• Arakawa, A., 1972: Design of the UCLA general circulation model. Numerical simulation of weather and climate. Tech. Rep. 7, Dept. of Meteorology, University of California, Los Angeles, 116 pp. [Available from Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1565.].

  • Bengtsson, L., M. Botzet, and M. Esch, 1995: Hurricane-type vortices in a general circulation model. Tellus,47A, 175–196.

  • Davidson, N. E., J. Wadsley, K. Puri, K. Kurihara, and M. Ueno, 1993: Implementation of the JMA typhoon bogus in the BMRC tropical prediction system. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,71, 437–467.

  • Davies, H. C., 1976: A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,102, 405–418.

  • DeMaria, M., 1996: The effect of vertical wind shear on tropical cyclone intensity change. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 2076–2087.

  • Emanuel, K. A., 1988: The maximum intensity of hurricanes. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1143–1155.

  • ——, 1995: Sensitivity of tropical cyclones to surface exchange coefficients and a revised steady-state model incorporating eye dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 3969–3976.

  • Frank, W. M., 1977: The structure and energetics of the tropical cyclone. I. Storm structure. Mon. Wea. Rev.,105, 1119–1135.

  • Giorgi, F., C. S. Brodeur, and G. T. Bates, 1994: Regional climate change scenarios over the United States produced with a nested regional climate model. J. Climate,7, 375–399.

  • Gordon, H. B., and S. P. O’Farrell, 1997: Transient climate change in the CSIRO coupled model with dynamic sea ice. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 875–907.

  • Hansen, J., A. Lacis, D. Rind, G. Russell, P. Stone, I. Fung, R. Ruedy, and J. Lerner, 1984: Climate sensitivity: Analysis of feedback mechanisms. Climate Processes in Meteorology, J. E. Hansen and T. Takahashi, Eds., Amer. Geophys. Union, 130–163.

  • Henderson-Sellers, A., and Coauthors, 1998: Tropical cyclones and global climate change: A post–IPCC assessment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,79, 19–38.

  • Holland, G. J., 1997: The maximum potential intensity of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 2519–2541.

  • Knutson, T. R., and R. E. Tuleya, 1999: Increased hurricane intensities with CO2-induced warming as simulated using the GFDL hurricane prediction system. Climate Dyn.,15, 503–519.

  • ——, ——, and Y. Kurihara, 1998: Simulated increase of hurricane intensities in a CO2-warmed world. Science,279, 1018–1020.

  • Kowalczyk, E. A., J. R. Garratt, and P. B. Krummel, 1991: A soil-canopy scheme for use in a numerical model of the atmosphere–1D stand-alone model. CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research, Tech. Paper 23, 59 pp. [Available from CSIRO Atmospheric Research, PMB 1, Aspendale, Vic. 3195, Australia.].

  • Kurihara, Y., R. E. Tuleya, and M. A. Bender, 1998: The GFDL hurricane prediction system and its performance in the 1995 hurricane season. Mon. Wea. Rev.,126, 1306–1322.

  • Li, S., 1996: Estimating tropical cyclone intensity from climate models. M. S. thesis, Climatic Impacts Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia, 136 pp. [Available from Department of Physical Geography, Division of Environmental and Life Science, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.].

  • McGregor, J. L., and J. J. Katzfey, 1997: Climate modelling for the Australian region using DARLAM. Proc. Int. Workshop on General Monsoon System, Beijing, China, START Regional Centre for Temperate East Asia, 13–18.

  • ——, H. B. Gordon, I. G. Watterson, M. R. Dix, and L. D. Rotstayn, 1993: The CSIRO 9-level atmospheric general circulation model. CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research, Tech. Paper 26, 89 pp. [Available from CSIRO Atmospheric Research, PMB 1, Aspendale, Vic. 3195, Australia.].

  • Suppiah, R., R. J. Allan, K. J. Hennessy, R. N. Jones, A. B. Pittock, K. J. E. Walsh, I. N. Smith, and P. H. Whetton, 1996: Climate change under enhanced greenhouse conditions in northern Australia: Second annual report 1995–1996. CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research, 63 pp. [Available from CSIRO Atmospheric Research, PMB 1, Aspendale, Vic. 3195, Australia.].

  • ——, and Coauthors, 1998: Climate change under enhanced greenhouse conditions in northern Australia: Third annual report 1996–1997. CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research, 95 pp. [Available from CSIRO Atmospheric Research, PMB 1, Aspendale, Vic. 3195, Australia.].

  • Walsh, K., and I. G. Watterson, 1997: Tropical cyclone-like vortices in a limited area model: Comparison with observed climatology. J. Climate,10, 2240–2259.

  • Watterson, I. G., S. P. O’Farrell, and M. R. Dix, 1997: Energy and water transport in climates simulated by a general circulation model that includes dynamic sea ice. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 11 027–11 037.

  • Weatherford, C. L., and W. M. Gray, 1988: Typhoon structure as revealed by aircraft reconnaisance. Part I: Data analysis and climatology. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 1032–1043.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1196 428 43
PDF Downloads 778 231 26

Tropical Cyclone Intensity Increase near Australia as a Result of Climate Change

Kevin J. E. WalshCSIRO Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Australia

Search for other papers by Kevin J. E. Walsh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Brian F. RyanCSIRO Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Australia

Search for other papers by Brian F. Ryan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Idealized tropical cyclones are inserted into a regional climate model and the resulting intensity evolution of the storms is examined under current and enhanced greenhouse climates. The regional climate model is implemented over a model domain near Australia. In general, storm intensities increase under enhanced greenhouse conditions, although these increases are mostly not statistically significant. The simulated intensities are compared to theoretically derived estimates of maximum potential intensity. The theoretical estimates are mostly larger than the simulated intensities, suggesting that other factors may be limiting the intensification of the storms. Two such factors are suggested: the limited horizontal resolution of the storm simulations and the presence of vertical wind shear. Significant regression relations are demonstrated between maximum intensity of the simulated storms as predicted by sea surface temperature and vertical wind shear variations, while much weaker relationships are shown between maximum intensity and sea surface temperature alone. This suggests that dynamical influences such as vertical wind shear, which are not included in theoretical estimates of maximum potential intensity, act to restrict the development of the storm and thereby its maximum intensity.

Corresponding author address: Kevin Walsh, CSIRO Atmospheric Research, PMB1, Aspendale, Victoria, 3195, Australia.

Email: kevin.walsh@dar.csiro.au

Abstract

Idealized tropical cyclones are inserted into a regional climate model and the resulting intensity evolution of the storms is examined under current and enhanced greenhouse climates. The regional climate model is implemented over a model domain near Australia. In general, storm intensities increase under enhanced greenhouse conditions, although these increases are mostly not statistically significant. The simulated intensities are compared to theoretically derived estimates of maximum potential intensity. The theoretical estimates are mostly larger than the simulated intensities, suggesting that other factors may be limiting the intensification of the storms. Two such factors are suggested: the limited horizontal resolution of the storm simulations and the presence of vertical wind shear. Significant regression relations are demonstrated between maximum intensity of the simulated storms as predicted by sea surface temperature and vertical wind shear variations, while much weaker relationships are shown between maximum intensity and sea surface temperature alone. This suggests that dynamical influences such as vertical wind shear, which are not included in theoretical estimates of maximum potential intensity, act to restrict the development of the storm and thereby its maximum intensity.

Corresponding author address: Kevin Walsh, CSIRO Atmospheric Research, PMB1, Aspendale, Victoria, 3195, Australia.

Email: kevin.walsh@dar.csiro.au

Save