Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Cloud Vertical Structure and Its Variations from a 20-Yr Global Rawinsonde Dataset

Junhong Wang National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado*

Search for other papers by Junhong Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
William B. Rossow NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York

Search for other papers by William B. Rossow in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Yuanchong Zhang Department of Applied Physics and Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Yuanchong Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Sep 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<3041:CVSAIV>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
3041–3056
Restricted access

Abstract

A global cloud vertical structure (CVS) climatic dataset is created by applying an analysis method to a 20-yr collection of twice-daily rawinsonde humidity profiles to estimate the height of cloud layers. The CVS dataset gives the vertical distribution of cloud layers for single and multilayered clouds, as well as the top and base heights and layer thicknesses of each layer, together with the original rawinsonde profiles of temperature, humidity, and winds. The average values are cloud-top height = 4.0 km above mean sea level (MSL), cloud-base height = 2.4 km MSL, cloud-layer thickness = 1.6 km, and separation distance between consecutive layers = 2.2 km. Multilayered clouds occur 42% of the time and are predominately two-layered. The lowest layer of multilayered cloud systems is usually located in the atmospheric boundary layer (below 2-km height MSL). Clouds over the ocean occur more frequently at lower levels and are more often formed in multiple layers than over land. Latitudinal variations of CVS also show maxima and minima that correspond to the locations of the intertropical convergence zone, the summer monsoons, the subtropical subsidence zones, and the midlatitude storm zones. Multilayered clouds exist most frequently in the Tropics and least frequently in the subtropics; there are more multilayered clouds in summer than in winter. Cloud layers are thicker in winter than in summer at mid- and high latitudes, but are thinner in winter in Southeast Asia.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Junhong Wang, NCAR/SSSF, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.

Email: junhong@ucar.edu

Abstract

A global cloud vertical structure (CVS) climatic dataset is created by applying an analysis method to a 20-yr collection of twice-daily rawinsonde humidity profiles to estimate the height of cloud layers. The CVS dataset gives the vertical distribution of cloud layers for single and multilayered clouds, as well as the top and base heights and layer thicknesses of each layer, together with the original rawinsonde profiles of temperature, humidity, and winds. The average values are cloud-top height = 4.0 km above mean sea level (MSL), cloud-base height = 2.4 km MSL, cloud-layer thickness = 1.6 km, and separation distance between consecutive layers = 2.2 km. Multilayered clouds occur 42% of the time and are predominately two-layered. The lowest layer of multilayered cloud systems is usually located in the atmospheric boundary layer (below 2-km height MSL). Clouds over the ocean occur more frequently at lower levels and are more often formed in multiple layers than over land. Latitudinal variations of CVS also show maxima and minima that correspond to the locations of the intertropical convergence zone, the summer monsoons, the subtropical subsidence zones, and the midlatitude storm zones. Multilayered clouds exist most frequently in the Tropics and least frequently in the subtropics; there are more multilayered clouds in summer than in winter. Cloud layers are thicker in winter than in summer at mid- and high latitudes, but are thinner in winter in Southeast Asia.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Junhong Wang, NCAR/SSSF, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.

Email: junhong@ucar.edu

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Baum, B. A., B. A. Wielicki, P. Minnis, and S. C. Tasy, 1994: Multilevel cloud retrieval using multispectral HIRS and AVHRR data: Nighttime oceanic analysis. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 5499– 5514.

  • Cairns, B., 1995: Diurnal variations of cloud from ISCCP data. Atmos. Res.,37, 133–246.

  • Cotton, W. R., and R. A. Anthes, 1989: Storm and Cloud Dynamics. International Geophysics Series, Vol. 44, Academic Press, 883 pp.

  • Douglas, M. W., and D. J. Stensrud, 1996: Upgrading the North American upper-air observing network: What are the possibilities? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 907–924.

  • Hahn, C. J., S. G. Warren, J. London, R. M. Chervin, and R. Jenne, 1982: Atlas of simultaneous occurrence of different cloud types over ocean. NCAR Tech. Note TN-201+STR, 212 pp.

  • ——, ——, ——, ——, and ——, 1984: Atlas of simultaneous occurrence of different cloud types over land. NCAR Tech. Note TN-241+STR, 211 pp.

  • Hamilton, K., and R. A. Vincent, 1995: High-resolution radiosonde data offer new prospects for research. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union,76, 497–507.

  • Hughes, N. A., 1984: Global cloud climatologies: A historical review. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,23, 724–751.

  • Jin, Y., and W. B. Rossow, 1997: Detection of cirrus overlapping low-level clouds. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 1727–1737.

  • Klein, S. A., and D. L. Hartmann, 1993: The seasonal cycle of low stratiform clouds. J. Climate,6, 1587–1606.

  • Kropfli, R. A., and Coauthors, 1995: Cloud physics studies with 8 mm wavelength radar. Atmos. Res.,35, 299–314.

  • Lau, N.-C., and M. W. Crane, 1995: A satellite view of the synoptic-scale organization of cloud properties in midlatitude and tropical circulation systems. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 1984–2006.

  • Lin, B., and W. B. Rossow, 1997: Precipitation water path and rainfall rate estimates over oceans using special sensor microwave imager and International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project data. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 9359–9374.

  • ——, P. Minnis, B. Wielicki, D. R. Doelling, R. Palikonda, D. F. Young, and T. Uttal, 1998: Estimation of water cloud properties from satellite microwave, infrared, and visible measurements in oceanic environments. Part 2: Results. J. Geophys. Res.,103, 3887–3906.

  • Miller, M. A., M. P. Jensen, and E. E. Clothiaux, 1998: Diurnal cloud and thermodynamic variations in the stratocumulus transition regime: A case study using in situ and remote sensors. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 2294–2310.

  • Peixoto, J. P., and A. H. Oort, 1992: Physics of Climate. American Institute of Physics, 520 pp.

  • ——, and ——, 1996: The climatology of relative humidity in the atmosphere. J. Climate,9, 3443–3463.

  • Platt, C. M. R., and Coauthors, 1994: The Experimental Cloud Lidar Pilot Study (ECLIPS) for cloud;radiation research. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,75, 1635–1654.

  • Poore, K., J. Wang, and W. B. Rossow, 1995: Cloud layer thicknesses from a combination of surface and upper-air observations. J. Climate,8, 550–568.

  • Randall, D. A., Harshvardhan, D. A. Dazlich, and T. G. Corsetti, 1989: Interactions among radiation, convection, and large-scale dynamics in a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 1943–1970.

  • Rind, D., and W. B. Rossow, 1984: The effects of physical processes on the Hadley circulation. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 479–507.

  • Rossow, W. B., 1993: Satellite observations of radiation and clouds to diagnose energy exchanges in the climate: Parts I and II. Energy and Water Cycles in the Climate System, E. Raschke and D. Jacob, Eds., NATO ASI Series, Vol. I5, 123–164.

  • ——, and A. A. Lacis, 1990: Global, seasonal cloud variations from satellite radiance measurements. Part II: Cloud properties and radiative effects. J. Climate,3, 1204–1253.

  • ——, and R. A. Schiffer, 1991: ISCCP cloud data products. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,72, 2–20.

  • ——, and B. Cairns, 1995: Monitoring changes of clouds. Climatic Change,31, 175–217.

  • ——, and R. A. Schiffer, 1999: Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,80, 2261–2287.

  • ——, A. W. Walker, D. E. Beuschel, and M. D. Roiter, 1996: International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) documentation of new cloud datasets. WMO/TD-737, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 115 pp.

  • Sassen, K., 1991: The polarization lidar technique for cloud research: A review and current assessment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,72, 1848–1866.

  • ——, and B. S. Cho, 1992: Subvisual-thin cirrus lidar dataset for satellite verification and climatological research. J. Appl. Meteor.,31, 1275–1285.

  • Sheu, R.-S., J. Curry, and G. S. Liu, 1997: Vertical stratification of tropical cloud properties as determined from satellite. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 4231–4246.

  • Slingo, A., and J. M. Slingo, 1988: The response of a general circulation model to cloud longwave radiative forcing. I: Introduction and initial experiments. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,114, 1027–1062.

  • Slingo, J. M., and A. Slingo, 1991: The response of a general circulation model to cloud longwave radiative forcing. II: Further studies. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,117, 333–364.

  • Stephens, G. L., 1978: Radiation profiles in extended water clouds. I: Theory. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 2111–2122.

  • Tselioudis, G., W. B. Rossow, and D. Rind, 1992: Global patterns of cloud optical thickness variation with temperature. J. Climate,5, 1484–1495.

  • ——, A. A. Lacis, D. Rind, and W. B. Rossow, 1993: Potential effects of cloud optical thickness on climate warming. Nature,366, 670–672.

  • Uttal, T., E. E. Clothiaux, T. P. Ackerman, J. M. Intrieri, and W. L. Eberhard, 1995: Cloud boundary statistics during FIRE II. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 4276–4284.

  • Wade, C. G., 1994: An evaluation of problems affecting the measurement of low relative humidity on the United States radiosonde. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,11, 687–700.

  • Wang, J., 1997: Determination of cloud vertical structure from upper air observations and its effects on atmospheric circulation in a GCM. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, 233 pp. [Available from J. Wang, NCAR/SSSF, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.].

  • ——, and W. B. Rossow, 1995: Determination of cloud vertical structure from upper-air observations. J. Appl. Meteor.,34, 2243– 2258.

  • ——, and ——, 1998: Effects of cloud vertical structure on atmospheric circulation in the GISS GCM. J. Climate,11, 3010– 3029.

  • ——, ——, T. Uttal, and M. Rozendaal, 1999: Variability of cloud vertical structure during ASTEX observed from a combination of rawinsonde, radar, ceilometer, and satellite. Mon. Wea. Rev.,127, 2484–2502.

  • Warren, S. G., C. J. Hahn, and J. London, 1985: Simultaneous occurrence of different cloud types. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,24, 658–667.

  • ——, ——, R. M. Chervin, and R. L. Jenne, 1986: Global distribution of total cloud cover and cloud type amounts over land. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-273+STR, 29 pp. and 200 maps.

  • ——, ——, J. London, R. M. Chervin, and R. L. Jenne, 1988: Global distribution of total cloud cover and cloud type amounts over ocean. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-317+STR, 42 pp. and 170 maps.

  • Webster, P. J., and G. L. Stephens, 1984: Cloud–radiation interaction and the climate problem. The Global Climate, J. Houghton, Ed., Cambridge University Press, 63–78.

  • Wylie, D. P., and P.-H. Wang, 1997: Comparison of cloud frequency data from the high-resolution infrared radiometer sounder and the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment II. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 29 893–29 900.

  • Zhang, Y.-C., W. B. Rossow, and A. A. Lacis, 1995: Calculation of surface and top-of-atmosphere radiative fluxes from physical quantities based on ISCCP datasets. Part I: Method and sensitivity to input data uncertainties. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 1149– 1165.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 761 219 21
PDF Downloads 480 137 15