Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Evaluation of the Multiscale Modeling Framework Using Data from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program

Mikhail Ovtchinnikov Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

Search for other papers by Mikhail Ovtchinnikov in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Thomas Ackerman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

Search for other papers by Thomas Ackerman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Roger Marchand Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

Search for other papers by Roger Marchand in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Marat Khairoutdinov Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Marat Khairoutdinov in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 May 2006
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3699.1
Page(s):
1716–1729
Restricted access

Abstract

In a recently developed approach to climate modeling, called the multiscale modeling framework (MMF), a two-dimensional cloud-resolving model (CRM) is embedded into each grid column of the Community Atmospheric Model (CAM), replacing traditional cloud and radiation parameterizations. This study presents an evaluation of the MMF through a comparison of its output with the output from the CAM and with data from two observational sites operated by the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program, one at the Southern Great Plains (SGP) in Oklahoma and one at the island of Nauru in the tropical western Pacific (TWP) region.

Two sets of one-year-long simulations are considered: one using climatological sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and another using 1999 SST. Each set includes a run with the MMF as well as a CAM run with traditional or standard cloud and radiation treatments. Time series of cloud fraction, precipitation intensity, and downwelling solar radiation flux at the surface are analyzed. For the TWP site, the distributions of these variables from the MMF run are shown to be more consistent with observation than those from the CAM run. This change is attributed to the improved representation of convective clouds in the MMF compared to the conventional climate model. For the SGP, the MMF shows little to no improvement in predicting the same quantities. Possible causes of this lack of improvement are discussed.

Corresponding author address: Mikhail Ovtchinnikov, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352. Email: mikhail@pnl.gov

Abstract

In a recently developed approach to climate modeling, called the multiscale modeling framework (MMF), a two-dimensional cloud-resolving model (CRM) is embedded into each grid column of the Community Atmospheric Model (CAM), replacing traditional cloud and radiation parameterizations. This study presents an evaluation of the MMF through a comparison of its output with the output from the CAM and with data from two observational sites operated by the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program, one at the Southern Great Plains (SGP) in Oklahoma and one at the island of Nauru in the tropical western Pacific (TWP) region.

Two sets of one-year-long simulations are considered: one using climatological sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and another using 1999 SST. Each set includes a run with the MMF as well as a CAM run with traditional or standard cloud and radiation treatments. Time series of cloud fraction, precipitation intensity, and downwelling solar radiation flux at the surface are analyzed. For the TWP site, the distributions of these variables from the MMF run are shown to be more consistent with observation than those from the CAM run. This change is attributed to the improved representation of convective clouds in the MMF compared to the conventional climate model. For the SGP, the MMF shows little to no improvement in predicting the same quantities. Possible causes of this lack of improvement are discussed.

Corresponding author address: Mikhail Ovtchinnikov, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352. Email: mikhail@pnl.gov

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Ackerman, T. P., and G. M. Stokes, 2003: The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program. Phys. Today, 56 , 38–44.

  • Blackmon, M., and Coauthors, 2001: The Community Climate System Model. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 82 , 2357–2376.

  • Briegleb, B. P., 1992: Delta-Eddington approximation for solar radiation in the NCAR Community Climate Model. J. Geophys. Res., 97 , 7603–7612.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Clothiaux, E. E., T. P. Ackerman, G. G. Mace, K. P. Moran, R. T. Marchand, M. A. Miller, and B. E. Martner, 2000: Objective determination of cloud heights and radar reflectivities using a combination of active remote sensors at the ARM CART sites. J. Appl. Meteor., 39 , 645–665.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Collins, W. D., 2001: Parameterization of generalized cloud overlap for radiative calculations in general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci., 58 , 3224–3242.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Grabowski, W. W., 2001: Coupling cloud processes with the large-scale dynamics using the cloud-resolving convection parameterization (CRCP). J. Atmos. Sci., 58 , 978–997.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Groisman, P. Y., and Coauthors, 1999: Changes in the probability of heavy precipitation: Important indicators of climatic change. Climatic Change, 42 , 243–283.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Khairoutdinov, M. F., and D. A. Randall, 2001: A cloud resolving model as a cloud parameterization in the NCAR Community Climate Model: Preliminary results. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28 , 3617–3620.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Khairoutdinov, M. F., D. A. Randall, and C. DeMott, 2005: Simulations of the atmospheric general circulation using a cloud-resolving model as a super-parameterization of physical processes. J. Atmos. Sci., 62 , 2136–2154.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lin, W. Y., and M. H. Zhang, 2004: Evaluation of clouds and their radiative effects simulated by the NCAR Community Atmospheric Model against satellite observations. J. Climate, 17 , 3302–3318.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McFarlane, S. A., C. N. Long, and D. M. Flynn, 2005: Impact of island-induced clouds on surface measurements: Analysis of the ARM Nauru Island Effect Study data. J. Appl. Meteor., 44 , 1045–1065.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ramanathan, V., and P. Downey, 1986: A nonisothermal emissivity and absorptivity formulation for water vapor. J. Geophys. Res., 91 , 8649–8666.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Randall, D., M. Khairoutdinov, A. Arakawa, and W. Grabowski, 2003: Breaking the cloud parameterizations deadlock. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84 , 1547–1564.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rasch, P. J., and J. E. Kristjánsson, 1998: A comparison of the CCM3 model climate using diagnosed and predicted condensate parameterizations. J. Climate, 11 , 1587–1614.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Slingo, J. M., 1987: The development and verification of a cloud prediction scheme for the ECMWF model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 113 , 899–927.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Williamson, D. L., and J. G. Olson, 1994: Climate simulations with a semi-Lagrangian version of the NCAR community climate model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122 , 1594–1610.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 468 309 28
PDF Downloads 108 43 5