Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Realism of Rainfall in a Very High-Resolution Regional Climate Model

Elizabeth J. Kendon Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Elizabeth J. Kendon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Nigel M. Roberts Joint Centre for Mesoscale Meteorology, Met Office, Reading, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Nigel M. Roberts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Catherine A. Senior Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Catherine A. Senior in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Malcolm J. Roberts Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Malcolm J. Roberts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Sep 2012
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00562.1
Page(s):
5791–5806
Restricted access

Abstract

The realistic representation of rainfall on the local scale in climate models remains a key challenge. Realism encompasses the full spatial and temporal structure of rainfall, and is a key indicator of model skill in representing the underlying processes. In particular, if rainfall is more realistic in a climate model, there is greater confidence in its projections of future change.

In this study, the realism of rainfall in a very high-resolution (1.5 km) regional climate model (RCM) is compared to a coarser-resolution 12-km RCM. This is the first time a convection-permitting model has been run for an extended period (1989–2008) over a region of the United Kingdom, allowing the characteristics of rainfall to be evaluated in a climatological sense. In particular, the duration and spatial extent of hourly rainfall across the southern United Kingdom is examined, with a key focus on heavy rainfall.

Rainfall in the 1.5-km RCM is found to be much more realistic than in the 12-km RCM. In the 12-km RCM, heavy rain events are not heavy enough, and tend to be too persistent and widespread. While the 1.5-km model does have a tendency for heavy rain to be too intense, it still gives a much better representation of its duration and spatial extent. Long-standing problems in climate models, such as the tendency for too much persistent light rain and errors in the diurnal cycle, are also considerably reduced in the 1.5-km RCM. Biases in the 12-km RCM appear to be linked to deficiencies in the representation of convection.

Corresponding author address: Elizabeth Kendon (née Kennett), Met Office Hadley Centre, Fitzroy Road, Exeter EX1 3PB, United Kingdom. E-mail: elizabeth.kendon@metoffice.gov.uk

Abstract

The realistic representation of rainfall on the local scale in climate models remains a key challenge. Realism encompasses the full spatial and temporal structure of rainfall, and is a key indicator of model skill in representing the underlying processes. In particular, if rainfall is more realistic in a climate model, there is greater confidence in its projections of future change.

In this study, the realism of rainfall in a very high-resolution (1.5 km) regional climate model (RCM) is compared to a coarser-resolution 12-km RCM. This is the first time a convection-permitting model has been run for an extended period (1989–2008) over a region of the United Kingdom, allowing the characteristics of rainfall to be evaluated in a climatological sense. In particular, the duration and spatial extent of hourly rainfall across the southern United Kingdom is examined, with a key focus on heavy rainfall.

Rainfall in the 1.5-km RCM is found to be much more realistic than in the 12-km RCM. In the 12-km RCM, heavy rain events are not heavy enough, and tend to be too persistent and widespread. While the 1.5-km model does have a tendency for heavy rain to be too intense, it still gives a much better representation of its duration and spatial extent. Long-standing problems in climate models, such as the tendency for too much persistent light rain and errors in the diurnal cycle, are also considerably reduced in the 1.5-km RCM. Biases in the 12-km RCM appear to be linked to deficiencies in the representation of convection.

Corresponding author address: Elizabeth Kendon (née Kennett), Met Office Hadley Centre, Fitzroy Road, Exeter EX1 3PB, United Kingdom. E-mail: elizabeth.kendon@metoffice.gov.uk
Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Boberg, F., P. Berg, P. Thejll, W. J. Gutowski, and J. H. Christensen, 2009: Improved confidence in climate change projections of precipitation evaluated using daily statistics from the PRUDENCE ensemble. Climate Dyn., 32, 1097–1106.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Boberg, F., P. Berg, P. Thejll, W. J. Gutowski, and J. H. Christensen, 2010: Improved confidence in climate change projections of precipitation further evaluated using daily statistics from ENSEMBLES models. Climate Dyn., 35, 1509–1520.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brockhaus, P., D. Lüthi, and C. Schär, 2008: Aspects of the diurnal cycle in a regional climate model. Meteor. Z., 17, 433–443.

  • Brown, A. R., S. H. Derbyshire, and P. J. Mason, 1994: Large-eddy simulation of stable atmospheric boundary layers with a revised stochastic subgrid model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 120, 1485–1512.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Christensen, J. H., and O. B. Christensen, 2007: A summary of the PRUDENCE model projections of changes in European climate by the end of this century. Climatic Change, 81 (Suppl.), 7–30.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Christensen, J. H., and Coauthors, 2007: Regional climate projections. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, S. Solomon et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 847–940.

  • Cullen, M. J. P., 1993: The unified forecast/climate model. Meteor. Mag., 122, 81–94.

  • Dai, A., 2006: Precipitation characteristics in eighteen coupled climate models. J. Climate, 19, 4605–4630.

  • Davies, T., M. J. P. Cullen, A. J. Malcolm, M. H. Mawson, A. Stainforth, A. A. White, and N. Wood, 2005: A new dynamical core for the Met Office’s global and regional modelling of the atmosphere. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 1759–1782, doi:10.1256/qj.04.101.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dee, D. P., and Coauthors, 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, doi:10.1002/qj.828.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Essery, R., M. Best, and P. Cox, 2001: MOSES 2.2 technical documentation. Hadley Centre Tech. Note 30, 31 pp.

  • Fowler, H. J., and M. Ekström, 2009: Multi-model ensemble estimates of climate change impacts on UK seasonal precipitation extremes. Int. J. Climatol., 29, 385–416.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fowler, H. J., M. Ekström, S. Blenkinsop, and A. P. Smith, 2007: Estimating change in extreme European precipitation using a multimodel ensemble. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D18104, doi:10.1029/2007JD008619.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Frei, C., R. Schöll, S. Fukutome, J. Schmidli, and P. L. Vidale, 2006: Future change of precipitation extremes in Europe: Intercomparison of scenarios from regional climate models. J. Geophys. Res., 111, D06105, doi:10.1029/2005JD005965.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Golding, B. W., 1998: Nimrod: A system for generating automated very short range forecasts. Meteor. Appl., 5, 1–16.

  • Gregory, D., and P. R. Rowntree, 1990: A mass-flux convection scheme with representation of cloud ensemble characteristics and stability-dependent closure. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 1483–1506.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hand, W. H., N. I. Fox, and C. G. Collier, 2004: A study of twentieth-century extreme rainfall events in the United Kingdom with implications for forecasting. Meteor. Appl., 11, 15–31, doi:10.1017/S1350482703001117.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Harrison, D. L., S. J. Driscoll, and M. Kitchen, 2000: Improving precipitation estimates from weather radar using quality control and correction techniques. Meteor. Appl., 7, 135–144, doi:10.1017/S1350482700001468.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hohenegger, C., P. Brockhaus, and C. Schär, 2008: Towards climate simulations at cloud-resolving scales. Meteor. Z., 17, 383–394, doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0303.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hohenegger, C., P. Brockhaus, C. S. Bretherton, and C. Schär, 2009: The soil moisture–precipitation feedback in simulations with explicit and parameterized convection. J. Climate, 22, 5003–5020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jones, R. G., J. M. Murphy, M. Noguer, and A. B. Keen, 1997: Simulation of climate change over Europe using a nested regional-climate model. II: Comparison of driving and regional model responses to a doubling of carbon dioxide. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 265–292.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kendon, E. J., D. P. Rowell, and R. G. Jones, 2010: Mechanisms and reliability of future projected changes in daily precipitation. Climate Dyn., 35, 489–509, doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0639-z.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kjellström, E., F. Boberg, M. Castro, J. H. Christensen, G. Nikulin, and E. Sánchez, 2010: Daily and monthly temperature and precipitation statistics as performance indicators for regional climate models. Climate Res., 44, 135–150, doi:10.3354/cr00932.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Knote, C., G. Heinemann, and B. Rockel, 2010: Changes in weather extremes: Assessment of return values using high resolution climate simulations at convection-resolving scale. Meteor. Z., 19, 11–23, doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2010/0424.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lean, H. W., P. A. Clark, M. Dixon, N. M. Roberts, A. Fitch, R. Forbes, and C. Halliwell, 2008: Characteristics of high-resolution versions of the Met Office Unified Model for forecasting convection over the United Kingdom. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 3408–3424.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lenderink, G., and E. van Meijgaard, 2008: Increase in hourly precipitation extremes beyond expectations from temperature changes. Nat. Geosci., 1, 511–514.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lilly, D. K., 1962: On the numerical simulation of buoyant convection. Tellus, 14A, 148–171.

  • Lock, A. P., A. R. Brown, M. R. Bush, G. M. Martin, and R. N. B. Smith, 2000: A new boundary layer mixing scheme. Part I: Scheme description and single-column model tests. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 3187–3199.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Maraun, D., and Coauthors, 2010: Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Rev. Geophys., 48, RG3003, doi:10.1029/2009RG000314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • May, W., 2007: The simulation of the variability and extremes of daily precipitation over Europe by the HIRHAM regional climate model. Global Planet. Change, 57, 59–82, doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.11.026.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rauscher, S. A., E. Coppola, C. Piani, and F. Giorgi, 2010: Resolution effects on regional climate model simulations of seasonal precipitation over Europe. Climate Dyn., 35, 685–711.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reynolds, R. W., T. M. Smith, C. Liu, D. B. Chelton, K. S. Casey, and M. G. Schlax, 2007: Daily high-resolution blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J. Climate, 20, 5473–5496.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Roberts, N. M., 2007: Meteorological components in forecasts of extreme convective rainfall using 12-km and 1-km NWP models: A tale of two storms. Forecasting Research Tech. Rep. 520, 58 pp.

  • Roberts, N. M., and H. W. Lean, 2008: Scale-selective verification of rainfall accumulations from high-resolution forecasts of convective events. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 78–97.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Roberts, N. M., S. Cole, R. M. Forbes, R. Moore, and D. Boswell, 2009: Use of high-resolution NWP rainfall and river flow forecasts for advance warning of the Carlisle flood, north-west England. Meteor. Appl., 16, 23–34, doi:10.1002/met.94.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schwartz, C. S., and Coauthors, 2009: Next-day convection-allowing WRF model guidance: A second look at 2-km versus 4-km grid spacing. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 3351–3372.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Smagorinsky, J., 1963: General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Part I: The basic experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 91, 99–164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, M. Marquis, K. Averyt, M. M. B. Tignor, H. L. Miller Jr., and Z. Chen, Eds., 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, 996 pp.

  • Stratton, R. A., and A. J. Stirling, 2012: Improving the diurnal cycle of convection in GCMs. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 1121–1134, doi:10.1002/qj.991.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Swann, H., 2001: Evaluation of the mass-flux approach to parametrizing deep convection. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 1239–1260.

  • Wakazuki, Y., M. Nakamura, S. Kanada, and C. Muroi, 2008: Climatological reproducibility evaluation and future climate projection of extreme precipitation events in the baiu season using a high-resolution non-hydrostatic RCM in comparison with an AGCM. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 86, 951–967.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Walters, D. N., and Coauthors, 2011: The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 3.0/3.1 and JULES Global Land 3.0/3.1 configurations. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., 4, 1213–1271, doi:10.5194/gmdd-4-1213-2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weusthoff, T., F. Ament, M. Arpagaus, and M. W. Rotach, 2010: Assessing the benefits of convection-permitting models by neighborhood verification: Examples from MAP D-PHASE. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 3418–3433.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wilson, D. R., and S. P. Ballard, 1999: A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK Meteorological Office Unified Model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 1607–1636.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 4651 1487 64
PDF Downloads 1988 440 29