Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Recent Changes in Cloud-Type Frequency and Inferred Increases in Convection over the United States and the Former USSR

Bomin Sun Department of Geosciences, Morrill Science Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachussetts

Search for other papers by Bomin Sun in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Pavel Ya Groisman UCAR Project Scientist at National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Pavel Ya Groisman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Igor I. Mokhov A. M. Oboukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Search for other papers by Igor I. Mokhov in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
15 Apr 2001
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<1864:RCICTF>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1864–1880
Restricted access

Abstract

Significant changes and a general redistribution in the frequencies of various cloud types have been observed during the past 40–50 years over the midlatitude land areas of the Northern Hemisphere. This is evident for North America and northern Eurasia in the daytime synoptic data of the United States and the former Soviet Union (FUSSR). An abrupt increase prior to the 1960s largely contributed to the upward trend in the frequency of convective clouds over both regions, particularly in the warm season. However, over both regions during the intermediate seasons and during the winter season over the FUSSR, the frequencies of convective clouds still showed gradual increase after the 1960s. The increase in the frequency of convective clouds has been accompanied by increases in the frequency of observation of high-level cloudiness (at elevations above 6 km) and heavy precipitation. Low cloudiness (stratiform types) has decreased over the FUSSR but increased over the contiguous United States. The latter increase was due to an increase in the frequency of stratocumulus clouds, while the frequency of stratus clouds has decreased. Generally, it appears that during the post-World War II period over the FUSSR high cloud-type frequencies increased and low cloudiness decreased with a relatively small change (increase) in total cloud cover, while over the United States cloud cover has increased at both low and high levels. The analyses of cloudiness information from the United States and the FUSSR reveal noticeable differences in definitions and observational practices that affect the estimates of climatology and interpretation of the results presented here in terms of changes of convective activity and its relation to precipitation in these two regions of Eurasia and North America.

Corresponding author address: Pavel Ya. Groisman, UCAR Project Scientist at National Climatic Data Center, Federal Building, 151 Patton Avenue, Asheville, NC 28801.

Email: pgroisma@ncdc.noaa.gov

Abstract

Significant changes and a general redistribution in the frequencies of various cloud types have been observed during the past 40–50 years over the midlatitude land areas of the Northern Hemisphere. This is evident for North America and northern Eurasia in the daytime synoptic data of the United States and the former Soviet Union (FUSSR). An abrupt increase prior to the 1960s largely contributed to the upward trend in the frequency of convective clouds over both regions, particularly in the warm season. However, over both regions during the intermediate seasons and during the winter season over the FUSSR, the frequencies of convective clouds still showed gradual increase after the 1960s. The increase in the frequency of convective clouds has been accompanied by increases in the frequency of observation of high-level cloudiness (at elevations above 6 km) and heavy precipitation. Low cloudiness (stratiform types) has decreased over the FUSSR but increased over the contiguous United States. The latter increase was due to an increase in the frequency of stratocumulus clouds, while the frequency of stratus clouds has decreased. Generally, it appears that during the post-World War II period over the FUSSR high cloud-type frequencies increased and low cloudiness decreased with a relatively small change (increase) in total cloud cover, while over the United States cloud cover has increased at both low and high levels. The analyses of cloudiness information from the United States and the FUSSR reveal noticeable differences in definitions and observational practices that affect the estimates of climatology and interpretation of the results presented here in terms of changes of convective activity and its relation to precipitation in these two regions of Eurasia and North America.

Corresponding author address: Pavel Ya. Groisman, UCAR Project Scientist at National Climatic Data Center, Federal Building, 151 Patton Avenue, Asheville, NC 28801.

Email: pgroisma@ncdc.noaa.gov

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Angell, J. K., 1990: Variations in the United States cloudiness and sunshine duration between 1950 and the drought year of 1988. J. Climate,3, 296–308.

  • Arking, A., 1991: The radiative effects of clouds and their impact on climate. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,72, 795–813.

  • Bajuk, L. J., and C. B. Leovy, 1998: Seasonal and interannual variations in stratiform and convective clouds over the tropical Pacific and Indian Oceans from ship observations. J. Climate,11, 2922–2941.

  • Bradley, R. S., H. F. Diaz, J. K. Escheid, P. D. Jones, P. M. Kelly, and C. M. Goodess, 1987: Precipitation fluctuations over Northern Hemisphere land areas since the mid-19th century. Science,237, 171–275.

  • Cess, R. D., and Coauthors, 1996: Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models: An update. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 12 791–12 794.

  • Changnon, S. A., 1981: Midwestern cloud, sunshine, and temperature trends since 1901: Possible evidence of jet effects. J. Appl. Meteor.,20, 496–508.

  • Dai, A., A. D. Del Genio, and I. Fung, 1997a: Clouds, precipitation and temperature range. Nature,386, 665–666.

  • ——, I. Fung, and A. D. Del Genio, 1997b: Surface observed global land precipitation variations during 1900–1988. J. Climate,10, 2943–2962.

  • ——, K. E. Trenberth, and T. R. Karl, 1999: Effects of clouds, soil moisture, precipitation, and water vapor on diurnal temperature range. J. Climate,12, 2451–2473.

  • ——, T. M. L. Wigley, B. Boville, J. T. Kiehl, and L. Buja, 2001: Climates of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries simulated by the NCAR Climate System Model. J. Climate,14, 485–519.

  • Fu, R., W. T. Liu, and R. E. Dickinson, 1996: Response of tropical clouds to the interannual variation of sea surface temperature. J. Climate,9, 616–634.

  • Gates, W. L., and Coauthors, 1999: An overview of the results of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP 1). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,80, 29–55.

  • GEWEX, 1990: Scientific plan for the Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment. World Meteorological Organization, Rep. WCRP-40 (WMO/TD 376), 83 pp.

  • Greenberg, J. H., J. Bromberg, C. M. Reed, T. L. Gustafson, and R. A. Beauchamp, 1983: The epidemiology of heat stress deaths, Texas—1950, 1970–75, and 1980. Amer. J. Public Health,73, 805–807.

  • Groisman, P. Ya., and D. R. Legates, 1995: Documenting and detecting long-term precipitation trends: Where we are and what should be done. Climatic Change,31, 601–622.

  • ——, T. R. Karl, R. W. Knight, and G. L. Stenchikov, 1994: Changes of snow cover, temperature, and radiative heat balance over the Northern Hemisphere. J. Climate,7, 1633–1656.

  • ——, and Coauthors, 1999a: Changes in the probability of heavy precipitation: Important indicators of climatic change. Climatic Change,42, 243–283.

  • ——, E. L. Genikhovich. R. S. Bradley, and B. Sun, 1999b: Trends in turbulent heat fluxes over Northern Eurasia. Interactions between the Cryosphere, Climate and Greenhouse Gases, M. Tranter et al., Eds., IAHS Publ. No. 256, IAHS Press, 19–25.

  • ——, R. S. Bradley, and B. Sun, 2000: The relationship of cloud cover to near-surface temperature and humidity: Comparison of GCM simulations with empirical data. J. Climate,13, 1858–1878.

  • ——, R. W. Knight, and T. R. Karl, 2001: Heavy precipitation and streamflow in the United States: Trends in the twentieth century. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,82, 219–246.

  • Gulev, S. K., I. I. Zveryaev, and I. I. Mokhov, 1991: Tropospheric lapse rate as a function of surface temperature. Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR, Atmos. Oceanic Phys.,27, 287–294.

  • Hahn, C. J., and S. G. Warren, 1999: Extended edited synoptic reports from ships and land stations over the globe, 1952–1996. Environmental Science Division Publ. 4913, ORNL/CDIAC-123, NDP-026C, 71 pp. [Available from Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; online at http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/ndp026c.].

  • ——, ——, and J. London, 1995: The effect of moonlight on observation of cloud cover at night, and application to cloud climatology. J. Climate,8, 1429–1446.

  • Hartmann, D. L., M. E. Ockert-Bell, and M. L. Michelsen, 1992: The effect of cloud type on Earth’s energy balance: Global analysis. J. Climate,5, 1281–1304.

  • Henderson-Sellers, A., 1992: Continental cloudiness changes this century. GeoJournal,27.3, 255–262.

  • Houghton, J. T., L. G. Meira Filho, B. A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg, and K. Maskell, Eds. 1996: Climate Change 1995:The Science of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 572 pp.

  • Houze, R. A., 1993: Cloud Dynamics. Academic Press, 573 pp.

  • Isaac, G. A., and R. A. Stuart, 1996: Relationship between cloud type and amount, precipitation, and surface temperature in the Mackenzie River Valley—Beaufort Sea area. J. Climate,9, 1921–1941.

  • Jones, P. D., 1994: Hemispheric surface air temperature variations: A reanalysis and an update to 1993. J. Climate,7, 1794–1802.

  • ——, S. C. B. Raper, R. S. Bradley, H. F. Diaz, P. M. Kelly, and T. M. L. Wigley, 1986: Northern Hemisphere surface air temperature variations, 1851–1984. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,25, 161–179.

  • Kagan, R. L., 1979: Averaging of Meteorological Fields (in Russian). Gidrometeoizdat, 212 pp. (Reprinted by Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997, L. S. Gandin and T. M. Smith, Eds., 279 pp.).

  • Kaiser, D. P., 1998: Analysis of total cloud amount over China: 1951–1994. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 3599–3602.

  • ——, and V. N. Razuvaev, 1995: Cloud cover and type over the former USSR, 1936–83; Trends derived from the RIHMI-WDC 223-station 6- and 3-hourly meteorological data base. Proc. Sixth Int. Meeting on Statistical Climatology, Galway, Ireland, University College, 419–422.

  • Karl, T. R., 1994: Smudging the fingerprints. Nature,371, 380–381.

  • ——, and A. J. Koscielny, 1982: Drought in the United States: 1895–1981. J. Climatol.,2, 313–329.

  • ——, and R. W. Knight, 1998: Secular trends of precipitation amount, frequency, and intensity in the United States. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,79, 231–242.

  • Kattenberg, A., and Coauthors, 1996: Climate models—Projection of future climate. Climate Change 1995: The IPCC Second Assessment, J. T. Houghton et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 285–358.

  • Kendall, M. G., and A. Stuart, 1967: Inference and Relationship. Vol. 2, The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Charles Griffin, 690 pp.

  • Klein, S. A., and D. L. Hartmann, 1993: The seasonal cycle of low stratiform clouds. J. Climate,6, 1587–1606.

  • Mitchell, J. F. B., 1989: The “greenhouse” effect and climate change. Rev. Geophys.,27, 115–139.

  • Mokhov, I. I., 1983: Tropospheric lapse rate and its relationship to surface air temperature by observations. Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR, Atmos. Oceanic Phys.,19, 688–693.

  • ——, and P. K. Love, 1995: Diagnostics of cloudiness evolution in the annual cycle and interannual variability in the AMIP (Cloudiness Diagnostics Subproject 13). Proc. First Int. AMIP Sci. Conf., Monterrey, CA, U.S. Department of Energy and World Climate Programme, WMO/TD-752, 49–53.

  • ——, and V. K. Petukhov, 1999: Sensitivity analysis of Atmospheric Centers of Action. Geophys. Res. Abstr.,1, p. 431.

  • ——, and ——, 2000: Atmospheric Centers of Action and tendencies of their change. Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR, Atmos. Oceanic Phys.,36, 292–299.

  • National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), 1970: Reference manual to WBAN hourly surface observations. NCDC TD 144, 14 pp. [Available from NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, Federal Building, 151 Patton Avenue, Asheville, NC 28801.].

  • Norris, J. R., 1998a: Low cloud type over the ocean from surface observations. Part I: Relationship to surface meteorology and the vertical distribution of temperature and moisture. J. Climate,11, 369–382.

  • ——, 1998b: Low cloud type over the ocean from surface observations. Part II: Geographical and seasonal variations. J. Climate,11, 383–403.

  • ——, and C. B. Leovy, 1994: Interannual variability in stratiform cloudiness and sea surface temperature. J. Climate,7, 1915–1925.

  • Peterson, T. C., V. S. Golubev, and P. Ya. Groisman, 1995: Evaporation losing its strength. Nature,377, 687–688.

  • Razuvaev, V. N., E. G. Apasova, and R. A. Martuganov, 1995: Six- and three-hourly meteorological observation from 223 USSR stations. ORNL/CDIAC-66, NDP-048, 69 pp. + appendixes. [Available from Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831.].

  • Roads, J. O., 1978: Numerical experiments on the climatic sensitivity of an atmospheric hydrological cycle. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 753–773.

  • Ross, R. J., and W. P. Elliott, 1996: Tropospheric water vapor climatology and trends over North America: 1973–93. J. Climate,9, 3561–3574.

  • ——, and ——, 2001: Radiosonde-based Northern Hemisphere tropospheric water vapor trends. J. Climate,14, 1864–1880.

  • Serreze, M., and Coauthors, 2000: Observational evidence of recent changes in the northern high latitude environment. Climatic Change,46, 159–207.

  • Sun, B., and P. Ya. Groisman, 2000: Cloudiness variations over the former Soviet Union. Int. J. Climatol.,20, 1097–1111.

  • ——, ——, R. S. Bradley, and F. Keimig, 2000: Temporal changes in the observed relationship between cloud cover and surface air temperature. J. Climate,13, 4341–4357.

  • Thiessen, A. H., 1911: Precipitation averages for large areas. Mon. Wea. Rev.,39, 1082–1084.

  • USAFETAC, 1986: DATSAV2 Surface USAFETAC Climatic Database. User Handbook No. 4, USAF Environmental Technical Application Center, Operating Location A, Federal Building, Asheville, NC, 6 pp. + appendices.

  • U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 1948: International code for radio weather reports from the ships. U.S. Weather Bureau, W.B. 1046 (revised), 24 pp.

  • USSR State Committee on Hydrometeorology and Environmental Control, 1985: Nastavlenie Gidrometeorologicheskim Stantsiyam i Postam. Vol. 3 (Part 1), Gidrometeoizdat, 300 pp.

  • Vinnikov, K. Y., and A. Robock, 1996: Scales of temporal and spatial variability of mid-latitude soil moisture. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 7163–7174.

  • Wang, J., and W. B. Rossow, 1998: Effects of cloud vertical structure on atmospheric circulation in the GISS GCM. J. Climate,11, 3010–3029.

  • Warren, S. G., C. J. Hahn, J. London, R. M. Chervin, and R. L. Jenne, 1986: Global distribution of total cloud cover and cloud type amounts over land. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-273 + STR, 29 pp. + 200 maps.

  • Weare, B. C., and I. I. Mokhov, 1995: Evaluation of total cloudiness and its variability in the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. J. Climate,8, 2224–2238.

  • WMO, 1975: Manual on the observation of clouds and other meteors. WMO Publ. 407, 155 pp.

  • Yao, M.-S., and A. D. Del Genio, 1999: Effects of cloud parameterization on the simulations of climate changes in the GISS GCM. J. Climate,12, 761–779.

  • Ye, B., A. D. Del Genio, and K.-W Lo, 1998. CAPE variations in the current climate and in a climate change. J. Climate,11, 1997–2015.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 482 144 12
PDF Downloads 147 54 0