Impact of Greenhouse Gas Concentration Changes on Surface Energetics in IPSL-CM4: Regional Warming Patterns, Land–Sea Warming Ratios, and Glacial–Interglacial Differences

Alexandre Laîné LSCE/IPSL, UMR CEA-CNRS-UVSQ 1572, Saclay, France

Search for other papers by Alexandre Laîné in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Masa Kageyama LSCE/IPSL, UMR CEA-CNRS-UVSQ 1572, Saclay, France

Search for other papers by Masa Kageyama in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pascale Braconnot LSCE/IPSL, UMR CEA-CNRS-UVSQ 1572, Saclay, France

Search for other papers by Pascale Braconnot in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ramdane Alkama LSCE/IPSL, UMR CEA-CNRS-UVSQ 1572, Saclay, France

Search for other papers by Ramdane Alkama in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

The temperature response to a greenhouse gas (GHG) concentration change is studied in an ocean–atmosphere coupled model—L’Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace Coupled Model, version 4 (IPSL-CM4)—for both a glacial and an interglacial context. The response to a GHG concentration changing from Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) to preindustrial values is similar for both climatic contexts in terms of temperature pattern, but the magnitude is greater under modern ones. The model simulates the classical amplification of the temperature response in the northern high latitudes compared to lower latitudes and over the land surfaces compared to the ocean.

The physical reasons for the differential warming according to the latitude and to the surface type are studied through an analysis of the energy flux changes, which are decomposed to consider and quantify many different physical processes. The results highlight the role of many different factors in the thermal response to a GHG forcing for different regions, and stress, for instance, the large effect of increased water vapor concentration in the atmosphere. Concerning the land–sea warming ratio, several fluxes contribute to the final value of the ratio, with latent flux having the greatest influence. The different contributions are quantified. The comparison of the flux changes between the interglacial and glacial contexts shows that the differences are more than a simple effect of different surface emissions of the base state. It suggests that the climatic context is particularly important for the cloud and oceanic advection responses to the forcing, along with albedo effects.

Corresponding author address: Alexandre Laîné, LSCE/IPSL, UMR CEA-CNRS-UVSQ 1572, CE Saclay, L’Orme des Merisiers, Bâtiment 701, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette CEDEX, France. Email: alexandre.laine@lsce.ipsl.fr

Abstract

The temperature response to a greenhouse gas (GHG) concentration change is studied in an ocean–atmosphere coupled model—L’Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace Coupled Model, version 4 (IPSL-CM4)—for both a glacial and an interglacial context. The response to a GHG concentration changing from Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) to preindustrial values is similar for both climatic contexts in terms of temperature pattern, but the magnitude is greater under modern ones. The model simulates the classical amplification of the temperature response in the northern high latitudes compared to lower latitudes and over the land surfaces compared to the ocean.

The physical reasons for the differential warming according to the latitude and to the surface type are studied through an analysis of the energy flux changes, which are decomposed to consider and quantify many different physical processes. The results highlight the role of many different factors in the thermal response to a GHG forcing for different regions, and stress, for instance, the large effect of increased water vapor concentration in the atmosphere. Concerning the land–sea warming ratio, several fluxes contribute to the final value of the ratio, with latent flux having the greatest influence. The different contributions are quantified. The comparison of the flux changes between the interglacial and glacial contexts shows that the differences are more than a simple effect of different surface emissions of the base state. It suggests that the climatic context is particularly important for the cloud and oceanic advection responses to the forcing, along with albedo effects.

Corresponding author address: Alexandre Laîné, LSCE/IPSL, UMR CEA-CNRS-UVSQ 1572, CE Saclay, L’Orme des Merisiers, Bâtiment 701, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette CEDEX, France. Email: alexandre.laine@lsce.ipsl.fr

Save
  • Alkama, M. R., M. Kageyama, G. Ramstein, O. Marti, P. Ribstein, and D. Swingedouw, 2008: Impact of a realistic river routing in coupled ocean-atmosphere simulations of the Last Glacial Maximum climate. Climate Dyn., 30 , 855869.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Braconnot, P., and Coauthors, 2007a: Results of PMIP2 coupled simulations of the Mid-Holocene and Last Glacial Maximum—Part 1: Experiments and large-scale features. Climate Past, 3 , 261277.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Braconnot, P., and Coauthors, 2007b: Results of PMIP2 coupled simulations of the Mid-Holocene and Last Glacial Maximum—Part 2: Feedbacks with emphasis on the location of the ITCZ and mid- and high latitudes heat budget. Climate Past, 3 , 261277.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cai, M., 2005: Dynamical amplification of polar warming. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32 , L22710. doi:10.1029/2005GL024481.

  • Crucifix, M., 2006: Does the Last Glacial Maximum constrain climate sensitivity? Geophys. Res. Lett., 33 , L18701. doi:10.1029/2006GL027137.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, A., 2004: The role of surface albedo feedback in climate. J. Climate, 17 , 15501568.

  • Held, I. M., and B. J. Soden, 2006: Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Climate, 19 , 56865699.

  • Holland, M. M., and C. M. Bitz, 2003: Polar amplification of climate change in coupled models. Climate Dyn., 21 , 221232.

  • Hourdin, F., and Coauthors, 2006: The LMDZ4 general circulation model: Climate performance and sensitivity to parameterized physics with emphasis on tropical convection. Climate Dyn., 27 , 787813.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kim, S., 2004: The effect of atmospheric CO2 and ice sheet topography on LGM climate. Climate Dyn., 22 , 639651.

  • Marti, O., and Coauthors, 2006: The new IPSL climate system model: IPSL-CM4. IPSL Note du Pôle de Modélisation 26, 332 pp. [Available online at http://dods.ipsl.jussieu.fr/omamce/IPSLCM4/DocIPSLCM4/HTML/].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Masson-Delmotte, V., and Coauthors, 2005: Past and future polar amplification of climate change: Climate model intercomparisons and ice-core constraints. Climate Dyn., 26 , 513529. doi:10.1007/s00382-005-0081-9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Otto-Bliesner, B. L., E. C. Brady, G. Clauzet, R. Tomas, S. Levis, and Z. Kothavala, 2006: Last Glacial Maximum and Holocene climate in CCSM3. J. Climate, 19 , 25262544.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peixoto, J., and A. H. Oort, 1992: Physics of Climate. American Institute of Physics, 520 pp.

  • Peltier, W. R., 2004: Global glacial isostasy and the surface of the ice-age Earth: The ICE-5G (VM2) model and GRACE. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 32 , 111149. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.32.082503.144359.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ramstein, G., Y. Serafini-Le Treut, H. Le Treut, M. Forichon, and S. Joussaume, 1998: Cloud processes associated with past and future climate changes. Climate Dyn., 14 , 233247.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shin, S., Z. Liu, B. Otto-Bliesner, E. Brady, J. Kutzbach, and S. Harrison, 2003: A simulation of the Last Glacial Maximum climate using the NCAR-CCSM. Climate Dyn., 20 , 127151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H. L. Miller, Eds. 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, 996 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sutton, R. T., B. Dong, and J. M. Gregory, 2007: Land/sea warming ratio in response to climate change: IPCC AR4 model results and comparison with observations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34 , L02701. doi:10.1029/2006GL028164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Swingedouw, D., P. Braconnot, P. Delecluse, E. Guilyardi, and O. Marti, 2007: Quantifying the AMOC feedbacks during a 2 × CO2 stabilization experiment with land-ice melting. Climate Dyn., 29 , 521534.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weaver, A. J., M. Eby, A. F. Fanning, and E. C. Wiebe, 1998: Simulated influence of carbon dioxide, orbital forcing and ice sheets on the climate of the Last Glacial Maximum. Nature, 394 , 847853.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 681 294 97
PDF Downloads 207 23 6