Representation of MJO Variability in the NCEP Climate Forecast System

Scott J. Weaver Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, Camp Springs, Maryland

Search for other papers by Scott J. Weaver in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wanqiu Wang Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, Camp Springs, Maryland

Search for other papers by Wanqiu Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mingyue Chen Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, Camp Springs, Maryland

Search for other papers by Mingyue Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Arun Kumar Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, Camp Springs, Maryland

Search for other papers by Arun Kumar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) is arguably the most important intraseasonal mode of climate variability, given its significant modulation of global climate variations and attendant societal impacts. Advancing the current understanding and simulation of the MJO using state-of-the-art climate data and modeling systems is thus a necessary goal for improving MJO prediction capability. MJO variability is assessed in NOAA/NCEP reanalyses and two versions of the Climate Forecast System (CFS), CFS version 1 (CFSv1) and its update version 2 (CFSv2). The analysis leans on a variety of diagnostic procedures and includes MJO sensitivity to varying El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phases. It is found that significant improvements have been realized in the representation of MJO variations in the new NCEP Climate Forecast System reanalysis (CFSR) as evidenced by outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) power spectral analysis and more coherent propagation characteristics of precipitation and 850-hPa zonal winds over the Eastern Hemisphere in CFSR-only depictions. Conversely, while modest improvements are realized in the CFSv2 as compared to CFSv1, in general the simulation of the MJO continues to be a challenge. Both versions produce strong eastward propagating variance of convection and wind fields in the intraseasonal frequency band. However, the simulated MJO propagates slower than the observed with difficulties traversing the Maritime Continent into the western Pacific, as noted in many previous modeling studies. The CFS shows robust intraseasonal simulations over the west Pacific during El Niño years with diminished simulation capability over the Indian Ocean during La Niña years. This is likely a manifestation of the preference for La Niña MJO activity to occur over the Indian Ocean and the simulation challenges over that domain.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Scott J. Weaver, Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, 5200 Auth Rd., Rm. 605, Camp Springs, MD 20746. E-mail: scott.weaver@noaa.gov

Abstract

The Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) is arguably the most important intraseasonal mode of climate variability, given its significant modulation of global climate variations and attendant societal impacts. Advancing the current understanding and simulation of the MJO using state-of-the-art climate data and modeling systems is thus a necessary goal for improving MJO prediction capability. MJO variability is assessed in NOAA/NCEP reanalyses and two versions of the Climate Forecast System (CFS), CFS version 1 (CFSv1) and its update version 2 (CFSv2). The analysis leans on a variety of diagnostic procedures and includes MJO sensitivity to varying El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phases. It is found that significant improvements have been realized in the representation of MJO variations in the new NCEP Climate Forecast System reanalysis (CFSR) as evidenced by outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) power spectral analysis and more coherent propagation characteristics of precipitation and 850-hPa zonal winds over the Eastern Hemisphere in CFSR-only depictions. Conversely, while modest improvements are realized in the CFSv2 as compared to CFSv1, in general the simulation of the MJO continues to be a challenge. Both versions produce strong eastward propagating variance of convection and wind fields in the intraseasonal frequency band. However, the simulated MJO propagates slower than the observed with difficulties traversing the Maritime Continent into the western Pacific, as noted in many previous modeling studies. The CFS shows robust intraseasonal simulations over the west Pacific during El Niño years with diminished simulation capability over the Indian Ocean during La Niña years. This is likely a manifestation of the preference for La Niña MJO activity to occur over the Indian Ocean and the simulation challenges over that domain.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Scott J. Weaver, Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, 5200 Auth Rd., Rm. 605, Camp Springs, MD 20746. E-mail: scott.weaver@noaa.gov
Save
  • Gottschalck, J., and Coauthors, 2010: A framework for assessing operational model MJO forecasts: A CLIVAR MJO working group project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 12471258.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Inness, P. M., and J. M. Slingo, 2006: The interaction of the Madden–Julian oscillation with the maritime continent in a GCM. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 16451667.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Inness, P. M., J. M. Slingo, E. Guilyardi, and J. Cole, 2003a: Simulation of the Madden–Julian oscillation in a coupled general circulation model. Part I: Comparisons with observations and an atmosphere-only GCM. J. Climate, 16, 345364.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Inness, P. M., J. M. Slingo, E. Guilyardi, and J. Cole, 2003b: Simulation of the Madden–Julian oscillation in a coupled general circulation model. Part II: The role of the basic state. J. Climate, 16, 365382.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kanamitsu, M., W. Ebisuzaki, J. Woollen, S.-K. Yang, J. J. Hnilo, M. Fiorino, and G. L. Potter, 2002: NCEP–DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 16311643.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaylor, R. E., 1977: Filtering and decimation of digital time series. Institute of Physical Science Technology Tech. Note BN 850, 42 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kessler, W. S., 2001: EOF representations of the Madden–Julian oscillation and its connection with ENSO. J. Climate, 14, 30553061.

  • Kessler, W. S., and R. Kleeman, 2000: Rectification of the Madden–Julian oscillation into the ENSO cycle. J. Climate, 13, 35603575.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kim, D., and Coauthors, 2009: Application of MJO simulation diagnostics to climate models. J. Climate, 22, 64136436.

  • Liebmann, B., and C. A. Smith, 1996: Description of a complete (interpolated) outgoing longwave radiation dataset. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 12751277.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lin, H., and G. Brunet, 2009: The influence of the Madden–Julian oscillation on Canadian wintertime surface air temperature. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 22502262.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lin, J.-L., and Coauthors, 2006: Tropical intraseasonal variability in 14 IPCC AR4 climate models. Part I: Convective signals. J. Climate, 19, 26652690.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Madden, R. A., and P. R. Julian, 1994: Observations of the 40–50-day tropical oscillation—A review. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 814837.

  • Maloney, E. D., and D. L. Hartmann, 2000: Modulation of eastern North Pacific hurricanes by the Madden–Julian oscillation. J. Climate, 13, 14511460.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pohl, B., and A. J. Matthews, 2007: Observed changes in the lifetime and amplitude of the Madden–Julian oscillation associated with interannual ENSO sea surface temperature anomalies. J. Climate, 20, 26592674.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roundy, P., K. MacRitchie, J. Asuma, and T. Melino, 2010: Modulation of the global atmospheric circulation by combined activity in the Madden–Julian oscillation and the El Niño–Southern Oscillation during boreal winter. J. Climate, 23, 40454059.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saha, S., and Coauthors, 2006: The NCEP Climate Forecast System. J. Climate, 19, 34833517.

  • Saha, S., and Coauthors, 2010: The NCEP Climate Forecast System reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 10151057.

  • Seo, K.-H., and W. Wang, 2010: The Madden–Julian oscillation simulated in the NCEP Climate Forecast System: The importance of stratiform heating. J. Climate, 23, 47704793.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vintzileos, A., and H.-L. Pan, 2007: On the importance of horizontal resolution and initial conditions to forecasting tropical intraseasonal oscillations: The Maritime Continent prediction barrier. Extended Abstracts, NOAA CTB-COLA Joint Seminar Series. [Available online at http://www.nws.noaa.gov/ost/climate/STIP/CTB-COLA/Augustin_091907.htm.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vitart, F., 2009: Impact of the Madden–Julian oscillation on tropical storms and risk of landfall in the ECMWF forecast system. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L15802, doi:10.1029/2009GL039089.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vitart, F., S. Woolnough, M. A. Balmaseda, and A. M. Tompkins, 2007: Monthly forecast of the Madden–Julian oscillation using a coupled GCM. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 27002715.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Waliser, D., and Coauthors, 2009: MJO simulation diagnostics. J. Climate, 22, 30063030.

  • Wheeler, M. C., and H. H. Hendon, 2004: An all-season real-time multivariate MJO index: Development of an index for monitoring and prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 19171932.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xie, P., J. E. Janowiak, P. A. Arkin, R. Adler, A. Gruber, R. Ferraro, G. J. Huffman, and S. Curtis, 2003: GPCP pentad precipitation analyses: An experimental dataset based on gauge observations and satellite estimates. J. Climate, 16, 21972214.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, C., 2005: Madden–Julian oscillation. Rev. Geophys., 43, RG2003, doi:10.1029/2004RG000158.

  • Zhang, C., and J. Gottschalck, 2002: SST anomalies of ENSO and the Madden– Julian oscillation in the equatorial Pacific. J. Climate, 15, 24292445.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, C., and M. Dong, 2004: Seasonality in the Madden–Julian oscillation. J. Climate, 17, 31693180.

  • Zhang, C., M. Dong, S. Gualdi, H. H. Hendon, E. D. Maloney, A. Marshall, K. R. Sperber, and W. Wang, 2006: Simulations of the Madden–Julian oscillation in four pairs of coupled and uncoupled global models. Climate Dyn., 27, 573592.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 259 86 4
PDF Downloads 135 30 3