Article Type:
Research Article

Varied Expressions of the Hemispheric Circulation Observed in Association with Contrasting Polarities of Prescribed Patterns of Variability

R. Quadrelli Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by R. Quadrelli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
J. M. Wallace Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by J. M. Wallace in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Nov 2004
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3196.1
Page(s):
4245–4253
Restricted access

Abstract

The low-frequency (>5 day period) variability observed within four different subsets of the climatology (H1, L1, H2, and L2) as defined by the high and low index polarities of the two leading principal components (PCs) of the sea level pressure field is compared, with emphasis on distinctive flow configurations and teleconnection patterns. The analysis is based on wintertime 500-hPa height, sea level pressure, and 1000–500-hPa thickness fields derived from the NCEP–NCAR reanalyses for the period of record, 1958–99.

“Spaghetti diagrams” display specified contours for ensembles of individual 10-day mean charts extracted from the four different subsets of the climatology. In L1, 10-day mean maps (weak zonal flow at latitudes ∼55°N) exhibit larger undulations in the barotropic component of the flow than those in H1, implying larger particle displacements and deeper penetration of Arctic air masses, particularly into Europe and the eastern United States. Maps in H2 and L2, separated in accordance with the Pacific–North American (PNA)-like second mode, exhibit quite different kinds of planetary wave patterns. The L2 subset (characterized by a retracted Pacific jet) exhibits greater variability over the Gulf of Alaska and over northern Europe.

Cold air outbreaks in Europe occur more frequently in L1 than H1, and over western North America, they occur more frequently in L2 than H2. The cold anomalies associated with low polarities of both PCs are observed more frequently than expected based on linear correlation; within the individual subsets of the climatology there are suggestions of multiple circulation regimes; teleconnection patterns for the subsets of the climatology are also discernibly different. These results constitute evidence of nonnormal or nonlinear behavior of 5- and 10-day mean fields and provide indications of how the intraseasonal variability depends on the mean state of the flow in which it is embedded.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Roberta Quadrelli, JISAO, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Box #354235, Seattle, WA 98195-4235. Email: roberta@atmos.washington.edu

Abstract

The low-frequency (>5 day period) variability observed within four different subsets of the climatology (H1, L1, H2, and L2) as defined by the high and low index polarities of the two leading principal components (PCs) of the sea level pressure field is compared, with emphasis on distinctive flow configurations and teleconnection patterns. The analysis is based on wintertime 500-hPa height, sea level pressure, and 1000–500-hPa thickness fields derived from the NCEP–NCAR reanalyses for the period of record, 1958–99.

“Spaghetti diagrams” display specified contours for ensembles of individual 10-day mean charts extracted from the four different subsets of the climatology. In L1, 10-day mean maps (weak zonal flow at latitudes ∼55°N) exhibit larger undulations in the barotropic component of the flow than those in H1, implying larger particle displacements and deeper penetration of Arctic air masses, particularly into Europe and the eastern United States. Maps in H2 and L2, separated in accordance with the Pacific–North American (PNA)-like second mode, exhibit quite different kinds of planetary wave patterns. The L2 subset (characterized by a retracted Pacific jet) exhibits greater variability over the Gulf of Alaska and over northern Europe.

Cold air outbreaks in Europe occur more frequently in L1 than H1, and over western North America, they occur more frequently in L2 than H2. The cold anomalies associated with low polarities of both PCs are observed more frequently than expected based on linear correlation; within the individual subsets of the climatology there are suggestions of multiple circulation regimes; teleconnection patterns for the subsets of the climatology are also discernibly different. These results constitute evidence of nonnormal or nonlinear behavior of 5- and 10-day mean fields and provide indications of how the intraseasonal variability depends on the mean state of the flow in which it is embedded.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Roberta Quadrelli, JISAO, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Box #354235, Seattle, WA 98195-4235. Email: roberta@atmos.washington.edu

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Baur, F., P. Hess, and H. Nagel, 1944: Kalender der grosswetterlagen Europas 1881–1939. Bad Homburg, Germany, 35 pp.

  • DeWeaver, E., and S. Nigam, 2000: Do stationary waves drive the zonal-mean jet anomalies of the northern winter? J. Climate, 13 , 2160–2176.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Girs, A., 1971: Large-Scale Circulation Method of Long Term Meteorological Forecasts. Hydrometizdat, 485 pp.

  • Gong, D. Y., S. W. Wang, and J. H. Zhu, 2001: East Asia winter monsoon and Arctic Oscillation. Geophys. Res. Lett, 28 , 2073–2076.

  • Hoerling, M., J. Hurrell, and T. Xu, 2001: Tropical origins for recent North Atlantic climate change. Science, 292 , 90–92.

  • Hurrell, J. W., 1995: Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: Regional temperatures and precipitation. Science, 269 , 676–679.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kalnay, E. M., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 77 , 437–471.

  • Kimoto, M., and M. Ghil, 1993: Multiple flow regimes in the Northern Hemisphere winter. Part I: Methodology and hemispheric regimes. J. Atmos. Sci, 50 , 2625–2643.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mantua, N., S. Hare, Y. Zhang, J. Wallace, and R. C. Francis, 1997: A Pacific interdecadal climate oscillation with impacts on salmon production. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 78 , 1069–1079.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Namais, J., 1950: The index cycle and its role in the general circulation. J. Meteor, 7 , 130–139.

  • North, G. R., T. L. Bell, R. F. Cahalan, and F. J. Moeng, 1982: Sampling errors in the estimation of empirical orthogonal functions. Mon. Wea. Rev, 110 , 699–706.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Quadrelli, R., and J. M. Wallace, 2004: A simplified linear framework for interpreting patterns of Northern Hemisphere wintertime climate variability. J. Climate,. 17 , 3728–3744.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rex, D., 1951: The effect of Atlantic blocking action upon European climate. Tellus, 3 , 100–111.

  • Thompson, D. W. J., and J. M. Wallace, 1998: The Arctic Oscillation signature in the wintertime geopotential height and temperature fields. Geophys. Res. Lett, 25 , 1297–1300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thompson, D. W. J., and J. M. Wallace, 2001: Regional climate impacts of the Northern Hemisphere annular mode. Science, 293 , 85–89.

  • Thompson, D. W. J., M. Baldwin, and J. M. Wallace, 2002: Stratospheric connection to Northern Hemisphere wintertime weather: Implications for prediction. J. Climate, 15 , 1421–1428.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vangengeim, G., 1952: The Basics of the Large-Scale Circulation Method of Long Term Meteorological Forecasts for the Arctic. Vol. 34, AANII, 314 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wallace, J. M., and D. S. Gutzler, 1981: Teleconnections in the geopotential height field during the Northern Hemisphere winter. Mon. Wea. Rev, 109 , 784–812.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wallace, J. M., and D. W. J. Thompson, 2002: The Pacific center of action of the Northern Hemisphere annular mode: Real or artifact? J. Climate, 15 , 1987–1991.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, Y., J. M. Wallace, and D. S. Battisti, 1997: ENSO-like interdecadal variability: 1900–93. J. Climate, 10 , 1004–1020.