Precipitation Recycling Variability and Ecoclimatological Stability—A Study Using NARR Data. Part I: Central U.S. Plains Ecoregion

Francina Dominguez Environmental Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois

Search for other papers by Francina Dominguez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Praveen Kumar Environmental Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois

Search for other papers by Praveen Kumar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

Precipitation recycling is one of the key mechanisms linking the land surface and atmospheric dynamics. This work explores the physical mechanisms that modulate precipitation recycling variability at the daily-to-intraseasonal time scales in the central U.S. plains ecoregion using a set of land–atmosphere variables derived from the North American Regional Reanalysis dataset. Recycling estimates are performed using the Dynamic Recycling Model, which allows for analysis at shorter time scales than the previous bulk recycling models.

In the central U.S. plains ecoregion local evapotranspiration only becomes an important contributor to precipitation when moisture of advective origin, the largest contributor to precipitation, diminishes. Consequently, the recycling ratio is negatively correlated to precipitation. The dominant mechanism is a negative feedback, which ensures that, even when precipitation is low, evapotranspiration continues to feed moisture into the overlying atmosphere and contribute to rainfall. Consequently, in the central U.S. plains, precipitation recycling acts as a mechanism for ecoclimatological stability through local negative feedbacks. Additionally, the zonal and meridional winds and moisture fluxes were also found to be important drivers of recycling variability. As winds decrease, the air has more time to traverse the region and capture moisture of evaporative origin. Evapotranspiration variability is not an important driver for recycling ratio variability in the central U.S. plains. Only during the extremely dry 1988 summer drought, when soil moisture storage was depleted, did the recycling ratio variability closely follow evapotranspiration.

* Current affiliation: Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

Corresponding author address: Praveen Kumar, Environmental Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 205 N. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801. Email: kumar1@uic.edu

Abstract

Precipitation recycling is one of the key mechanisms linking the land surface and atmospheric dynamics. This work explores the physical mechanisms that modulate precipitation recycling variability at the daily-to-intraseasonal time scales in the central U.S. plains ecoregion using a set of land–atmosphere variables derived from the North American Regional Reanalysis dataset. Recycling estimates are performed using the Dynamic Recycling Model, which allows for analysis at shorter time scales than the previous bulk recycling models.

In the central U.S. plains ecoregion local evapotranspiration only becomes an important contributor to precipitation when moisture of advective origin, the largest contributor to precipitation, diminishes. Consequently, the recycling ratio is negatively correlated to precipitation. The dominant mechanism is a negative feedback, which ensures that, even when precipitation is low, evapotranspiration continues to feed moisture into the overlying atmosphere and contribute to rainfall. Consequently, in the central U.S. plains, precipitation recycling acts as a mechanism for ecoclimatological stability through local negative feedbacks. Additionally, the zonal and meridional winds and moisture fluxes were also found to be important drivers of recycling variability. As winds decrease, the air has more time to traverse the region and capture moisture of evaporative origin. Evapotranspiration variability is not an important driver for recycling ratio variability in the central U.S. plains. Only during the extremely dry 1988 summer drought, when soil moisture storage was depleted, did the recycling ratio variability closely follow evapotranspiration.

* Current affiliation: Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

Corresponding author address: Praveen Kumar, Environmental Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 205 N. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801. Email: kumar1@uic.edu

Save
  • Allen, M. R., and A. W. Robertson, 1996: Distinguishing modulated oscillations from coloured noise in multivariate datasets. Climate Dyn., 12 , 775784.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allen, M. R., and L. A. Smith, 1996: Monte Carlo SSA: Detecting irregular oscillations in the presence of colored noise. J. Climate, 9 , 33733404.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnston, A., and P. T. Schickedanz, 1984: The effect of irrigation on warm season precipitation in the southern Great Plains. J. Appl. Meteor., 23 , 865888.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Benke, A. C., and C. E. Cushing, 2005: Rivers of North America. Elsevier/Academic Press, 1144 pp.

  • Berbery, E. H., Y. Luo, K. E. Mitchell, and A. K. Betts, 2003: Eta model estimated land surface processes and the hydrologic cycle of the Mississippi basin. J. Geophys. Res., 108 .8852, doi:10.1029/2002JD003192.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Betts, A. K., J. H. Ball, A. C. M. Beljaars, M. J. Miller, and P. A. Viterbo, 1996: The land surface–atmosphere interaction: A review based on observational and global modeling perspectives. J. Geophys. Res., 101 , 72097225.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bosilovich, M. G., 2003: On the vertical distribution of local and remote sources of water for precipitation. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 80 , 3141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bosilovich, M. G., and S. D. Schubert, 2001: Precipitation recycling over the central United States diagnosed from the GEOS-1 data assimilation system. J. Hydrometeor., 2 , 2635.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bosilovich, M. G., and S. D. Schubert, 2002: Water vapor tracers as diagnostics of the regional hydrologic cycle. J. Hydrometeor., 3 , 149165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bosilovich, M. G., and J. Chern, 2006: Simulation of water sources and precipitation recycling for the MacKenzie, Mississippi, and Amazon River basins. J. Hydrometeor., 7 , 312329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bosilovich, M. G., Y. C. Sud, S. D. Schubert, and G. K. Walker, 2003: Numerical simulation of the large-scale North American monsoon water sources. J. Geophys. Res., 108 .8614, doi:10.1029/2002JD003095.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Broomhead, D. S., and G. P. King, 1986: On the qualitative analysis of experimental dynamical systems. Nonlinear Phenom. Chaos, 11 , 25302555.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brubaker, K. L., D. Entekhabi, and P. S. Eagleson, 1993: Estimation of continental precipitation recycling. J. Climate, 6 , 10771089.

  • Brubaker, K. L., P. A. Dirmeyer, A. Sudradjat, B. S. Levy, and F. Bernal, 2001: A 36-yr climatological description of the evaporative sources of warm-season precipitation in the Mississippi River basin. J. Hydrometeor., 2 , 537557.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burde, G. I., 2006: Bulk recycling models with incomplete vertical mixing. Part I: Conceptual framework and models. J. Climate, 19 , 14611472.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burde, G. I., and A. Zangvil, 2001: The estimation of regional precipitation recycling. Part I: Review of recycling models. J. Climate, 14 , 24972508.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burde, G. I., C. Gandush, and Y. Bayarjargal, 2006: Bulk recycling models with incomplete vertical mixing. Part II: Precipitation recycling in the Amazon Basin. J. Climate, 19 , 14731489.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CEC, 1997: Ecological regions of North America. Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Montreal, Canada, 71 pp.

  • De Ridder, K., 1998: The impact of vegetation cover on Sahelian drought persistence. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 88 , 307321.

  • Dirmeyer, P. A., and K. L. Brubaker, 1999: Contrasting evaporative moisture sources during the drought of 1988 and the flood of 1993. J. Geophys. Res., 104 , 1938319397.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dirmeyer, P. A., and K. L. Brubaker, 2007: Characterization of the global hydrologic cycle from a back-trajectory analysis of atmospheric water vapor. J. Hydrometeor., 8 , 2037.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dominguez, F., P. Kumar, X. Liang, and M. Ting, 2006: Impact of atmospheric moisture storage on precipitation recycling. J. Climate, 19 , 15131530.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dominguez, F., P. Kumar, and E. R. Vivoni, 2008: Precipitation recycling variability and ecoclimatological stability—A study using NARR data. Part II: North American monsoon region. J. Climate, 21 , 51875203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ek, M., and A. A. M. Holtslag, 2004: Influence of soil moisture on boundary layer cloud development. J. Hydrometeor., 5 , 8699.

  • Eltahir, E. A. B., and R. L. Bras, 1994: Precipitation recycling in the Amazon basin. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 120 , 861880.

  • Eltahir, E. A. B., and R. L. Bras, 1996: Precipitation recycling. Rev. Geophys., 34 , 367378.

  • Findell, K. L., and E. A. B. Eltahir, 2003: Atmospheric controls on soil moisture–boundary layer interactions. Part I: Framework development. J. Hydrometeor., 4 , 552569.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ghil, M., and Coauthors, 2002: Advanced spectral methods for Climatic time series. Rev. Geophys., 40 .1003, doi:10.1029/2000RG000092.

  • Giorgi, F., L. O. Mearns, C. Shields, and L. Mayer, 1996: A regional model study of the importance of local versus remote controls of the 1988 drought and the 1993 flood over the central United States. J. Climate, 9 , 11501168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, J., H. M. van den Dool, and K. P. Georgakakos, 1996: Analysis of model-calculated soil moisture over the United States (1931–1993) and applications to long-range temperature forecasts. J. Climate, 9 , 13501362.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keppenne, C. L., 1995: An ENSO signal in soybean future prices. J. Climate, 8 , 16851689.

  • Mesinger, F., and Coauthors, 2006: North American Regional Reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87 , 343360.

  • Nigam, S., and A. Ruiz-Barradas, 2006: Seasonal hydroclimate variability over North America in global and regional reanalyses and AMIP simulations: Varied representation. J. Climate, 19 , 815837.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Plaut, G., and R. Vautard, 1994: Spells of low-frequency oscillations and weather regimes in the Northern Hemisphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 51 , 210236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Quian, B., H. Xu, and J. Corte-Real, 2000: Spatial-temporal structures of quasi-periodic oscillations in precipitation over Europe. Int. J. Climatol., 20 , 15831598.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rabin, R., 1977: The surface energy budget of a summer convective period. M.S. thesis, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, 125 pp.

  • Ruiz-Barradas, A., and S. Nigam, 2006: Great Plains hydroclimate variability: The view from North American Regional Reanalysis. J. Climate, 19 , 30043010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Salvucci, G. D., J. A. Saleem, and R. Kaufmann, 2002: Investigating soil moisture feedbacks on precipitation with tests of Granger causality. Adv. Water. Res., 22 , 13051312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tucker, C., J. Pinzon, M. Brown, D. Slayback, E. Pak, R. Mahoney, E. Vermote, and N. El Saleous, 2005: An extended AVHRR 8-km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data. Int. J. Remote Sens., 26 , 44854498.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van den Dool, H. M., J. Huang, and Y. Fan, 2003: Performance and analysis of the constructed analogue method applied to U.S. soil moisture over 1981–2001. J. Geophys. Res., 108 .8617, doi:10.1029/2002JD003114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vautard, P., R. Yiou, and M. Ghil, 1992: Singular-spectrum analysis: A toolkit for short, noisy chaotic signals. Phys. D, 58 , 95126.

  • Zangvil, A., D. H. Portis, and P. J. Lamb, 2001: Investigation of the large-scale atmospheric moisture field over the midwestern United States in relation to summer precipitation. Part I: Relationship between moisture budget components on different time scales. J. Climate, 14 , 582597.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zangvil, A., D. H. Portis, and P. J. Lamb, 2004: Investigation of the large-scale atmospheric moisture field over the midwestern United States in relation to summer precipitation. Part II: Recycling of local evapotranspiration and association with soil moisture and crop yields. J. Climate, 17 , 32833301.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, X., J. Sheng, and A. Shabbar, 1998: Modes of interannual and interdecadal variability of Pacific SST. J. Climate, 11 , 25562569.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1188 676 91
PDF Downloads 431 88 9