Probabilistic Projections of Climate Change over China under the SRES A1B Scenario Using 28 AOGCMs

Weilin Chen Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China

Search for other papers by Weilin Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Zhihong Jiang Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China

Search for other papers by Zhihong Jiang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Laurent Li Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, IPSL/CNRS/UPMC, Paris, France

Search for other papers by Laurent Li in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Probabilistic projection of climate change consists of formulating the climate change information in a probabilistic manner at either global or regional scale. This can produce useful results for studies of the impact of climate change impact and change mitigation. In the present study, a simple yet effective approach is proposed with the purpose of producing probabilistic results of climate change over China for the middle and end of the twenty-first century under the Special Report on Emissions Scenarios A1B (SRES A1B) emission scenario. Data from 28 coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) are used. The methodology consists of ranking the 28 models, based on their ability to simulate climate over China in terms of two model evaluation metrics. Different weights were then given to the models according to their performances in present-day climate. Results of the evaluation for the current climate show that five models that have relatively higher resolutions—namely, the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia ECHAM4 (INGV ECHAM4), the third climate configuration of the Met Office Unified Model (UKMO HadCM3), the CSIRO Mark version 3.5 (Mk3.5), the NCAR Community Climate System Model, version 3 (CCSM3), and the Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate 3.2, high-resolution version [MIROC3.2 (hires)]—perform better than others over China. Their corresponding weights (normalized to 1) are 0.289, 0.096, 0.058, 0.048, and 0.044, respectively. Under the A1B scenario, surface air temperature is projected to increase significantly for both the middle and end of the twenty-first century, with larger magnitude over the north and in winter. There are also significant increases in rainfall in the twenty-first century under the A1B scenario, especially for the period 2070–99. As far as the interannual variability is concerned, the most striking feature is that there are high probabilities for the future intensification of interannual variability of precipitation over most of China in both winter and summer. For instance, over the Yangtze–Huai River basin (28°–35°N, 105°–120°E), there is a 60% probability of increased interannual standard deviation of precipitation by 20% in summer, which is much higher than that of the mean precipitation. In general there are small differences between weighted and unweighted projections, but the uncertainties in the projected changes are reduced to some extent after weighting.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Zhihong Jiang, Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China. E-mail: zhjiang@nuist.edu.cn

Abstract

Probabilistic projection of climate change consists of formulating the climate change information in a probabilistic manner at either global or regional scale. This can produce useful results for studies of the impact of climate change impact and change mitigation. In the present study, a simple yet effective approach is proposed with the purpose of producing probabilistic results of climate change over China for the middle and end of the twenty-first century under the Special Report on Emissions Scenarios A1B (SRES A1B) emission scenario. Data from 28 coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) are used. The methodology consists of ranking the 28 models, based on their ability to simulate climate over China in terms of two model evaluation metrics. Different weights were then given to the models according to their performances in present-day climate. Results of the evaluation for the current climate show that five models that have relatively higher resolutions—namely, the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia ECHAM4 (INGV ECHAM4), the third climate configuration of the Met Office Unified Model (UKMO HadCM3), the CSIRO Mark version 3.5 (Mk3.5), the NCAR Community Climate System Model, version 3 (CCSM3), and the Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate 3.2, high-resolution version [MIROC3.2 (hires)]—perform better than others over China. Their corresponding weights (normalized to 1) are 0.289, 0.096, 0.058, 0.048, and 0.044, respectively. Under the A1B scenario, surface air temperature is projected to increase significantly for both the middle and end of the twenty-first century, with larger magnitude over the north and in winter. There are also significant increases in rainfall in the twenty-first century under the A1B scenario, especially for the period 2070–99. As far as the interannual variability is concerned, the most striking feature is that there are high probabilities for the future intensification of interannual variability of precipitation over most of China in both winter and summer. For instance, over the Yangtze–Huai River basin (28°–35°N, 105°–120°E), there is a 60% probability of increased interannual standard deviation of precipitation by 20% in summer, which is much higher than that of the mean precipitation. In general there are small differences between weighted and unweighted projections, but the uncertainties in the projected changes are reduced to some extent after weighting.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Zhihong Jiang, Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China. E-mail: zhjiang@nuist.edu.cn
Save
  • Chen, W., Z. Jiang, L. Li, and P. Yiou, 2011: Simulation of regional climate change under the IPCC A2 scenario in southeast China. Climate Dyn., 36, 491507, doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0910-3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen, J. H., and Coauthors, 2007: Regional climate projections. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, S. Solomon et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 847–940.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collins, M., 2007: Ensembles and probabilities: A new era in the prediction of climate change. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, A365, 19571970.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cubasch, U., and Coauthors, 2001: Projections of future climate change. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, J. T. Houghton et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 525–582.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Furrer, R., R. Knutti, S. R. Sain, D. W. Nychka, and G. A. Meehl, 2007: Spatial patterns of probabilistic temperature change projections from a multivariate Bayesian analysis. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L06711, doi:10.1029/2006GL027754.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gao, X., Y. Xu, Z. C. Zhao, J. S. Pal, and F. Giorgi, 2006: On the role of resolution and topography in the simulation of East Asia precipitation. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 86, 173185.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Giorgi, F., and L. O. Mearns, 2002: Calculation of average, uncertainty range, and reliability of regional climate changes from AOGCM simulations via the “reliability ensemble averaging” (REA) method. J. Climate, 15, 11411158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Giorgi, F., and L. O. Mearns, 2003: Probability of regional climate change based on the reliability ensemble averaging (REA) method. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1629, doi:10.1029/2003GL017130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gleckler, P. J., K. E. Taylor, and C. Doutriaux, 2008: Performance metrics for climate models. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D06104, doi:10.1029/2007JD008972.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greene, A. M., L. Goddard, and U. Lall, 2006: Probabilistic multimodel regional temperature change projections. J. Climate, 19, 43264346.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jiang, D., H. Wang, and X. Lang, 2004: Multimodel ensemble prediction for climate change trend of China under SRES A2 scenario (in Chinese). Chin. J. Geophys., 47, 776784.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jiang, D., H. Wang, and X. Lang, 2005: Evaluation of East Asian climatology as simulated by seven coupled models. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 22, 479495.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jiang, D., Y. Zhang, and J. Sun, 2009: Ensemble projection of 1-3°C warming in China. Chin. Sci. Bull., 54, 33263334.

  • Jiang, Z., J. Song, L. Li, W. Chen, Z. Wang, and J. Wang, 2011: Extreme climate events in China: IPCC-AR4 model evaluation and projection. Climatic Change, doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0090-0, in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knutti, R., 2010: The end of model democracy? An editorial comment. Climatic Change, 102, 395404.

  • Knutti, R., R. Furrer, C. Tebaldi, J. Cermak, and G. A. Meehl, 2010: Challenges in combining projections from multiple climate models. J. Climate, 23, 27392758.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, H., L. Feng, and T. Zhou, 2010: Multi-model projection of July–August climate extreme changes over China under CO2 doubling. Part I: Precipitation. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 28, 433447, doi:10.1007/s00376-010-0013-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lu, R., and Y. Fu, 2010: Intensification of East Asian summer rainfall interannual variability in the twenty-first century simulated by 12 CMIP3 coupled models. J. Climate, 23, 33163331.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meehl, G. A., and Coauthors, 2007: Global climate projections. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, S. Solomon et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 747–846.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, T. D., and P. D. Jones, 2005: An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int. J. Climatol., 25, 693712, doi:10.1002/joc.1181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moise, A. F., and D. A. Hudson, 2008: Probabilistic predictions of climate change for Australia and southern Africa using the reliability ensemble average of IPCC CMIP3 model simulations. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15113, doi:10.1029/2007JD009250.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nakicenovic, N., and R. Swart, Eds., 2000: Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, 599 pp.

  • New, M., D. Lister, M. Hulme, and I. Makin, 2002: A high-resolution data set of surface climate over global land areas. Climate Res., 21, 125, doi:10.3354/cr021001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Perkins, S. E., and A. J. Pitman, 2009: Do weak AR4 models bias projections of future climate changes over Australia? Climatic Change, 93, 527558.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pierce, D. W., T. P. Barnett, B. D. Santer, and P. J. Gleckler, 2009: Selecting global climate models for regional climate change studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 84418446.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Raisanen, J., and T. N. Palmer, 2001: A probability and decision-model analysis of a multimodel ensemble of climate change simulations. J. Climate, 14, 32123226.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Raisanen, J., L. Ruokolainen, and J. Ylhaisi, 2010: Weighting of model results for improving best estimates of climate change. Climate Dyn., 35, 407422.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Santer, B. D., and Coauthors, 2009: Incorporating model quality information in climate change detection and attribution studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 14 77814 783.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scherrer, S. C., 2010: Present-day interannual variability of surface climate in CMIP3 models and its relation to future warming. Int. J. Climatol., 31, 15181529, doi:10.1002/joc.2170.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmittner, A., M. Latif, and B. Schneider, 2005: Model projections of the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation for the 21st century assessed by observations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L23710, doi:10.1029/2005GL024368.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, R. L., C. Tebaldi, D. Nychka, and L. O. Mearns, 2009: Bayesian modeling of uncertainty in ensembles of climate models. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 104, 97116.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sun, Y., and Y. Ding, 2008: Validation of IPCC AR4 climate models in simulating interdecadal change of East Asian summer monsoon (in Chinese). Acta Meteor. Sin., 66, 765780.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sun, Y., and Y. Ding, 2009: A projection of future changes in summer precipitation and monsoon in East Asia. Sci. China, D53, 284300, doi:10.1007/s11430-009-0123-y.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, K. E., R. J. Stouffer, and G. A. Meehl, 2008: A summary of the CMIP5 experiment design. [Available online at http://cmip-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cmip5/docs/Taylor_CMIP5_dec31.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tebaldi, C., and R. Knutti, 2007: The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, A365, 20532075.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tebaldi, C., and B. Sanso, 2009: Joint projections of temperature and precipitation change from multiple climate models: A hierarchical Bayesian approach. J. Roy. Stat. Soc., A172, 83106.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tebaldi, C., L. O. Mearns, D. Nychka, and R. L. Smith, 2004: Regional probabilities of precipitation change: A Bayesian analysis of multimodel simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L24213, doi:10.1029/2004GL021276.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tebaldi, C., R. W. Smith, D. Nychka, and L. O. Mearns, 2005: Quantifying uncertainty in projections of regional climate change: A Bayesian approach to the analysis of multi-model ensembles. J. Climate, 18, 15241540.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van der Linden, P., and J. F. B. Mitchell, Eds., 2009: ENSEMBLES: Climate change and its impacts at seasonal, decadal and centennial timescales. Met Office Hadley Centre, 160 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Watterson, I. G., 2008: Calculation of probability density functions for temperature and precipitation change under global warming. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D12106, doi:10.1029/2007JD009254.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weigel, A. P., R. Knutti, M. A. Liniger, and C. Appenzeller, 2010: Risks of model weighting in multimodel climate projections. J. Climate, 23, 41754191.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Whetton, P., I. Macadam, J. Bathols, and J. O’Grady, 2007: Assessment of the use of current climate patterns to evaluate regional enhanced greenhouse response patterns of climate models. Geophys Res. Lett., 34, L14701, doi:10.1029/2007GL030025.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xu, Y., X. Gao, and F. Giorgi, 2010: Upgrades to the reliability ensemble averaging method for producing probabilistic climate-change projections. Climate Res., 41, 6181, doi:10.3354/cr00835.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yin, J. H., 2005: A consistent poleward shift of the storm tracks in simulations of 21st century climate. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L18701, doi:10.1029/2005GL023684.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhou, T., and R. Yu, 2006: Twentieth-century surface air temperature over China and the globe simulated by coupled climate models. J. Climate, 19, 58435858.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1268 520 41
PDF Downloads 1114 420 28