Decadal Variability and Predictability in the Midlatitude Ocean–Atmosphere System

R. Saravanan National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder*, Colorado

Search for other papers by R. Saravanan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
G. Danabasoglu National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder*, Colorado

Search for other papers by G. Danabasoglu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. C. Doney National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder*, Colorado

Search for other papers by S. C. Doney in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
James C. McWilliams Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

Search for other papers by James C. McWilliams in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

The coupled ocean–atmosphere interaction and predictability associated with the tropical El Niño phenomenon has motivated researchers to seek analogous phenomena in the midlatitudes as well. Are there midlatitude coupled ocean–atmosphere modes? Is there significant predictability in the midlatitudes? The authors address these questions in the broader context of trying to understand the mechanisms behind midlatitude variability, using an idealized model of the ocean–atmosphere system. The atmosphere is represented using a global two-level eddy-resolving primitive equation model with simplified physical parameterizations. The ocean is represented using a state-of-the-art ocean general circulation model, but configured in a simple Atlantic-like sector geometry. In addition to a coupled integration using this model, uncoupled integrations of the component oceanic and atmospheric models are also carried out to elucidate the mechanisms behind midlatitude variability. The sea surface temperature in the coupled equilibrium state exhibits two dominant modes of variability: (i) a passive oceanic red noise response to stochastic atmospheric forcing, and (ii) an active oceanic mode of variability that is partially excited by atmospheric forcing, and is associated with a periodicity of 16–20 yr. True coupled ocean–atmosphere modes do not appear to play any quantitatively significant role in the midlatitudes, due to the fundamentally different nature of atmospheric dynamics in the midlatitudes compared to the Tropics. However, coupling to the atmosphere does play an important role in determining the spatial and temporal characteristics of the oceanic variability. A statistical assessment suggests that midlatitude atmospheric predictability is modest compared to the predictability associated with tropical phenomena such as El Niño. This predictability arises from the atmospheric response to oceanic modes of variability, rather than from coupled modes. There is significant oceanic predictability on interannual timescales but not on decadal timescales.

Corresponding author address: R. Saravanan, National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.

Abstract

The coupled ocean–atmosphere interaction and predictability associated with the tropical El Niño phenomenon has motivated researchers to seek analogous phenomena in the midlatitudes as well. Are there midlatitude coupled ocean–atmosphere modes? Is there significant predictability in the midlatitudes? The authors address these questions in the broader context of trying to understand the mechanisms behind midlatitude variability, using an idealized model of the ocean–atmosphere system. The atmosphere is represented using a global two-level eddy-resolving primitive equation model with simplified physical parameterizations. The ocean is represented using a state-of-the-art ocean general circulation model, but configured in a simple Atlantic-like sector geometry. In addition to a coupled integration using this model, uncoupled integrations of the component oceanic and atmospheric models are also carried out to elucidate the mechanisms behind midlatitude variability. The sea surface temperature in the coupled equilibrium state exhibits two dominant modes of variability: (i) a passive oceanic red noise response to stochastic atmospheric forcing, and (ii) an active oceanic mode of variability that is partially excited by atmospheric forcing, and is associated with a periodicity of 16–20 yr. True coupled ocean–atmosphere modes do not appear to play any quantitatively significant role in the midlatitudes, due to the fundamentally different nature of atmospheric dynamics in the midlatitudes compared to the Tropics. However, coupling to the atmosphere does play an important role in determining the spatial and temporal characteristics of the oceanic variability. A statistical assessment suggests that midlatitude atmospheric predictability is modest compared to the predictability associated with tropical phenomena such as El Niño. This predictability arises from the atmospheric response to oceanic modes of variability, rather than from coupled modes. There is significant oceanic predictability on interannual timescales but not on decadal timescales.

Corresponding author address: R. Saravanan, National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.

Save
  • Barsugli, J. J., and D. S. Battisti, 1998: The basic effects of atmosphere–ocean thermal coupling on midlatitude variability. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 477–493.

  • Bjerknes, J., 1964: Atlantic air–sea interaction. Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 10, Academic Press, 1–82.

  • Bladé, I., 1997: The influence of midlatitude ocean–atmosphere coupling on the low-frequency variability of a GCM. Part I: No tropical SST forcing. J. Climate,10, 2087–2106.

  • Bryan, F., 1986: High latitude salinity effects and interhemispheric circulations. Nature,323, 301–304.

  • Bryan, K., 1984: Accelerating the convergence to equilibrium of ocean–climate models. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,14, 666–673.

  • Capotondi, A., and W. R. Holland, 1997: Decadal variability in an idealized ocean model and its sensitivity to surface boundary conditions. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,27, 1072–1093.

  • Chen, F., and M. Ghil, 1995: Interdecadal variability of the thermohaline circulation and high-latitude surface fluxes. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 2547–2568.

  • Curry, R. G., M. S. McCartney, and T. M. Joyce, 1998: Oceanic transport of subpolar climate signals to mid-depth tropical waters. Nature,391, 575–577.

  • Delworth, T., 1996: North Atlantic interannual variability in a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate,9, 2356–2375.

  • ——, S. Manabe, and R. J. Stouffer, 1993: Interdecadal variations of the thermohaline circulation in a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate,6, 1993–2011.

  • Deser, C., and M. L. Blackmon, 1993: Surface climate variations over the North Atlantic ocean during winter: 1900–1989. J. Climate,6, 1743–1753.

  • Feldstein, S. B., and W. A. Robinson, 1994: Comments on “Spatial structure of ultra-low frequency variability in a simple atmospheric circulation model.” Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,120, 739–735.

  • Ferranti, L., F. Molteni, and T. N. Palmer, 1994: Impact of localized tropical and extratropical SST anomalies in ensembles of seasonal GCM integrations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,120, 1613–1645.

  • Frankignoul, C., 1985: Sea surface temperature anomalies, planetary waves, and air–sea feedback in the middle latitudes. Rev. Geophys.,23, 357–390.

  • ——, and K. Hasselmann, 1977: Stochastic climate models: Part I. Application to sea surface temperature anomalies and thermocline variability. Tellus,29, 289–305.

  • Gent, P. R., and J. C. McWilliams, 1990: Isopycnal mixing in ocean circulation models. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,20, 150–155.

  • ——, F. O Bryan, G. Danabasoglu, S. C. Doney, W. R. Holland, W. G. Large, and J. C. McWilliams, 1998: The NCAR Climate System Model Global Ocean Component. J. Climate,11, 1287–1306.

  • Goodman, J., and J. Marshall, 1999: A model of decadal middle-latitude atmosphere–ocean coupled modes. J. Climate,12, 621–641.

  • Greatbatch, R. J., and S. Zhang, 1995: Interdecadal oscillation in an idealized ocean basin forced by constant heat flux. J. Climate,8, 81–91.

  • Griffies, S. M., and E. Tziperman, 1995: A linear thermohaline oscillator driven by stochastic atmospheric forcing. J. Climate,8, 2440–2453.

  • ——, and K. Bryan, 1997: A predictability study of simulated North Atlantic multidecadal variability. Climate Dyn.,13, 459–487.

  • Grötzner, A., M. Latif, and T. P. Barnett, 1998: A decadal climate cycle in the North Atlantic Ocean as simulated by the ECHO coupled GCM. J. Climate,11, 831–847.

  • Hall, M. M., and H. L. Bryden, 1982: Direct estimates and mechanism of ocean heat transport. Deep-Sea Res.,29, 339–359.

  • Hasselmann, K., 1976: Stochastic climate models: Part I. Theory. Tellus,28, 473–485.

  • Hurrell, J. W., 1995: Decadal trends in the North Atlantic oscillation:Regional temperatures and precipitation. Science,269, 676–679.

  • Jin, F.-F., 1997: A theory of interdecadal climate variability of the North Pacific ocean–atmosphere system. J. Climate,10, 1821–1835.

  • Kushnir, Y., 1994: Interdecadal variations in North Atlantic sea surface temperature and associated atmospheric conditions. J. Climate,7, 141–157.

  • Large, W. G., J. C. McWilliams, and S. C. Doney, 1994: Oceanic vertical mixing: A review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization. Rev. Geophys.,32, 363–403.

  • ——, G. Danabasoglu, S. C. Doney, and J. C. McWilliams, 1997: Sensitivity to surface forcing and boundary layer mixing in the NCAR CSM ocean model: Annual-mean climatology. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,27, 2418–2447.

  • Latif, M., and T. P. Barnett, 1994: Causes of decadal climate variability over the North Pacific and North America. Science,266, 634–637.

  • Levitus, S., 1982: Climatological Atlas of the World Oceans. NOAA Prof. Paper 13, U.S. Government Printing Office, 173 pp.

  • Lorenz, E. N., 1973: On the existence of extended range predictability. J. Appl. Meteor.,12, 543–546.

  • Madden, R. A., and P. R. Julian, 1971: Detection of a 40–50 day oscillation in the zonal wind in the tropical Pacific. J. Atmos. Sci.,28, 702–708.

  • Manabe, S., and R. J. Stouffer, 1996: Low-frequency variability of surface air temperature in a 1000-year integration of a coupled atmosphere–ocean–land surface model. J. Climate,9, 376–393.

  • Palmer, T. N., and Z. Sun, 1985: A modeling and observational study of the relationship between sea surface temperature in the north west Atlantic and the atmospheric general circulation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,111, 947–975.

  • Peixoto, J. P., and A. H. Oort, 1984: Physics of climate. Rev. Mod. Phys.,56, 365–429.

  • Rooth, C., 1982: Hydrology and the ocean circulation. Progress in Oceanography, Vol. 11, Pergamon, 131–149.

  • Saravanan, R., 1998: Atmospheric low frequency variability and its relationship to midlatitude SST variability: Studies using the NCAR Climate System Model. J. Climate,11, 1386–1404.

  • ——, and J. C. McWilliams, 1995: Multiple equilibria, natural variability, and climate transitions in an idealized ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate,8, 2296–2323.

  • ——, and ——, 1997: Stochasticity and spatial resonance in interdecadal climate fluctuations. J. Climate,10, 2299–2320.

  • ——, and ——, 1998: Advective ocean–atmosphere interaction: An analytical stochastic model with implications for decadal variability. J. Climate,11, 165–188.

  • Selten, F., R. J. Haarsma, and J. D. Opsteegh, 1999: On the mechanism of North Atlantic decadal variability. J. Climate,12, 1956–1973.

  • Spall, M. A., 1996: Dynamics of the Gulf Stream/Deep Western Boundary Current crossover. Part II: Low-frequency internal oscillations. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 2169–2182.

  • Sutton, R. T., and M. R. Allen, 1997: Decadal predictability in Gulf Stream sea surface temperatures. Nature,388, 563–567.

  • Timmermann, A., M. Latif, R. Voss, and A. Grötzner, 1998: Northern Hemispheric interdecadal variability: A coupled air–sea mode. J. Climate,11, 1906–1931.

  • Trenberth, K. E., and A. Solomon, 1994: The global heat balance: Heat transports in the atmosphere and the ocean. Climate Dyn.,10, 107–134.

  • Wallace, J. M., C. Smith, and Q. Jiang, 1990: Spatial patterns of atmosphere–ocean interaction in the Northern winter. J. Climate,3, 990–998.

  • Weaver, A. J., and E. S. Sarachik, 1991: Evidence for decadal variability in an ocean general circulation model: An advective mechanism. Atmos.–Ocean,29, 197–231.

  • ——, J. Marotzke, P. F. Cummins, and E. S. Sarachik, 1993: Stability and variability of the thermohaline circulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,23, 39–60.

  • Weng, W., and J. D. Neelin, 1998: On the role of ocean–atmosphere interaction in midlatitude interdecadal variability. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 167–170.

  • Wilks, D. S., 1995: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. Academic Press, 467 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 428 218 73
PDF Downloads 70 26 3