Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Soil Moisture Feedbacks to Precipitation in Southern Africa

Benjamin I. Cook Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia

Search for other papers by Benjamin I. Cook in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Gordon B. Bonan National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Gordon B. Bonan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Samuel Levis National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Samuel Levis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Sep 2006
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3856.1
Page(s):
4198–4206
Restricted access

Abstract

The effects of increased soil moisture on wet season (October–March) precipitation in southern Africa are investigated using the Community Climate System Model version 3 (CCSM3). In the CTRL case, soil moisture is allowed to interact dynamically with the atmosphere. In the MOIST case, soil moisture is set so that evapotranspiration is not limited by the supply of water. The MOIST scenario actually results in decreased precipitation over the region of perturbed soil moisture, compared to CTRL. The increased soil moisture alters the surface energy balance, resulting in a shift from sensible to latent heating. This manifests in two ways relevant for precipitation processes. First, the shift from sensible to latent heating cools the surface, causing a higher surface pressure, a reduced boundary layer height, and an increased vertical gradient in equivalent potential temperature. These changes are indicative of an increase in atmospheric stability, inhibiting vertical movement of air parcels and decreasing the ability of precipitation to form. Second, the surface changes induce anomalous surface divergence and increased subsidence. This causes a reduction in cloud cover and specific humidity above 700 hPa and results in a net decrease of column-integrated precipitable water, despite the increased surface water flux, indicating a reduction in moisture convergence. Based on this and a previous study, soil moisture may act as a negative feedback to precipitation in southern Africa, helping to buffer the system against any external forcing of precipitation (e.g., ENSO).

Corresponding author address: Benjamin Cook, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, 291 McCormick Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22903. Email: bc9z@virginia.edu

Abstract

The effects of increased soil moisture on wet season (October–March) precipitation in southern Africa are investigated using the Community Climate System Model version 3 (CCSM3). In the CTRL case, soil moisture is allowed to interact dynamically with the atmosphere. In the MOIST case, soil moisture is set so that evapotranspiration is not limited by the supply of water. The MOIST scenario actually results in decreased precipitation over the region of perturbed soil moisture, compared to CTRL. The increased soil moisture alters the surface energy balance, resulting in a shift from sensible to latent heating. This manifests in two ways relevant for precipitation processes. First, the shift from sensible to latent heating cools the surface, causing a higher surface pressure, a reduced boundary layer height, and an increased vertical gradient in equivalent potential temperature. These changes are indicative of an increase in atmospheric stability, inhibiting vertical movement of air parcels and decreasing the ability of precipitation to form. Second, the surface changes induce anomalous surface divergence and increased subsidence. This causes a reduction in cloud cover and specific humidity above 700 hPa and results in a net decrease of column-integrated precipitable water, despite the increased surface water flux, indicating a reduction in moisture convergence. Based on this and a previous study, soil moisture may act as a negative feedback to precipitation in southern Africa, helping to buffer the system against any external forcing of precipitation (e.g., ENSO).

Corresponding author address: Benjamin Cook, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, 291 McCormick Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22903. Email: bc9z@virginia.edu

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Anthes, R. A., 1984: Enhancement of precipitation by mesoscale variations in semiarid regions. J. Appl. Meteor., 23 , 541–554.

  • Bonan, G. B., K. W. Oleson, M. Vertenstein, S. Levis, X. Zeng, Y. Dai, R. E. Dickinson, and Z-L. Yang, 2002: The land surface climatology of the Community Land Model coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model. J. Climate, 15 , 3123–3149.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Charney, J. G., 1975: Dynamics of deserts and droughts in the Sahel. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 101 , 193–202.

  • Collins, W. D., and Coauthors, 2004: Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3). Tech. Note NCAR/TN-464+STR, 226 pp. [Available from the National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO, 80307-3000.].

  • Collins, W. D., and Coauthors, 2006: The formulation and atmospheric simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3). J. Climate, 19 , 2144–2161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cook, K. H., 1999: Generation of the African easterly jet and its role in determining West African precipitation. J. Climate, 12 , 1165–1184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dai, A., K. E. Trenberth, and T. R. Karl, 1999: Effects of clouds, soil moisture, precipitation, and water vapor on diurnal temperature range. J. Climate, 12 , 2451–2473.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dickinson, R. E., K. W. Oleson, G. Bonan, F. Hoffman, P. Thornton, M. Vertenstein, Z-L. Yang, and X. Zeng, 2006: The Community Land Model and its climate statistics as a component of the Community Climate System Model. J. Climate, 19 , 2302–2324.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • D’Odorico, P., and A. Porporato, 2004: Preferential states in soil moisture and climate dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101 , 8848–8851.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Douville, H., F. Chauvin, and H. Broqua, 2001: Influence of soil moisture on the Asian and African monsoons. Part I: Mean monsoon and daily precipitation. J. Climate, 14 , 2381–2403.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Eltahir, E. A. B., 1998: A soil moisture–rainfall feedback mechanism. 1. Theory and observations. Water Resour. Res., 34 , 765–776.

  • Fan, Y., and H. Van den Dool, 2004: Climate Prediction Center global monthly soil moisture data set at 0.5° resolution for 1948-present. J. Geophys. Res., 109 .D10102, doi:10.1029/2003JD004345.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Faucheareau, N., S. Trzaska, M. Rouault, and Y. Richard, 2003: Rainfall variability and changes in southern Africa during the 20th century in the global warming context. Nat. Hazards, 29 , 139–154.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Findell, K. L., and E. A. B. Eltahir, 2003: Atmospheric controls on soil moisture–boundary layer interactions. Part II: Feedbacks within the continental United States. J. Hydrometeor., 4 , 570–583.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hoerling, M., J. Hurrell, J. Eischeid, and A. Phillips, 2006: Detection and attribution of twentieth-century northern and southern African rainfall change. J. Climate, 19 , 3989–4008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hong, S. Y., and E. Kalnay, 2000: Role of sea surface temperature and soil-moisture feedback in the 1998 Oklahoma–Texas drought. Nature, 408 , 842–844.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jury, M. R., W. B. White, and C. J. C. Reason, 2004: Modelling the dominant climate signals around southern Africa. Climate Dyn., 23 , 717–726.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koster, R. D., M. J. Suarez, R. W. Higgins, and H. M. Van den Dool, 2003: Observational evidence that soil moisture variations affect precipitation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30 .1241, doi:10.1029/2002GL016571.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Levis, S., G. B. Bonan, and C. Bonfils, 2004: Soil feedback drives the mid-Holocene North African monsoon northward in fully coupled CCSM2 simulations with a dynamic vegetation model. Climate Dyn., 23 , 791–802.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mason, S. J., 2001: El Niño, climate change, and Southern African climate. Environmetrics, 12 , 327–345.

  • Mason, S. J., and M. R. Jury, 1997: Climate variability and change over southern Africa: A reflection on the underlying processes. Prog. Phys. Geogr., 21 , 23–50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mason, S. J., and P. D. Tyson, 2000: The occurrence and predictability of drought over southern Africa. Drought: A Global Assessment, D. A. Wilhite, Ed., Vol. 1, Routledge, 113–134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Meehl, G., 1994: Influence of the land surface in the Asian summer monsoon: External conditions versus internal feedbacks. J. Climate, 7 , 1033–1049.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • New, M., M. Hulme, and P. Jones, 2000: Representing twentieth-century space–time climate variability. Part II: Development of 1901–96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. J. Climate, 13 , 2217–2238.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • New, M., R. Washington, C. Jack, and B. Hewitson, 2003: Sensitivity of southern African climate to soil-moisture. CLIVAR Exchanges, No. 8, International CLIVAR Project Office, Southampton, United Kingdom, 45–47.

  • Nicholson, S., 2000: Land surface processes and Sahel climate. Rev. Geophys., 38 , 117–139.

  • Oglesby, R. J., and D. J. Erikson III, 1989: Soil moisture and the persistence of North American drought. J. Climate, 2 , 1362–1380.

  • Oleson, K. W., and Coauthors, 2004: Technical description of the Community Land Model (CLM). Tech. Note NCAR/TN-461+STR, 173 pp. [Available from the National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.].

  • Reason, C. J. C., and M. Rouault, 2002: ENSO-like decadal variability and South African rainfall. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29 .1638, doi:10.1029/2002GL014663.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Richard, Y., S. Trzaska, P. Roucou, and M. Rouault, 2000: Modification of the southern African rainfall variability/ENSO relationship since the late 1960s. Climate Dyn., 16 , 883–895.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Richard, Y., N. Fauchereau, I. Poccard, M. Rouault, and S. Trzaska, 2001: 20th century droughts in southern Africa: Spatial and temporal variability, teleconnections with oceanic and atmospheric conditions. Int. J. Climatol., 21 , 873–885.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Webster, P. J., 1987: The elementary monsoon. Monsoons, J. S. Fein and P. L. Stephens, Eds., John Wiley & Sons, 3–32.

  • Willmott, C. J., and K. Matsuura, cited. 2000: Terrestrial air temperature and precipitation: Monthly and annual climatologies. [Available online at http://climate.geog.udel.edu/~climate/html_pages/README.ghcn_clim2.html .].

  • Zeng, N., J. D. Neelin, K. M. Lau, and C. J. Tucker, 1999: Enhancement of interdecadal climate variability in the Sahel by vegetation interaction. Nature, 286 , 1537–1540.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1343 395 35
PDF Downloads 916 236 32