Simple Nonparametric Techniques for Exploring Changing Probability Distributions of Weather

Christopher A. T. Ferro Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Christopher A. T. Ferro in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Abdelwaheb Hannachi Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Abdelwaheb Hannachi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
David B. Stephenson Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by David B. Stephenson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Anthropogenic influences are expected to cause the probability distribution of weather variables to change in nontrivial ways. This study presents simple nonparametric methods for exploring and comparing differences in pairs of probability distribution functions. The methods are based on quantiles and allow changes in all parts of the probability distribution to be investigated, including the extreme tails. Adjusted quantiles are used to investigate whether changes are simply due to shifts in location (e.g., mean) and/or scale (e.g., variance). Sampling uncertainty in the quantile differences is assessed using simultaneous confidence intervals calculated using a bootstrap resampling method that takes account of serial (intraseasonal) dependency. The methods are simple enough to be used on large gridded datasets. They are demonstrated here by exploring the changes between European regional climate model simulations of daily minimum temperature and precipitation totals for winters in 1961–90 and 2071–2100. Projected changes in daily precipitation are generally found to be well described by simple increases in scale, whereas minimum temperature exhibits changes in both location and scale.

Corresponding author address: C. Ferro, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Earley Gate, P.O. Box 243, Reading RG6 6BB, United Kingdom. Email: c.a.t.ferro@reading.ac.uk

Abstract

Anthropogenic influences are expected to cause the probability distribution of weather variables to change in nontrivial ways. This study presents simple nonparametric methods for exploring and comparing differences in pairs of probability distribution functions. The methods are based on quantiles and allow changes in all parts of the probability distribution to be investigated, including the extreme tails. Adjusted quantiles are used to investigate whether changes are simply due to shifts in location (e.g., mean) and/or scale (e.g., variance). Sampling uncertainty in the quantile differences is assessed using simultaneous confidence intervals calculated using a bootstrap resampling method that takes account of serial (intraseasonal) dependency. The methods are simple enough to be used on large gridded datasets. They are demonstrated here by exploring the changes between European regional climate model simulations of daily minimum temperature and precipitation totals for winters in 1961–90 and 2071–2100. Projected changes in daily precipitation are generally found to be well described by simple increases in scale, whereas minimum temperature exhibits changes in both location and scale.

Corresponding author address: C. Ferro, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Earley Gate, P.O. Box 243, Reading RG6 6BB, United Kingdom. Email: c.a.t.ferro@reading.ac.uk

Save
  • Antoniadou, T., P. Besse, A. L. Fougères, C. Le Gall, and D. B. Stephenson, 2001: L’Oscillation Atlantique Nord (NAO) et son influence sur le climat Européen. Rev. Stat. Appl., 49 , 3,. 3960.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beniston, M., and D. B. Stephenson, 2004: Extreme climatic events and their evolution under changing climatic conditions. Global Planet. Change, 44 , 19.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bonsal, B. R., X. Zhang, L. A. Vincent, and W. D. Hogg, 2001: Characteristics of daily and extreme temperatures over Canada. J. Climate, 14 , 19591976.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen, J. H., T. Carter, and F. Giorgi, 2002: PRUDENCE employs new methods to assess European climate change. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 82 , 147.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen, O. B., J. H. Christensen, B. Machenhauer, and M. Botzet, 1998: Very high-resolution regional climate simulations over Scandinavia—Present climate. J. Climate, 11 , 32043229.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Conover, W. J., M. E. Johnson, and M. M. Johnson, 1981: A comparative study of tests for homogeneity of variances, with applications to the outer continental shelf bidding data. Technometrics, 23 , 351361.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davison, A. C., and D. V. Hinkley, 1997: Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge University Press, 592 pp.

  • DiCiccio, T. J., and J. P. Romano, 1988: A review of bootstrap confidence intervals. J. Roy. Stat. Soc., 50B , 338354.

  • Dunn, P. K., 2001: Bootstrap confidence intervals for predicted rainfall quantiles. Int. J. Climatol., 21 , 8994.

  • Falk, M., and E. Kaufmann, 1991: Coverage probabilities of bootstrap-confidence intervals for quantiles. Ann. Stat., 19 , 485495.

  • Hall, P., T. J. DiCiccio, and J. P. Romano, 1989: On smoothing the bootstrap. Ann. Stat., 17 , 692704.

  • Katz, R. W., and B. G. Brown, 1992: Extreme events in a changing climate: Variability is more important than averages. Climatic Change, 21 , 289302.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kjellström, E., 2004: Recent and future signatures of climate change in Europe. Ambio, 33 , 1924.

  • Lanzante, J. R., 1996: Resistant, robust and nonparametric techniques for the analysis of climate data: Theory and examples, including applications to historical radiosonde station data. Int. J. Climatol., 16 , 11971226.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lehmann, E. H., 1975: Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. Holden-Day, 457 pp.

  • McGregor, G. R., C. A. T. Ferro, and D. B. Stephenson, 2005: Projected changes in extreme weather and climate events in Europe. Extreme Weather Events and Public Health Responses, W. Kirch, B. Menne, and R. Bertollini, Eds., Springer, 13–23.

  • Mearns, L. O., R. W. Katz, and S. H. Schneider, 1984: Extreme high-temperature events: Changes in their probabilities with changes in mean temperature. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 23 , 16011613.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nakićenović, N., and R. Swart, 2000: IPCC Special Report on Emission Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, 599 pp.

  • Parrish, R. S., 1990: Comparison of quantile estimators in normal sampling. Biometrics, 46 , 247257.

  • Sun, Y., S. Sun, and Y. Diao, 2001: Smooth quantile processes from right censored data and construction of simultaneous confidence bands. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods, 30 , 707727.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • von Storch, H., and F. W. Zwiers, 2001: Statistical Analysis in Climate Research. Cambridge University Press, 484 pp.

  • Watson, R. T., and Core Writing Team, Eds. 2001: Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Cambridge University Press, 398 pp.

  • Wilcox, R. R., 1997: Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. Academic Press, 296 pp.

  • Wilks, D. S., 1995: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. Academic Press, 467 pp.

  • Wilks, D. S., 1997: Resampling hypothesis tests for autocorrelated fields. J. Climate, 10 , 6582.

  • Zhang, Z., and Q. Yu, 2002: A minimum distance estimation approach to the two-sample location-scale problem. Lifetime Data Anal., 8 , 289305.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 539 252 12
PDF Downloads 285 83 5