The Global Hydrological Cycle and Atmospheric Shortwave Absorption in Climate Models under CO2 Forcing

Ken Takahashi Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Program, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Ken Takahashi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The spread among the predictions by climate models for the strengthening of the global hydrological cycle [i.e., the global mean surface latent heat flux (LH), or, equivalently, precipitation] at a given level of CO2-induced global warming is of the same magnitude as the intermodel mean. By comparing several climate models from the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3 (CMIP3) database under idealized CO2 forcings, it is shown that differences in the increase in global atmospheric shortwave heating (SWabs) induced by clear-sky absorption, presumably by water vapor, partly explains this spread. The increases in SWabs and LH present similar spreads across models but are anticorrelated, so the sum SWabs + LH increases more robustly than either alone. This is consistent with a recently proposed theory (Takahashi) that predicts that this sum (or, equivalently, the net longwave divergence minus the surface sensible heat flux) is constrained by energy conservation and robust longwave physics.

The intermodel scatter in SWabs changes is explained neither by differences in the radiative transfer models nor in intermodel differences in global water vapor content change, but perhaps by more subtle aspects of the changes in the water vapor distribution. Nevertheless, the fact that the radiative transfer models generally underestimate the increase in SWabs relative to the corresponding line-by-line calculation for a given change in water vapor content suggests that the climate models might be overestimating the rate of increase in the global hydrological cycle with global warming.

Corresponding author address: Ken Takahashi, Calle Badajoz 169, Instituto Geofísico del Perú, Lima 3, Peru. Email: ktakahashi@geo.igp.gob.pe

Abstract

The spread among the predictions by climate models for the strengthening of the global hydrological cycle [i.e., the global mean surface latent heat flux (LH), or, equivalently, precipitation] at a given level of CO2-induced global warming is of the same magnitude as the intermodel mean. By comparing several climate models from the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3 (CMIP3) database under idealized CO2 forcings, it is shown that differences in the increase in global atmospheric shortwave heating (SWabs) induced by clear-sky absorption, presumably by water vapor, partly explains this spread. The increases in SWabs and LH present similar spreads across models but are anticorrelated, so the sum SWabs + LH increases more robustly than either alone. This is consistent with a recently proposed theory (Takahashi) that predicts that this sum (or, equivalently, the net longwave divergence minus the surface sensible heat flux) is constrained by energy conservation and robust longwave physics.

The intermodel scatter in SWabs changes is explained neither by differences in the radiative transfer models nor in intermodel differences in global water vapor content change, but perhaps by more subtle aspects of the changes in the water vapor distribution. Nevertheless, the fact that the radiative transfer models generally underestimate the increase in SWabs relative to the corresponding line-by-line calculation for a given change in water vapor content suggests that the climate models might be overestimating the rate of increase in the global hydrological cycle with global warming.

Corresponding author address: Ken Takahashi, Calle Badajoz 169, Instituto Geofísico del Perú, Lima 3, Peru. Email: ktakahashi@geo.igp.gob.pe

Save
  • Allen, M. R., and W. J. Ingram, 2002: Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature, 419 , 224–232.

  • Bony, S., and J-L. Dufresne, 2005: Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32 , L20806. doi:10.1029/2005GL023851.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collins, W. D., and Coauthors, 2006a: Radiative forcing by well-mixed greenhouse gases: Estimates from climate models in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). J. Geophys. Res., 111 , D14317. doi:10.1029/2005JD006713.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collins, W. D., J. M. Lee-Taylor, D. P. Edwards, and G. L. Francis, 2006b: Effects of increased near-infrared absorption by water vapor on the climate system. J. Geophys. Res., 111 , D18109. doi:10.1029/2005JD006796.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Forster, P. M. F., and K. E. Taylor, 2006: Climate forcings and climate sensitivities diagnosed from coupled climate model integrations. J. Climate, 19 , 6181–6194.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gregory, J. M., and Coauthors, 2004: A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31 , L03205. doi:10.1029/2003GL018747.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hansen, J., and Coauthors, 2005: Efficacy of climate forcings. J. Geophys. Res., 110 , D18104. doi:10.1029/2005JD005776.

  • Held, I. M., and B. J. Soden, 2000: Water vapor feedback and global warming. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ., 25 , 441–475.

  • Held, I. M., and B. J. Soden, 2006: Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Climate, 19 , 5686–5699.

  • Kiehl, J. T., and K. E. Trenberth, 1997: Earth’s annual global mean energy budget. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78 , 197–208.

  • Lambert, F. H., and M. J. Webb, 2008: Dependency of global mean precipitation on surface temperature. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35 , L16706. doi:10.1029/2008GL034838.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meehl, G. A., C. Covey, T. Delworth, M. Latif, B. McAvaney, J. F. B. Mitchell, R. J. Stouffer, and K. E. Taylor, 2007: The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset: A new era in climate change research. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88 , 1383–1394.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, J. F. B., C. A. Wilson, and W. M. Cunnington, 1989: On CO2 climate sensitivity and model dependence of results. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 113 , 293–322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Soden, B. J., and I. M. Held, 2006: An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean–atmosphere models. J. Climate, 19 , 3354–3360.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Soden, B. J., I. M. Held, R. Colman, K. M. Shell, J. T. Kiehl, and C. A. Shields, 2008: Quantifying climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. J. Climate, 21 , 3504–3520.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Takahashi, K., 2009: Radiative constraints on the hydrological cycle in an idealized radiative–convective equilibrium model. J. Atmos. Sci., 66 , 77–91.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wentz, F. J., L. Ricciardulli, K. Hilburn, and C. Mears, 2007: How much more rain will global warming bring? Science, 317 , 233–235.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wild, M., C. N. Long, and A. Ohmura, 2006: Evaluation of clear-sky solar fluxes in GCMs participating in AMIP and IPCC-AR4 from a surface perspective. J. Geophys. Res., 111 , D01104. doi:10.1029/2005JD006118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williams, K. D., W. J. Ingram, and J. M. Gregory, 2008: Time variation of effective climate sensitivity in GCMs. J. Climate, 21 , 5076–5090.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1721 858 228
PDF Downloads 271 62 8