Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Observations of the Infrared Outgoing Spectrum of the Earth from Space: The Effects of Temporal and Spatial Sampling

H. E. Brindley Space and Atmospheric Physics Group, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by H. E. Brindley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
J. E. Harries Space and Atmospheric Physics Group, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by J. E. Harries in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
15 Nov 2003
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<3820:OOTIOS>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
3820–3833
Restricted access

Abstract

A recent comparison between data taken by two different satellite instruments, the Interferometric Monitor of Greenhouse Gases (IMG) that flew in 1997 and the Infrared Interferometer Spectrometer (IRIS) that flew in 1970, showed evidence of a change in the clear-sky greenhouse radiative forcing due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations between those years. A possibly even more intriguing question is whether the data can be used to extract unambiguous information about the radiative feedback processes that accompany such a change of forcing, especially cloud feedback. This paper is an investigation of this question, with particular reference to the uncertainties introduced into the differences between IMG and IRIS spectra due to their different patterns of temporal and spatial sampling. This has been approached by modeling the sampling problem, using high-resolution proxy scenes of top-of-the-atmosphere 11-μm brightness temperature, TB11, taken from International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) data, sampled according to the characteristics of IRIS and IMG, respectively. The results suggest that while the sampling pattern of the IRIS instrument is sufficiently well distributed and dense to generate monthly regional mean brightness temperatures that are within 1.5 K of the true all-sky values, the IMG sampling is too sparse and yields results that differ from the true case by up to 6.0 K. Under cloud-free conditions the agreement with the true field for both instruments improves to within a few tenths of a kelvin. Comparisons with the observed IMG–IRIS difference spectra show that these uncertainties due to sampling presently limit the conclusions that can be drawn about climatically significant feedback processes. However, further analysis using the sampling characteristics of the Advanced Infrared Sounder (AIRS) instrument suggests that as climate change progresses, spectral measurements may be able to pick out significant changes due to processes such as cloud feedback.

Corresponding author address: Dr. H. E. Brindley, Space and Atmospheric Physics Group, Imperial College, Blackett Laboratory, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BZ, United Kingdom. Email: h.brindley;caic.ac.uk

Abstract

A recent comparison between data taken by two different satellite instruments, the Interferometric Monitor of Greenhouse Gases (IMG) that flew in 1997 and the Infrared Interferometer Spectrometer (IRIS) that flew in 1970, showed evidence of a change in the clear-sky greenhouse radiative forcing due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations between those years. A possibly even more intriguing question is whether the data can be used to extract unambiguous information about the radiative feedback processes that accompany such a change of forcing, especially cloud feedback. This paper is an investigation of this question, with particular reference to the uncertainties introduced into the differences between IMG and IRIS spectra due to their different patterns of temporal and spatial sampling. This has been approached by modeling the sampling problem, using high-resolution proxy scenes of top-of-the-atmosphere 11-μm brightness temperature, TB11, taken from International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) data, sampled according to the characteristics of IRIS and IMG, respectively. The results suggest that while the sampling pattern of the IRIS instrument is sufficiently well distributed and dense to generate monthly regional mean brightness temperatures that are within 1.5 K of the true all-sky values, the IMG sampling is too sparse and yields results that differ from the true case by up to 6.0 K. Under cloud-free conditions the agreement with the true field for both instruments improves to within a few tenths of a kelvin. Comparisons with the observed IMG–IRIS difference spectra show that these uncertainties due to sampling presently limit the conclusions that can be drawn about climatically significant feedback processes. However, further analysis using the sampling characteristics of the Advanced Infrared Sounder (AIRS) instrument suggests that as climate change progresses, spectral measurements may be able to pick out significant changes due to processes such as cloud feedback.

Corresponding author address: Dr. H. E. Brindley, Space and Atmospheric Physics Group, Imperial College, Blackett Laboratory, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BZ, United Kingdom. Email: h.brindley;caic.ac.uk

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Aumann, H. H., and R. J. Pagano, 1994: Atmospheric infrared sounder on the Earth observing system. Opt. Eng., 33 , 776–784.

  • Barnett, T. P., and M. E. Schlesinger, 1987: Detecting changes in global climate induced by greenhouse gases. J. Geophys. Res., 92 , 14772–14780.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brindley, H., and J. Harries, 2003: The impact of instrument field of view on spectrally resolved brightness temperatures: Application to IRIS and IMG. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 78 , 341–352.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Charlock, T. P., 1984: CO2 induced climatic change and spectral variations in the outgoing terrestrial infrared radiation. Tellus, 36B , 139–148.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Engelen, R., L. Fowler, P. Glecker, and M. Wehner, 2000: Sampling strategies for the comparison of climate model calculated and satellite observed brightness temperatures. J. Geophys. Res., 105 , 9393–9406.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Goody, R., and Y. L. Yung, 1989: Atmospheric Radiation, Theoretical Basis. 2d ed. Oxford University Press, 519 pp.

  • Goody, R., R. Haskins, W. Abdou, and L. Chen, 1996: Detection of climate forcing using emission spectra. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., 5 , 22–33.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Harries, J., H. Brindley, and A. Geer, 1998: Climate variability and trends from operational satellite spectral data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25 , 3975–3978.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Harries, J., H. Brindley, P. Sagoo, and R. Bantges, 2001: Increases in greenhouse forcing inferred from the outgoing longwave spectra of the Earth in 1970 and 1997. Nature, 410 , 355–357.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Houghton, J. T., Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, and D. Xiaosu, Eds.,. 2001: Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, 944 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Iacono, M., and S. Clough, 1996: Application of infrared interferometer spectrometer clear sky spectral radiance to investigations of climate variability. J. Geophys. Res., 101 , 29439–29460.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Joly, A., and Coauthors. 1997: The Fronts and Atlantic Storm-Track Experiment (FASTEX): Scientific objectives and experimental design. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78 , 1917–1940.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kiehl, J. T., 1983: Satellite detection of effects due to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 222 , 504–506.

  • Kobayashi, H., 1999: Interferometric monitor for greenhouse gases. IMG Project Tech. Rep., IMG Mission Operation and Verification Committee, Central Research Institue of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), Komae Research Laboratory, Komae-shi, Tokyo, 45 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peixoto, J., and A. Oort, 1992: Physics of Climate. American Institute of Physics, 520 pp.

  • Rossow, W., and Coauthors. 1996: International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP): Documentation of new cloud datasets. World Meteorological Organization WMO/TD-No. 737, 115 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Salby, M., and P. Callaghan, 1997: Sampling error in climate properties derived from satellite measurements: Consequences of undersampled diurnal variability. J. Climate, 10 , 18–36.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Santer, B., K. Taylor, T. Wigley, J. Penner, P. Jones, and U. Cubasch, 1995: Towards the detection and attribution of an anthropogenic effect on climate. Climate Dyn., 12 , 77–100.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Santer, B., and Coauthors. 1996: A search for human influences on the thermal structure of the atmosphere. Nature, 382 , 39–46.

  • Slingo, A., and M. J. Webb, 1997: The spectral signature of global warming. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123 , 293–307.

  • Tett, S., P. Stott, M. Allen, W. Ingram, and J. Mitchell, 1999: Causes of twentieth century temperature change near the Earth's surface. Nature, 399 , 569–575.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Webster, P., and R. Lukas, 1992: TOGA COARE—The Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 73 , 1377–1416.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, X., J. Bates, and S. Singh Kasala, 1993: A climatology of the water vapor band brightness temperatures from NOAA operational satellites. J. Climate, 6 , 1282–1300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 272 54 3
PDF Downloads 99 41 2