How Much Do Different Land Models Matter for Climate Simulation? Part II: A Decomposed View of the Land–Atmosphere Coupling Strength

Jiangfeng Wei Center for Ocean–Land–Atmosphere Studies, Calverton, Maryland

Search for other papers by Jiangfeng Wei in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Paul A. Dirmeyer Center for Ocean–Land–Atmosphere Studies, Calverton, Maryland

Search for other papers by Paul A. Dirmeyer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Zhichang Guo Center for Ocean–Land–Atmosphere Studies, Calverton, Maryland

Search for other papers by Zhichang Guo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (GLACE) built a framework to estimate the strength of the land–atmosphere interaction across many weather and climate models. Within this framework, GLACE-type experiments are performed with a single atmospheric model coupled to three different land models. The precipitation time series is decomposed into three frequency bands to investigate the large-scale connection between external forcing, precipitation variability and predictability, and land–atmosphere coupling strength. It is found that coupling to different land models or prescribing subsurface soil moisture does not change the global pattern of precipitation predictability and variability too much. However, the regional impact of soil moisture can be highlighted by calculating the land–atmosphere coupling strength, which shows very different patterns for the three models. The estimated precipitation predictability and land–atmosphere coupling strength is mainly associated with the low-frequency component of precipitation (periods beyond 3 weeks). Based on these findings, the land–atmosphere coupling strength is conceptually decomposed into the impact of low-frequency external forcing and the impact of soil moisture. Because most models participating in GLACE have overestimated the low-frequency component of precipitation, a calibration to the GLACE-estimated land–atmosphere coupling strength is performed. The calibrated coupling strength is generally weaker, but the global pattern does not change much. This study provides an important clarification of land–atmosphere coupling strength and increases the understanding of the land–atmosphere interaction.

Corresponding author address: Jiangfeng Wei, COLA/IGES, 4041 Powder Mill Road, Suite 302, Calverton, MD 20705. Email: jianfeng@cola.iges.org

Abstract

The Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (GLACE) built a framework to estimate the strength of the land–atmosphere interaction across many weather and climate models. Within this framework, GLACE-type experiments are performed with a single atmospheric model coupled to three different land models. The precipitation time series is decomposed into three frequency bands to investigate the large-scale connection between external forcing, precipitation variability and predictability, and land–atmosphere coupling strength. It is found that coupling to different land models or prescribing subsurface soil moisture does not change the global pattern of precipitation predictability and variability too much. However, the regional impact of soil moisture can be highlighted by calculating the land–atmosphere coupling strength, which shows very different patterns for the three models. The estimated precipitation predictability and land–atmosphere coupling strength is mainly associated with the low-frequency component of precipitation (periods beyond 3 weeks). Based on these findings, the land–atmosphere coupling strength is conceptually decomposed into the impact of low-frequency external forcing and the impact of soil moisture. Because most models participating in GLACE have overestimated the low-frequency component of precipitation, a calibration to the GLACE-estimated land–atmosphere coupling strength is performed. The calibrated coupling strength is generally weaker, but the global pattern does not change much. This study provides an important clarification of land–atmosphere coupling strength and increases the understanding of the land–atmosphere interaction.

Corresponding author address: Jiangfeng Wei, COLA/IGES, 4041 Powder Mill Road, Suite 302, Calverton, MD 20705. Email: jianfeng@cola.iges.org

Save
  • Adler, R. F., and Coauthors, 2003: The Version-2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979–present). J. Hydrometeor., 4 , 11471167.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Charney, J. G., and J. Shukla, 1981: Predictability of monsoons. Monsoon Dynamics, Sir J. Lighthill and R. P. Pearce, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 99–109.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dirmeyer, P. A., 2006: The hydrologic feedback pathway for land–climate coupling. J. Hydrometeor., 7 , 857867.

  • Dirmeyer, P. A., M. J. Fennessy, and L. Marx, 2003: Low skill in dynamical prediction of boreal summer climate: Grounds for looking beyond sea surface temperature. J. Climate, 16 , 9951002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gebremichael, M., W. F. Krajewski, M. L. Morrissey, G. J. Huffman, and R. F. Adler, 2005: A detailed evaluation of GPCP 1° daily rainfall estimates over the Mississippi River basin. J. Appl. Meteor., 44 , 665681.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Graham, N. E., T. P. Barnett, R. Wilde, M. Ponater, and S. Schubert, 1994: On the roles of tropical and midlatitude SSTs in forcing interannual to interdecadal variability in the winter Northern Hemisphere circulation. J. Climate, 7 , 14161441.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guo, Z., and Coauthors, 2006: GLACE: The Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part II: Analysis. J. Hydrometeor., 7 , 611625.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huffman, G. J., and Coauthors, 1997: The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) combined precipitation dataset. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78 , 520.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huffman, G. J., R. F. Adler, M. Morrissey, D. T. Bolvin, S. Curtis, R. Joyce, B. McGavock, and J. Susskind, 2001: Global precipitation at one-degree daily resolution from multisatellite observations. J. Hydrometeor., 2 , 3650.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huffman, G. J., and Coauthors, 2007: The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. J. Hydrometeor., 8 , 3855.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joyce, R. J., J. E. Janowiak, P. A. Arkin, and P. Xie, 2004: CMORPH: A method that produces global precipitation estimates from passive microwave and infrared data at high spatial and temporal resolution. J. Hydrometeor., 5 , 487503.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., M. J. Suarez, and M. Heiser, 2000: Variance and predictability of precipitation at seasonal-to-interannual time scales. J. Hydrometeor., 1 , 2646.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., and Coauthors, 2004: Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science, 305 , 11381140.

  • Koster, R. D., and Coauthors, 2006: GLACE: The Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part I: Overview. J. Hydrometeor., 7 , 590610.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lawrence, D. M., and J. M. Slingo, 2005: Weak land–atmosphere coupling strength in HadAM3: The role of soil moisture variability. J. Hydrometeor., 6 , 670680.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McPhee, J., and S. A. Margulis, 2005: Validation and error characterization of the GPCP-1DD precipitation product over the contiguous United States. J. Hydrometeor., 6 , 441459.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pegion, K., and B. P. Kirtman, 2008a: The impact of air–sea interactions on the predictability of the tropical intraseasonal oscillation. J. Climate, 21 , 58705886.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pegion, K., and B. P. Kirtman, 2008b: The impact of air–sea interactions on the simulation of tropical intraseasonal variability. J. Climate, 21 , 66166635.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Quan, X. W., P. J. Webster, A. M. Moore, and H. R. Chang, 2004: Seasonality in SST-forced atmospheric short-term climate predictability. J. Climate, 17 , 30903108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ruane, A. C., and J. O. Roads, 2007: 6-hour to 1-year variance of five global precipitation sets. Earth Interactions, 11 .[Available online at http://EarthInteractions.org].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ruane, A. C., and J. O. Roads, 2008: Diurnal to annual precipitation sensitivity to convective and land surface schemes. Earth Interactions, 12 .[Available online at http://EarthInteractions.org].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ruiz-Barradas, A., and S. Nigam, 2005: Warm season rainfall variability over the U.S. Great Plains in observations, NCEP and ERA-40 reanalyses, and NCAR and NASA atmospheric model simulations. J. Climate, 18 , 18081830.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ruiz-Barradas, A., and S. Nigam, 2006: Great Plains hydroclimate variability: The view from North American Regional Reanalysis. J. Climate, 19 , 30043010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shukla, J., 1993: Predictability of short-term climate variations. Prediction of Interannual Climate Variations, J. Shukla, Ed., NATO ASI Series I: Global Environmental Change, Vol. 6, Springer-Verlag, 217–232.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shukla, J., 1998: Predictability in the midst of chaos: A scientific basis for climate forecasting. Science, 282 , 728731.

  • Shukla, J., and Coauthors, 2000: Dynamical seasonal prediction. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81 , 25932606.

  • Skomorowski, P., F. Rubel, and B. Rudolf, 2001: Verification of GPCP-1DD global satellite precipitation products using MAP surface observations. Phys. Chem. Earth, 26 , 403409.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Su, F., Y. Hong, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2008: Evaluation of TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) and its utility in hydrologic prediction in the La Plata basin. J. Hydrometeor., 9 , 622640.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sun, Y., S. Solomon, A. Dai, and R. W. Portmann, 2006: How often does it rain? J. Climate, 19 , 916934.

  • Trenberth, K. E., A. Dai, R. M. Rasmussen, and D. B. Parsons, 2003: The changing character of precipitation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84 , 12051217.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, G., Y. Kim, and D. Wang, 2007: Quantifying the strength of soil moisture–precipitation coupling and its sensitivity to changes in surface water budget. J. Hydrometeor., 8 , 551570.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wei, J., R. E. Dickinson, and N. Zeng, 2006: Climate variability in a simple model of warm climate land–atmosphere interaction. J. Geophys. Res., 111 , G03009. doi:10.1029/2005JG000096.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wei, J., R. E. Dickinson, and H. Chen, 2008: A negative soil moisture precipitation relationship and its causes. J. Hydrometeor., 9 , 13641376.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wei, J., P. A. Dirmeyer, Z. Guo, L. Zhang, and V. Misra, 2010: How much do different land models matter for climate simulation? Part I: Climatology and variability. J. Climate, 23 , 31203134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilcox, E. M., and L. J. Donner, 2007: The frequency of extreme rain events in satellite rain-rate estimates and an atmospheric general circulation model. J. Climate, 20 , 5369.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yamada, T. J., R. D. Koster, S. Kanae, and T. Oki, 2007: Estimation of predictability with a newly derived index to quantify similarity among ensemble members. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135 , 26742687.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zeweldi, D. A., and M. Gebremichael, 2009: Evaluation of CMORPH precipitation products at fine space–time scales. J. Hydrometeor., 10 , 300307.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, J., W-C. Wang, and J. Wei, 2008: Assessing land–atmosphere coupling using soil moisture from the Global Land Data Assimilation System and observational precipitation. J. Geophys. Res., 113 , D17119. doi:10.1029/2008JD009807.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1043 668 44
PDF Downloads 257 44 4