Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

A Comparison of Atmospheric Reanalysis Surface Products over the Ocean and Implications for Uncertainties in Air–Sea Boundary Forcing

Ayan H. Chaudhuri Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Lexington, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Ayan H. Chaudhuri in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Rui M. Ponte Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Lexington, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Rui M. Ponte in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Gael Forget Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Gael Forget in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Patrick Heimbach Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Patrick Heimbach in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jan 2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00090.1
Page(s):
153–170
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper investigates the uncertainties related to atmospheric fields from reanalysis products used in forcing ocean models. Four reanalysis products, namely from 1) the interim ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim), 2) version 2 of the Common Reference Ocean–Ice Experiments (CORE2), 3) the 25-Year Japanese Reanalysis Project (JRA-25), and 4) NCEP–NCAR, are evaluated against satellite-derived observations for eight different fields (zonal and meridional winds, precipitation, specific humidity, continental discharge, surface air temperature, and downwelling longwave and shortwave radiation fluxes). No single product is found to agree better in all fields with satellite-derived observations. Reanalysis products are mostly comparable to each other because of their similar physical assumptions and assimilation of common observations. Adjusted atmospheric fields from the Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean (ECCO) optimizations are also in agreement with other reanalysis products. Time-mean and time-variable errors are estimated separately and mapped globally in space, based on 14-day average fields to focus on monthly to interannual periods. Time-variable errors are larger in comparison to the signal than time-mean errors for most fields, thus justifying the need to separate them for studying uncertainties as well as formulating optimization procedures. Precipitation and wind stress fields show significant time-mean and time-variable errors whereas downwelling radiation, air temperature, and humidity fields show small time-mean errors but large time-variable errors, particularly in the tropics. Uncertainties based on evaluating multiple products presented here are considerably larger than uncertainties based on single product pairs.

Corresponding author address: Ayan H. Chaudhuri, Atmospheric and Environmental Research, 131 Hartwell Ave., Lexington, MA 02421. E-mail: achaudhu@aer.com

Abstract

This paper investigates the uncertainties related to atmospheric fields from reanalysis products used in forcing ocean models. Four reanalysis products, namely from 1) the interim ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim), 2) version 2 of the Common Reference Ocean–Ice Experiments (CORE2), 3) the 25-Year Japanese Reanalysis Project (JRA-25), and 4) NCEP–NCAR, are evaluated against satellite-derived observations for eight different fields (zonal and meridional winds, precipitation, specific humidity, continental discharge, surface air temperature, and downwelling longwave and shortwave radiation fluxes). No single product is found to agree better in all fields with satellite-derived observations. Reanalysis products are mostly comparable to each other because of their similar physical assumptions and assimilation of common observations. Adjusted atmospheric fields from the Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean (ECCO) optimizations are also in agreement with other reanalysis products. Time-mean and time-variable errors are estimated separately and mapped globally in space, based on 14-day average fields to focus on monthly to interannual periods. Time-variable errors are larger in comparison to the signal than time-mean errors for most fields, thus justifying the need to separate them for studying uncertainties as well as formulating optimization procedures. Precipitation and wind stress fields show significant time-mean and time-variable errors whereas downwelling radiation, air temperature, and humidity fields show small time-mean errors but large time-variable errors, particularly in the tropics. Uncertainties based on evaluating multiple products presented here are considerably larger than uncertainties based on single product pairs.

Corresponding author address: Ayan H. Chaudhuri, Atmospheric and Environmental Research, 131 Hartwell Ave., Lexington, MA 02421. E-mail: achaudhu@aer.com
Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Alves, O., and C. Robert, 2005: Tropical Pacific Ocean model error covariances from Monte Carlo simulations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 3643–3658.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Andersson, A., K. Fennig, C. Klepp, S. Bakan, H. Graßl, and J. Schulz, 2010: The Hamburg Ocean–Atmosphere Parameters and Fluxes from Satellite Data—HOAPS-3. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 2, 215–234.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bentamy, A., K. B. Katsaros, A. M. Mestas-Nuñez, W. M. Drennan, E. B. Forde, and H. Roquet, 2003: Satellite estimates of wind speed and latent heat flux over the global oceans. J. Climate, 16, 637–656.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bosilovich, M. G., J. Chen, F. R. Robertson, and R. F. Adler, 2008: Evaluation of global precipitation in reanalyses. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 2279–2299.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bourassa, M. A, and Coauthors, 2013: High-latitude ocean and sea-ice surface fluxes: Challenges for climate research. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brodeau, L., B. Bernard, A. M. Treguier, T. Penduff, and S. Gulev, 2010: An ERA40-based atmospheric forcing for global ocean circulation models. Ocean Modell., 31, 88–104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bromwich, D. H., J. P. Nicolas, and A. J. Monaghan, 2011: An assessment of precipitation changes over Antarctica and the Southern Ocean since 1989 in contemporary global reanalyses. J. Climate, 24, 4189–4209.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Broquet, G., C. A. Edwards, A. M. Moore, B. S. Powell, M. Veneziani, and J. D. Doyle, 2009: Application of 4D variational data assimilation to the California current system. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans, 48, 69–92.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brunke, M. A., C. W. Fairall, X. Zeng, L. Eymard, and J. A. Curry, 2003: Which bulk aerodynamic algorithms are least problematic in computing ocean surface turbulent fluxes? J. Climate, 16, 619–635.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brunke, M. A., Z. Wang, X. Zeng, M. Bosilovich, and C.-L. Shie, 2011: An assessment of the uncertainties in ocean surface turbulent fluxes in 11 reanalysis, satellite-derived, and combined global data sets. J. Climate, 24, 5469–5493.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bryan, F., 1986: High-latitude salinity effects and interhemispheric thermohaline circulations. Nature, 323, 301–304.

  • Carton, J. A., 1991: Effect of seasonal surface freshwater flux on sea surface temperature in the tropical Atlantic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 96, 12 593–12 598.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chelton, D. B., and M. H. Freilich, 2005: Scatterometer-based assessment of 10-m wind analyses from the operational ECMWF and NCEP numerical weather prediction models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 409–429.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chou, S. H., W. Zhao, and M.-D. Chou, 2000: Surface heat budgets and sea surface temperature in the Pacific warm pool during TOGA COARE. J. Climate, 13, 634–649.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cox, M. D., and K. Bryan, 1984: A numerical model of the ventilated thermocline. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 14, 674–687.

  • Curry, J. A., and Coauthors, 2004: SEAFLUX. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85, 409–424.

  • Dai, A., T. Qian, K. E. Trenberth, and J. D. Milliman, 2009: Changes in continental freshwater discharge from 1948 to 2004. J. Climate, 22, 2773–2792.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Danabasoglu, G., and J. C. McWilliams, 1995: Sensitivity of the global ocean circulation to parameterizations of mesoscale tracer transports. J. Climate, 8, 2967–2987.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Danabasoglu, G., W. G. Large, J. J. Tribbia, P. R. Gent, B. P. Briegleb, and J. C. McWilliams, 2006: Diurnal coupling in the tropical oceans of CCSM3. J. Climate, 19, 2347–2365.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dee, D. P., and Coauthors, 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dong, S., S. T. Gille, and J. Sprintall, 2007: An assessment of the Southern Ocean mixed layer heat budget. J. Climate, 20, 4425–4442.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Drobot, S. D., J. A. Maslanik, and C. Fowler, 2006: A long-range forecast of Arctic summer sea-ice minimum extent. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L10501, doi:10.1029/2006GL026216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Griffies, S. M., and Coauthors, 2005: Formulation of an ocean model for global climate simulations. Ocean Sci., 1, 45–79.

  • Griffies, S. M., and Coauthors, 2009: Coordinated Ocean-Ice Reference Experiments (COREs). Ocean Modell., 26, 1–46.

  • Griffies, S. M., M. Winton, B. Samuels, G. Danabasoglu, S. Yeager, S. Marsland, and H. Drange, 2012: Datasets and protocol for the CLIVAR WGOMD Coordinated Ocean–Sea Ice Reference Experiments (COREs), 20 pp. [Available online at http://data1.gfdl.noaa.gov/~nnz/mom4/COREv2/doc/CORE_notes_15feb2012.pdf.]

  • Han, Y.-J., 1984: A numerical world ocean general circulation model. Part II: A baroclinic experiment. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans, 8, 141–172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Haney, R. L., 1971: Surface thermal boundary condition for ocean circulation models. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 1, 241–248.

  • Huffman, G. J., and Coauthors, 1997: The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) combined precipitation datasets. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 5–20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437–431.

  • Kent, E., P. Taylor, B. Truscott, and J. Hopkins, 1993: The accuracy of voluntary observing ships’ meteorological observations—Results of the VSOP-NA. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 10, 591–608.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kistler, R., and Coauthors, 2001: The NCEP–NCAR 50-Year Reanalysis: Monthly means CD-ROM and documentation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 82, 247–267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Large, W. G., and S. Pond, 1981: Open ocean momentum flux measurements in moderate to strong winds. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 11, 324–336.

  • Large, W. G., and S. G. Yeager, 2004: Diurnal to decadal global forcing for ocean and sea-ice models: The data sets and flux climatologies. NCAR Tech. Rep. NCAR/TN-460+STR, 105 pp.

  • Large, W. G., and S. G. Yeager, 2009: The global climatology of an interannually varying air–sea flux data set. Climate Dyn., 33, 341–364.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Large, W. G., G. Danabasoglu, S. C. Doney, and J. C. McWilliams, 1997: Sensitivity to surface forcing and boundary layer mixing in a global ocean model: Annual mean climatology. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 2418–2447.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Leeuwenburgh, O., 2005: Assimilation of along-track altimeter data in the tropical Pacific region of a global OGCM ensemble. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 2455–2472.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lorenc, A. C., 1986: Analysis methods for numerical weather prediction. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 1177–1194.

  • Lucas, M., N. Ayoub, B. Barnier, T. Penduff, and P. de Mey, 2008: Stochastic study of the temperature response of the upper ocean to uncertainties in the atmospheric forcing in an Atlantic OGCM. Ocean Modell., 20, 90–113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mazloff, M. R., P. Heimbach, and C. Wunsch, 2010: An eddy-permitting Southern Ocean state estimate. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 40, 880–899.

  • McWilliams, J. C., 1996: Modeling the oceanic general circulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 28, 1–34.

  • Milliff, R. F., and J. Morzel, 2001: The global distribution of the time-average wind-stress curl from NSCAT. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 109–131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Milliff, R. F., W. G. Large, J. Morzel, G. Danabasoglu, and T. M. Chin, 1999: Ocean general circulation model sensitivity to forcing from scatterometer winds. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 11 337–11 358.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moore, A. M., H. G. Arango, G. Broquet, B. S. Powell, J. Zavala-Garay, and A. T. Weaver, 2011: The Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) 4-dimensional variational data assimilation systems. Part I—System overview and formulation. Prog. Oceanogr., 91, 34–49.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nicolas, J. P., and D. H. Bromwich, 2011: Precipitation changes in high southern latitudes from global reanalyses: A cautionary tale. Surv. Geophys., 32, 475–494.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Onogi, K., and Coauthors, 2005: JRA-25: Japanese 25-Year Re-Analysis Project—Progress and status. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 3259–3268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Onogi, K., and Coauthors, 2007: The JRA-25 Reanalysis. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 85, 369–432.

  • Peel, M. C., and T. A. McMahon, 2006: Recent frequency component changes in interannual climate variability. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L16810, doi:10.1029/2006GL025670.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rigor, I. G., R. L. Colony, and S. Martin, 2000: Variations in surface air temperature observations in the Arctic, 1979–97. J. Climate, 13, 896–914.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rigor, I. G., J. M. Wallace, and R. L. Colony, 2002: Response of sea ice to the Arctic oscillation. J. Climate, 15, 2648–2663.

  • Risien, C. M., and D. B. Chelton, 2008: A global climatology of surface wind and wind stress fields from eight years of QuikSCAT scatterometer data. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38, 2379–2413.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Salstein, D. A., R. M. Ponte, and K. Cady-Pereira, 2008: Uncertainties in atmospheric surface pressure fields from global analyses. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D14107, doi:10.1029/2007JD009531.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schlax, M. G., D. B. Chelton, and M. H. Freilich, 2001: Sampling errors in wind fields constructed from single and tandem scatterometer datasets. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 18, 1014–1036.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schultz, J., P. Schlussel, and H. Grassl, 1993: Water vapour in the atmosphere boundary layer over oceans from SSM/I measurements. Int. J. Remote. Sens., 14, 2773–2789.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Simmons, A., S. Uppala, D. Dee, and S. Kobayashi, 2006: ERA-Interim: New ECMWF reanalysis products from 1989 onwards. ECMWF Newsletter, No. 110, ECMWF, Reading, United Kingdom, 25–35.

  • Smith, S. R., D. M. Legler, and K. V. Verzone, 2001: Quantifying uncertainties in NCEP reanalyses using high-quality research vessel observations. J. Climate, 14, 4062–4072.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stammer, D., and Coauthors, 2002: The global ocean circulation during 1992–1997, estimated from ocean observations and a general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res., 107, 3118, doi:10.1029/2001JC000888.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stammer, D., K. Ueyoshi, A. Kohl, W. G. Large, S. A. Josey, and C. Wunsch, 2004: Estimating air–sea fluxes of heat, freshwater, and momentum through global ocean data assimilation. J. Geophys. Res., 109, C05023, doi:10.1029/2003JC002082.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sun, B., L. Yu, and R. A. Weller, 2003: Comparisons of surface meteorology and turbulent heat fluxes over the Atlantic: NWP model analyses versus moored buoy observations. J. Climate, 16, 679–695.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Syed, T. H., J. S. Famiglietti, D. P. Chambers, J. K. Willis, and K. Hilburn, 2010: Satellite-based global-ocean mass balance estimates of interannual variability and emerging trends in continental freshwater discharge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 17 916–17 921.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Taylor, K. E., 2001: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in single diagram. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 7183–7192.

  • Taylor, P. K., Ed., 2000: Intercomparison and validation of ocean–atmosphere energy flux fields: Final report of the Joint World Climate Research Program and Scientific Committee on Ocean Research working group on air–sea fluxes. World Climate Research Program Rep. WCRP-112, 303 pp.

  • Tjernström, M., J. Sedlar, and M. D. Shupe, 2008: How well do regional climate models reproduce radiation and clouds in the Arctic? An evaluation of ARCMIP simulations. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 2405–2422.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Uppala, S. M., and Coauthors, 2005: The ERA-40 Re-Analysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 2961–3012.

  • Wallcraft, A. J., A. B. Kara, C. N. Barron, E. J. Metzger, R. L. Pauley, and M. A. Bourassa, 2009: Comparisons of monthly mean 10-m wind speeds from satellites and NWP products over the global ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D16109, doi:10.1029/2008JD011696.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wang, W., and M. J. McPhaden, 2001: Surface layer temperature balance in the equatorial Pacific during the 1997–98 El Niño and 1998–99 La Niña. J. Climate, 14, 3393–3407.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wunsch, C., and P. Heimbach, 2006: Estimated decadal changes in the North Atlantic meridional overturning circulation and heat flux 1993–2004. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 36, 2012–2024.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wunsch, C., and P. Heimbach, 2007: Practical global ocean state estimation. Physica D, 230, 197–208.

  • Xie, P., and P. A. Arkin, 1997: Global precipitation: A 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model outputs. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 2539–2558.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xu, Y., and R. B. Scott, 2008: Subtleties in forcing eddy resolving ocean models with satellite wind data. Ocean Modell., 20, 240–251.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, Y.-C., W. B. Rossow, and A. A. Lacis, 1995: Calculation of surface and top-of-atmosphere radiative fluxes from physical quantities based on ISCCP datasets: 1. Method and sensitivity to input data uncertainties. J. Geophys. Res., 100, 1149–1165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, Y.-C., W. B. Rossow, A. A. Lacis, V. Oinas, and M. I. Mishchenko, 2004: Calculation of radiative fluxes from the surface to top of atmosphere based on ISCCP and other global data sets: Refinements of the radiative transfer model and the input data. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D19105, doi:10.1029/2003JD004457.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 534 156 11
PDF Downloads 346 95 8