Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Atmospheric Circulation and Its Effect on Arctic Sea Ice in CCSM3 Simulations at Medium and High Resolution

Eric DeWeaver Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Eric DeWeaver in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Cecilia M. Bitz Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Cecilia M. Bitz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jun 2006
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3753.1
Page(s):
2415–2436
Restricted access

Abstract

The simulation of Arctic sea ice and surface winds changes significantly when Community Climate System Model version 3 (CCSM3) resolution is increased from T42 (∼2.8°) to T85 (∼1.4°). At T42 resolution, Arctic sea ice is too thick off the Siberian coast and too thin along the Canadian coast. Both of these biases are reduced at T85 resolution. The most prominent surface wind difference is the erroneous North Polar summer anticyclone, present at T42 but absent at T85.

An offline sea ice model is used to study the effect of the surface winds on sea ice thickness. In this model, the surface wind stress is prescribed alternately from reanalysis and the T42 and T85 simulations. In the offline model, CCSM3 surface wind biases have a dramatic effect on sea ice distribution: with reanalysis surface winds annual-mean ice thickness is greatest along the Canadian coast, but with CCSM3 winds thickness is greater on the Siberian side. A significant difference between the two CCSM3-forced offline simulations is the thickness of the ice along the Canadian archipelago, where the T85 winds produce thicker ice than their T42 counterparts. Seasonal forcing experiments, with CCSM3 winds during spring and summer and reanalysis winds in fall and winter, relate the Canadian thickness difference to spring and summer surface wind differences. These experiments also show that the ice buildup on the Siberian coast at both resolutions is related to the fall and winter surface winds.

The Arctic atmospheric circulation is examined further through comparisons of the winter sea level pressure (SLP) and eddy geopotential height. At both resolutions the simulated Beaufort high is quite weak, weaker at higher resolution. Eddy heights show that the wintertime Beaufort high in reanalysis has a barotropic vertical structure. In contrast, high CCSM3 SLP in Arctic winter is found in association with cold lower-tropospheric temperatures and a baroclinic vertical structure.

In reanalysis, the summertime Arctic surface circulation is dominated by a polar cyclone, which is accompanied by surface inflow and a deep Ferrel cell north of the traditional polar cell. The Arctic Ferrel cell is accompanied by a northward flux of zonal momentum and a polar lobe of the zonal-mean jet. These features do not appear in the CCSM3 simulations at either resolution.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Eric DeWeaver, Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1225 West Dayton Avenue, Madison, WI 53706. Email: deweaver@aos.wisc.edu

Abstract

The simulation of Arctic sea ice and surface winds changes significantly when Community Climate System Model version 3 (CCSM3) resolution is increased from T42 (∼2.8°) to T85 (∼1.4°). At T42 resolution, Arctic sea ice is too thick off the Siberian coast and too thin along the Canadian coast. Both of these biases are reduced at T85 resolution. The most prominent surface wind difference is the erroneous North Polar summer anticyclone, present at T42 but absent at T85.

An offline sea ice model is used to study the effect of the surface winds on sea ice thickness. In this model, the surface wind stress is prescribed alternately from reanalysis and the T42 and T85 simulations. In the offline model, CCSM3 surface wind biases have a dramatic effect on sea ice distribution: with reanalysis surface winds annual-mean ice thickness is greatest along the Canadian coast, but with CCSM3 winds thickness is greater on the Siberian side. A significant difference between the two CCSM3-forced offline simulations is the thickness of the ice along the Canadian archipelago, where the T85 winds produce thicker ice than their T42 counterparts. Seasonal forcing experiments, with CCSM3 winds during spring and summer and reanalysis winds in fall and winter, relate the Canadian thickness difference to spring and summer surface wind differences. These experiments also show that the ice buildup on the Siberian coast at both resolutions is related to the fall and winter surface winds.

The Arctic atmospheric circulation is examined further through comparisons of the winter sea level pressure (SLP) and eddy geopotential height. At both resolutions the simulated Beaufort high is quite weak, weaker at higher resolution. Eddy heights show that the wintertime Beaufort high in reanalysis has a barotropic vertical structure. In contrast, high CCSM3 SLP in Arctic winter is found in association with cold lower-tropospheric temperatures and a baroclinic vertical structure.

In reanalysis, the summertime Arctic surface circulation is dominated by a polar cyclone, which is accompanied by surface inflow and a deep Ferrel cell north of the traditional polar cell. The Arctic Ferrel cell is accompanied by a northward flux of zonal momentum and a polar lobe of the zonal-mean jet. These features do not appear in the CCSM3 simulations at either resolution.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Eric DeWeaver, Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1225 West Dayton Avenue, Madison, WI 53706. Email: deweaver@aos.wisc.edu

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Bitz, C. M., M. M. Holland, A. J. Weaver, and M. Eby, 2001: Simulating the ice-thickness distribution in a coupled climate model. J. Geophys. Res, 106 , 2441–2464.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bitz, C. M., J. C. Fyfe, and G. M. Flato, 2002: Sea ice response to wind forcing from AMIP models. J. Climate, 15 , 522–536.

  • Bitz, C. M., M. M. Holland, E. C. Hunke, and R. E. Moritz, 2005: Maintenance of the sea-ice edge. J. Climate, 18 , 2903–2921.

  • Bourke, R. H., and R. P. Garrett, 1987: Sea-ice thickness distribution in the Arctic Ocean. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol, 13 , 259–280.

  • Boville, B., 1991: Sensitivity of simulated climate to model resolution. J. Climate, 4 , 469–485.

  • Briegleb, B., and D. H. Bromwich, 1998: Polar climate simulation of the NCAR CCM3. J. Climate, 11 , 1270–1286.

  • Collins, W. D., and Coauthors, 2006a: The Community Climate System Model version 3 (CCSM3). J. Climate, 19 , 2122–2143.

  • Collins, W. D., and Coauthors, 2006b: The formulation and atmospheric simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3). J. Climate, 19 , 2144–2161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dickinson, R., K. W. Oleson, G. B. Bonan, F. Hoffman, P. Thornton, M. Vertenstein, and Z-L. Yang, 2006: The Community Land Model and its climate statistics as a component of the Community Climate System Model. J. Climate, 19 , 2302–2324.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • ECMWF, 1997: ERA description. ECMWF Re-Analysis Project Report Series, Vol. 1, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 72 pp.

  • Gates, W. L., 1992: AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 73 , 1962–1970.

  • Hack, J. J., J. M. Caron, G. Danabasoglu, K. W. Olson, C. M. Bitz, and J. E. Truesdale, 2006a: CCSM–CAM3 climate simulation sensitivity to changes in horizontal resolution. J. Climate, 19 , 2267–2289.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hack, J. J., J. M. Caron, S. G. Yeager, K. W. Oleson, M. M. Holland, J. E. Truesdale, and P. J. Rasch, 2006b: Simulation of the global hydrological cycle in the CCSM Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3): Mean features. J. Climate, 19 , 2199–2221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Held, I. M., M-F. Ting, and H. Wang, 2002: Northern winter stationary waves: Theory and modeling. J. Climate, 15 , 2125–2144.

  • Hibler, W. D., and G. M. Flato, 1992: Sea ice models. Climate System Modeling, K. Trenberth, Ed., Cambridge University Press, 788 pp.

  • Holland, M., and C. M. Bitz, 2003: Polar amplification of climate change in the coupled models. Climate Dyn, 21 , 221–232.

  • Holland, M., C. M. Bitz, E. C. Hunke, W. H. Lipscomb, and J. L. Schramm, 2006: Influence of the sea ice thickness distribution on polar climate in CCSM3. J. Climate, 19 , 2398–2414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Houghton, J. T., Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C. A. Johnson, 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, 881 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hurrell, J. W., J. J. Hack, A. Phillips, J. Caron, and J. Yin, 2006: The dynamical simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3). J. Climate, 19 , 2162–2183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP–NCAR 40-Yr Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 77 , 437–471.

  • Large, W. G., and G. Danabasoglu, 2006: Attribution and impacts of upper-ocean biases in CCSM3. J. Climate, 19 , 2325–2346.

  • Lynch, A. H., A. G. Slater, and M. Serreze, 2001: The Alaskan Arctic frontal zone: Forcing by orography, coastal contrast, and the boreal forest. J. Climate, 14 , 4351–4362.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nigam, S., and E. DeWeaver, 2003: Stationary waves (orographically and thermally forced). Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences, J. Holton, J. Pyle, and J. Curry, Eds. Elsevier, 2780 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Palmén, E., and C. W. Newton, 1969: Atmospheric Circulation Systems. Academic Press, 603 pp.

  • Ramage, C. S., 1971: Monsoon Meteorology. Academic Press, 296 pp.

  • Randall, D., and Coauthors, 1998: Status of and outlook for large-scale modeling of atmosphere–ice–ocean interactions in the Arctic. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 79 , 197–219.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Randall, W. J., and I. M. Held, 1991: Phase speed spectra of transient eddy fluxes and critical layer absorption. J. Atmos. Sci, 48 , 688–697.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reed, R. J., and B. A. Kunkel, 1960: The Arctic circulation in summer. J. Meteor, 17 , 489–506.

  • Rigor, I. G., J. M. Wallace, and R. L. Colony, 2002: Response of sea ice to the Arctic Oscillation. J. Climate, 15 , 2648–2663.

  • Rind, D., R. Healy, C. Parkinson, and D. Martinson, 1995: The role of sea ice in 2 × CO2 climate model sensitivity. Part I: The total influence of sea ice thickness and extent. J. Climate, 8 , 449–463.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Serreze, M. C., and R. G. Barry, 1988: Synoptic activity in the Arctic Basin, 1979–85. J. Climate, 1 , 1276–1295.

  • Serreze, M. C., R. G. Barry, and A. S. McLaren, 1989: Seasonal variations in sea ice motion and effects on sea ice concentration in the Canada Basin. J. Geophys. Res, 94 , 10955–10970.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Serreze, M. C., A. H. Lynch, and M. P. Clark, 2001: The Arctic front as seen in the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis. J. Climate, 14 , 1550–1567.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thorndyke, A. S., and R. Colony, 1982: Sea ice motion in response to geostrophic winds. J. Geophys. Res, 87 , 5845–5852.

  • Vinje, T., 2001: Fram Strait ice fluxes and atmospheric circulation: 1950–2000. J. Climate, 14 , 3508–3517.

  • von Storch, H., and F. W. Zwiers, 2001: Statistical Analysis in Climate Research. Cambridge University Press, 484 pp.

  • Walsh, J., and C. Crane, 1992: A comparison of GCM simulations of Arctic climate. Geophys. Res. Lett, 19 , 29–32.

  • Weatherly, J., B. P. Briegleb, W. Large, and J. Maslanik, 1998: Sea ice and polar climate in the NCAR CSM. J. Climate, 11 , 1472–1486.

  • Yeager, S. G., W. G. Large, J. J. Hack, and C. A. Shields, 2006: The low-resolution CCSM2. J. Climate, 19 , 2545–2566.

  • Zhang, J., D. Rothrock, and M. Steele, 2000: Recent changes in Arctic sea ice: The interplay between ice dynamics and thermodynamics. J. Climate, 13 , 3099–3114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 199 76 1
PDF Downloads 84 30 1