Constraining Climate Sensitivity from the Seasonal Cycle in Surface Temperature

Reto Knutti National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Reto Knutti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gerald A. Meehl National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Gerald A. Meehl in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Myles R. Allen Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Myles R. Allen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
David A. Stainforth Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by David A. Stainforth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The estimated range of climate sensitivity has remained unchanged for decades, resulting in large uncertainties in long-term projections of future climate under increased greenhouse gas concentrations. Here the multi-thousand-member ensemble of climate model simulations from the climateprediction.net project and a neural network are used to establish a relation between climate sensitivity and the amplitude of the seasonal cycle in regional temperature. Most models with high sensitivities are found to overestimate the seasonal cycle compared to observations. A probability density function for climate sensitivity is then calculated from the present-day seasonal cycle in reanalysis and instrumental datasets. Subject to a number of assumptions on the models and datasets used, it is found that climate sensitivity is very unlikely (5% probability) to be either below 1.5–2 K or above about 5–6.5 K, with the best agreement found for sensitivities between 3 and 3.5 K. This range is narrower than most probabilistic estimates derived from the observed twentieth-century warming. The current generation of general circulation models are within that range but do not sample the highest values.

* The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation

Corresponding author address: Reto Knutti, NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307. Email: knutti@ucar.edu

Abstract

The estimated range of climate sensitivity has remained unchanged for decades, resulting in large uncertainties in long-term projections of future climate under increased greenhouse gas concentrations. Here the multi-thousand-member ensemble of climate model simulations from the climateprediction.net project and a neural network are used to establish a relation between climate sensitivity and the amplitude of the seasonal cycle in regional temperature. Most models with high sensitivities are found to overestimate the seasonal cycle compared to observations. A probability density function for climate sensitivity is then calculated from the present-day seasonal cycle in reanalysis and instrumental datasets. Subject to a number of assumptions on the models and datasets used, it is found that climate sensitivity is very unlikely (5% probability) to be either below 1.5–2 K or above about 5–6.5 K, with the best agreement found for sensitivities between 3 and 3.5 K. This range is narrower than most probabilistic estimates derived from the observed twentieth-century warming. The current generation of general circulation models are within that range but do not sample the highest values.

* The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation

Corresponding author address: Reto Knutti, NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307. Email: knutti@ucar.edu

Save
  • Andronova, N. G., and M. E. Schlesinger, 2001: Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivity. J. Geophys. Res., 106 , D19. 2260522611.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Annan, J. D., J. C. Hargreaves, R. Ohgaito, A. Abe-Ouchi, and S. Emori, 2005: Efficiently constraining climate sensitivity with paleoclimate simulations. SOLA, 1 , 181184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Braganza, K., D. J. Karoly, A. C. Hirst, M. E. Mann, P. Stott, R. J. Stouffer, and S. F. B. Tett, 2003: Simple indices of global climate variability and change: Part I—Variability and correlation structure. Climate Dyn., 20 , 491502.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Charney, J. G., 1979: Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment. National Academy of Science, 22 pp.

  • Forest, C. E., P. H. Stone, A. P. Sokolov, M. R. Allen, and M. D. Webster, 2002: Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations. Science, 295 , 113117.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Forest, C. E., P. H. Stone, and A. P. Sokolov, 2006: Estimated PDFs of climate system properties including natural and anthropogenic forcings. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33 .L01705, doi:10.1029/2005GL023977.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frame, D. J., B. B. B. Booth, J. A. Kettleborough, D. A. Stainforth, J. M. Gregory, M. Collins, and M. R. Allen, 2005: Constraining climate forecasts: The role of prior assumptions. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32 .L09702, doi:10.1029/2004GL022241.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Giorgi, F., and R. Francisco, 2000: Uncertainties in regional climate change predictions. Climate Dyn., 16 , 169182.

  • Gregory, J. M., R. J. Stouffer, S. C. B. Raper, P. A. Stott, and N. A. Rayner, 2002: An observationally based estimate on the climate sensitivity. J. Climate, 15 , 31173121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hagan, M. T., and M. Menhaj, 1994: Training feedforward networks with the Marquart algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 5 , 989993.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hagan, M. T., H. B. Demuth, and M. H. Beale, 1996: Neural Network Design. PWS Publishing, 736 pp.

  • Hall, A., and X. Qu, 2006: Using the current seasonal cycle to constrain snow albedo feedback in future climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33 .L03502, doi:10.1029/2005GL025127.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hegerl, G. C., T. J. Crowley, W. T. Hyde, and D. J. Frame, 2006: Climate sensitivity constrained by temperature reconstructions over the past seven centuries. Nature, 440 , 10291032.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoffert, M. I., and C. Covey, 1992: Deriving global climate sensitivity from paleoclimate reconstructions. Nature, 360 , 573576.

  • Houghton, J. T., L. G. Meira Filho, B. A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg, and K. Maskell, and Eds., 1996: Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 572 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houghton, J. T., Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, and D. Xiaosu, and Eds., 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, 944 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, P. D., and A. Moberg, 2003: Hemispheric and large-scale surface air temperature variations: An extensive revision and an update to 2001. J. Climate, 16 , 206223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Metoer. Soc., 77 , 437471.

  • Knutti, R., T. F. Stocker, F. Joos, and G-K. Plattner, 2002: Constraints on radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate model ensembles. Nature, 416 , 719723.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knutti, R., T. F. Stocker, F. Joos, and G-K. Plattner, 2003: Probabilistic climate change projections using neural networks. Climate Dyn., 21 , 257272.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lea, D., 2004: The 100 000-yr cycle in tropical SST, greenhouse forcing, and climate sensitivity. J. Climate, 17 , 21702179.

  • Murphy, J. M., D. M. H. Sexton, D. N. Barnett, G. S. Jones, M. J. Webb, M. Collins, and D. A. Stainforth, 2004: Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature, 430 , 768772.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Myhre, G., E. J. Highwood, and K. P. Shine, 1998: New estimates of radiative forcing due to well mixed greenhouse gases. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25 , 27152718.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Piani, C., D. J. Frame, D. A. Stainforth, and M. R. Allen, 2005: Constraints on climate change from a multi-thousand member ensemble of simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32 .L23825, doi:10.1029/2005GL024452.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pope, V. D., M. L. Gallani, P. R. Rowntree, and R. A. Stratton, 2000: The impact of new physical parametrizations in the Hadley Centre climate model: HadAM3. Climate Dyn., 16 , 2–3. 123146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schneider von Deimling, T., H. Held, A. Ganopolski, and S. Rahmstorf, 2006: Climate sensitivity estimated from ensemble simulations of glacial climate. Climate Dyn., 27 , 149163.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simmons, A. J., and J. K. Gibson, 2000: The ERA-40 project plan. ERA-40 Project Rep. Series 1, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting, Reading, United Kingdom, 63 pp.

  • Stainforth, D. A., and Coauthors, 2005: Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature, 433 , 403406.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stott, P. A., and J. A. Kettleborough, 2002: Origins and estimates of uncertainty in predictions of twenty-first century temperature rise. Nature, 416 , 723726.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wigley, T. M. L., and S. C. B. Raper, 2001: Interpretation of high projections for global-mean warming. Science, 293 , 451454.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1347 668 50
PDF Downloads 1341 515 43