• Ainslie, B., , and P. L. Jackson, 2010: Downscaling and bias correcting a cold season precipitation climatology over coastal southern British Columbia using the regional atmospheric modeling system (RAMS). J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 937953.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bukovsky, M. S., , and D. J. Karoly, 2011: A regional modeling study of climate change impacts on warm-season precipitation in the central United States. J. Climate, 24, 19852002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caldwell, P., , H.-N. S. Chin, , D. C. Bader, , and G. Bala, 2009: Evaluation of a WRF dynamical downscaling simulation over California. Climatic Change, 95, 499521.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, F., , and J. Dudhia, 2001: Coupling an advanced land surface–hydrology model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 569585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collins, W. D., and Coauthors, 2004: Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3.0). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-464+STR, 214 pp.

  • Cook, K. H., , and E. K. Vizy, 2008: Effects of twenty-first-century climate change on the Amazon rain forest. J. Climate, 21, 542560.

  • Cooley, D., 2009: Extreme value analysis and the study of climate change: A commentary on Wigley 1988. Climatic Change, 97, 7783.

  • Dickinson, R. E., , R. M. Errico, , F. Giorgi, , and G. T. Bates, 1989: A regional climate model for the western United States. Climatic Change, 15, 383422.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fu, C., and Coauthors, 2005: Regional Climate Model Intercomparison Project for Asia. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 257266.

  • Giorgi, F., , and B. Hewitson, 2001: Regional climate information—Evaluation and projections. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, J. T. Houghton et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 583–638.

  • Giorgi, F., , C. S. Brodeur, , and G. T. Bates, 1994: Regional climate change scenarios over the United States produced with a nested regional climate model. J. Climate, 7, 357399.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gold, L. W., 1967: Influence of surface conditions on ground temperature. Can. J. Earth Sci., 4, 199208.

  • Heikkila, U., , A. Sandvik, , and A. Sorteberg, 2010: Dynamical downscaling of ERA-40 in complex terrain using the WRF regional climate model. Climate Dyn., 37, 15511564, doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0928-6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holland, G. J., , J. Done, , C. Bruyere, , C. Cooper, , and A. Suzuki, 2010: Model investigations of the effects of climate variability and change on future Gulf of Mexico tropical cyclone activity. Proc. Offshore Technology Conf., Houston, TX, ASCE, OTC 20690. [Available online at http://www.netl.doe.gov/kmd/RPSEA_Project_Outreach/07121-DW1801_OTC-20690-MS.pdf.]

  • Hong, S.-Y., , Y. Noh, , and J. Dudhia, 2006: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 23182341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jin, J. M., , S. Y. Wang, , and R. R. Gillies, 2011: An improved dynamical downscaling for the western United States. Climate Change: Research and Technology for Adaptation and Mitigation, J. Blanco and H. Kheradmand, Eds., InTech, 23–38.

  • Kain, J. S., 2004: The Kain–Fritsch convective parameterization: An update. J. Appl. Meteor., 43, 170181.

  • Kanamitsu, M., , K. Yoshimura, , Y.-B. Yhang, , and S.-Y. Hong, 2010: Errors of interannual variability and trend in dynamical downscaling of reanalysis. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D17115, doi:10.1029/2009JD013511.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Khairoutdinov, M., , D. Randall, , and C. DeMott, 2005: Simulations of the atmospheric general circulation using a cloud-resolving model as a superparameterization of physical processes. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 21362154.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kim, J., , and N. L. Miller, 2000: A seasonal precipitation and stream flow hindcast and prediction study in the western United States during the 1997/98 winter season using a dynamic downscaling system. J. Hydrometeor., 1, 311329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leung, L. R., , Y. Qian, , and X. Bian, 2003: Hydroclimate of the western United States based on observations and regional climate simulations of 1981–2000. Part I: Seasonal statistics. J. Climate, 16, 18921911.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lo, J. C., , Z.-L. Yang, , and R. A. Pielke Sr., 2008: Assessment of three dynamical climate downscaling methods using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D09112, doi:10.1029/2007JD009216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mearns, L. O., , W. J. Gutowski, , R. Jones, , L.-Y. Leung, , S. McGinnis, , A. M. B. Nunes, , and Y. Qian, 2009: A regional climate change assessment program for North America. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 90, 311312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neale, R. B., and Coauthors, 2010: Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 5.0). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-486+STR, 268 pp. [Available online at http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm1.0/cam/docs/description/cam5_desc.pdf.]

  • Oleson, K. W. Coauthors, 2010: Technical description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM4). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-478+STR, 257 pp.

  • Patricola, C. M., , and K. H. Cook, 2010: Northern African climate at the end of the twenty-first century: An integrated application of regional and global climate models. Climate Dyn., 35, 193212.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pausader, M., , D. Bernie, , S. Parey, , and M. Nogaj, 2011: Computing the distribution of return levels of extreme warm temperatures for future climate projections. Climate Dyn., 38, 10031015, doi:10.1007/s00382-011-1032-2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rojas, M., , and A. Seth, 2003: Simulation and sensitivity in a nested modeling study for South America. Part II: GCM boundary forcing. J. Climate, 16, 24542471.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sato, T., , F. Kimura, , and A. Kitoh, 2007: Projection of global warming onto regional precipitation over Mongolia using a regional climate model. J. Hydrol., 333, 144154.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seth, A., , and M. Rojas, 2003: Simulation and sensitivity in a nested modeling study for South America. Part I: Reanalysis boundary forcing. J. Climate, 16, 24372453.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seth, A., , S. A. Rauscher, , S. J. Camargo, , J.-H. Qian, , and J. S. Pal, 2007: RegCM3 regional climatologies for South America using reanalysis and ECHAM global model driving fields. Climate Dyn., 28, 461480, doi:10.1007/s00382-006-0191-z.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shukla, J., , and K. R. Saha, 1974: Computation of non-divergent streamfunction and irrotational velocity potential from the observed winds. Mon. Wea. Rev., 102, 419425.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Skamarock, W. C., and Coauthors, 2008: A description of the Advanced Research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-475+STR, 113 pp. [Available online at http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/arw_v3.pdf.]

  • Solomon, S., , D. Qin, , M. Manning, , M. Marquis, , K. Averyt, , M. M. B. Tignor, , H. L. Miller Jr., , and Z. Chen, Eds., 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, 996 pp.

  • van der Linden, P., , and J. F. B. Mitchell, Eds., 2009: ENSEMBLES: Climate change and its impacts: Summary of research and results from the ENSEMBLES project. Met Office Hadley Centre Rep., 160 pp. [Available online at http://ensembles-eu.metoffice.com/docs/Ensembles_final_report_Nov09.pdf.]

  • Wang, Y., , L. R. Leung, , J. L. Mcgregor, , D.-K. Lee, , W.-C. Wang, , Y. Ding, , and F. Kimura, 2004: Regional climate modeling: Progress, challenges and prospects. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 82, 15991628.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wigley, T. M. L., 2009: The effect of changing climate on the frequency of absolute extreme events. Climatic Change, 97, 6776.

  • Wu, W., , and A. H. Lynch, 2000: Response of the seasonal carbon cycle in high latitudes to climate anomalies. J. Geophys. Res., 105 (D18), 22 89722 908.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, W., , A. H. Lynch, , and A. Rivers, 2005: Estimating the uncertainty in a regional climate model related to initial and lateral boundary conditions. J. Climate, 18, 917933.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 214 214 28
PDF Downloads 126 126 20

An Improved Dynamical Downscaling Method with GCM Bias Corrections and Its Validation with 30 Years of Climate Simulations

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Geological Sciences, The Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, and RCE-TEA, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • | 2 Department of Geological Sciences, The Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
© Get Permissions
Restricted access

Abstract

An improved dynamical downscaling method (IDD) with general circulation model (GCM) bias corrections is developed and assessed over North America. A set of regional climate simulations is performed with the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) version 3.3 embedded in the National Center for Atmospheric Research's (NCAR's) Community Atmosphere Model (CAM). The GCM climatological means and the amplitudes of interannual variations are adjusted based on the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)–NCAR global reanalysis products (NNRP) before using them to drive WRF. In this study, the WRF downscaling experiments are identical except the initial and lateral boundary conditions derived from the NNRP, original GCM output, and bias-corrected GCM output, respectively. The analysis finds that the IDD greatly improves the downscaled climate in both climatological means and extreme events relative to the traditional dynamical downscaling approach (TDD). The errors of downscaled climatological mean air temperature, geopotential height, wind vector, moisture, and precipitation are greatly reduced when the GCM bias corrections are applied. In the meantime, IDD also improves the downscaled extreme events characterized by the reduced errors in 2-yr return levels of surface air temperature and precipitation. In comparison with TDD, IDD is also able to produce a more realistic probability distribution in summer daily maximum temperature over the central U.S.–Canada region as well as in summer and winter daily precipitation over the middle and eastern United States.

Corresponding author address: Zong-Liang Yang, The Jackson School of Geosciences, 1 University Station #C1100, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-0254. E-mail: liang@jsg.utexas.edu

Abstract

An improved dynamical downscaling method (IDD) with general circulation model (GCM) bias corrections is developed and assessed over North America. A set of regional climate simulations is performed with the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) version 3.3 embedded in the National Center for Atmospheric Research's (NCAR's) Community Atmosphere Model (CAM). The GCM climatological means and the amplitudes of interannual variations are adjusted based on the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)–NCAR global reanalysis products (NNRP) before using them to drive WRF. In this study, the WRF downscaling experiments are identical except the initial and lateral boundary conditions derived from the NNRP, original GCM output, and bias-corrected GCM output, respectively. The analysis finds that the IDD greatly improves the downscaled climate in both climatological means and extreme events relative to the traditional dynamical downscaling approach (TDD). The errors of downscaled climatological mean air temperature, geopotential height, wind vector, moisture, and precipitation are greatly reduced when the GCM bias corrections are applied. In the meantime, IDD also improves the downscaled extreme events characterized by the reduced errors in 2-yr return levels of surface air temperature and precipitation. In comparison with TDD, IDD is also able to produce a more realistic probability distribution in summer daily maximum temperature over the central U.S.–Canada region as well as in summer and winter daily precipitation over the middle and eastern United States.

Corresponding author address: Zong-Liang Yang, The Jackson School of Geosciences, 1 University Station #C1100, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-0254. E-mail: liang@jsg.utexas.edu
Save