A Linear Stochastic Dynamical Model of ENSO. Part I: Model Development

C. J. Thompson Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by C. J. Thompson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
D. S. Battisti Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by D. S. Battisti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Singular vector analysis and Floquet analysis are carried out on a linearized variant of the Zebiak–Cane atmosphere–ocean model of El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), hereinafter called the nominal model. The Floquet analysis shows that the system has a single unstable mode. This mode has a shape and frequency similar to ENSO and is well described by delayed oscillator physics. Singular vector analysis shows two interesting features. (i) For any starting month and time period of optimization the singular vector is shaped like one of two nearly orthogonal patterns. These two patterns correspond approximately to the real and imaginary parts of the adjoint of the ENSO mode for the time-invariant basic-state version of the system that was calculated in previous work. (ii) Contour plots of the singular values as a function of starting month and period of optimization show a ridge along end times around December. This result along with a study of the time evolution of the associated singular vectors shows that the growth of the singular vectors has a strong tendency to peak in the boreal winter. For the case of a stochastically perturbed ENSO model, this result indicates that the annual cycle in the basic state of the ocean is sufficient to produce strong phase locking of ENSO to the annual cycle; it is not necessary to invoke either nonlinearity or an annual cycle in the structure of the noise.

The structures of the ENSO mode, of the optimal vectors, and of the phase locking to the annual cycle are robust to a wide range of values for the following parameters: the coupling strength, the ocean mechanical damping, and the reflection efficiency of Rossby waves that are incident on the western boundary. Four variant models were formed from the nominal coupled model by changing the aforementioned parameters in such a way as to (i) make the model linearly stable and (ii) affect the ratio of optimal transient growth to the amplitude of the first Floquet multiplier (i.e., the decay rate of the ENSO mode). Each of these four models is linearly stable to perturbations but is shown to support realistic ENSO variability via transient growth for plausible values of stochastic forcing. For values of these parameters that are supported by observations and theory, these results show the coupled system to be linearly stable and that ENSO is the result of transient growth. Supporting evidence is found in a companion paper.

Corresponding author address: David Battisti, JISAO, University of Washington, Box 354235, Seattle, WA 98195-4235.

Abstract

Singular vector analysis and Floquet analysis are carried out on a linearized variant of the Zebiak–Cane atmosphere–ocean model of El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), hereinafter called the nominal model. The Floquet analysis shows that the system has a single unstable mode. This mode has a shape and frequency similar to ENSO and is well described by delayed oscillator physics. Singular vector analysis shows two interesting features. (i) For any starting month and time period of optimization the singular vector is shaped like one of two nearly orthogonal patterns. These two patterns correspond approximately to the real and imaginary parts of the adjoint of the ENSO mode for the time-invariant basic-state version of the system that was calculated in previous work. (ii) Contour plots of the singular values as a function of starting month and period of optimization show a ridge along end times around December. This result along with a study of the time evolution of the associated singular vectors shows that the growth of the singular vectors has a strong tendency to peak in the boreal winter. For the case of a stochastically perturbed ENSO model, this result indicates that the annual cycle in the basic state of the ocean is sufficient to produce strong phase locking of ENSO to the annual cycle; it is not necessary to invoke either nonlinearity or an annual cycle in the structure of the noise.

The structures of the ENSO mode, of the optimal vectors, and of the phase locking to the annual cycle are robust to a wide range of values for the following parameters: the coupling strength, the ocean mechanical damping, and the reflection efficiency of Rossby waves that are incident on the western boundary. Four variant models were formed from the nominal coupled model by changing the aforementioned parameters in such a way as to (i) make the model linearly stable and (ii) affect the ratio of optimal transient growth to the amplitude of the first Floquet multiplier (i.e., the decay rate of the ENSO mode). Each of these four models is linearly stable to perturbations but is shown to support realistic ENSO variability via transient growth for plausible values of stochastic forcing. For values of these parameters that are supported by observations and theory, these results show the coupled system to be linearly stable and that ENSO is the result of transient growth. Supporting evidence is found in a companion paper.

Corresponding author address: David Battisti, JISAO, University of Washington, Box 354235, Seattle, WA 98195-4235.

Save
  • Barnett, T. P., M. Latif, N. Graham, M. Flugel, S. Pazan, and W. White, 1993: ENSO and ENSO-related predictability. Part I: Prediction of equatorial Pacific sea surface temperature with a hybrid coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate,6, 1545–1566.

  • Battisti, D. S., 1988: The dynamics and thermodynamics of a warming event in a coupled tropical atmosphere–ocean model. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 2889–2919.

  • ——, and A. C. Hirst, 1989: Interannual variability in the tropical atmosphere–ocean system: Influence of the basic state, ocean geometry, and nonlinearity. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 1687–1712.

  • Burgers, G., 1999: The El Niño stochastic oscillator. Climate Dyn.,15, 521–531.

  • Chang, P., L. Ji, H. Li, and M. Flugel, 1996: Chaotic dynamic versus stochastic processes in ENSO in coupled ocean–atmosphere models. Physica D,9, 301–320.

  • Chen, Y.-Q., D. S. Battisti, T. N. Palmer, J. Barsugli, and E. S. Sarachik, 1997: A study of the predictability of tropical Pacific SST in a coupled atmosphere–ocean model using singular vector analysis: The role of the annual cycle and the ENSO cycle. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 831–845.

  • Clarke, A. J., 1991: On the reflection and transmission of low-frequency energy at the irregular western Pacific Ocean boundary. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 3289–3305.

  • du Penhoat, Y., and M. A. Cane, 1991: Effects of low-latitude western boundary gaps on the reflection of equatorial motions. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 3307–3322.

  • Eckert, C., and M. Latif, 1997: Predictabilty of a stochastically forced hybrid coupled model of El Niño. J. Climate,10, 1488–1504.

  • Farrell, B., 1988a: Optimal excitation of perturbations in viscous shear flow. Phys. Fluids,31, 2093–2102.

  • ——, 1988b: Optimal excitation of neutral Rossby waves. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 163–172.

  • Flugel, M., and P. Chang, 1999: Stochastically induced climate shift of El Nino–Southern Oscillation. Geophys. Res. Lett.,26, 2473–2476.

  • Gill, A. E., 1980: Some simple solutions for heat-induced tropical circulation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,106, 447–462.

  • Hirst, A. C., 1988: Slow instabilities in tropical ocean basin–global atmosphere models. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 830–852.

  • Iooss, G., and D. D. Joseph, 1980: Elementary Stability and Bifurcation Theory. Springer-Verlag, 286 pp.

  • Jin, F., D. Neelin, and M. Ghil, 1994: El Niño on the devil’s staircase:Annual subharmonic steps to chaos. Science,264, 70–72.

  • Kleeman, R., 1993: On the dependence of hindcast skill on ocean thermodynamics in a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate,6, 2012–2033.

  • Lindzen, R., and S. Nigam, 1987: On the role of sea surface temperature gradients in forcing low-level winds and convergence in the Tropics. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 2440–2458.

  • Mantua, N. J., and D. S. Battisti, 1994: Evidence for the delayed oscillator mechanism for ENSO: The “observed” oceanic Kelvin mode in the western Pacific. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 691–699.

  • Moore, A. M., and R. Kleeman, 1999: Stochastic forcing of ENSO by the intraseasonal oscillation. J. Climate,12, 1199–1220.

  • Noble, B., and J. W. Daniel, 1988: Applied Linear Algebra. 3d ed. Prentice-Hall.

  • Palmer, T. N., R. Gelaro, J. Barkmeijer, and R. Buizza, 1998: Singular vectors, metrics, and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 633–653.

  • Penland, C., and P. D. Sardeshmuhk, 1995: The optimal growth of tropical sea surface temperature anomalies. J. Climate,8, 1999–2004.

  • Picaut, J., C. Menkes, J.-P. Boulanger, and Y. du Penhout, 1993: Dissipation in a Pacific equatorial long wave model. TOGA Notes,10, 11–15.

  • Rasmusson, E. M., and T. H. Carpenter, 1982: Variations in tropical sea surface temperatures and surface wind fields associated with the Southern Oscillation and El Niño. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 354–384.

  • Thompson, C. J., 1998a: Initial conditions for optimal growth in a coupled ocean–atmosphere model of ENSO. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 537–557.

  • ——, 1998b: A linear, stochastic, dynamical model of El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, 235 pp.

  • Tziperman, E., L. Stone, M. Cane, and H. Jarosh, 1994: El Niño chaos: Overlapping of resonances between the seasonal cycle and the Pacific ocean–atmosphere oscillator. Science,264, 72–74.

  • Wang, B., A. Barcilon, and Z. Fang, 1999: Stochastic dynamics of El Niño–Southern Oscillation. J. Atmos. Sci.,56, 5–23.

  • Xue, Y., M. A. Cane, and S. E. Zebiak, 1997a: Predictability of a coupled model of ENSO using singular vector analysis. Part I: Optimal growth in seasonal background and ENSO cycles. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 2043–2056.

  • ——, ——, ——, and T. N. Palmer, 1997b: Predictability of a coupled model of ENSO using singular vector analysis. Part II: Optimal growth and forecast skill. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 2057–2073.

  • Zebiak, S. E., 1984: Tropical atmospheric–ocean interaction and the El Niño/Southern Oscillation phenomenon. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, 261 pp. [Available from MIT, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307.].

  • ——, 1986: Atmospheric convergence feedback in a simple model for El Niño. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 1263–1271.

  • ——, and M. A. Cane, 1987: A model ENSO. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 2262–2278.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1111 475 26
PDF Downloads 443 106 8