Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Modeling the Biosphere–Atmosphere System: The Impact of the Subgrid Variability in Rainfall Interception

Guiling Wang Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Guiling Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Elfatih A. B. Eltahir Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Elfatih A. B. Eltahir in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
15 Aug 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<2887:MTBAST>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
2887–2899
Restricted access

Abstract

Subgrid variability in rainfall distribution has been widely recognized as an important factor to include in the representation of land surface hydrology within climate models. In this paper, using West Africa as a case study, the impact of the subgrid variability in rainfall interception on the modeling of the biosphere–atmosphere system is investigated. According to the authors’ results, when neglecting the rainfall spatial variability, even if the impact on the total evapotranspiration is negligible, significant errors may result in the representation of surface hydrological processes and surface energy balance. These findings are consistent with the results of previous studies. However, in this paper, this issue is further explored and it is demonstrated that the extent of the resulting errors is not limited to the land surface processes. They extend to the atmosphere via the low-level cloud feedback to impact solar radiation, boundary layer energy, atmospheric circulation, and the distribution of precipitation. The same errors also propagate into the biosphere through vegetation dynamics and can eventually lead to a significantly different biosphere–atmosphere equilibrium state. This study provides a good example for the need to have physical realism in modeling the subgrid variability and most other details of the complex biosphere–atmosphere–ocean system.

Corresponding author address: Dr. G. Wang, Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory, 48-208, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.

Abstract

Subgrid variability in rainfall distribution has been widely recognized as an important factor to include in the representation of land surface hydrology within climate models. In this paper, using West Africa as a case study, the impact of the subgrid variability in rainfall interception on the modeling of the biosphere–atmosphere system is investigated. According to the authors’ results, when neglecting the rainfall spatial variability, even if the impact on the total evapotranspiration is negligible, significant errors may result in the representation of surface hydrological processes and surface energy balance. These findings are consistent with the results of previous studies. However, in this paper, this issue is further explored and it is demonstrated that the extent of the resulting errors is not limited to the land surface processes. They extend to the atmosphere via the low-level cloud feedback to impact solar radiation, boundary layer energy, atmospheric circulation, and the distribution of precipitation. The same errors also propagate into the biosphere through vegetation dynamics and can eventually lead to a significantly different biosphere–atmosphere equilibrium state. This study provides a good example for the need to have physical realism in modeling the subgrid variability and most other details of the complex biosphere–atmosphere–ocean system.

Corresponding author address: Dr. G. Wang, Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory, 48-208, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Avissar, R., and R. A. Pielke, 1989: A parameterization of heterogeneous land surfaces for atmospheric numerical models and its impact on regional meteorology. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 2113–2136.

  • Baker, M. B., 1997: Cloud microphysics and climate. Science,276, 1072–1078.

  • Carson, D. J., 1986: Parameterization of land surface processes in meteorological office numerical weather predicting and climate models. Dynamical Climatology Tech. Note 37, 30 pp. [Available from U.K. Met. Office, London Rd., Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 2SZ, United Kingdom.].

  • Dickinson, R. E., A. Henderson-Sellers, and P. J. Kennedy, 1993: Biosphere–Atmsophere Transfer Scheme (BATS) Version 1e as coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-387+STR, 72 pp.

  • Dolman, A. J., and D. Gregory, 1992: The parameterization of rainfall interception in GCMs. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,118, 455–467.

  • Eltahir, E. A. B., 1996: Role of vegetation in sustaining large-scale atmospheric circulations in the Tropics. J. Geophys. Res.,101 (D2), 4255–4268.

  • ——, and R. L. Bras, 1993a: Estimation of the fractional coverage of rainfall in climate models. J. Climate,6, 639–644.

  • ——, and ——, 1993b: Description of rainfall interception over large areas. J. Climate,6, 1002–1008.

  • ——, and ——, 1994: Comments on “The parameterization of rainfall interception in GCMs.” Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,120, 733–734.

  • ——, and C. Gong, 1996: Dynamics of wet and dry years in West Africa. J. Climate,9, 1030–1042.

  • Entekhabi, D., and P. S. Eagleson, 1989: Land surface hydrology parameterization for atmospheric general circulation models including subgrid scale spatial variability. J. Climate,2, 816–831.

  • Foley, J. A., I. C. Prentice, N. Ramankutty, S. Levis, D. Pollard, S. Sitch, and A. Haxeltine, 1996: An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics. Global Biogeochem. Cycles,10, 603–628.

  • Ghan, S. J., J. C. Liljegren, W. J. Shaw, J. H. Hubbe, and J. C. Dorman, 1997: Influence of subgrid variability on surface hydrology. J. Climate,10, 3157–3166.

  • Giorgi, F., 1997: An approach for the representation of surface heterogeneity in land surface models. Part 2: Validation and sensitivity experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 1900–1919.

  • ——, and R. Avissar, 1997: Representaion of heterogeneity effects in earth system modeling: Experience from land surface modeling. Rev. Geophys.,35, 413–438.

  • Gornitz, V., and NASA, 1985: A survey of anthropogenic vegetation changes in West Africa during the last century—Climatic implications. Climatic Change,7, 285–325.

  • Jackson, R. B., J. Canadell, J. R. Ehleringer, H. A. Mooney, O. E. Sala, and E. D. Schulze, 1996: A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia,108, 389–411.

  • Johnson, K. D., D. Entekhabi, and P. S. Eagleson, 1991: The implementation and validation of improved landsurface hydrology in an atmospheric general circulation model. Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory Tech. Rep. 334, 192 pp. [Available from Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.].

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 437–471.

  • Kim, C. P., and D. Entekhabi, 1998: Feedbacks in the land-surface and mixed-layer energy budgets. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,88, 1–21.

  • Klein, S. A., and D. L. Hartmann, 1993: The seasonal cycle of low stratiform clouds. J. Climate,6, 1587–1606.

  • Koster, R. D., and M. J. Suarez, 1992a: Modeling the land-surface boundary in climate models as a composite of independent vegetation stands. J. Geophys. Res.,97, 2697–2715.

  • ——, and ——, 1992b: A comparative analysis of two land surface heterogeneity representations. J. Climate,5, 1379–1390.

  • Kvamsto, N. G., 1991: An investigation of diagnostic relations between stratiform fractional cloud cover and other meteorological parameters in numerical weather prediction models. J. Appl. Meteor.,30, 200–216.

  • Lean, J., and D. A. Warrilow, 1989: Simulation of the regional climatic impact of Amazon deforestation. Nature,342, 411–413.

  • Le Barbe, L., and T. Lebel, 1997: Rainfall climatology of the HAPEX-Sahel region during the years 1950–1990. J. Hydrol.,189, 43–73.

  • Lebel, T., J. D. Taupin, and N. D’Amato, 1997: Rainfall monitoring during HAPEX-Sahel. 1. General rainfall conditions and climatology. J. Hydrol.,189, 74–96.

  • Lloyd, C. R., 1990: The temporal distribution of Amazonian rainfall and its implications for forest interception. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,116, 1487–1494.

  • London, J., 1952: The distribution of radiational temperature change in the Northern Hemisphere during March. J. Meteor.,9, 145–151.

  • Mocko, D. M., and W. R. Cotton, 1995: Evaluation of fractional cloudiness parameterizations for use in a mesoscale model. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2884–2901.

  • Pitman, A. J., A. Henderson-Sellers, and Z.-L. Yang, 1990: Sensitivity of regional climates to localized precipitation in global models. Nature,346, 734–737.

  • Pollard, D., and S. L. Thompson, 1995: Use of a land-surface transfer scheme (LSX) in a global climate model: The response to doubling stomatal resistance. Global Planet. Change,10, 129–161.

  • Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and P. S. Eagleson, 1987: Mathematical models of rainstorm events in space and time. Water Resour. Res.,23, 181–190.

  • Seth, A., F. Giorgi, and R. E. Dickinson, 1994: Simulating fluxes from heterogeneous land surfaces: Explicit subgrid method employing the biosphere–atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS). J. Geophys. Res.,99, 18 651–18 667.

  • Shuttleworth, W. J., 1988: Macrohydrology—The new challenge for process hydrology. J. Hydrol.,100, 31–56.

  • Slingo, A., 1990: Sensitivity of the earth’s radiation budget to changes in low clouds. Nature,343, 49–51.

  • Thomas, G., and A. Henderson-Sellers, 1991: An evaluation of proposed representations of subgrid hydrologic processes in climate models. J. Climate,4, 898–910.

  • Wang, G., and E. A. B. Eltahir, 1998: Biosphere–atmosphere interactions: Representation of sub-grid spatial variability of rainfall interception (abstract). Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union,79, 349.

  • ——, and ——, 2000a: Biosphere–atmosphere interactions over West Africa. 1. Development and validation of a coupled dynamic model. Quart J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,126, 1239–1260.

  • ——, and ——, 2000b: Biosphere–atmosphere interactions over West Africa. 2. Multiple climate equilibria. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,126, 1261–1280.

  • Zheng, X., and E. A. B. Eltahir, 1997: The response to deforestation and desertification in a model of West African monsoons. Geophys. Res. Lett.,24, 155–158.

  • ——, and ——, 1998: The role of vegetation in the dynamics of West African monsoons. J. Climate,11, 2078–2096.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1495 1205 58
PDF Downloads 129 46 5