Dynamic Stabilization of Atmospheric Single Column Models

John W. Bergman NOAA–CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by John W. Bergman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Prashant D. Sardeshmukh NOAA–CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Prashant D. Sardeshmukh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Single column models (SCMs) provide an economical framework for assessing the sensitivity of atmospheric temperature and humidity to natural and imposed perturbations, and also for developing improved representations of diabatic processes in weather and climate models. Their economy is achieved at the expense of ignoring interactions with the circulation dynamics; thus, advection by the large-scale flow is either prescribed or neglected. This artificial decoupling of the diabatic and adiabatic tendencies can often cause rapid error growth in SCM integrations, especially in the Tropics where large-scale vertical advection is important. As a result, SCMs can quickly develop highly unrealistic thermodynamic structures, making it pointless to study their subsequent evolution.

This paper suggests one way around this fundamental difficulty through a simple coupling of the diabatic and adiabatic tendencies. In essence, the local vertical velocity at any instant is specified by a formula that links the local vertical temperature advection to the evolution of SCM-generated diabatic heating rates up to that instant. This vertical velocity is then used to determine vertical humidity advection, and also horizontal temperature and humidity advection under an additional assumption that the column is embedded in a uniform environment. The parameters in the formula are estimated in a separate set of calculations, from the approach to equilibrium of a linearized global primitive equation model forced by steady heat sources. As a test, the parameterized dynamics are used to predict the linear model's local response to oscillating heat sources, and found to perform remarkably well over a wide range of space and time scales. In a second test, the parameterization is found to capture important aspects of a general circulation model's vertical advection and temperature tendencies and their lead–lag relationships with diabatic heating fluctuations at convectively active locations in the Tropics.

When implemented in the NCAR SCM, the dynamically coupled SCM shows a clear improvement over its uncoupled counterpart for tropical conditions observed during the Tropical Ocean Global Atmosphere Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment (TOGA COARE). Coupling effectively stabilizes the SCM. As a result, short-term prediction errors are substantially reduced, the ensemble spread is reduced in ensemble runs, and the SCM is able to maintain realistic thermodynamic structures in extended runs. Such a dynamically coupled SCM should therefore be more useful not only for isolating physical parameterization errors in weather and climate models, but also for economical simulations of regional climate variability.

Corresponding author address: John Bergman, NOAA–CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center, Mail Code: R/CDC1, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305-3328. Email: bergmanj@colorado.edu

Abstract

Single column models (SCMs) provide an economical framework for assessing the sensitivity of atmospheric temperature and humidity to natural and imposed perturbations, and also for developing improved representations of diabatic processes in weather and climate models. Their economy is achieved at the expense of ignoring interactions with the circulation dynamics; thus, advection by the large-scale flow is either prescribed or neglected. This artificial decoupling of the diabatic and adiabatic tendencies can often cause rapid error growth in SCM integrations, especially in the Tropics where large-scale vertical advection is important. As a result, SCMs can quickly develop highly unrealistic thermodynamic structures, making it pointless to study their subsequent evolution.

This paper suggests one way around this fundamental difficulty through a simple coupling of the diabatic and adiabatic tendencies. In essence, the local vertical velocity at any instant is specified by a formula that links the local vertical temperature advection to the evolution of SCM-generated diabatic heating rates up to that instant. This vertical velocity is then used to determine vertical humidity advection, and also horizontal temperature and humidity advection under an additional assumption that the column is embedded in a uniform environment. The parameters in the formula are estimated in a separate set of calculations, from the approach to equilibrium of a linearized global primitive equation model forced by steady heat sources. As a test, the parameterized dynamics are used to predict the linear model's local response to oscillating heat sources, and found to perform remarkably well over a wide range of space and time scales. In a second test, the parameterization is found to capture important aspects of a general circulation model's vertical advection and temperature tendencies and their lead–lag relationships with diabatic heating fluctuations at convectively active locations in the Tropics.

When implemented in the NCAR SCM, the dynamically coupled SCM shows a clear improvement over its uncoupled counterpart for tropical conditions observed during the Tropical Ocean Global Atmosphere Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment (TOGA COARE). Coupling effectively stabilizes the SCM. As a result, short-term prediction errors are substantially reduced, the ensemble spread is reduced in ensemble runs, and the SCM is able to maintain realistic thermodynamic structures in extended runs. Such a dynamically coupled SCM should therefore be more useful not only for isolating physical parameterization errors in weather and climate models, but also for economical simulations of regional climate variability.

Corresponding author address: John Bergman, NOAA–CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center, Mail Code: R/CDC1, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305-3328. Email: bergmanj@colorado.edu

Save
  • Bergman, J. W., and H. H. Hendon, 2000: Cloud radiative forcing of the low-latitude tropospheric circulation: Linear calculations. J. Atmos. Sci, 57 , 22252245.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bergman, J. W., and P. D. Sardeshmukh, 2003: Usefulness of single column model diagnosis through short-term predictions. J. Climate, 16 , 38023818.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Emanuel, K. A., and M. Zivkovic-Rothman, 1999: Development and evaluation of a convection scheme for use in climate models. J. Atmos. Sci, 56 , 17661782.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ghan, S. J., L. R. Leung, and J. McCaa, 1999: A comparison of three different modeling strategies for evaluating cloud and radiation parameterizations. Mon. Wea. Rev, 127 , 19671984.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ghan, S. J., and Coauthors, 2000: A comparison of single column model simulations of summertime midlatitude continental convection. J. Geophys. Res, 105 , 20912124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hack, J. J., and J. A. Pedretti, 2000: Assessment of solution uncertainties in single-column modeling frameworks. J. Climate, 13 , 352365.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kiehl, J. T., J. J. Hack, G. B. Bonan, B. A. Boville, B. P. Briegleb, D. L. Williamson, and P. J. Rasch, 1996: Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM3). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-420 + STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, 152 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, W-H., S. F. Iacobellis, and R. C. J. Somerville, 1997: Cloud radiation forcings and feedbacks: General circulation model tests and observational validation. J. Climate, 10 , 24792496.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lin, J. W-B., and J. D. Neelin, 2002: Considerations for stochastic convective parameterizations. J. Atmos. Sci, 59 , 959975.

  • Lohmann, U., N. McFarlane, L. Levkov, K. Abdella, and F. Albers, 1999: Comparing different cloud schemes of a single column model by using mesoscale forcing and nudging technique. J. Climate, 12 , 438461.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lord, S. J., 1982: Interaction of a cumulus cloud ensemble with the large-scale environment. Part III: Semi-prognostic test of the Arakawa–Shubert cumulus parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci, 39 , 88103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Manabe, S., and R. T. Wetherald, 1967: Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a given distribution of relative humidity. J. Atmos. Sci, 24 , 241259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mapes, B. E., 1993: Gregarious tropical convection. J. Atmos. Sci, . 50 , 20262037.

  • Mapes, B. E., 2003: Sensitivities of cumulus ensemble rainfall in a cloud- resolving model with parameterized large-scale dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., submitted.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moncrieff, M. W., S. K. Krueger, D. Gregory, J-L. Redelsperger, and W-K. Tao, 1997: GEWEX Cloud System Study (GCSS) working group 4: Precipitating convective cloud systems. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 78 , 831845.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Press, W. H., B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vettering, 1989: Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, 702 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Randall, D. A., and D. G. Cripe, 1999: Alternative methods for specification of observed forcing in single-column models and cloud system models. J. Geophys. Res, 104 , 2452724545.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Randall, D. A., K-M. Xu, R. J. C. Somerville, and S. Iacobellis, 1996: Single- column models and cloud ensemble models as links between observations and climate models. J. Climate, 9 , 16831697.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Randall, D. A., and Coauthors, 2003: Confronting models with data: The GEWEX cloud systems study. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 84 , 455469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ricciardulli, L., and P. D. Sardeshmukh, 2002: Local time- and space scales of organized tropical deep convection. J. Climate, 15 , 27752790.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sobel, A. H., and C. S. Bretherton, 2000: Modeling tropical precipitation in a single column. J. Climate, 13 , 43784392.

  • Stokes, G. M., and S. E. Schwartz, 1994: The atmospheric radiation measurement (ARM) program: Programmatic background and design of the cloud and radiation test bed. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 75 , 12021221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van den Dool, H. M., 1987: An empirical study on the parameterization of precipitation in a model of the time mean atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci, 44 , 224235.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van den Dool, H. M., 1990: Time-mean precipitation and vertical motion patterns over the United States. Tellus, 42A , 5164.

  • Xie, S., and Coauthors, 2002: Intercomparison and evaluation of cumulus parameterizations under summertime midlatitude continental conditions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 128 , 10951135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, M. H., and J. L. Lin, 1997: Constrained variational analysis of sounding data based on column-integrated conservations of mass, heat, moisture, and momentum: Approach and application to ARM measurements. J. Atmos. Sci, 54 , 15031524.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 411 234 2
PDF Downloads 102 35 0