Investigating Possible Links between Incoming Cosmic Ray Fluxes and Lightning Activity over the United States

Themis G. Chronis Hellenic Center for Marine Research, Anavissos, Attika, Greece

Search for other papers by Themis G. Chronis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

During the past two decades, particular scientific attention has been drawn to the potential cosmic ray–atmospheric coupling. Galactic cosmic rays reaching the upper troposphere are suggested as the key modulators of the global electric circuit, with further implications on cloud microphysical processes. Unfortunately, the scarcity of the associated observations renders the evaluation of the theoretical mechanisms rather difficult. This contribution proposes a different approach by introducing observations provided by the National Lightning Detection Network for the period 1990–2005. The study area encompasses the greater part of continental United States and the surrounding waters. The results highlight a statistically significant positive trend between monthly lightning activity and galactic cosmic ray fluxes during the winter season. During the summer season, the trend becomes statistically nonsignificant. In addition, the featured analysis introduces a technique to assess the potential impact of Forbush events on daily lightning activity. Results illustrate that lightning activity may be responsive (minimized) 4–5 days after a Forbush event.

Corresponding author address: Themis G. Chronis, Hellenic Center for Marine Research, 46.7 km Athens, Sounio Ave., P.O. Box 712, P.C.19013 Anavyssos, Attika, Greece. Email: themis@ath.hcmr.gr

Abstract

During the past two decades, particular scientific attention has been drawn to the potential cosmic ray–atmospheric coupling. Galactic cosmic rays reaching the upper troposphere are suggested as the key modulators of the global electric circuit, with further implications on cloud microphysical processes. Unfortunately, the scarcity of the associated observations renders the evaluation of the theoretical mechanisms rather difficult. This contribution proposes a different approach by introducing observations provided by the National Lightning Detection Network for the period 1990–2005. The study area encompasses the greater part of continental United States and the surrounding waters. The results highlight a statistically significant positive trend between monthly lightning activity and galactic cosmic ray fluxes during the winter season. During the summer season, the trend becomes statistically nonsignificant. In addition, the featured analysis introduces a technique to assess the potential impact of Forbush events on daily lightning activity. Results illustrate that lightning activity may be responsive (minimized) 4–5 days after a Forbush event.

Corresponding author address: Themis G. Chronis, Hellenic Center for Marine Research, 46.7 km Athens, Sounio Ave., P.O. Box 712, P.C.19013 Anavyssos, Attika, Greece. Email: themis@ath.hcmr.gr

Save
  • Bazilevskaya, G. A., 2000: Observations of variability in cosmic rays. Space Sci. Rev., 94 , 2538.

  • Brooks, C. F. P., 1934: The variation of the annual frequency of thunderstorms in relation to sunspots. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 60 , 153165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carslaw, K. S., R. G. Harrison, and J. Kirkby, 2002: Cosmic rays, clouds and climate. Science, 298 , 17321737.

  • Christian, H. J., and Coauthors, 2003: Global frequency and distribution of lightning as observed from space by the Optical Transient Detector. J. Geophys. Res., 108 , 4005. doi:10.1029/2002JD002347.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cummins, K. L., E. A. Bardo, W. L. Hiscox, R. B. Pyle, and A. E. Pifer, 1995: A combined TOA/MDF technology upgrade of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network. Proc. Int. Aerospace and Ground Conference on Lightning and Static Electricity, Williamsburg, VA, U.S. Navy Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, 72.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cummins, K. L., E. P. Krider, and M. D. Malone, 1998: The U.S. National Lightning Detection Network and applications of cloud-to-ground lightning by electric power utilities. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., 40 , 465480.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ely, J. T. A., 1984: Cosmic rays, solar activity, magnetic coupling and lightning incidence. NASA Tech. Memo. NAS8-33884, 17 pp.

  • Goodman, S. J., 2003: Atmospheric electrical activity and the prospects for improving short-term weather forecasting, Preprints, 12th Int. Conf. on Atmospheric Electricity, Versailles, France, The International Commission on Atmospheric Electricity (ICAE).

  • Goodman, S. J., 2008: Geostationary Lightning Mapper for GOES-R and beyond. Preprints, Fifth GOES Users’ Conf., New Orleans, LA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 2.3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harrison, R. G., 2004: The global atmospheric electrical circuit and climate. Surv. Geophys., 25 , 441484.

  • Harrison, R. G., and K. S. Carslaw, 2003: Ion-aerosol cloud processes in the lower atmosphere. Rev. Geophys., 41 , 126.

  • Herman, J. R., and R. A. Goldberg, 1978: Sun, weather and climate. NASA SP-426, 11 pp.

  • Kniveton, D. R., and M. C. Todd, 2001: On the relationship of cosmic ray flux and precipitation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28 , 15271530.

  • Lethbridge, M. D., 1981: Cosmic rays and thunderstorm frequency. Geophys Res. Lett., 8 , 521.

  • Markson, R., 1983: Solar modulation of fair weather and thunderstorm electrification and a proposed program to test an atmospheric electrical sun–weather mechanism. Weather and Climate Responses to Solar Variations, B. M. McCormac, Ed., Colorado Associated University Press, 323–343.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Markson, R., and M. Muir, 1980: Solar wind control of the Earth’s electric field. Science, 206 , 979.

  • Markson, R., and C. Price, 1999: Ionospheric potential as a proxy index for global temperature. Atmos. Res., 51 , 309314.

  • Marsh, N., and H. Svensmark, 2004: Comment on “Solar influences on cosmic rays and cloud formation: A reassessment” by Bomin Sun and Raymond S. Bradley. J. Geophys. Res., 109 , D14205. doi:10.1029/2003JD004063.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Murphy, M. J., N. W. S. Demetriades, R. L. Holle, and K. L. Cummins, 2006: Overview of capabilities and performance of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network. Preprints, 12th Conf. on Aviation Range and Aerospace Meteorology and Second Conf. on Meteorological Applications of Lightning Data, Tucson, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., J2.5. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/103980.pdf].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Olson, D. E., 1983: Interpretation of the solar influence on the atmospheric electrical parameters. Weather and Climate Responses to Solar Variations, B. M. McCormac, Ed., Colorado Associated University Press, 483–488.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Orville, R. E., and G. R. Huffines, 2001: Cloud-to-Ground lightning in the United States: NLDN results in the first decade, 1989–1998. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129 , 11791193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Palle, E., C. J. Butler, and K. O’Brien, 2004: The possible connection between ionization in the atmosphere by cosmic rays and low level clouds. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 66 , 17791790.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petersen, W. A., and S. A. Rutledge, 2001: Regional variability in tropical convection: Observations from TRMM. J. Climate, 14 , 35663586.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schlegel, K., G. Diendorfer, S. Thern, and M. Schmidt, 2001: Thunderstorms, lightning and solar activity—Middle Europe. J. Terr. Sol. Phys., 63 , 17051713.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stringfellow, M. F., 1974: Lightning incidence in Britain and the solar cycle. Nature, 249 , 332333.

  • Tinsley, B. A., 1996: Influence of the solar wind on the global electric circuit, and inferred effects on cloud microphysics, temperature, and dynamics of the troposphere. Space Sci. Rev., 94 , 231258.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tinsley, B. A., 2000: Influence of the solar wind on the global electric circuit, and inferred effects on cloud microphysics, temperature, and dynamics of the troposphere. Space Sci. Rev., 94 , 231258.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tinsley, B. A., 2004: Scavenging of condensation nuclei in clouds: Dependence of sign of electro-scavenging effect on droplet and CCN sizes. Proc. Int. Conf. on Clouds and Precipitation, Bologna, Italy, IAMS, 248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tinsley, B. A., and G. W. Deen, 1991: Apparent tropospheric response to MeV–GeV particle flux variations: A connection via electro-freezing of super-cooled water in high level clouds? J. Geophys. Res., 96 , 2228322296.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tinsley, B. A., and F. Yu, 2004: Atmospheric ionization and clouds as links between solar activity and climate. Solar Variability and Its Effects on Climate, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 141., Amer. Geophys. Union, 321–339.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tinsley, B. A., and L. Zhou, 2006: Initial results of a global circuit model with stratospheric and tropospheric aerosols. J. Geophys. Res., 111 , D16205. doi:10.1029/2005JD006988.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tinsley, B. A., G. B. Burns, and L. Zhou, 2007: The role of the global electric circuit in solar and internal forcing of clouds and climate. Adv. Space Res., 40 , 11261139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williams, E. R., 2005: Lightning and climate: A review. Atmos. Res., 76 , 272287.

  • Yu, F., and R. P. Turco, 2000: Ultrafine aerosol formation via ion-mediated nucleation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27 , 883886.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1133 614 244
PDF Downloads 243 63 9