Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Albrecht, B. A., A. K. Betts, W. H. Schubert, and S. K. Cox, 1979:A model of the thermodynamic structure of the trade wind boundary layer. Part I: Theoretical formulation and sensitivity tests. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 73–89.

  • Barsugli, J. J., and D. S. Battisti, 1998: The basic effects of atmosphere–ocean thermal coupling on midlatitude variability. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 477–493.

  • Battisti, D. S., U. S. Bhatt, and M. A. Alexander, 1995: A modeling study of the interannual variability in the wintertime North Atlantic Ocean. J. Climate,8, 3067–3083.

  • Betts, A. K., 1976: Modeling subcloud layer structure and interaction with a shallow cumulus layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,33, 2363–2382.

  • ——, and W. Ridgway, 1989: Climatic equilibrium of the atmospheric convective boundary layer over a tropical ocean. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 2621–2641.

  • Bhatt, U. S., M. A. Alexander, D. S. Battisti, D. D. Houghton, and L. M. Keller, 1998: Atmosphere–ocean interaction in the North Atlantic: Near-surface variability. J. Climate,11, 1615–1632.

  • Bladé, I., 1999: The influence of midlatitude ocean–atmosphere coupling on the low-frequency variability of a GCM. Part II: Interannual variability induced by tropical SST forcing. J. Climate,12, 21–45.

  • Boers, R., and A. K. Betts, 1988: Saturation point structure of marine stratocumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1156–1175.

  • Bretherton, C. S., 1993: Understanding Albrecht’s model of trade cumulus cloud fields. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 2264–2283.

  • ——, and D. S. Battisti, 2000: An interpretation of the results from atmospheric general circulation models forced by the time history of the observed sea surface temperature distribution. Geophys. Res. Lett.,27, 767–770.

  • ——, C. Smith, and J. M. Wallace, 1992: An intercomparison of methods for finding coupled patterns in climate data. J. Climate,5, 541–560.

  • Cayan, D., 1992a: Latent and sensible heat flux anomalies over the northern oceans: Driving the sea surface temperature. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,22, 859–881.

  • ——, 1992b: Latent and sensible heat flux anomalies over the northern oceans: The connection to monthly atmospheric circulation. J. Climate,5, 354–369.

  • Chang, P., R. Saravanan, L. Ji, and G. Hegerl, 2000: The effect of local sea surface temperatures on the atmospheric circulation over the tropical Atlantic sector. J. Climate,13, 2195–2216.

  • Clement, A. C., and R. Seager, 1999: Climate and the tropical oceans. J. Climate,12, 3383–3401.

  • Cullen, H. M., and P. B. deMenocal, 1999: North Atlantic Influence on Turkish Climate and Water Supply. Int. J. Climatol., in press.

  • Delworth, T., and V. Mehta, 1998: Simulated interannual to decadal variability in the tropical and sub-tropical North Atlantic. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 2825–2828.

  • Deser, C., and M. L. Blackmon, 1993: Surface climate variations over the North Atlantic ocean during winter: 1900–1989. J. Climate,6, 1743–1753.

  • Ferranti, L., F. Molteni, and T. N. Palmer, 1994: Impact of localized tropical and extratropical SST anomalies in ensembles of seasonal GCM integrations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,120, 1613–1645.

  • Giannini, A., Y. Kushnir, and M. A. Cane, 2000: Interannual variability of Caribbean rainfall, ENSO, and the Atlantic Ocean. J. Climate,13, 297–311.

  • Grötzner, A., M. Latif, and T. Barnett, 1998: A decadal cycle in the North Atlantic Ocean as simulated by the ECHO coupled GCM. J. Climate,11, 831–847.

  • Halliwell, G. R., 1998: Simulation of North Atlantic decadal/multidecadal winter SST anomalies driven by basin-scale atmospheric circulation anomalies. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,28, 5–21.

  • Houghton, R. W., and Y. Tourre, 1992: Characteristics of low-frequency sea surface temperature fluctuations in the tropical Atlantic. J. Climate,5, 765–771.

  • Hurrell, J. W., 1995: Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: Regional temperatures and precipitation. Science,269, 676–679.

  • ——, and H. Van Loon, 1997: Decadal variations in climate associated with the North Atlantic Oscillation. Climatic Change,36, 301–326.

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 437–471.

  • Kushner, P. J., and I. M. Held, 1998: A test, using atmospheric data, of a method for estimating oceanic eddy diffusivity. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 4213–4216.

  • Kushnir, Y., 1994: Interdecadal variations in North Atlantic sea surface temperature and associated atmospheric conditions. J. Climate,7, 141–157.

  • ——, and I. M. Held, 1996: Equilibrium response to North Atlantic SST anomalies. J. Climate,9, 1208–1220.

  • Lau, N.-C., and M. J. Nath, 1994: A modeling study of the relative roles of tropical and extratropical SST anomalies in the variability of the global atmosphere–ocean system. J. Climate,7, 1184–1207.

  • Levitus, S. E., 1982: Climatological Atlas of the World Ocean. NOAA Professional Paper 13, 173 pp.

  • Luksch, U., 1996: Simulation of North Atlantic low-frequency SST variability. J. Climate,9, 2083–2092.

  • Nicholls, S., and M. A. LeMone, 1980: The fair weather boundary layer in GATE: The relationship of subcloud fluxes and structure to the distribution and enhancement of cumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 2051–2067.

  • Nobre, C., and J. Shukla, 1996: Variations of sea surface temperature, wind stress, and rainfall over the tropical Atlantic and South America. J. Climate,9, 2464–2479.

  • Norris, J. R., 1998: Low cloud structure over the ocean from surface observations. Part I: Relationship to advection and the vertical distribution of temperature and moisture. J. Climate,11, 369–382.

  • Peng, S., L. A. Mysak, H. Ritchie, J. Derome, and B. Dugas, 1995:The difference between early and middle winter atmospheric response to sea surface temperature anomalies in the northwest Atlantic. J. Climate,8, 137–157.

  • Pitcher, E. J., M. L. Blackmon, G. Bates, and S. Munoz, 1988: The effect of North Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies on the January climate of a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci,45, 172–188.

  • Rajagopolan, B., Y. Kushnir, and Y. M. Tourre, 1998: Observed decadal midlatitude and tropical Atlantic climate variability. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 3967–3970.

  • Robertson, A. W., C. R. Mechoso, and Y.-J. Kim, 2000: The influence of Atlantic sea surface temperature anomalies on the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Climate,13, 122–138.

  • Rodwell, M. J., D. P. Rowell, and C. K. Folland, 1999: Oceanic forcing of the wintertime North Atlantic Oscillation and European climate. Nature,398, 320–323.

  • Saravanan, R., and P. Chang, 2000: Interaction between tropical Atlantic variability and El Niño–Southern Oscillation. J. Climate,13, 2177–2194.

  • Seager, R., 1989: Modeling tropical Pacific sea surface temperature:1970–1987. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,19, 419–434.

  • ——, S. E. Zebiak, and M. A. Cane, 1988: A model of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperature climatology. J. Geophys. Res.,93, 1265–1280.

  • ——, M. B. Blumenthal, and Y. Kushnir, 1995: An advective atmospheric mixed layer model for ocean modeling purposes: Global simulation of surface heat fluxes. J. Climate,8, 1951–1964.

  • Shindell, D. T., R. L. Miller, G. A. Schmidt, and L. Pandolfo, 1999:Greenhouse gas forcing of Northern Hemisphere winter climate trends. Nature,399, 452–455.

  • Tennekes, H., 1973: A model for the dynamics of the inversion above a convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,30, 558–567.

  • Visbeck, M., H. Cullen, G. Krahmann, and N. Naik, 1998: An ocean model’s response to North Atlantic Oscillation-like wind forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 4521–4524.

  • Zebiak, S. E., 1993: Air–sea interaction in the equatorial Atlantic region. J. Climate,6, 1567–1586.

  • Zhang, Y., J. M. Wallace, and D. S. Battisti, 1997: ENSO-like interdecadal variability: 1900–93. J. Climate,10, 1004–1020.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 492 148 16
PDF Downloads 276 90 11
Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Causes of Atlantic Ocean Climate Variability between 1958 and 1998

Richard SeagerLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York

Search for other papers by Richard Seager in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
,
Yochanan KushnirLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York

Search for other papers by Yochanan Kushnir in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
,
Martin VisbeckLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York

Search for other papers by Martin Visbeck in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
,
Naomi NaikLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York

Search for other papers by Naomi Naik in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
,
Jennifer MillerLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York

Search for other papers by Jennifer Miller in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
,
Gerd KrahmannLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York

Search for other papers by Gerd Krahmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
, and
Heidi CullenLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York

Search for other papers by Heidi Cullen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
Print Publication:
15 Aug 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<2845:COAOCV>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
2845–2862
Restricted access

Abstract

Numerical experiments are performed to examine the causes of variability of Atlantic Ocean SST during the period covered by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP–NCAR) reanalysis (1958–98). Three ocean models are used. Two are mixed layer models: one with a 75-m-deep mixed layer and the other with a variable depth mixed layer. For both mixed layer models the ocean heat transports are assumed to remain at their diagnosed climatological values. The third model is a full dynamical ocean general circulation model (GCM). All models are coupled to a model of the subcloud atmospheric mixed layer (AML). The AML model computes the air temperature and humidity by balancing surface fluxes, radiative cooling, entrainment at cloud base, advection and eddy heat, and moisture transports. The models are forced with NCEP–NCAR monthly mean winds from 1958 to 1998.

The ocean mixed layer models adequately reproduce the dominant pattern of Atlantic Ocean climate variability in both its spatial pattern and time dependence. This pattern is the familiar tripole of alternating zonal bands of SST anomalies stretching between the subpolar gyre and the subtropics. This SST pattern goes along with a wind pattern that corresponds to the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). Analysis of the results reveals that changes in wind speed create the subtropical SST anomalies while at higher latitudes changes in advection of temperature and humidity and changes in atmospheric eddy fluxes are important.

An observational analysis of the boundary layer energy balance is also performed. Anomalous atmospheric eddy heat fluxes are very closely tied to the SST anomalies. Anomalous horizontal eddy fluxes damp the SST anomalies while anomalous vertical eddy fluxes tend to cool the entire midlatitude North Atlantic during the NAO’s high-index phase with the maximum cooling exactly where the SST gradient is strengthened the most.

The SSTs simulated by the ocean mixed layer model are compared with those simulated by the dynamic ocean GCM. In the far North Atlantic Ocean anomalous ocean heat transports are equally important as surface fluxes in generating SST anomalies and they act constructively. The anomalous heat transports are associated with anomalous Ekman drifts and are consequently in phase with the changing surface fluxes. Elsewhere changes in surface fluxes dominate over changes in ocean heat transport. These results suggest that almost all of the variability of the North Atlantic SST in the last four decades can be explained as a response to changes in surface fluxes caused by changes in the atmospheric circulation. Changes in the mean atmospheric circulation force the SST while atmospheric eddy fluxes dampen the SST. Both the interannual variability and the longer timescale changes can be explained in this way. While the authors were unable to find evidence for changes in ocean heat transport systematically leading or lagging development of SST anomalies, this leaves open the problem of explaining the causes of the low-frequency variability. Possible causes are discussed with reference to the modeling results.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Richard Seager, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, P.O. Box 1000, Palisades, NY 10964-8000.

Email: rich@rosie.ldeo.columbia.edu

Abstract

Numerical experiments are performed to examine the causes of variability of Atlantic Ocean SST during the period covered by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP–NCAR) reanalysis (1958–98). Three ocean models are used. Two are mixed layer models: one with a 75-m-deep mixed layer and the other with a variable depth mixed layer. For both mixed layer models the ocean heat transports are assumed to remain at their diagnosed climatological values. The third model is a full dynamical ocean general circulation model (GCM). All models are coupled to a model of the subcloud atmospheric mixed layer (AML). The AML model computes the air temperature and humidity by balancing surface fluxes, radiative cooling, entrainment at cloud base, advection and eddy heat, and moisture transports. The models are forced with NCEP–NCAR monthly mean winds from 1958 to 1998.

The ocean mixed layer models adequately reproduce the dominant pattern of Atlantic Ocean climate variability in both its spatial pattern and time dependence. This pattern is the familiar tripole of alternating zonal bands of SST anomalies stretching between the subpolar gyre and the subtropics. This SST pattern goes along with a wind pattern that corresponds to the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). Analysis of the results reveals that changes in wind speed create the subtropical SST anomalies while at higher latitudes changes in advection of temperature and humidity and changes in atmospheric eddy fluxes are important.

An observational analysis of the boundary layer energy balance is also performed. Anomalous atmospheric eddy heat fluxes are very closely tied to the SST anomalies. Anomalous horizontal eddy fluxes damp the SST anomalies while anomalous vertical eddy fluxes tend to cool the entire midlatitude North Atlantic during the NAO’s high-index phase with the maximum cooling exactly where the SST gradient is strengthened the most.

The SSTs simulated by the ocean mixed layer model are compared with those simulated by the dynamic ocean GCM. In the far North Atlantic Ocean anomalous ocean heat transports are equally important as surface fluxes in generating SST anomalies and they act constructively. The anomalous heat transports are associated with anomalous Ekman drifts and are consequently in phase with the changing surface fluxes. Elsewhere changes in surface fluxes dominate over changes in ocean heat transport. These results suggest that almost all of the variability of the North Atlantic SST in the last four decades can be explained as a response to changes in surface fluxes caused by changes in the atmospheric circulation. Changes in the mean atmospheric circulation force the SST while atmospheric eddy fluxes dampen the SST. Both the interannual variability and the longer timescale changes can be explained in this way. While the authors were unable to find evidence for changes in ocean heat transport systematically leading or lagging development of SST anomalies, this leaves open the problem of explaining the causes of the low-frequency variability. Possible causes are discussed with reference to the modeling results.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Richard Seager, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, P.O. Box 1000, Palisades, NY 10964-8000.

Email: rich@rosie.ldeo.columbia.edu

Save