The Atmospheric Water Vapor Cycle in South America and theTropospheric Circulation

J. C. Labraga Centro Nacional Patagónico, The National Research Council of Argentina, Puerto Madryn, Argentina

Search for other papers by J. C. Labraga in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
O. Frumento Centro Nacional Patagónico, The National Research Council of Argentina, Puerto Madryn, Argentina

Search for other papers by O. Frumento in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
M. López Centro Nacional Patagónico, The National Research Council of Argentina, Puerto Madryn, Argentina

Search for other papers by M. López in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The main characteristics of the atmospheric water vapor cycle over the South American continent and the adjacent oceans are investigated using the 22-yr period, from 1976 to 1997, of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP–NCAR) 40-Year Reanalysis Project database. Precipitation rate and water vapor content fields obtained from this dataset are compared over the region with newly available observed datasets, which combine ground-based and satellite-derived observations. The temporal variation and spatial distribution of the atmospheric water vapor balance equation terms (precipitation rate, evaporation rate, and water vapor flux convergence) are examined with regard to their consistency and relative importance. The net effect of the atmospheric water vapor transport, represented in the last term of the balance equation, is decomposed into the horizontal and vertical convergence terms. The analysis of the latter highlights those regions where the topographic uplift makes a substantial contribution to the total precipitation rate. The former term is further decomposed into the stationary and transient water vapor flux contributions. The comparison of these terms with relevant characteristics of the large-scale tropospheric circulation provides a better understanding of the different precipitation regimes in South America. The mean annual balance satisfactorily closes over most of the oceanic regions. However, important imbalances found in the vicinity of high topographic features, such as in the central Andes, are attributed to large errors in the local computation of the atmospheric water vapor flux. The current results corroborate previous findings on the role of the stationary water vapor flux convergence in the spatial distribution and seasonal variation of the rainfall rate in tropical and subtropical latitudes and extend over the less-investigated continental midlatitudes. The magnitude of the transient water vapor flux convergence is, in general, lower than that of the stationary flux. Nonetheless, in some oceanic and continental regions, they are comparable and seem to be dynamically linked. This interaction, which can be explained by means of a simple transport-gradient model of the transient water vapor flux, could help to clarify the observed seasonal and interannual variability of the rainfall rate in the humid-to-dry transition zone in the southern part of the continent.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Juan C. Labraga, Centro Nacional Patagónico-CONICET, Blvd. Brown s/n, (9120) Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina.

Abstract

The main characteristics of the atmospheric water vapor cycle over the South American continent and the adjacent oceans are investigated using the 22-yr period, from 1976 to 1997, of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP–NCAR) 40-Year Reanalysis Project database. Precipitation rate and water vapor content fields obtained from this dataset are compared over the region with newly available observed datasets, which combine ground-based and satellite-derived observations. The temporal variation and spatial distribution of the atmospheric water vapor balance equation terms (precipitation rate, evaporation rate, and water vapor flux convergence) are examined with regard to their consistency and relative importance. The net effect of the atmospheric water vapor transport, represented in the last term of the balance equation, is decomposed into the horizontal and vertical convergence terms. The analysis of the latter highlights those regions where the topographic uplift makes a substantial contribution to the total precipitation rate. The former term is further decomposed into the stationary and transient water vapor flux contributions. The comparison of these terms with relevant characteristics of the large-scale tropospheric circulation provides a better understanding of the different precipitation regimes in South America. The mean annual balance satisfactorily closes over most of the oceanic regions. However, important imbalances found in the vicinity of high topographic features, such as in the central Andes, are attributed to large errors in the local computation of the atmospheric water vapor flux. The current results corroborate previous findings on the role of the stationary water vapor flux convergence in the spatial distribution and seasonal variation of the rainfall rate in tropical and subtropical latitudes and extend over the less-investigated continental midlatitudes. The magnitude of the transient water vapor flux convergence is, in general, lower than that of the stationary flux. Nonetheless, in some oceanic and continental regions, they are comparable and seem to be dynamically linked. This interaction, which can be explained by means of a simple transport-gradient model of the transient water vapor flux, could help to clarify the observed seasonal and interannual variability of the rainfall rate in the humid-to-dry transition zone in the southern part of the continent.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Juan C. Labraga, Centro Nacional Patagónico-CONICET, Blvd. Brown s/n, (9120) Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina.

Save
  • Berbery, E. H., and C. S. Vera, 1996: Characteristics of the Southern Hemisphere winter storm track with filtered and unfiltered data. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 468–481.

  • Betts, A. K., S.-Y. Hong, and H.-L. Pan, 1996: Comparison of NCEP–NCAR reanalysis with 1987 FIFE data. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 1480–1498.

  • Chu, P. S., 1985: A contribution to the upper-air climatology of tropical South America. J. Climatol.,5, 403–416.

  • Hastenrath, S., 1997: Annual cycle of upper air circulation and convective activity over the tropical Americas. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 4267–4274.

  • Huffman, G. J., and Coauthors, 1997: The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) combined precipitation dataset. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,78, 5–33.

  • Jaeger, L., 1976: Monatskarten des Niederschlags für die ganze Erde (Monthly maps of precipitation for the whole world). Tech. Rep. 18, No. 139, 33 pp. and plates. [Available from Bibliothek des Deutschen Wetterdienstes, Frankfurter Str. 135, 63067 Offenbach, Germany.].

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 437–471.

  • Kodama, Y. M., 1992: Large-scale common features of subtropical precipitation zones (the Baiu frontal zone, the SPCZ, and the SACZ). Part I: Characteristics of subtropical frontal zones. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,70, 813–836.

  • Legates, D. R., and C. J. Willmott, 1990: Mean seasonal and spatial variability in gauge-corrected, global precipitation. Int. J. Climatol.,10, 111–127.

  • Lenters, J. D., and K. H. Cook, 1995: Simulation and diagnosis of the regional summertime precipitation climatology of South America. J. Climate,8, 2988–3005.

  • ——, and ——, 1997: On the origin of the Bolivian high and related circulation features of the South American climate. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 656–677.

  • Miyakoda, K., and J. Sirutis, 1986: Manual of the E-physics, 87 pp. [Available from Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, P.O. Box 308, Princeton, NJ 08542.].

  • Moura, A. D., and J. Shukla, 1981: On the dynamics of droughts in northeast Brazil: Observations, theory, and numerical experiments with a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 2653–2675.

  • Peixoto, J. P., and A. H. Oort, 1992: Physics of Climate. American Institute of Physics, 520 pp.

  • Randel, D. L., T. H. Vonder Haar, M. A. Ringerud, G. L. Stephens, T. J. Greenwald, and C. L. Combs, 1996: A new global water vapor dataset. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 1233–1246.

  • Rao V. B., I. F. A. Cavalcanti, and K. Hada, 1996: Annual variation of rainfall over Brazil and water vapor characteristics over South America. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 26 539–26 551.

  • Rasmusson, E. M., and K. C. Mo, 1996: Large-scale atmospheric moisture cycling as evaluated from NMC global analysis and forecast products. J. Climate,9, 3276–3297.

  • Schwerdtfeger, W., 1976: Climates of Central and South America. Vol. 12, World Survey of Climatology, Elsevier, 532 pp.

  • Trenberth, K. E., 1991: Storm tracks in the Southern Hemisphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 2159–2178.

  • Virji, H., 1981: A preliminary study of summertime tropospheric circulation patterns over South America estimated from cloud winds. Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 599–610.

  • Watterson, I. G., 1996: Nondimensional measures of climate model performance. Int. J. Climatol.,16, 379–391.

  • ——, 1998: An analysis of the global water cycle of present and doubled CO2 climates simulated by the CSIRO general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res.,103, 23 113–23 129.

  • Yanai, M., and T. Tomita, 1998: Seasonal and interannual variability of atmospheric heat sources and moisture sinks as determined from NCEP–NCAR reanalysis. J. Climate,11, 463–482.

  • Zhou, J., and K.-M. Lau, 1998: Does a monsoon climate exist over South America? J. Climate,11, 1020–1040.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 915 385 24
PDF Downloads 385 71 7