Spatial and Temporal Scales of Precipitating Tropical Cloud Systems in Satellite Imagery and the NCAR CCM3

Eric M. Wilcox Center for Atmospheric Sciences, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Eric M. Wilcox in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Testing general circulation model parameterizations against observations is traditionally done by comparing simulated and observed, time-averaged quantities, such as monthly mean cloud cover, evaluated on a stationary grid. This approach ignores the dynamical aspects of clouds, such as their life cycle characteristics, spatial coverage, temporal duration, and internal variability. In this study, a complementary Lagrangian approach to the validation of modeled tropical cloudiness is explored. An automated cloud detection and tracking algorithm is used to observe and track overcast decks of cloud in a consecutive set of hourly Meteosat-5 images and the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 3 (NCAR CCM3). The algorithm is applied to the deep convective cloud systems of the tropical Indian Ocean region during a 49-day period of the 1999 winter monsoon season. Observations of precipitation are taken from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite in addition to a Meteosat-5 infrared rainfall technique that is calibrated using the TRMM data.

Clouds, defined as overcast decks, are observed spanning spatial scales from 25 km2 to greater than 107 km2, as well as temporal scales from 1 h to greater than 100 h. Semipermanent decks of anvil and cirrus cloud, with numerous regions of deep convection embedded within, dominate total cloud cover. Bridging between convective centers within the deck by cirrus clouds, particularly during the suppressed portion of the diurnal cycle of convection, may help to maintain the integrity of semipermanent overcast decks over long timescales. At scales greater than 106 km2 the size distribution of simulated clouds is biased such that the dominant scale of clouds is several million square kilometers larger than the dominant scale of observed clouds. Virtually all of the simulated precipitation occurs at rain rates lower than 2 mm h−1, while as much as 25% of observed precipitation occurs at rain rates higher than 2 mm h−1. Precipitation associated with deep convection in observed semipermanent cloud systems is organized into more localized mesoscale structures of adjacent convective cells attached to stratiform precipitation regions. A separate analysis of TRMM data by Wilcox and Ramanathan determined that such structures can exceed the size of grid cells in coarse-grid global models and have area-averaged rain rates up to and exceeding 2 mm h−1. These mesoscale convective systems are responsible for the extreme, episodic precipitation events that are not parameterized in the model. The simulated cloud systems gently precipitate throughout their duration and everywhere within their boundaries. The model lacks a process that acts to organize the convective cells within fewer grid cells, in addition to a representation of the observed stratiform precipitation structures. A modification to CCM3 is tested that is intended to account for the evaporation of upper-level precipitation in midlevel mesoscale downdrafts. The modification results in only a slight change in domain-averaged precipitation. However, it causes a significant shift in the distribution of precipitation toward higher rain rates that is more consistent with the distribution of TRMM observed rain rates. The modification demonstrates the sensitivity of the model to one important component of mesoscale organized convection.

Current affiliation: Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

Corresponding author address: Eric Wilcox, NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, P.O. Box 308, Princeton, NJ 08542-0308. Email: ewilcox@princeton.edu

Abstract

Testing general circulation model parameterizations against observations is traditionally done by comparing simulated and observed, time-averaged quantities, such as monthly mean cloud cover, evaluated on a stationary grid. This approach ignores the dynamical aspects of clouds, such as their life cycle characteristics, spatial coverage, temporal duration, and internal variability. In this study, a complementary Lagrangian approach to the validation of modeled tropical cloudiness is explored. An automated cloud detection and tracking algorithm is used to observe and track overcast decks of cloud in a consecutive set of hourly Meteosat-5 images and the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 3 (NCAR CCM3). The algorithm is applied to the deep convective cloud systems of the tropical Indian Ocean region during a 49-day period of the 1999 winter monsoon season. Observations of precipitation are taken from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite in addition to a Meteosat-5 infrared rainfall technique that is calibrated using the TRMM data.

Clouds, defined as overcast decks, are observed spanning spatial scales from 25 km2 to greater than 107 km2, as well as temporal scales from 1 h to greater than 100 h. Semipermanent decks of anvil and cirrus cloud, with numerous regions of deep convection embedded within, dominate total cloud cover. Bridging between convective centers within the deck by cirrus clouds, particularly during the suppressed portion of the diurnal cycle of convection, may help to maintain the integrity of semipermanent overcast decks over long timescales. At scales greater than 106 km2 the size distribution of simulated clouds is biased such that the dominant scale of clouds is several million square kilometers larger than the dominant scale of observed clouds. Virtually all of the simulated precipitation occurs at rain rates lower than 2 mm h−1, while as much as 25% of observed precipitation occurs at rain rates higher than 2 mm h−1. Precipitation associated with deep convection in observed semipermanent cloud systems is organized into more localized mesoscale structures of adjacent convective cells attached to stratiform precipitation regions. A separate analysis of TRMM data by Wilcox and Ramanathan determined that such structures can exceed the size of grid cells in coarse-grid global models and have area-averaged rain rates up to and exceeding 2 mm h−1. These mesoscale convective systems are responsible for the extreme, episodic precipitation events that are not parameterized in the model. The simulated cloud systems gently precipitate throughout their duration and everywhere within their boundaries. The model lacks a process that acts to organize the convective cells within fewer grid cells, in addition to a representation of the observed stratiform precipitation structures. A modification to CCM3 is tested that is intended to account for the evaporation of upper-level precipitation in midlevel mesoscale downdrafts. The modification results in only a slight change in domain-averaged precipitation. However, it causes a significant shift in the distribution of precipitation toward higher rain rates that is more consistent with the distribution of TRMM observed rain rates. The modification demonstrates the sensitivity of the model to one important component of mesoscale organized convection.

Current affiliation: Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

Corresponding author address: Eric Wilcox, NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, P.O. Box 308, Princeton, NJ 08542-0308. Email: ewilcox@princeton.edu

Save
  • Arkin, P. A., and B. N. Meisner, 1987: The relationship between large-scale convective rainfall and cold cloud over the Western Hemisphere during 1982–84. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115 , 5174.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Atlas, D., D. Rosenfeld, and D. A. Short, 1990: The estimation of convective rainfall by area integrals. I: The theoretical and empirical basis. J. Geophys. Res., 95 , 21532160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balkanski, Y. J., D. J. Jacob, G. M. Gardner, W. C. Graustein, and K. K. Turekian, 1993: Transport and residence times of tropospheric aerosols inferred from global three-dimensional simulation of 210Pb. J. Geophys. Res., 98 , 2057320586.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boer, E. R., and V. Ramanathan, 1997: Lagrangian approach for deriving cloud characteristics from satellite observations and its implications to cloud parameterization. J. Geophys. Res., 102 , 2138321399.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Churchill, D. D., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1984: Development and structure of winter monsoon cloud clusters on 10 December 1978. J. Atmos. Sci., 41 , 933960.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Donner, L. J., C. J. Seman, R. S. Hemler, and S. Fan, 2001: A cumulus parameterization including mass fluxes, convective vertical velocities, and mesoscale effects: Thermodynamic and hydrological aspects in a general circulation model. J. Climate, 14 , 34443463.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gamache, J. F., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1983: Water budget of a mesoscale convective system in the Tropics. J. Atmos. Sci., 40 , 18351850.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gambheer, A. V., and G. S. Bhat, 2000: Life cycle characteristics of deep cloud systems over the Indian region using INSAT-1B pixel data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128 , 40714083.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hack, J. J., 1994: Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model (CCM2). J. Geophys. Res., 99 , 55515568.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houghton, J. T., Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, and D. Xiaosu, Eds.,. . 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis: Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 944 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houze, R. A., and A. K. Betts, 1981: Convection in GATE. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 19 , 541576.

  • Kiehl, J. T., J. J. Hack, G. B. Bonan, B. A. Boville, B. P. Briegleb, D. L. Williamson, and P. J. Rasch, 1996: Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM3). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-420+STR, 151 pp. [Available from National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307; http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cms/ccm3/TN-420/.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kiehl, J. T., J. J. Hack, G. B. Bonan, B. A. Boville, D. L. Williamson, and P. J. Rasch, 1998: The National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model: CCM3. J. Climate, 11 , 11311149.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kummerow, C., W. Barnes, T. Kozu, J. Shiue, and J. Simpson, 1998: The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) sensor package. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 15 , 809817.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kummerow, C., and Coauthors. 2001: The evolution of the Goddard profiling algorithm (GPROF) for rainfall estimation from passive microwave sensors. J. Appl. Meteor., 40 , 18011820.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Machado, L. A. T., W. B. Rossow, R. L. Guedes, and A. W. Walker, 1998: Life cycle variations of mesoscale convective systems over the Americas. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126 , 16301654.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mapes, B. E., and R. A. Houze, 1993: Cloud clusters and superclusters over the oceanic warm pool. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121 , 13981415.

  • Morcrette, J. J., 1991: Evaluation of model-generated cloudiness: Satellite-observed and model-generated diurnal variability of brightness temperature. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119 , 12051224.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rasch, P. J., and J. E. Kristjánsson, 1998: A comparison of the CCM3 model climate using diagnosed and predicted condensate parameterizations. J. Climate, 11 , 15871614.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rasch, P. J., W. D. Collins, and B. E. Eaton, 2001: Understanding the Indian Ocean Experiment (INDOEX) aerosol distributions with an aerosol assimilation. J. Geophys. Res., 106 , 73377355.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Richards, F., and P. Arkin, 1981: On the relationship between satellite-observed cloud cover and precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 109 , 10811093.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roads, J. O., S. Marshall, R. Oglesby, and S-C. Chen, 1996: Sensitivity of the CCM1 hydrologic cycle to CO2. J. Geophys. Res., 101 , 73217339.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roca, R., 2000: Validation of cloudiness in GCMs using METEOSAT observations. Proc. ECMWF/Euro TRMM Workshop on the Assimilation of Clouds and Precipitation, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 185–204.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roca, R., and V. Ramanathan, 2000: Scale dependence of monsoonal convective systems over the Indian Ocean. J. Climate, 13 , 12861289.

  • Roca, R., M. Viollier, L. Picon, and M. Desbois, 2002: A multi-satellite analysis of deep convection and its moist environment over the Indian Ocean during the winter monsoon. J. Geophys. Res., 107 .8012, doi:10.1029/2000JD000040.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rossow, W. B., and L. C. Garder, 1993: Cloud detection using satellite measurements of infrared and visible radiances for ISCCP. J. Climate, 6 , 23412369.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sherwood, S. C., and R. Wahrlich, 1999: Observed evolution of tropical deep convective events and their environment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127 , 17771795.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Slingo, J. M., 1987: The development and verification of a cloud prediction scheme for the ECMWF model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 113 , 899927.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stowe, L. L., E. P. McClain, R. Carey, P. Pellegrino, and G. G. Gutman, 1991: Global distribution of cloud cover derived from NOAA/AVHRR operational satellite data. Adv. Space Res., 11 , 5154.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sundqvist, H. R., 1988: Parameterization of condensation and associated clouds in models for weather prediction and general circulation simulation. Physically-Based Modelling and Simulation of Climate and Climatic Change, M. E. Schlesinger, Ed., Kluwer Academic, 433–461.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trenberth, K. E., 1998: Atmospheric moisture residence times and cycling: Implications for rainfall rates and climate change. Climatic Change, 39 , 667694.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilcox, E. M., and V. Ramanathan, 2001: Scale dependence of the thermodynamic forcing of tropical monsoon clouds: Results from TRMM observations. J. Climate, 14 , 15111524.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williams, M., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1987: Satellite-observed characteristics of winter monsoon cloud clusters. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115 , 505519.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, G. J., and N. A. McFarlane, 1995: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model. Atmos.–Ocean, 33 , 407446.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 297 40 5
PDF Downloads 84 11 1