Editorial Type:
Letters
Article Type:
Letter

Tropical Stabilization of the Thermohaline Circulation in a Greenhouse Warming Simulation

M. Latif Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany

Search for other papers by M. Latif in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
E. Roeckner Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany

Search for other papers by E. Roeckner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
U. Mikolajewicz Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany

Search for other papers by U. Mikolajewicz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
R. Voss Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany

Search for other papers by R. Voss in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jun 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<1809:L>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1809–1813
Restricted access

Abstract

Most global climate models simulate a weakening of the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation (THC) in response to enhanced greenhouse warming. Both surface warming and freshening in high latitudes, the so-called sinking region, contribute to the weakening of the THC. Some models even simulate a complete breakdown of the THC at sufficiently strong forcing. Here results are presented from a state-of-the-art global climate model that does not simulate a weakening of the THC in response to greenhouse warming. Large-scale air–sea interactions in the Tropics, similar to those operating during present-day El Niños, lead to anomalously high salinities in the tropical Atlantic. These are advected into the sinking region, thereby increasing the surface density and compensating the effects of the local warming and freshening.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Mojib Latif, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Bundesstrasse 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.

Abstract

Most global climate models simulate a weakening of the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation (THC) in response to enhanced greenhouse warming. Both surface warming and freshening in high latitudes, the so-called sinking region, contribute to the weakening of the THC. Some models even simulate a complete breakdown of the THC at sufficiently strong forcing. Here results are presented from a state-of-the-art global climate model that does not simulate a weakening of the THC in response to greenhouse warming. Large-scale air–sea interactions in the Tropics, similar to those operating during present-day El Niños, lead to anomalously high salinities in the tropical Atlantic. These are advected into the sinking region, thereby increasing the surface density and compensating the effects of the local warming and freshening.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Mojib Latif, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Bundesstrasse 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Bacher, A., J. M. Oberhuber, and E. Roeckner, 1998: ENSO dynamics and seasonal cycle in the tropical Pacific as simulated by the ECHAM4/OPYC3 coupled general circulation model. Climate Dyn.,14, 431–450.

  • Broecker, W. S., 1991: The great ocean conveyor. Oceanography,4, 79–89.

  • ——, D. M. Peteet, and D. Rind, 1985: Does the ocean–atmosphere system have more than one stable mode of operation? Nature,315, 21–26.

  • Christoph, M., T. P. Barnett, and E. Roeckner, 1998: The Antarctic circumpolar wave in a coupled ocean–atmosphere GCM. J. Climate,11, 1659–1672.

  • Cubasch, U., K. Kasselmann, H. Höck, E. Maier-Reimer, U. Mikolajewicz, B. D. Santer, and R. Sausen, 1992: Time-dependent greenhouse warming computations with a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. Climate Dyn.,8, 55–69.

  • Delworth, T., S. Manabe, and R. J. Stouffer, 1993: Interdecadal variations of the thermohaline circulation in a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate,6, 1993–2011.

  • IPCC, 1992: Climate Change 1992. The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment. J. T. Houghton, B. A. Callander, and S. K. Varney, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 200 pp.

  • Manabe, S., and R. J. Stouffer, 1994: Multiple-century response of a coupled ocean–atmosphere model to an increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide. J. Climate,7, 5–23.

  • ——, and ——, 1995: Simulation of abrupt climate change induced by freshwater input to the North Atlantic Ocean. Nature,378, 165–167.

  • ——, and ——, 1999: The role of thermohaline circulation in climate. Tellus,51, 91–109.

  • ——, ——, M. Spelman, and K. Bryan, 1991: Transient responses of a coupled ocean–atmosphere model to gradual changes of atmospheric CO2. Part I: Annual mean response. J. Climate,4, 785–818.

  • Mikolajewicz, U., and R. Voss, 2000: The role of the individual air–sea flux components in CO2-induced changes of the ocean’s circulation and climate. Climate Dyn., in press.

  • ——, B. D. Santer, and E. Maier-Reimer, 1990: Ocean response to greenhouse warming. Nature,345, 589–593.

  • Neelin, J. D., and H. A. Dijkstra, 1995: Ocean–atmosphere interaction and tropical climatology. Part I: The dangers of flux correction. J. Climate,8, 1325–1342.

  • Oberhuber, J. M., E. Roeckner, M. Christoph, M. Esch, and M. Latif, 1998: Predicting the ’97 El Niño event with a global climate model. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 2273–2276.

  • Philander, S. G. H., 1990: El Niño, La Niña and the Southern Oscillation. Academic Press, 293 pp.

  • Rahmstorf, S., 1995: Bifurcations of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation in response to changes in the hydrological cycle. Nature,378, 145–149.

  • ——, 1997: Risk of sea-change in the Atlantic. Nature,388, 825–826.

  • ——, 1999: Shifting seas in the greenhouse? Nature,399, 523–524.

  • Roeckner, E., J. M. Oberhuber, A. Bacher, M. Christoph, and I. Kirchner, 1996: ENSO variability and atmospheric response in a global atmosphere–ocean GCM. Climate Dyn.,12, 737–754.

  • ——, L. Bengtsson, J. Feichter, J. Lelieveld, and H. Rodhe, 1999: Transient climate change simulations with a coupled atmosphere–ocean GCM including the tropospheric sulfur cycle. J. Climate,12, 3004–3032.

  • Ropelewski, C. F., and M. Halpert, 1987: Global and regional scale precipitation patterns associated with the El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 1606–1627.

  • Schiller, A., U. Mikolajewicz, and R. Voss, 1997: The stability of the thermohaline circulation in a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. Climate Dyn.,13, 325–348.

  • Schmittner, A., C. Appenzeller, and T. F. Stocker, 2000: Enhanced Atlantic freshwater export during El Niño. Geophys. Res. Lett., in press.

  • Stocker, T. F., and D. G. Wright, 1991: Rapid transitions of the ocean’s deep circulation induced by changes in surface water fluxes. Nature,351, 729–732.

  • Timmermann, A., M. Latif, R. Voss, and A. Groetzner, 1998: Northern Hemisphere interdecadal variability: A coupled air–sea mode. J. Climate,11, 1906–1931.

  • ——, J. Oberhuber, A. Bacher, M. Esch, M. Latif, and E. Roeckner, 1999: Increased El Niño frequency in a climate model forced by future greenhouse warming. Nature,398, 694–697.

  • Ulbrich, U., and M. Christoph, 1999: A shift of the NAO and increasing storm track activity over Europe due to anthropogenic greenhouse gas forcing. Climate Dyn.,15, 551–559.

  • Wood, R. A., A. B. Keen, J. F. Mitchell, and J. M. Gregory, 1999: Changing spatial structure of the thermohaline circulation in response to atmospheric CO2 forcing in a climate model. Nature,399, 572–575.

  • Zhang, X.-H., J. Oberhuber, A. Bacher, and E. Roeckner, 1998: Interpretation of interbasin exchange in an isopycnal ocean model. Climate Dyn.,14, 725–740.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2323 1653 40
PDF Downloads 433 71 3