Article Type:
Research Article

Analyzing the Potential Impacts of Soil Moisture on the Observed and Model-Simulated Australian Surface Temperature Variations

Huqiang Zhang Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for other papers by Huqiang Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Nov 2004
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3141.1
Page(s):
4190–4212
Restricted access

Abstract

Based on observational and modeling analyses, this study aims to assess the potential influence of land surface conditions (soil moisture, in particular) on the Australian surface temperature variations. At first, a simple linear regression method is used to largely remove the ENSO influence from 50-yr observational surface temperature and precipitation datasets. Then, lag and partial correlations of the residuals are analyzed. The impacts of precipitation on the forthcoming surface temperature variations are largely attributed to the soil storage of precipitation water and the slow-varying soil moisture process. Results from partial correlations between precipitation and temperature variations suggest that when responding to anomalous atmospheric forcing, the land surface can introduce some slow-varying processes that can in turn affect the mean state of the atmosphere at monthly or longer scales and increase the predictability of the climate system.

Following the observational analysis, results from 16 Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2 (AMIP2) AGCM simulations are analyzed to assess whether land surface modeling can affect the model-simulated climate variability. Lag-correlation analysis reveals that “climatic memory” of soil moisture has different features in the 16 models. Models with simple bucket-type schemes tend to have a rapid decay rate in the retention of soil moisture anomalies and show rapid feedback between land surface and the overlying atmosphere, with a much weaker influence of soil moisture conditions on surface climate variations. In contrast, most models using nonbucket schemes in which more physical processes are introduced in simulating soil water evaporation and soil water movement tend to show slow-varying soil moisture processes, affecting the model integrations at longer time scales. Different characteristics for translating soil moisture memory into climate variability and predictability are seen across the models, and more detailed studies are needed to further explore how land surface processes affect climate variability and predictability.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Huqiang Zhang, Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre, GPO Box 1289K, Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia. Email: h.zhang@bom.gov.au

Abstract

Based on observational and modeling analyses, this study aims to assess the potential influence of land surface conditions (soil moisture, in particular) on the Australian surface temperature variations. At first, a simple linear regression method is used to largely remove the ENSO influence from 50-yr observational surface temperature and precipitation datasets. Then, lag and partial correlations of the residuals are analyzed. The impacts of precipitation on the forthcoming surface temperature variations are largely attributed to the soil storage of precipitation water and the slow-varying soil moisture process. Results from partial correlations between precipitation and temperature variations suggest that when responding to anomalous atmospheric forcing, the land surface can introduce some slow-varying processes that can in turn affect the mean state of the atmosphere at monthly or longer scales and increase the predictability of the climate system.

Following the observational analysis, results from 16 Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2 (AMIP2) AGCM simulations are analyzed to assess whether land surface modeling can affect the model-simulated climate variability. Lag-correlation analysis reveals that “climatic memory” of soil moisture has different features in the 16 models. Models with simple bucket-type schemes tend to have a rapid decay rate in the retention of soil moisture anomalies and show rapid feedback between land surface and the overlying atmosphere, with a much weaker influence of soil moisture conditions on surface climate variations. In contrast, most models using nonbucket schemes in which more physical processes are introduced in simulating soil water evaporation and soil water movement tend to show slow-varying soil moisture processes, affecting the model integrations at longer time scales. Different characteristics for translating soil moisture memory into climate variability and predictability are seen across the models, and more detailed studies are needed to further explore how land surface processes affect climate variability and predictability.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Huqiang Zhang, Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre, GPO Box 1289K, Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia. Email: h.zhang@bom.gov.au

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Bonan, G. B., 2001: Observational evidence for reduction of daily maximum temperature by croplands in the midwest United States. J. Climate, 14 , 2430–2442.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chambers, D. P., B. D. Tapley, and R. H. Stewart, 1999: Anomalous warming in the Indian Ocean coincident with El Niño. J. Geophys. Res, 104 , 10523–10533.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, J., and P. Kumar, 2002: Role of terrestrial hydrologic memory in modulating ENSO impacts in North America. J. Climate, 15 , 3569–3585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Delworth, T. L., and S. Manabe, 1988: The influence of potential evaporation on the variability of simulated soil wetness and climate. J. Climate, 1 , 523–547.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Desborough, C. E., A. J. Pitman, and P. Irannejad, 1996: Analysis of the relationship between bare soil evaporation and soil moisture simulated by 13 land surface schemes for a simple non-vegetated site. Global Planet. Change, 13 , 47–56.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Drosdowsky, W., 1993: Potential predictability of winter rainfall over southern and eastern Australia using Indian Ocean sea-surface temperature anomalies. Aust. Meteor. Mag, 42 , 1–6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Drosdowsky, W., and L. Chambers, 2001: Near-global sea surface temperature anomalies as predictors of Australian seasonal rainfall. J. Climate, 14 , 1677–1687.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Frederiksen, C. S., and R. C. Balgovind, 1994: The influence of the Indian Ocean/Indonesian SST gradient on the Australian winter rainfall and circulation in an atmospheric GCM. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 120 , 923–952.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gedney, N., P. M. Cox, H. Douville, J. Polcher, and P. J. Valdes, 2000: Characterizing GCM land surface schemes to understand their responses to climate change. J. Climate, 13 , 3066–3079.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hammer, G. L., N. Nicholls, and C. Mitchell, Eds.,. 2000: Applications of Seasonal Climate Forecasting in Agricultural and Natural Ecosystems: The Australian Experience. Kluwer, 469 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • IOCIP, 2000: Towards understanding climate variability in southwestern Australia: Research reports on the first phase of the Indian Ocean Climate Initiative. Indian Ocean Climate Initiative, Perth, Australia, 237 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jones, D. A., 1998: The prediction of Australian land surface temperatures using near global sea surface temperature patterns. BMRC Research Rep. 70, Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia, 44 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jones, D. A., 1999: Characteristics of Australian land surface temperature variability. Theor. Appl. Climatol, 61 , 11–31.

  • Jones, D. A., and B. C. Trewin, 2000: On the relationships between the El Niño–Southern Oscillation and Australian land surface temperature. Int. J. Climatol, 20 , 697–719.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koster, R. D., and M. J. Suarez, 1996: The influence of land surface moisture retention on precipitation statistics. J. Climate, 9 , 2551–2567.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koster, R. D., and P. C. D. Milly, 1997: The interplay between transpiration and runoff formulations in land surface schemes used with atmospheric models. J. Climate, 10 , 1578–1591.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koster, R. D., and M. J. Suarez, 2001: Soil moisture memory in climate models. J. Hydrometeor, 2 , 558–570.

  • Koster, R. D., P. A. Dirmeyer, A. N. Hahmann, R. Ijpelaar, L. Tyahla, P. Cox, and M. J. Suarez, 2002: Comparing the degree of land–atmosphere interaction in four atmospheric general circulation models. J. Hydrometeor, 3 , 363–375.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koster, R. D., Z. Guo, and P. A. Dirmeyer, 2003: First results from GLACE. GEWEX News, Vol. 13, No. 4, International GEWEX Project Office, 2–3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Livezey, R. E., and W. Y. Chen, 1983: Statistical field significance and its determination by Monte Carlo techniques. Mon. Wea. Rev, 111 , 46–59.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Manabe, S., 1969: Climate and the ocean circulation. I: The atmospheric circulation and the hydrology of the earth's surface. Mon. Wea. Rev, 97 , 739–774.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McBride, J. L., and N. Nicholls, 1983: Seasonal relationships between Australian rainfall and the Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev, 111 , 1998–2004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nicholls, N., 1989: Sea surface temperatures and Australian winter rainfall. J. Climate, 2 , 965–973.

  • Nicholls, N., and W. Drosdowsky, 2001: Is there an equatorial Indian Ocean SST dipole independent of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation? Preprints, Symp. on Climate Variability, the Oceans, and Societal Impacts, Albuquerque, NM, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 17–18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Noilhan, J., and J-F. Mahfouf, 1996: The ISBA land surface parameterisation scheme. Global Planet. Change, 13 , 145–159.

  • Phillips, T. J., and Coauthors, 2000: Validation of land-surface processes in AMIP models: A pilot study. PCMDI Rep. 63, PCMDI, Livermore, CA, 22 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Power, S., F. Tseitkin, S. Torok, B. Lavery, R. Dahni, and B. McAvaney, 1998: Australian temperature, Australian rainfall and the Southern Oscillation, 1910–1992: Coherent variability and recent changes. Aust. Meteor. Mag, 47 , 85–101.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Richter, H., A. W. Western, and F. H. S. Chiew, 2004: The effect of soil and vegetation parameters in the ECMWF land surface scheme. J. Hydrometeor., in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Saji, N. H., B. N. Goswami, P. N. Vinayachandran, and T. Yamagata, 1999: A dipole mode in the tropical Indian Ocean. Nature, 401 , 360–363.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schlosser, C. A., and P. C. D. Milly, 2002: A model-based investigation of soil moisture predictability and associated climate predictability. J. Hydrometeor, 3 , 483–501.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shao, Y., and A. Henderson-Sellers, 1996: Validation of soil moisture simulation in land surface parameterisation schemes with HAPEX data. Global Planet. Change, 13 , 11–46.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Simmonds, I., and P. Hope, 1998: Seasonal and regional responses to changes in Australian soil moisture conditions. Int. J. Climatol, 10 , 1105–1139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Timbal, B., S. Power, R. Colman, J. Viviand, and S. Lirola, 2002: Does soil moisture influence climate variability and predictability over Australia? J. Climate, 15 , 1230–1238.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Viterbo, P., and A. M. Beljaars, 1995: An improved land surface parameterization scheme in the ECMWF model and its validation. J. Climate, 8 , 2716–2748.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, H., and C. S. Frederiksen, 2003: Local and nonlocal impacts of soil moisture initialization on AGCM seasonal forecasts: A model sensitivity study. J. Climate, 16 , 2117–2137.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, H., A. Henderson-Sellers, and K. McGuffie, 1996: Impacts of tropical deforestation. Part I: Process analysis of local climate change. J. Climate, 9 , 1497–1517.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, H., A. Henderson-Sellers, A. J. Pitman, J. L. McGregor, C. E. Desborough, and J. Katzfey, 2001: Limited-area model sensitivity to the complexity of representation of the land surface energy balance. J. Climate, 14 , 3965–3986.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, H., A. Henderson-Sellers, P. Irannejad, S. Sharmeen, T. Phillips, and K. McGuffie, 2002: Land-surface modelling and climate simulations: Results over the Australian region from sixteen AMIP2 models. Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre Rep. 89, 51 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zheng, X., and J. A. Renwick, 2003: A regression-based scheme for seasonal forecasting of New Zealand temperature. J. Climate, 16 , 1843–1853.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 806 679 214
PDF Downloads 82 25 1