Climate Feedbacks in CCSM3 under Changing CO2 Forcing. Part I: Adapting the Linear Radiative Kernel Technique to Feedback Calculations for a Broad Range of Forcings

Alexandra K. Jonko Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon

Search for other papers by Alexandra K. Jonko in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Karen M. Shell Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon

Search for other papers by Karen M. Shell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Benjamin M. Sanderson National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Benjamin M. Sanderson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Gokhan Danabasoglu National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Gokhan Danabasoglu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

Climate feedbacks vary strongly among climate models and continue to represent a major source of uncertainty in estimates of the response of climate to anthropogenic forcings. One method to evaluate feedbacks in global climate models is the radiative kernel technique, which is well suited for model intercomparison studies because of its computational efficiency. However, the usefulness of this technique is predicated on the assumption of linearity between top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative fluxes and feedback variables, limiting its application to simulations of small climate perturbations, where nonlinearities can be neglected. This paper presents an extension of the utility of this linear technique to large forcings, using global climate model simulations forced with CO2 concentrations ranging from 2 to 8 times present-day values. Radiative kernels depend on the model’s radiative transfer algorithm and climate base state. For large warming, kernels based on the present-day climate significantly underestimate longwave TOA flux changes and somewhat overestimate shortwave TOA flux changes. These biases translate to inaccurate feedback estimates. It is shown that a combination of present-day kernels and kernels computed using a large forcing climate base state leads to significant improvement in the approximation of TOA flux changes and increased reliability of feedback estimates. While using present-day kernels results in a climate sensitivity that remains constant, using the new kernels shows that sensitivity increases significantly with each successive doubling of CO2 concentrations.

The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.

Corresponding author address: Alexandra K. Jonko, College of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 CEOAS Administration Bldg., Corvallis, OR 97331-5503. E-mail: ajonko@coas.oregonstate.edu

Abstract

Climate feedbacks vary strongly among climate models and continue to represent a major source of uncertainty in estimates of the response of climate to anthropogenic forcings. One method to evaluate feedbacks in global climate models is the radiative kernel technique, which is well suited for model intercomparison studies because of its computational efficiency. However, the usefulness of this technique is predicated on the assumption of linearity between top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative fluxes and feedback variables, limiting its application to simulations of small climate perturbations, where nonlinearities can be neglected. This paper presents an extension of the utility of this linear technique to large forcings, using global climate model simulations forced with CO2 concentrations ranging from 2 to 8 times present-day values. Radiative kernels depend on the model’s radiative transfer algorithm and climate base state. For large warming, kernels based on the present-day climate significantly underestimate longwave TOA flux changes and somewhat overestimate shortwave TOA flux changes. These biases translate to inaccurate feedback estimates. It is shown that a combination of present-day kernels and kernels computed using a large forcing climate base state leads to significant improvement in the approximation of TOA flux changes and increased reliability of feedback estimates. While using present-day kernels results in a climate sensitivity that remains constant, using the new kernels shows that sensitivity increases significantly with each successive doubling of CO2 concentrations.

The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.

Corresponding author address: Alexandra K. Jonko, College of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 CEOAS Administration Bldg., Corvallis, OR 97331-5503. E-mail: ajonko@coas.oregonstate.edu
Save
  • Boer, G., K. Hamilton, and W. Zhu, 2005: Climate sensitivity and climate change under strong forcing. Climate Dyn., 24, 685700.

  • Bony, S., and Coauthors, 2006: How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes? J. Climate, 19, 34453482.

  • Cess, R. D., and G. L. Potter, 1987: Exploratory studies of cloud radiative forcing with a general circulation model. Tellus, 39A, 460473.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collins, W., and Coauthors, 2006: The formulation and atmospheric simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model Version 3 (CAM3). J. Climate, 19, 21442161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Colman, R., and B. McAvaney, 2009: Climate feedbacks under a very broad range of forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L01702, doi:10.1029/2008GL036268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Colman, R., S. Powers, and B. McAvaney, 1997: Non-linear climate feedback analysis in an atmospheric general circulation model. Climate Dyn., 13, 717731.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cox, P., R. A. Betts, C. D. Jones, S. A. Spall, and I. J. Totterdell, 2000: Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature, 408, 184187.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Danabasoglu, G., and P. Gent, 2009: Equilibrium climate sensitivity: Is it accurate to use a Slab Ocean Model? J. Climate, 22, 24942499.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dessler, A. E., Z. Zhang, and P. Yang, 2008: Water-vapor climate feedback inferred from climate fluctuations, 2003–2008. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L20704, doi:10.1029/2008GL035333.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Forster, P., and Coauthors, 2007: Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, S. Solomon et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 129–234.

  • Friedlingstein, P., and Coauthors, 2006: Climate–carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J. Climate, 19, 33373353.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gregory, J. M., and Coauthors, 2004: A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L03205, doi:10.1029/2003GL018747.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hansen, J., and Coauthors, 2005: Efficacy of climate forcings. J. Geophys. Res., 110, D18104, doi:10.1029/2005JD005776.

  • Kay, J. E., M. M. Holland, C. M. Bitz, E. Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, A. Gettelman, A. Conley, and D. Bailey, 2012: The influence of local feedbacks and northward heat transport on the equilibrium Arctic climate response to increased greenhouse gas forcing. J. Climate, in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kiehl, J., C. Shields, J. Hack, and W. Collins, 2006: The climate sensitivity of the Community Climate System Model version 3 (CCMS3). J. Climate, 19, 25842596.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Randall, D. A., and Coauthors, 2007: Climate models and their evaluation. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, S. Solomon et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 589–662.

  • Raupach, M. R., G. Marland, P. Ciais, C. L. Quéré, J. G. Canadell, G. Klepper, and C. B. Field, 2007: Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 10 28810 293.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Raval, A., and V. Ramanathan, 1989: Observational determination of the greenhouse effect. Nature, 342, 758761.

  • Roe, G. H., and M. B. Baker, 2007: Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable? Science, 318, 629632.

  • Sanderson, B. M., K. M. Shell, and W. Ingram, 2010: Climate feedbacks determined using radiative kernels in a multi-thousand member ensemble of AOGCMs. Climate Dyn., 35, 12191236, doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0661-1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shell, K., J. Kiehl, and C. Shields, 2008: Using the radiative kernel technique to calculate climate feedbacks in NCAR’s Community Atmospheric Model. J. Climate, 21, 22692282.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Soden, B., I. Held, R. Colman, K. Shell, J. Kiehl, and C. Shields, 2008: Quantifying climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. J. Climate, 21, 35043520.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walker, J., and J. Kasting, 1992: Effects of fuel and forest conservation on future levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Paleogeogr. Paleoclimatol. Paleoecol., 97, 151189.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wetherald, R., and S. Manabe, 1988: Cloud feedback processes in a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 13971416.

  • Yeager, S., C. Shields, W. Large, and J. Hack, 2006: The low-resolution CCSM3. J. Climate, 19, 25452566.

  • Zhang, M. H., J. J. Hack, J. T. Kiehl, and R. D. Cess, 1994: Diagnostic study of climate feedback processes in atmospheric general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res., 99 (D3), 55255537.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1059 386 53
PDF Downloads 413 79 11