relationships between low cloud type and the synoptic environment. The composites are constructed by averaging meteorological observations of surface wind and sea level pressure from volunteering observing ships (VOS) and analyses of sea level pressure, 1000-mb wind, and 700-mb pressure vertical velocity from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP–NCAR) reanalysis project on those dates and times of day when a particular low cloud type was reported at the OWS.

VOS and NCEP results for OWS C during summer show that bad-weather stratus occurs with strong convergence and ascent slightly ahead of a surface low center and trough. Cumulus-under-stratocumulus and moderate and large cumulus occur with divergence and subsidence in the cold sector of an extratropical cyclone. Both sky-obscuring fog and no-low-cloud typically occur with southwesterly flow from regions of warmer sea surface temperature and differ primarily according to slight surface convergence and stronger warm advection in the case of sky-obscuring fog or surface divergence and weaker warm advection in the case of no-low-cloud. Fair-weather stratus and ordinary stratocumulus are associated with a mixture of meteorological conditions, but differ with respect to vertical motion in the environment. Fair-weather stratus occurs most commonly in the presence of slight convergence and ascent, while stratocumulus often occurs in the presence of divergence and subsidence.

Surface divergence and estimated subsidence at the top of the boundary layer are calculated from VOS observations. At both OWS C and OWS N during summer and winter these values are large for ordinary stratocumulus, less for cumulus-under-stratocumulus, and least (and sometimes slightly negative) for moderate and large cumulus. Subsidence interpolated from NCEP analyses to the top of the boundary layer does not exhibit such variation, but the discrepancy may be due to deficiencies in the analysis procedure or the boundary layer parameterization of the NCEP model. The VOS results suggest that decreasing divergence and subsidence in addition to increasing sea surface temperature may promote the transition from stratocumulus to trade cumulus observed over low-latitude oceans.

Corresponding author address: Joel R. Norris, GFDL/NOAA, Princeton University, P.O. Box 308, Princeton, NJ 08542.

Email: jnorris@ucar.edu

Save
  • Albrecht, B. A., D. A. Randall, and S. Nicholls, 1988: Observations of marine stratocumulus clouds during FIRE. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,69, 618–626.

  • ——, C. S. Bretherton, D. Johnson, W. H. Schubert, and A. S. Frisch, 1995: The Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment—ASTEX. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,76, 889–904.

  • Betts, A. K., and W. Ridgway, 1988: Coupling of radiative, convective, and surface fluxes over the equatorial Pacific. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 522–536.

  • Boers, R., and P. B. Krummel, 1998: Microphysical properties of boundary layer clouds over the Southern Ocean during ACE 1. J. Geophys. Res.,103, 16 651–16 663.

  • ——, J. B. Jensen, P. B. Krummel, and H. Gerber, 1996: Microphysical and short-wave radiative structure of wintertime stratocumulus clouds over the Southern Ocean. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,122, 1307–1339.

  • ——, ——, and ——, 1997: A line of convection embedded in a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,123, 207–221.

  • ——, P. B. Krummel, S. T. Siems, and G. D. Hess, 1998a: Thermodynamic structure and entrainment of stratocumulus over the Southern Ocean. J. Geophys. Res.,103, 16 637–16 650.

  • ——, J. B. Jensen, and P. B. Krummel, 1998b: Microphysical and short-wave radiative structure of stratocumulus clouds over the Southern Ocean: Summer results and seasonal differences. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,124, 151–168.

  • Bretherton, C. S., P. Austin, and S. T. Siems, 1995: Cloudiness and marine boundary layer dynamics in the ASTEX Lagrangian experiments. Part II: Cloudiness, drizzle, surface fluxes, and entrainment. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2724–2735.

  • Cardone, V. J., J. G. Greenwood, and M. A. Cane, 1990: On trends in historical marine wind data. J. Climate,3, 113–127.

  • ——, ——, and ——, 1995: The effect of moonlight on observation of cloud cover at night, and application to cloud climatology. J. Climate,8, 1429–1446.

  • ——, ——, and ——, 1996: Edited synoptic cloud reports from ships and land stations over the globe, 1982–1991. Rep #NDP026B, 45 pp. [Available from Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6050.].

  • Isemer, H.-J., and L. Hasse, 1991: The scientific equivalent scale: Effects on wind statistics and climatological air–sea flux estimates in the North Atlantic Ocean. J. Climate,4, 819–836.

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 437–471.

  • Kent, E. C., P. K. Taylor, B. S. Truscott, and J. S. Hopkins, 1993: The accuracy of voluntary observing ships’ meteorological observations—Results of the VSOP-NA. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,10, 591–608.

  • Klein, S. A., 1997: Synoptic variability of low-cloud properties and meteorological parameters in the subtropical trade wind boundary layer. J. Climate,10, 2018–2039.

  • ——, and D. L. Hartmann, 1993: The seasonal cycle of low stratiform clouds. J. Climate,6, 1587–1606.

  • ——, ——, and J. R. Norris, 1995: On the relationships among low cloud structure, sea surface temperature, and atmospheric circulation in the summertime northeast Pacific. J. Climate,8, 1140–1155.

  • Krueger, S. K., G. T. McLean, and Q. Fu, 1995: Numerical simulation of the stratus-to-cumulus transition in subtropical marine boundary layer. Part I: Boundary-layer structure. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2839–2850.

  • Lau, N.-C., and M. W. Crane, 1997: Comparing satellite and surface observations of cloud patterns in synoptic-scale circulation systems. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 3172–3189.

  • Leith, C. E., 1973: The standard error of time-average estimates of climatic means. J. Appl. Meteor.,12, 1066–1069.

  • Martin, G. M., D. W. Johnson, P. R. Jonas, D. P. Rogers, I. M. Brooks, and R. W. Barlow, 1997: Effects of airmass type on the interaction between warm stratocumulus and underlying cumulus clouds in the marine boundary-layer. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,123, 849–882.

  • Nicholls, S., 1984: The dynamics of stratocumulus: Aircraft observations and comparisons with a mixed layer model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,110, 783–820.

  • ——, and J. Leighton, 1986: An observational study of the structure of stratiform cloud sheets. Part I: Structure. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,112, 431–460.

  • Norris, J. R., 1998a: Low cloud type over the ocean from surface observations. Part I: Relationship to surface meteorology and the vertical distribution of temperature and moisture. J. Climate,11, 369–382.

  • ——, 1998b: Low cloud type over the ocean from surface observations. Part II: Geographical and seasonal variations. J. Climate,11, 383–403.

  • ——, Y. Zhang, and J. M. Wallace, 1998: Role of low clouds in summertime atmosphere–ocean interactions over the North Pacific. J. Climate,11, 2482–2490.

  • Ramage, C. S., 1987: Secular change in reported surface wind speeds over the ocean. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,26, 525–528.

  • Rozendaal, M. A., C. B. Leovy, and S. A. Klein, 1995: An observational study of diurnal variations of marine stratiform cloud. J. Climate,8, 1795–1809.

  • Saur, J. F. T., 1963: A study of the quality of sea water temperatures reported in logs of ships’ weather observations. J. Appl. Meteor.,2, 417–425.

  • Slingo, A., 1990: Sensitivity of the earth’s radiation budget to changes in low clouds. Nature,343, 49–51.

  • ——, S. Nicholls, and J. Schmetz, 1982: Aircraft observations of marine stratocumulus during JASIN. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,108, 833–856.

  • Smith, S. A., and P. R. Jonas, 1995: Observations of the turbulent fluxes in fields of cumulus clouds. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,121, 1185–1208.

  • Tabata, S., 1978: Comparison of observations of sea surface temperatures at Ocean Station P and NOAA buoy stations and those made by merchant ships traveling in their vicinities, in the northeast Pacific Ocean. J. Appl. Meteor.,17, 374–385.

  • Weaver, C. P., and V. Ramanathan, 1997: Relationships between large-scale vertical velocity, static stability, and cloud radiative forcing over Northern Hemisphere extratropical oceans. J. Climate,10, 2871–2887.

  • Woodruff, S. D., R. J. Slutz, R. L. Jenne, and P. M. Steurer, 1987: A comprehensive ocean–atmosphere data set. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,68, 1239–1250.

  • World Meteorological Organization, 1975: International cloud atlas. Vol. I. WMO Publ. 407, WMO, 155 pp.

  • Wyant, M. C., C. S. Bretherton, H. A. Rand, and D. E. Stevens, 1997:Numerical simulations and a conceptual model of the stratocumulus to trade cumulus transition. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 168–192.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 374 58 4
PDF Downloads 220 45 2