Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Impact on a GCM Climate of an Extended Mosaic Technique for the Land–Atmosphere Coupling

Andrea Molod Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for other papers by Andrea Molod in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Haydee Salmun Department of Geography, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Haydee Salmun in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Darryn W. Waugh Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for other papers by Darryn W. Waugh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
15 Oct 2004
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3877:TIOAGC>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
3877–3891
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

Heterogeneities in the land surface on scales smaller than the typical general circulation model (GCM) grid size can have a profound influence on the grid-scale mean climate. There exists observational and modeling evidence that the direct effects of surface heterogeneities may be felt by the atmosphere well into the planetary boundary layer. The impact of including an “extended mosaic” (EM) scheme, which accounts for the vertical influence of land surface heterogeneities in a GCM, is evaluated here by comparing side-by-side GCM simulations with EM and with the more standard mosaic formulation (M).

Differences between the EM and M simulations are observed in the boundary layer structure, in fields that link the boundary layer and the general circulation, and in fields that represent the general circulation itself. Large EM − M differences are found over the eastern United States, eastern Asia, and southern Africa in the summertime, and are associated with a boundary layer eddy diffusion feedback mechanism. The feedback mechanism operates as a positive or negative feedback depending on the local Bowen ratio. Significant EM − M differences are also found in the region of the Australian monsoon and in the strength of the stationary Pacific–North America pattern in the northern Pacific.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Andrea Molod, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139. Email: molod@ocean.mit.edu

Abstract

Heterogeneities in the land surface on scales smaller than the typical general circulation model (GCM) grid size can have a profound influence on the grid-scale mean climate. There exists observational and modeling evidence that the direct effects of surface heterogeneities may be felt by the atmosphere well into the planetary boundary layer. The impact of including an “extended mosaic” (EM) scheme, which accounts for the vertical influence of land surface heterogeneities in a GCM, is evaluated here by comparing side-by-side GCM simulations with EM and with the more standard mosaic formulation (M).

Differences between the EM and M simulations are observed in the boundary layer structure, in fields that link the boundary layer and the general circulation, and in fields that represent the general circulation itself. Large EM − M differences are found over the eastern United States, eastern Asia, and southern Africa in the summertime, and are associated with a boundary layer eddy diffusion feedback mechanism. The feedback mechanism operates as a positive or negative feedback depending on the local Bowen ratio. Significant EM − M differences are also found in the region of the Australian monsoon and in the strength of the stationary Pacific–North America pattern in the northern Pacific.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Andrea Molod, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139. Email: molod@ocean.mit.edu

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Angevine, W. M., A. B. White, C. J. Senff, M. Trainer, R. M. Banta, and M. A. Ayoub, 2003: Urban–rural contrasts in mixing height and cloudiness over Nashville in 1999. J. Geophys. Res.,108, 4092, doi:10.1029/2001JD001061.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Arola, A., 1999: Parameterization of turbulent and mesoscale fluxes for heterogeneous surfaces. J. Atmos. Sci, 56 , 584–598.

  • Banta, R. M., and A. B. White, 2003: Mixing-height differences between land use types: Dependence on wind speed. J. Geophys. Res.,108, 4321, doi:10.1029/2002JD002748.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bringfelt, B., M. Heikinheimo, N. Gustafsson, V. Perov, and A. Lindroth, 1999: A new land-surface treatment for HIRLAM—Comparisons with NOPEX measurements. Agric. For. Meteor, 98-9 , 239–256.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cook, K. H., 1994: Mechanisms by which surface drying perturbs tropical precipitation fields. J. Climate, 7 , 400–413.

  • Cotton, W. R., and R. A. Pielke, 1992: Human Impacts on Weather and Climate. Cambridge University Press, 288 pp.

  • Ducoudre, N. I., K. Laval, and A. Perrier, 1993: SECHIBA, a new set of parameterizations of the hydrologic exchanges at the land– atmosphere interface within the LMD atmospheric general circulation model. J. Climate, 6 , 248–273.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Findell, K., and E. Eltahir, 2003: Atmospheric controls on soil moisture–boundary layer interactions. Part II: Feedbacks within the continental United States. J. Hydrometeor, 4 , 573–583.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gates, W. L., Ed.,. 1995: The Proceedings of the First International AMIP Scientific Conference. WCRP-92, WMO/TD-No. 732, World Climate Research Programme, World Meteorological Organization, 532 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Helfand, H. M., and J. C. Labraga, 1988: Design of a nonsingular level 2.5 second-order closure model for the prediction of atmospheric turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci, 45 , 113–132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Helfand, H. M., and S. D. Schubert, 1995: Climatology of the simulated Great Plains low-level jet and its contribution to the continental moisture budget of the United States. J. Climate, 8 , 784–806.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Helfand, H. M., A. Molod, and M. G. Bosilovich, 1999: Implications of a moist turbulence parameterization for the numerical prediction of the structure and properties of the atmospheric boundary layer. Preprints, 13th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Denver, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 54–59.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hubbe, J. M., J. C. Doran, J. C. Liljegren, and W. J. Shaw, 1997: Observations of spatial variations of boundary layer structure over the Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed. J. Appl. Meteor, 34 , 1221–1231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koide, H., and K. Kodera, 1999: A SVD analysis between the winter NH 500-hPa height and surface temperature fields. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 77 , 47–61.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koster, R. D., and M. J. Suarez, 1992a: Modeling the land surface boundary in climate models as a composite of independent vegetation stands. J. Geophys. Res, 97 , 2697–2715.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koster, R. D., and M. J. Suarez, 1992b: A comparative analysis of two land surface heterogeneity representations. J. Climate, 5 , 1379–1390.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koster, R. D., and M. J. Suarez, 1992c: Energy and water balance calculations in the MOSAIC LSM. NASA Tech. Memo. 104606, Technical Report Series on Modeling and Data Assimilation, Vol. 9, Goddard Space Flight Center, 76 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mahrt, L., 2000: Surface heterogeneity and vertical structure of the boundary layer. Bound.-Layer Meteor, 96 , 33–62.

  • Mölders, N., A. Raabe, and G. Tetzlaff, 1996: A comparison of two strategies on land surface heterogeneity used in a mesoscale β meteorological model. Tellus, 48A , 733–749.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Molod, A., and H. Salmun, 2002: A global assessment of the mosaic approach to modeling land surface heterogeneity. J. Geophys. Res.,107, 4217, doi:10.1029/2001JD000588.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Molod, A., H. Salmun, and D. W. Waugh, 2003: A new look at modeling surface heterogeneity: Extending its influence in the vertical. J. Hydrometeor, 4 , 810–825.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reynolds, R. W., 1988: A real-time global sea surface temperature analysis. J. Climate, 1 , 75–86.

  • Rosenzweig, C., and F. Abramopoulos, 1997: Land-surface model development for the GISS GCM. J. Climate, 10 , 2040–2054.

  • Trenberth, K. E., G. W. Branstator, D. Karoly, A. Kumar, N-C. Lau, and C. Ropelewski, 1998: Progress during TOGA in understanding and modeling global teleconnections associated with tropical sea surface temperatures. J. Geophys. Res, 103 (C7) 14291–14324.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vihma, T., 1995: Subgrid parameterization of surface heat and momentum fluxes over the polar oceans. J. Geophys. Res, 100 (C11) 22625–22646.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wallace, J. M., and D. S. Gutzler, 1981: Teleconnections in the geopotential height field during the Northern Hemisphere winter. Mon. Wea. Rev, 109 , 784–812.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Werth, D., and R. Avissar, 2002: The local and global effects of Amazon deforestation. J. Geophys. Res.,107, 8087, doi:10.1029/ 2001JD000717.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, M. L., S. Schubert, I. S. Kang, and D. E. Waliser, 2002: Forced and free intraseasonal variability over the South Asian monsoon region simulated by 10 AGCMs. J. Climate, 15 , 2862–2880.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation