An Evaluation of Rotated EOF Analysis and Its Application to Tropical Pacific SST Variability

Tao Lian Department of Ocean Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, and State Key Lab of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Hangzhou, China

Search for other papers by Tao Lian in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Dake Chen Department of Ocean Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, and State Key Lab of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Hangzhou, China, and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York

Search for other papers by Dake Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

As an effective eigen method for phenomenon identification and space reduction, empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis is widely used in climate research. However, because of its orthorgonality constraint, EOF analysis has a tendency to produce unphysical modes. Previous studies have shown that the drawbacks of EOF analysis could be partly alleviated by rotated EOF (REOF) analysis, but such studies are always based on specific cases. This paper provides a thorough statistical evaluation of REOF analysis by comparing its ability with that of EOF analysis in reproducing a large number of randomly selected stationary modes of variability. The synthetic experiments indicate that REOF analysis is overwhelmingly a better choice in terms of accuracy and effectiveness, especially for picking up localized patterns. When applied to the tropical Pacific sea surface temperature variability, REOF and EOF analyses show obvious discrepancies, with the former making much better physical sense. This challenges the validity of the so-called sea surface temperature cooling mode and the spatial structure of “El Niño Modoki,” both of which are recently identified by EOF analysis. At any rate, one has to be cautious when claiming new discoveries of climate modes based on EOF analysis alone.

Corresponding author address: Tao Lian, Department of Ocean Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China. E-mail: liantao@sio.org.cn

Abstract

As an effective eigen method for phenomenon identification and space reduction, empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis is widely used in climate research. However, because of its orthorgonality constraint, EOF analysis has a tendency to produce unphysical modes. Previous studies have shown that the drawbacks of EOF analysis could be partly alleviated by rotated EOF (REOF) analysis, but such studies are always based on specific cases. This paper provides a thorough statistical evaluation of REOF analysis by comparing its ability with that of EOF analysis in reproducing a large number of randomly selected stationary modes of variability. The synthetic experiments indicate that REOF analysis is overwhelmingly a better choice in terms of accuracy and effectiveness, especially for picking up localized patterns. When applied to the tropical Pacific sea surface temperature variability, REOF and EOF analyses show obvious discrepancies, with the former making much better physical sense. This challenges the validity of the so-called sea surface temperature cooling mode and the spatial structure of “El Niño Modoki,” both of which are recently identified by EOF analysis. At any rate, one has to be cautious when claiming new discoveries of climate modes based on EOF analysis alone.

Corresponding author address: Tao Lian, Department of Ocean Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China. E-mail: liantao@sio.org.cn
Save
  • Ashok, K., S. K. Behera, S. A. Rao, H. Weng, and T. Yamagata, 2007: El Niño Modoki and its possible teleconnection. J. Geophys. Res., 112, C11007, doi:10.1029/2006JC003798.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnett, T. P., 1983: Interaction of the monsoon and Pacific trade wind system at interannual time scales. Part I: The equatorial zone. Mon. Wea. Rev., 111, 756773.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnett, T. P., 1985: Variations in near-global sea level pressure. J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 478501.

  • Cane, M. A., A. C. Clement, A. Kaplan, Y. Kushnir, D. Pozdnyakov, R. Seager, S. E. Zebiak, and R. Murtugudde, 1997: Twentieth-century sea surface temperature trends. Science, 275, 957960.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, D., 2008: The ocean’s role in climate variability. Acta Oceanol. Sin., 27, 18.

  • Chen, D., and M. A. Cane, 2008: ENSO prediction and predictability. J. Comput. Phys., 227, 36253640.

  • Cheng, X., G. Nitsche, and J. M. Wallace, 1995: Robustness of low-frequency circulation patterns derived from EOF and rotated EOF analyses. J. Climate, 8, 17091713.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clement, A. C., R. Seager, M. A. Cane, and S. E. Zebiak, 1996: An ocean dynamical thermostat. J. Climate, 9, 21902196.

  • Dommenget, D., and M. Latif, 2002: A cautionary note on the interpretation of EOFs. J. Climate, 15, 216225.

  • Hannachi, A., 2007: Pattern hunting in climate: A new method for finding trends in gridded climate data. Int. J. Climatol., 27, 115.

  • Hannachi, A., I. T. Jolliffe, D. B. Stephenson, and N. Trendafilov, 2006: In search of simple structures in climate: Simplifying EOFs. Int. J. Climatol., 26, 728.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hannachi, A., I. T. Jolliffe, and D. B. Stephenson, 2007: Empirical orthogonal functions and related techniques in atmospheric science: A review. Int. J. Climatol., 27, 11191152.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hawkins, D. M., 1973: On the investigation of alternative regressions by principal component analysis. J. Appl. Stat., 22, 275286.

  • Horel, J. D., 1984: Complex principal component analysis: Theory and examples. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 23, 16601673.

  • Houghton, R. W., and Y. M. Tourre, 1992: Characteristics of low-frequency sea surface temperature fluctuations in the tropical Atlantic. J. Climate, 5, 765771.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jolliffe, I., 1989: Rotation of ill-defined principal components. J. Appl. Stat., 38, 139147.

  • Jolliffe, I., 1995: Rotation of principal components: Choice of normalization constraints. J. Appl. Stat., 22, 2935.

  • Jolliffe, I., 2003: A cautionary note on artificial examples of EOFs. J. Climate, 16, 10841086.

  • Kaiser, H. F., 1958: The Varimax criterion for analytic rotations in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187200.

  • Kao, H.-Y., and J.-Y. Yu, 2009: Contrasting eastern-Pacific and central-Pacific types of El Niño. J. Climate, 22, 615632.

  • Kaplan, A., M. A. Cane, Y. Kushnir, A. C. Clement, M. B. Blumenthal, and B. Rajagopalan, 1998: Analyses of global sea surface temperature 1856–1991. J. Geophys. Res., 103 (C9), 18 56718 589.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kim, K.-Y., and Q. Wu, 1999: A comparison study of EOF techniques: Analysis of nonstationary data with periodic statistics. J. Climate, 12, 185199.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kug, J.-S., F.-F. Jin, and S.-I. An, 2009: Two types of El Niño events: Cold tongue El Niño and warm pool El Niño. J. Climate, 22, 14991515.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lorenz, E. N., 1956: Empirical orthogonal functions and statistical weather prediction. Dept. of Meteorology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Statistical Forecasting Project Rep. 1, 49 pp.

  • North, G. R., T. L. Bell, R. F. Cahalan, and F. J. Moeng, 1982: Sampling errors in the estimation of empirical orthogonal functions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 699706.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rayner, N. A., D. E. Parker, E. B. Horton, C. K. Folland, L. V. Alexander, D. P. Rowell, E. C. Kent, and A. Kaplan, 2003: Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4407, doi:10.1029/2002JD002670.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Richman, M. B., 1986: Rotation of principal components. J. Climatol., 6, 293335.

  • Smith, T. M., and R. W. Reynolds, 2004: Improved Extended Reconstruction of SST (1854–1997). J. Climate, 17, 24662477.

  • Wallace, J. M., and R. E. Dickinson, 1972: Empirical orthogonal representation of time series in the frequency domain. Part I: Theoretical considerations. J. Appl. Meteor., 11, 887892.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weare, B. C., and J. N. Nasstrom, 1982: Examples of extended empirical orthogonal function analyses. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 481485.

  • Zhang, W., J. Li, and X. Zhao, 2010: Sea surface temperature cooling mode in the Pacific cold tongue. J. Geophys. Res., 115, C12042, doi:10.1029/2010JC006501.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 3769 1286 189
PDF Downloads 2667 636 53