The Climate Sensitivity of the Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3)

Jeffrey T. Kiehl National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Jeffrey T. Kiehl in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Christine A. Shields National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Christine A. Shields in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
James J. Hack National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by James J. Hack in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
William D. Collins National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by William D. Collins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

The climate sensitivity of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM) is described in terms of the equilibrium change in surface temperature due to a doubling of carbon dioxide in a slab ocean version of the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) and the transient climate response, which is the surface temperature change at the point of doubling of carbon dioxide in a 1% yr−1 CO2 simulation with the fully coupled CCSM. For a fixed atmospheric horizontal resolution across model versions, we show that the equilibrium sensitivity has monotonically increased across CSM1.4, CCSM2, to CCSM3 from 2.01° to 2.27° to 2.47°C, respectively. The transient climate response for these versions is 1.44° to 1.09° to 1.48°C, respectively.

Using climate feedback analysis, it is shown that both clear-sky and cloudy-sky processes have contributed to the changes in transient climate response. The dependence of these sensitivities on horizontal resolution is also explored. The equilibrium sensitivity of the high-resolution (T85) version of CCSM3 is 2.71°C, while the equilibrium response for the low-resolution model (T31) is 2.32°C. It is shown that the shortwave cloud response of the high-resolution version of the CCSM3 is anomalous compared to the low- and moderate-resolution versions.

* The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation

Corresponding author address: Jeffrey T. Kiehl, National Center for Atmospheric Research, 1850 Table Mesa Drive, Boulder, CO 80305. Email: jtkon@ucar.edu

Abstract

The climate sensitivity of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM) is described in terms of the equilibrium change in surface temperature due to a doubling of carbon dioxide in a slab ocean version of the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) and the transient climate response, which is the surface temperature change at the point of doubling of carbon dioxide in a 1% yr−1 CO2 simulation with the fully coupled CCSM. For a fixed atmospheric horizontal resolution across model versions, we show that the equilibrium sensitivity has monotonically increased across CSM1.4, CCSM2, to CCSM3 from 2.01° to 2.27° to 2.47°C, respectively. The transient climate response for these versions is 1.44° to 1.09° to 1.48°C, respectively.

Using climate feedback analysis, it is shown that both clear-sky and cloudy-sky processes have contributed to the changes in transient climate response. The dependence of these sensitivities on horizontal resolution is also explored. The equilibrium sensitivity of the high-resolution (T85) version of CCSM3 is 2.71°C, while the equilibrium response for the low-resolution model (T31) is 2.32°C. It is shown that the shortwave cloud response of the high-resolution version of the CCSM3 is anomalous compared to the low- and moderate-resolution versions.

* The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation

Corresponding author address: Jeffrey T. Kiehl, National Center for Atmospheric Research, 1850 Table Mesa Drive, Boulder, CO 80305. Email: jtkon@ucar.edu

Save
  • Boer, G. J., and B. Yu, 2003: Dynamical aspects of climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett, 30 .1135, doi:10.1029/2002GL016549.

  • Boville, B. A., and P. R. Gent, 1998: The NCAR climate system model, version one. J. Climate, 11 , 11151130.

  • Boville, B. A., J. T. Kiehl, P. J. Rasch, and F. O. Bryan, 2001: Improvements to the NCAR CSM-1 for transient climate simulations. J. Climate, 14 , 164179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boville, B. A., P. J. Rasch, J. J. Hack, and J. M. McCaa, 2006: Representation of clouds and precipitation processes in the Community Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3). J. Climate, 19 , 21882198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collins, W. D., and Coauthors, 2006a: The Community Climate System Model version 3 (CCSM3). J. Climate, 19 , 21222143.

  • Collins, W. D., and Coauthors, 2006b: The formulation and atmospheric simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3). J. Climate, 19 , 21442161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cubasch, U., and Coauthors, 2001: Projections of future climate change. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, J. T. Houghton et al., Eds. Cambridge University Press, 527–582.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dai, A., T. M. L. Wigley, B. A. Boville, J. T. Kiehl, and L. E. Buja, 2001: Climates of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries simulated by the NCAR Climate System Model. J. Climate, 14 , 485519.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dickinson, R. E., K. W. Oleson, G. B. Bonan, F. Hoffman, P. Thorton, M. Vertenstein, Z-L. Yang, and X. Zeng, 2006: The Community Land Model and its climate statistics as a component of the Community Climate System Model. J. Climate, 19 , 23022324.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gregory, J. M., and J. F. B. Mitchell, 1997: The climate response to CO2 of the Hadley Centre coupled AOGCM with and without flux adjustment. Geophys. Res. Lett, 24 , 19431946.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gregory, J. M., and Coauthors, 2004: A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett, 31 .L03205, doi:10.1029/2003GL018747.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kiehl, J. T., and P. R. Gent, 2004: The Community Climate System Model, version 2. J. Climate, 17 , 36663682.

  • Large, W., and G. Danabasoglu, 2006: Attribution and impacts of the upper-ocean biases in CCSM3. J. Climate, 19 , 23252346.

  • Meehl, G. A., W. D. Collins, B. A. Boville, J. T. Kiehl, T. M. L. Wigley, and J. M. Arblaster, 2000: Response of the NCAR Climate System Model to increased CO2 and the role of physical processes. J. Climate, 13 , 18791898.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meehl, G. A., W. M. Washington, J. M. Arblaster, and A. Hu, 2004: Factors affecting climate sensitivity in global coupled models. J. Climate, 17 , 15841596.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Murphy, J. M., 1995: Transient response of the Hadley Centre coupled ocean–atmosphere model to increasing carbon dioxide. Part III: Analysis of global-mean response using simple models. J. Climate, 8 , 496514.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Raper, S. C. B., J. M. Gregory, and R. J. Stouffer, 2002: The role of climate sensitivity and ocean heat uptake on AOGCM transient temperature response. J. Climate, 15 , 124130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Senior, C. A., and J. F. B. Mitchell, 2000: The time-dependence of climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett, 27 , 26852688.

  • Yeager, S., C. Shields, W. Large, and J. J. Hack, 2006: The low-resolution CCSM3. J. Climate, 19 , 25452566.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 913 356 54
PDF Downloads 434 99 6