Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Another Look at the Annual and Semiannual Cycles of AtmosphericAngular Momentum

Huei-Ping Huang NOAA/CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Huei-Ping Huang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Prashant D. Sardeshmukh NOAA/CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Prashant D. Sardeshmukh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
15 Sep 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<3221:ALATAA>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
3221–3238
Restricted access

Abstract

The annual variation of global atmospheric angular momentum (AAM) is dominated by its first and second harmonic components. The first harmonic is associated with maximum global AAM in winter (December– January–February) and minimum in summer, but the second harmonic is important enough to produce a distinct secondary midwinter minimum. Locally, the second harmonic has largest amplitude in the Tropics and subtropics of the upper troposphere. At present, little is known concerning the fundamental cause of this semiannual variation. The problem is investigated here by focusing on the upper-tropospheric winds, whose angular momentum is an excellent proxy of global AAM. The annual variation of the rotational part of these winds (the part that contributes to the global AAM) is diagnosed in a nonlinear upper-tropospheric vorticity-equation model with specified horizontal wind divergence and transient-eddy forcing. The divergence forcing is the more important of the two, especially in the Tropics and subtropics, where it is associated with tropical heating and cooling. Given the harmonics of the forcing, the model predicts the harmonics of the response, that is, the vorticity, from which the harmonics of angular momentum can then be calculated. The surprising but clear conclusion from this diagnosis is that the second harmonic of AAM arises more as a nonlinear response to the first harmonic of the divergence forcing than as a linear response to the second harmonic of the divergence forcing. This result has implications for general circulation model simulations of semiannual variations, not only of global AAM but also of other quantities.

Corresponding author address: Huei-Ping Huang, NOAA/CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center, University of Colorado, Campus Box 216, Boulder, CO 80309-0216.

Abstract

The annual variation of global atmospheric angular momentum (AAM) is dominated by its first and second harmonic components. The first harmonic is associated with maximum global AAM in winter (December– January–February) and minimum in summer, but the second harmonic is important enough to produce a distinct secondary midwinter minimum. Locally, the second harmonic has largest amplitude in the Tropics and subtropics of the upper troposphere. At present, little is known concerning the fundamental cause of this semiannual variation. The problem is investigated here by focusing on the upper-tropospheric winds, whose angular momentum is an excellent proxy of global AAM. The annual variation of the rotational part of these winds (the part that contributes to the global AAM) is diagnosed in a nonlinear upper-tropospheric vorticity-equation model with specified horizontal wind divergence and transient-eddy forcing. The divergence forcing is the more important of the two, especially in the Tropics and subtropics, where it is associated with tropical heating and cooling. Given the harmonics of the forcing, the model predicts the harmonics of the response, that is, the vorticity, from which the harmonics of angular momentum can then be calculated. The surprising but clear conclusion from this diagnosis is that the second harmonic of AAM arises more as a nonlinear response to the first harmonic of the divergence forcing than as a linear response to the second harmonic of the divergence forcing. This result has implications for general circulation model simulations of semiannual variations, not only of global AAM but also of other quantities.

Corresponding author address: Huei-Ping Huang, NOAA/CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center, University of Colorado, Campus Box 216, Boulder, CO 80309-0216.

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Anderson, J. R., and R. D. Rosen, 1983: The latitude–height structure of 40–50 day variations in atmospheric angular momentum. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 1584–1591.

  • Boer, G. J., 1990: Earth–atmosphere exchange of angular momentum simulated in a general circulation model and implications for the length of day. J. Geophys. Res.,95, 5511–5531.

  • Borges, M. D., and P. D. Sardeshmukh, 1995: Barotropic Rossby wave dynamics of zonally varying upper-level flows during northern winter. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 3779–3796.

  • Chao, B. F., 1989: Length-of-day variations caused by El Niño/Southern Oscillation and the quasi-biennial oscillation. Science,243, 923–925.

  • Chen, T.-C., H. van Loon, and M.-C. Yen, 1996: An observational study of the tropical–subtropical semiannual oscillation. J. Climate,9, 1993–2002.

  • Drazin, P. G., and W. H. Reid, 1981: Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press, 527 pp.

  • Frostman, T. O., D. W. Martin, and W. Schwerdtfeger, 1967: Annual and semiannual variations in the length of day, related to geophysical effects. J. Geophys. Res.,72, 5065–5073.

  • Gates, W. L., 1992: AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,73, 1962–1970.

  • Gutzler, D. S., 1987: The annual and semiannual cycles of the tropical wind field. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 2553–2564.

  • Hide, R., N. T. Birch, L. V. Morrison, D. J. Shea, and A. A. White, 1980: Atmospheric angular momentum fluctuations and change in the length of the day. Nature,286, 114–117.

  • ——, J. O. Dickey, S. L. Marcus, R. D. Rosen, and D. A. Salstein, 1997: Atmospheric angular momentum fluctuations during 1979–1988 simulated by global circulation models. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 16423–16438.

  • Hsu, C.-P. F., and J. M. Wallace, 1976: The global distribution of the annual and semiannual cycles in precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 1093–1101.

  • Huang, H.-P., P. D. Sardeshmukh, and K. M. Weickmann, 1999: The balance of global angular momentum in a long-term atmospheric data set. J. Geophys. Res.,104, 2031–2040.

  • Jin, F.-F., J. D. Neelin, and M. Ghil, 1994: El Niño on the devil’s staircase: Annual subharmonics steps to chaos. Science,264, 70– 72.

  • Klinker, E., and P. D. Sardeshmukh, 1992: The diagnosis of mechanical dissipation in the atmosphere from large-scale balance requirements. J. Atmos. Sci.,49, 608–627.

  • Krishnamurti, T. N., M. C. Sinha, R. Krishnamurti, D. Oosterhof, and J. Comeaux, 1992: Angular momentum, length of day and monsoonal low frequency mode. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,70, 131– 166.

  • Lambeck, K., and A. Cazenave, 1973: The earth’s rotation and atmospheric circulation—I. Seasonal variations. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc.,32, 79–93.

  • Madden, R. A., 1987: Relationship between changes in the length of day and the 40- to 50-day oscillation in the Tropics. J. Geophys. Res.,92, 8391–8399.

  • Meehl, G. A., 1991: A reexamination of the mechanism of the semiannual oscillation in the Southern Hemisphere. J. Climate,4, 911–926.

  • Munk, W. H., and R. L. Miller, 1950: Variation in the earth’s angular velocity resulting from fluctuations in atmospheric and oceanic circulation. Tellus,2, 93–101.

  • ——, and G. J. F. McDonald, 1960: The Rotation of the Earth. Cambridge University Press, 323 pp.

  • Murakami, T., and B. Wang, 1993: Annual cycle of equatorial east– west circulation over the Indian and Pacific Oceans. J. Climate,6, 932–952.

  • Nakamura, H., 1993: Horizontal divergence associated with isolated jet streams. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 2310–2313.

  • Newman, M., and P. D. Sardeshmukh, 1998: The impact of the annual cycle on the North Pacific/North American response to remote low-frequency forcing. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 1336–1353.

  • ——, ——, and J. W. Bergman, 2000: An assessment of the NCEP, NASA, and ECMWF reanalyses over the tropical West Pacific warm pool. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,81, 41–48.

  • Peixoto, J. P., and A. H. Oort, 1992: Physics of Climate. American Institute of Physics, 520 pp.

  • Phillips, T. J., 1994: A summary documentation of the AMIP models. PCMDI Rep. 18, Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparisons, University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, 343 pp.

  • Rosen, R. D., and D. A. Salstein, 1985: Contributions of stratospheric winds to annual and semiannual fluctuations in atmospheric angular momentum and the length of day. J. Geophys. Res.,90, 8033–8041.

  • ——, ——, T. M. Eubanks, J. O. Dickey, and J. A. Steppe, 1984: An El Niño signal in atmospheric angular momentum and earth rotation. Science,225, 411–414.

  • ——, ——, and T. M. Wood, 1991: Zonal contributions to global momentum variations on intraseasonal through interannual timescales. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 5145–5151.

  • Sardeshmukh, P. D., 1993: The baroclinic χ problem and its application to the diagnosis of atmospheric heating rates. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 1099–1112.

  • ——, and B. J. Hoskins, 1985: Vorticity balance in the Tropics during the 1982–83 El Niño–Southern Oscillation event. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,111, 261–278.

  • ——, and ——, 1987. On the derivation of the divergent flow from the rotational flow: The χ problem. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,113, 339–360.

  • ——, and ——, 1988: The generation of global rotational flow by steady idealized tropical divergence. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1228– 1251.

  • ——, and B. Liebmann, 1993: An assessment of low-frequency variability in the Tropics as indicated by some proxies of tropical convection. J. Climate,6, 569–575.

  • Sheng, J., and Y. Hayashi, 1990a: Observed and simulated energy cycles in the frequency domain. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 1243–1254.

  • ——, and ——, 1990b: Estimation of atmospheric energetics in the frequency domain during the FGGE year. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 1255–1268.

  • Smith, H. M., and R. H. Tucker, 1953: The annual fluctuation in the rate of rotation of the earth. Mon. Notices Roy. Astron. Soc.,113, 251–257.

  • Strong, C. M., F.-F. Jin, and M. Ghil, 1995: Intraseasonal oscillations in a barotropic model with annual cycle, and their predictability. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2627–2642.

  • van Loon, H., 1967: The half-yearly oscillations in middle and high southern latitudes and the coreless winter. J. Atmos. Sci.,24, 472–486.

  • ——, and R. J. Jenne, 1969: The half-yearly oscillations in the Tropics of the Southern Hemisphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,26, 218–232.

  • ——, and ——, 1970: On the half-yearly oscillations in the Tropics. Tellus,22, 391–398.

  • Weickmann, K. M., and R. M. Chervin, 1988: The observed and simulated atmospheric seasonal cycle. Part I: Global wind field modes. J. Climate,1, 265–289.

  • ——, and P. D. Sardeshmukh, 1994: The atmospheric angular momentum cycle associated with a Madden–Julian oscillation. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 3194–3208.

  • Wikle, C. K., and T.-C. Chen, 1996: On the semiannual variation in the Northern Hemisphere extratropical height field. J. Climate,9, 2250–2258.

  • Wolf, W. L., and R. B. Smith, 1987: Length-of-day changes and mountain torque during El Niño. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 3656–3660.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 264 70 21
PDF Downloads 79 28 2