• Bitz, C. M., 2008: Some aspects of uncertainty in predicting sea ice thinning. Sea Ice Decline, E. deWeaver, C. M. Bitz, and B. Tremblay, Eds., Amer. Geophys. Union, 63–76.

  • Bitz, C. M., , and G. H. Roe, 2004: A mechanism for the high rate of sea ice thinning in the Arctic Ocean. J. Climate, 17, 36233631.

  • Bitz, C. M., , P. R. Gent, , R. A. Woodgate, , M. M. Holland, , and R. Lindsay, 2006: The influence of sea ice on ocean heat uptake in response to increasing CO2. J. Climate, 19, 24372450.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boer, G. J., , and B. Yu, 2003a: Climate sensitivity and climate state. Climate Dyn., 21, 167176.

  • Boer, G. J., , and B. Yu, 2003b: Climate sensitivity and response. Climate Dyn., 20, 415429.

  • Boer, G. J., , and B. Yu, 2003c: Dynamic climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1135, doi:10.1029/2002GL016549.

  • Briegleb, B. P., , and B. Light, 2007: A Delta–Eddington multiple scattering parameterization for solar radiation in the sea ice component of the Community Climate System Model. NCAR Tech. Note 472+STR, 100 pp.

  • Collins, W. D., and Coauthors, 2006: The Community Climate System Model, version 3 (CCSM3). J. Climate, 19, 21222143.

  • Comiso, J. C., 1990: DMSP SSM/I daily and monthly polar gridded bootstratp sea ice concentrations 1990–99. National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, CO, digital media. [Available online at http://nsidc.org/data/nsidc-0002.html.]

  • Danabasoglu, G., , and P. R. Gent, 2009: Equilibrium climate sensitivity: Is it accurate to use a slab ocean model? J. Climate, 22, 24942499.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Danabasoglu, G., , S. Bates, , B. P. Briegleb, , S. R. Jayne, , M. Jochum, , W. G. Large, , S. Peacock, , and S. G. Yeager, 2012: The CCSM4 ocean component. J. Climate, 25, 13611389.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gent, P., and Coauthors, 2011: The Community Climate System Model, version 4. J. Climate, 24, 49734991.

  • Gregory, J. M., and Coauthors, 2004: A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L03205, doi:10.1029/2003GL018747.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hansen, J., , M. Sato, , and R. Ruedy, 1997: Radiative forcing and climate response. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 68316864.

  • Holland, M. M., , and C. M. Bitz, 2003: Polar amplification of climate change in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. Climate Dyn., 21, 221232.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holland, M. M., , C. M. Bitz, , and A. Weaver, 2001: The influence of sea ice physics on simulations of climate change. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 24412464.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holland, M. M., , C. M. Bitz, , E. C. Hunke, , W. H. Lipscomb, , and J. L. Schramm, 2006: Influence of the sea ice thickness distribution on polar climate in CCSM3. J. Climate, 19, 23982414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holland, M. M., , D. Bailey, , B. Briegleb, , B. Light, , and E. Hunke, 2012: Improved sea ice shortwave radiation physics in CCSM4: The impact of melt ponds and aerosols on Arctic sea ice. J. Climate, 25, 14131430.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IPCC, 1990: Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 365 pp.

  • Kay, J., , M. Holland, , C. Bitz, , A. Gettleman, , E. Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, , A. Conley, , and D. Bailey, 2012: The influence of local feedbacks and northward heat transport on the equilibrium Arctic climate response to increased greenhouse gas forcing. J. Climate, in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kiehl, J. T., , W. D. Collins, , J. J. Hack, , and C. Shields, 2006: The climate sensitivity of the Community Climate System Model, version 3 (CCSM3). J. Climate, 19, 25842596.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knutson, T., cited 2009: FMS slab ocean model technical documentation. [Available online at http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/fms-slab-ocean-model-technical-documentation.]

  • Lawrence, D. M., , K. W. Oleson, , M. G. Flanner, , C. G. Fletcher, , P. J. Lawrence, , S. Levis, , S. C. Swenson, , and G. B. Bonan, 2012: The CCSM4 land simulation, 1850–2005: Assessment of surface climate and new capabilities. J. Climate, 25, 22402260.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lunt, D. J., , A. M. Haywood, , G. A. Schmidt, , U. Salzmann, , P. J. Valdes, , and H. J. Dowsett, 2010: Earth system sensitivity inferred from Pliocene modelling and data. Nat. Geosci., 3, 6064.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCusker, K., , D. Battisti, , and C. M. Bitz, 2012: The climate response to stratospheric sulfate injections and implications for addressing climate emergencies. J. Climate, 25, 30963116.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McFarlane, N. A., , G. J. Boer, , J.-P. Blanchet, , and M. Lazare, 1992: The Canadian Climate Centre second-generation general circulation model and its equilibrium climate. J. Climate, 5, 10131044.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Murphy, D. M., 1995: Transient response of the Hadley Centre coupled ocean–atmosphere model to increasing carbon dioxide: Part III. Analysis of global-mean response using simple models. J. Climate, 8, 495514.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neale, R. B., , J. H. Richter, , and M. Jochum, 2008: The impact of convection on ENSO: From a delayed oscillator to a series of events. J. Climate, 21, 59045924.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neale, R. B., and Coauthors, 2010: Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 4.0). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-485+STR, 212 pp. [Available online at http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/ccsm4.0/cam/docs/description/cam4_desc.pdf.]

  • Randall, D. A., and Coauthors, 2007: Climate models and their evaluation. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, S. Solomon et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 589–662.

  • Richter, J. H., , and P. J. Rasch, 2008: Effects of convective momentum transport on the atmospheric circulation in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3. J. Climate, 21, 14871499.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rind, D., , R. Healy, , C. Parkinson, , and D. Martinson, 1997: The role of sea ice in 2XCO2 climate model sensitivity. Part II: Hemispheric dependencies. Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 14911494.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmidt, G. A., and Coauthors, 2006: Present-day atmospheric simulations using GISS ModelE: Comparison to in situ, satellite, and reanalysis data. J. Climate, 19, 153192.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Senior, C. A., , and J. F. B. Mitchell, 2000: The time-dependence of climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 26852688.

  • Shell, K., , J. T. Kiehl, , and C. Shields, 2008: Using the radiative kernel technique to calculate climate feedbacks in NCAR’s Community Atmosphere Model. J. Climate, 21, 22692282.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Soden, B., , and I. Held, 2006: An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean–atmosphere models. J. Climate, 19, 33543360.

  • Soden, B., , I. Held, , R. Colman, , K. Shell, , J. Kiehl, , and C. Shields, 2008: Quantifying climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. J. Climate, 21, 35043520.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vavrus, S. J., , and D. Waliser, 2008: An improved parameterization for simulating Arctic cloud amount in the CCSM3 climate model. J. Climate, 21, 56735687.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williams, K., , A. Keen, , J. Crossley, , C. Senior, , and C. Hewitt, 2000: The slab model. Unified Model Documentation Paper 058, 27 pp. [Available online at http://cms.ncas.ac.uk/index.php/component/content/article/56-general/1494-met-office-docs.]

  • Winton, M., , K. Takahashi, , and I. Held, 2010: Importance of ocean heat uptake efficacy to transient climate change. J. Climate, 23, 23332344.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yi, D., , and J. Zwally, 2010: Arctic sea ice freeboard and thickness. National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, CO, digital media. [Available online at http://nsidc.org/data/nsidc-0393.html.]

  • Zhang, G., , and N. McFarlane, 1995: Role of convective-scale momentum transport in climate simulation. J. Geophys. Res., 100, 14171426.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 186 186 65
PDF Downloads 90 90 14

Climate Sensitivity of the Community Climate System Model, Version 4

View More View Less
  • 1 Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • 2 College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon
  • 3 National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
  • 4 Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • 5 National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
© Get Permissions
Restricted access

Abstract

Equilibrium climate sensitivity of the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4) is 3.20°C for 1° horizontal resolution in each component. This is about a half degree Celsius higher than in the previous version (CCSM3). The transient climate sensitivity of CCSM4 at 1° resolution is 1.72°C, which is about 0.2°C higher than in CCSM3. These higher climate sensitivities in CCSM4 cannot be explained by the change to a preindustrial baseline climate. This study uses the radiative kernel technique to show that, from CCSM3 to CCSM4, the global mean lapse-rate feedback declines in magnitude and the shortwave cloud feedback increases. These two warming effects are partially canceled by cooling because of slight decreases in the global mean water vapor feedback and longwave cloud feedback from CCSM3 to CCSM4.

A new formulation of the mixed layer, slab-ocean model in CCSM4 attempts to reproduce the SST and sea ice climatology from an integration with a full-depth ocean, and it is integrated with a dynamic sea ice model. These new features allow an isolation of the influence of ocean dynamical changes on the climate response when comparing integrations with the slab ocean and full-depth ocean. The transient climate response of the full-depth ocean version is 0.54 of the equilibrium climate sensitivity when estimated with the new slab-ocean model version for both CCSM3 and CCSM4. The authors argue the ratio is the same in both versions because they have about the same zonal mean pattern of change in ocean surface heat flux, which broadly resembles the zonal mean pattern of net feedback strength.

Corresponding author address: C. M. Bitz, Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, NE Campus Parkway, Seattle, WA 98195-5852. E-mail: bitz@atmos.washington.edu

This article is included in the CCSM4 Special Collection.

Abstract

Equilibrium climate sensitivity of the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4) is 3.20°C for 1° horizontal resolution in each component. This is about a half degree Celsius higher than in the previous version (CCSM3). The transient climate sensitivity of CCSM4 at 1° resolution is 1.72°C, which is about 0.2°C higher than in CCSM3. These higher climate sensitivities in CCSM4 cannot be explained by the change to a preindustrial baseline climate. This study uses the radiative kernel technique to show that, from CCSM3 to CCSM4, the global mean lapse-rate feedback declines in magnitude and the shortwave cloud feedback increases. These two warming effects are partially canceled by cooling because of slight decreases in the global mean water vapor feedback and longwave cloud feedback from CCSM3 to CCSM4.

A new formulation of the mixed layer, slab-ocean model in CCSM4 attempts to reproduce the SST and sea ice climatology from an integration with a full-depth ocean, and it is integrated with a dynamic sea ice model. These new features allow an isolation of the influence of ocean dynamical changes on the climate response when comparing integrations with the slab ocean and full-depth ocean. The transient climate response of the full-depth ocean version is 0.54 of the equilibrium climate sensitivity when estimated with the new slab-ocean model version for both CCSM3 and CCSM4. The authors argue the ratio is the same in both versions because they have about the same zonal mean pattern of change in ocean surface heat flux, which broadly resembles the zonal mean pattern of net feedback strength.

Corresponding author address: C. M. Bitz, Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, NE Campus Parkway, Seattle, WA 98195-5852. E-mail: bitz@atmos.washington.edu

This article is included in the CCSM4 Special Collection.

Save