Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

On the Persistence of Decadal SST Anomalies in the North Atlantic

Masahiro Watanabe Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Search for other papers by Masahiro Watanabe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Masahide Kimoto Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Search for other papers by Masahide Kimoto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
15 Aug 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<3017:OTPODS>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
3017–3028
Restricted access

Abstract

Historical wintertime sea surface temperature (SST) data show that a sandwich pattern dominates on the decadal timescales in the North Atlantic, at least after the 1970s. The authors investigated how such decadal SST anomalies can survive against local thermal feedback, which acts to dampen them rapidly. At the surface, winter SST anomalies have a negligible projection with the subsequent summer anomalies while they show a significant projection with the SST anomalies in the next winter. On the other hand, observed summer temperature anomalies below the mixed layer tend to have the same sign as the previous winter SST anomalies, although the magnitude of the former is roughly one-third of the latter. This suggests that a reemergence mechanism of SST anomalies associated with the seasonal cycle of the mixed layer depth (MLD), which has been verified by Alexander and Deser, helps maintain the decadal SST anomalies. In order to examine this scenario, a mixed layer model driven by daily atmospheric data generated by a T42 atmospheric general circulation model was used. The mixed layer model well reproduces the climatology of both SST and MLD in the North Atlantic. An experiment in which a thermal forcing having the observed decadal pattern is added only for the initial winter shows that the SST anomalies disappear until July but reappear in the subsequent winters. This result supports the inference based on the observational evidence, and is explained as follows: (i) SST anomalies are partly detrained to deeper levels in spring when the mixed layer shoals rapidly, (ii) temperature anomalies beneath the shallow mixed layer are preserved during summer, (iii) they are entrained into the surface in the succeeding fall and winter when the mixed layer is again deepened. The recurrence of SST anomalies was found in two centers of the decadal anomaly pattern (30°–45°N, 80°–50°W and 45°–60°N, 50°–20°W), but not in another center in the subtropics (10°–25°N, 40°–10°W) where the MLD reveals only a small seasonality. The magnitude of recurrent SST anomalies is affected by two factors: MLD difference between winter and summer and the persistence of SST anomalies from winter to spring as they determine the amount and the magnitude of detrained temperature anomalies into the mixed layer, respectively.

The above results indicate that the effective damping time for the winter SST anomalies is much longer than the local damping time of several months.

Corresponding author address: M. Watanabe, Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan.

Abstract

Historical wintertime sea surface temperature (SST) data show that a sandwich pattern dominates on the decadal timescales in the North Atlantic, at least after the 1970s. The authors investigated how such decadal SST anomalies can survive against local thermal feedback, which acts to dampen them rapidly. At the surface, winter SST anomalies have a negligible projection with the subsequent summer anomalies while they show a significant projection with the SST anomalies in the next winter. On the other hand, observed summer temperature anomalies below the mixed layer tend to have the same sign as the previous winter SST anomalies, although the magnitude of the former is roughly one-third of the latter. This suggests that a reemergence mechanism of SST anomalies associated with the seasonal cycle of the mixed layer depth (MLD), which has been verified by Alexander and Deser, helps maintain the decadal SST anomalies. In order to examine this scenario, a mixed layer model driven by daily atmospheric data generated by a T42 atmospheric general circulation model was used. The mixed layer model well reproduces the climatology of both SST and MLD in the North Atlantic. An experiment in which a thermal forcing having the observed decadal pattern is added only for the initial winter shows that the SST anomalies disappear until July but reappear in the subsequent winters. This result supports the inference based on the observational evidence, and is explained as follows: (i) SST anomalies are partly detrained to deeper levels in spring when the mixed layer shoals rapidly, (ii) temperature anomalies beneath the shallow mixed layer are preserved during summer, (iii) they are entrained into the surface in the succeeding fall and winter when the mixed layer is again deepened. The recurrence of SST anomalies was found in two centers of the decadal anomaly pattern (30°–45°N, 80°–50°W and 45°–60°N, 50°–20°W), but not in another center in the subtropics (10°–25°N, 40°–10°W) where the MLD reveals only a small seasonality. The magnitude of recurrent SST anomalies is affected by two factors: MLD difference between winter and summer and the persistence of SST anomalies from winter to spring as they determine the amount and the magnitude of detrained temperature anomalies into the mixed layer, respectively.

The above results indicate that the effective damping time for the winter SST anomalies is much longer than the local damping time of several months.

Corresponding author address: M. Watanabe, Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan.

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Alexander, M. A., and C. Deser, 1995: A mechanism for the recurrence of wintertime midlatitude SST anomalies. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 122–137.

  • ——, and C. Penland, 1996: Variability in a mixed layer ocean model driven by stochastic atmospheric forcing. J. Climate,9, 2424–2442.

  • ——, C. Deser, and M. S. Timlin, 1999: The reemergence of SST anomalies in the North Pacific Ocean. J. Climate,12, 2419–2433.

  • Barsugli, J. J., and D. S. Battisti, 1998: The basic effects of atmosphere–ocean thermal coupling on midlatitude variability. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 477–493.

  • Battisti, D. S., U. S. Bhatt, and M. A. Alexander, 1995: A modeling study of the interannual variability in the North Atlantic Ocean. J. Climate,8, 3067–3083.

  • Bhatt, U. S., M. A. Alexander, D. S. Battisti, D. D. Houghton, and L. M. Keller, 1998: Atmosphere–ocean intraction in the North Atlantic: Near-surface climate variability. J. Climate,11, 1615–1632.

  • Cayan, D. R., 1992: Latent and sensible heat flux anomalies over the northern oceans: Driving the sea surface temperature. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,22, 859–881.

  • Derber, J., and A. Rosati, 1989: A global oceanic data assimilation system. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,19, 1333–1347.

  • Deser, C., and M. Blackmon, 1993: Surface climate variations over the North Atlantic Ocean during winter: 1900–1989. J. Climate,6, 1743–1753.

  • ——, M. A. Alexander, and M. S. Timlin, 1996: Upper-ocean thermal variations in the North Pacific during 1970–1991. J. Climate,9, 1840–1855.

  • Frankignoul, C., 1985: Sea surface temperature anomalies, planetary waves, and air–sea feedback in the middle latitudes. Rev. Geophys.,23, 357–390.

  • Gaspar, P., 1988: Modeling the seasonal cycle of the upper ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,18, 161–180.

  • Grötzner, A., M. Latif, and T. P. Barnett, 1998: A decadal climate cycle in the North Atlantic Ocean as simulated by the ECHO coupled GCM. J. Climate,11, 831–847.

  • Iwasaka, N., and J. M. Wallace, 1995: Large scale air sea interaction in the Northern Hemisphere from a view point of variations of surface heat flux by SVD analysis. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,73, 781–794.

  • Lau, N. C., and M. J. Nath, 1996: The role of the atmospheric bridge in linking tropical Pacific ENSO events to extratropical SST anomalies. J. Climate,9, 2036–2057.

  • Levitus, S., and T. P. Boyer, 1994: Temperature. Vol. 4, World Ocean Atlas 1994, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 4, 117 pp.

  • ——, J. I. Antonov, and T. P. Boyer, 1994: Interannual variability of temperature at a depth of 125 meters in the North Atlantic Ocean. Science,266, 96–99.

  • Louis, J., 1979: A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,17, 187–202.

  • Marshall, J. C., A. J. G. Nurser, and R. G. Williams, 1993: Inferring the subduction rate and period over the North Atlantic. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,23, 1315–132.

  • Molinari, R. L., D. A. Mayer, J. F. Festa, and H. F. Bezdek, 1997: Multiyear variability in the near-surface temperature structure of the midlatitude western Noth Atlantic. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 3267–3278.

  • Namias, J., and R. M. Born, 1970: Temporal coherence in North Pacific sea-surface temperature patterns. J. Geophys. Res.,75, 5952–5955.

  • Neelin, J. D., and W. Weng, 1999: Analytical prototypes for ocean–atmosphere interaction at midlatitudes. Part I: Coupled feedbacks as a sea surface temperature dependent stochastic process. J. Climate,12, 697–721.

  • Parker, D. E., C. K. Folland, A. Bevan, M. N. Ward, M. Jackson, and K. Maskell, 1995: Marine surface data for analysis of climatic fluctuations on interannual to century timescales. Natural Climate Variability on Decade to Century Time Scales, D. G. Martinson et al., Eds., National Academy Press, 241–250.

  • Paulson, C. A., and J. J. Simpson, 1977: Irradiance measurements in the upper ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,7, 952–956.

  • Peng, S., and J. S. Whitaker, 1999: Mechanisms determining the atmospheric response to midlatitude SST anomalies. J. Climate,12, 1393–1408.

  • Qiu, B., and R. X. Huang, 1995: Ventilation of the North Atlantic and North Pacific: Subduction versus obduction. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 2374–2390.

  • Saravanan, R., 1998: Atmospheric low-frequency variability and its relationship to midlatitude SST variability: Studies using the NCAR Climate System Model. J. Climate,11, 1386–1404.

  • ——, and J. C. McWilliams, 1998: Advective ocean–atmosphere interaction: An analytical stochastic model with implications for decadal variability. J. Climate,11, 165–188.

  • Shen, X., M. Kimoto, and A. Sumi, 1998: Role of land surface processes associated with interannual variability of broad-scale Asian summer monsoon as simulated by the CCSR/NIES AGCM. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,76, 217–236.

  • Sutton, R. T., and M. R. Allen, 1997: Decadal predictability of North Atlantic sea surface temperature and climate. Nature,388, 563–567.

  • Wallace, J. M., C. Smith, and Q. Jiang, 1990: Spatial patterns of atmosphere–ocean interaction in the northern winter. J. Climate,3, 990–998.

  • Watanabe, M., and T. Nitta, 1998: Relative impacts of snow and sea surface temperature anomalies on an extreme phase in the winter atmospheric circulation. J. Climate,11, 2837–2857.

  • ——, and M. Kimoto, 2000: Behavior of midlatitude decadal oscillations in a simple, atmosphere–ocean system. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, in press.

  • ——, ——, T. Nitta, and M. Kachi, 1999: A comparison of decadal climate oscillations in the North Atlantic detected in observations and a coupled GCM. J. Climate,12, 2920–2940.

  • Weng, W., and D. Neelin, 1998: On the role of ocean–atmosphere interaction in midlatitude interdecadal variability. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 167–170.

  • ——, and ——, 1999: Analytical prototypes for ocean–atmosphere interaction at midlatitudes. Part II: Mechanisms for coupled gyre modes. J. Climate,12, 2757–2774.

  • Williams, R. G., M. A. Spall, and J. C. Marshall, 1995: Does Stommel’s mixed layer “demon” work? J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 3089–3102.

  • Zhang, R.-H., and S. Levitus, 1997: Structure and cycle of decadal variability of upper-ocean temperature in the North Pacific. J. Climate,10, 710–727.

  • Zhang, Y., J. R. Norris, and J. M. Wallace, 1998: Seasonality of large-scale atmosphere–ocean interaction over the North Pacific. J. Climate,11, 2473–2481.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 845 570 26
PDF Downloads 215 54 6