Coarse-Grid and Cloud-Resolving Simulations of a Midlatitude Cyclonic Cloud System: Implications for the Parameterization of Layer Clouds in GCMs

K. K. Szeto Atmospheric Environment Service, Downsview, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by K. K. Szeto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
H. Guan Atmospheric Environment Service, Downsview, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by H. Guan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A winter oceanic cyclonic cloud system was simulated by using the mesoscale compressible community (MC2) model with different combinations of model resolutions and cloud microphysics packages. Results from these simulations are intercompared to examine the effects of the coarse model grid and simplified model physics on the simulated large-scale storm environment. When aggregated to an area approximately equivalent to the size of a grid box in current GCMs, the results from the models differ significantly in the large-scale cloud and moisture profiles. Although the effects of using different stratiform cloud schemes on the coarse-grid results are appreciable, the effects of different model resolution are shown to be greater on the large-scale frontal cloud field. In particular, the coarse-grid models underestimated the cloudiness and atmospheric moisture content in the warm-frontal region. Such differences in the large-scale model storm environment were consequences of the stronger mean cross-front circulation and mesoscale cloud features in the high-resolution simulation. The stronger cross-front circulation was in turn a result of stronger frontogenetic processes over the region and dynamic influences of the mesoscale cloud bands on the parent storm. Because both the frontal zones and the mesoscale cloud bands are unresolved features in current GCMs, these results suggest that the parameterization of their bulk effects on the large scales should be included in the representation of frontal layered clouds in climate models.

Corresponding author address: Kit K. Szeto, CCRP, AES, 4905 Dufferin Street, Downsview, ON M3H 5T4, Canada.

Abstract

A winter oceanic cyclonic cloud system was simulated by using the mesoscale compressible community (MC2) model with different combinations of model resolutions and cloud microphysics packages. Results from these simulations are intercompared to examine the effects of the coarse model grid and simplified model physics on the simulated large-scale storm environment. When aggregated to an area approximately equivalent to the size of a grid box in current GCMs, the results from the models differ significantly in the large-scale cloud and moisture profiles. Although the effects of using different stratiform cloud schemes on the coarse-grid results are appreciable, the effects of different model resolution are shown to be greater on the large-scale frontal cloud field. In particular, the coarse-grid models underestimated the cloudiness and atmospheric moisture content in the warm-frontal region. Such differences in the large-scale model storm environment were consequences of the stronger mean cross-front circulation and mesoscale cloud features in the high-resolution simulation. The stronger cross-front circulation was in turn a result of stronger frontogenetic processes over the region and dynamic influences of the mesoscale cloud bands on the parent storm. Because both the frontal zones and the mesoscale cloud bands are unresolved features in current GCMs, these results suggest that the parameterization of their bulk effects on the large scales should be included in the representation of frontal layered clouds in climate models.

Corresponding author address: Kit K. Szeto, CCRP, AES, 4905 Dufferin Street, Downsview, ON M3H 5T4, Canada.

Save
  • Benoit, R., M. Desgagne, P. Pellerin, S. Pellerin, and Y. Chartier, 1997: The Canadian MC2: A semi-Lagrangian, semi-implicit wideband atmospheric model suited for finescale process studies and simulation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 2382–2415.

  • Del Genio, A. D., 1996: Observational requirements for modelling of global and regional climate change. Remote Sensing of Processes Governing Energy and Water Cycles in the Climate System, E. Raschke, Ed., NATO ASI Series, Vol. 45, Springer-Verlag, 31–57.

  • Houghton, J. T., L. G. Meiro Filho, B. A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenburg, and K. Maskell, Eds., 1996: Climate Change 1995:The Science of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 572 pp.

  • Houze, R. A., and P. V. Hobbs, 1982: Organization and structure of precipitating cloud systems. Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 24. Academic Press, 225–315.

  • Hudak, D. R., R. E. Stewart, A. D. Thomson, and R. List, 1996: Warm frontal structure in association with a rapidly deepening extratropical cyclone. Atmos.–Ocean,34, 103–132.

  • Kong, F.-Y., and M. K. Yau, 1997: An explicit approach of microphysics in MC2. Atmos.–Ocean,35, 257–291.

  • Ryan, B. F., and Coauthors, 2000: Simulations of a cold front by cloud-resolving, limited-area, and large-scale models, and a model evaluation using in situ and satellite observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., in press.

  • Stewart, R. E., K. K. Szeto, R. F. Reinking, S. A. Clough, and S. P. Ballard, 1998: Midlatitude cyclonic cloud systems and their features affecting large scales and climates. Rev. Geophys.,36, 245–273.

  • Sundqvist, H., E. Berge, and J. E. Kristjansson, 1989: Condensation and cloud parameterization studies with a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 1641–1657.

  • Szeto, K. K., and U. Lohmann, 1999: Cloud-resolving and single-column model simulations of a synoptic cloud system: Implications for cloud parameterizations in GCMs. Geophys. Res. Lett.,26, 3113–3116.

  • ——, R. E. Stewart, and J. M. Hanesiak, 1997: High latitude cold season frontal cloud systems and their precipitation efficiency. Tellus,49A, 439–454.

  • ——, A. Tremblay, H. Guan, D. R. Hudak, R. E. Stewart, and Z. Cao, 1999: On the mesoscale dynamics of freezing rain storms over eastern Canada. J. Atmos. Sci.,56, 1261–1281.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 751 545 38
PDF Downloads 51 22 1