Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Estimating the Permafrost-Carbon Climate Response in the CMIP5 Climate Models Using a Simplified Approach

Eleanor J. Burke Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Eleanor J. Burke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Chris D. Jones Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Chris D. Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Charles D. Koven Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California

Search for other papers by Charles D. Koven in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
15 Jul 2013
Collections:
C4MIP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00550.1
Page(s):
4897–4909
Restricted access

Abstract

Under climate change, thawing permafrost may cause a release of carbon, which has a positive feedback on the climate. The permafrost-carbon climate response (γPF) is the additional permafrost-carbon made vulnerable to decomposition per degree of global temperature increase. A simple framework was adopted to estimate γPF using the database for phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). The projected changes in the annual maximum active layer thicknesses (ALTmax) over the twenty-first century were quantified using CMIP5 soil temperatures. These changes were combined with the observed distribution of soil organic carbon and its potential decomposability to give γPF. This estimate of γPF is dependent on the biases in the simulated present-day permafrost. This dependency was reduced by combining a reference estimate of the present-day ALTmax with an estimate of the sensitivity of ALTmax to temperature from the CMIP5 models. In this case, γPF was from −6 to −66 PgC K−1(5th–95th percentile) with a radiative forcing of 0.03–0.29 W m−2 K−1. This range is mainly caused by uncertainties in the amount of soil carbon deeper in the soil profile and whether it thaws over the time scales under consideration. These results suggest that including permafrost-carbon within climate models will lead to an increase in the positive global carbon climate feedback. Under future climate change the northern high-latitude permafrost region is expected to be a small sink of carbon. Adding the permafrost-carbon response is likely to change this region to a source of carbon.

Corresponding author address: Eleanor Burke, Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, United Kingdom. E-mail: eleanor.burke@metoffice.gov.uk

This article is included in the (C4MIP) Climate–Carbon Interactions in the CMIP5 Earth System Models special collection.

Abstract

Under climate change, thawing permafrost may cause a release of carbon, which has a positive feedback on the climate. The permafrost-carbon climate response (γPF) is the additional permafrost-carbon made vulnerable to decomposition per degree of global temperature increase. A simple framework was adopted to estimate γPF using the database for phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). The projected changes in the annual maximum active layer thicknesses (ALTmax) over the twenty-first century were quantified using CMIP5 soil temperatures. These changes were combined with the observed distribution of soil organic carbon and its potential decomposability to give γPF. This estimate of γPF is dependent on the biases in the simulated present-day permafrost. This dependency was reduced by combining a reference estimate of the present-day ALTmax with an estimate of the sensitivity of ALTmax to temperature from the CMIP5 models. In this case, γPF was from −6 to −66 PgC K−1(5th–95th percentile) with a radiative forcing of 0.03–0.29 W m−2 K−1. This range is mainly caused by uncertainties in the amount of soil carbon deeper in the soil profile and whether it thaws over the time scales under consideration. These results suggest that including permafrost-carbon within climate models will lead to an increase in the positive global carbon climate feedback. Under future climate change the northern high-latitude permafrost region is expected to be a small sink of carbon. Adding the permafrost-carbon response is likely to change this region to a source of carbon.

Corresponding author address: Eleanor Burke, Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, United Kingdom. E-mail: eleanor.burke@metoffice.gov.uk

This article is included in the (C4MIP) Climate–Carbon Interactions in the CMIP5 Earth System Models special collection.

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Arneth, A., and Coauthors, 2010: Terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in the climate system. Nat. Geosci., 3, 525–532, doi:10.1038/ngeo905.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Arora, V. K., and Coauthors, 2013: Carbon-concentration and carbon–climate feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth system models. J. Climate, in press.

  • Best, M. J., and Coauthors, 2011: The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), Model description—Part 1: Energy and water fluxes. Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 677–699, doi:10.5194/gmd-4-677-2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Boer, G. J., and V. K. Arora, 2010: Geographic aspects of temperature and concentration feedbacks in the carbon budget. J. Climate, 23, 775–784.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Burke, E. J., I. P. Hartley, and C. D. Jones, 2012: Uncertainties in the global temperature change caused by carbon release from permafrost thawing. Cryosphere, 6, 1063–1076, doi:10.5194/tc-6-1063-2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Burke, E. J., R. D. Dankers, C. D. Jones, and A. J. Wiltshire, 2013: Evaluating changes in near-surface permafrost during the 20th century with the JULES land surface model. Climate Dyn.,in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dankers, R., E. J. Burke, and J. Price, 2011: Simulation of permafrost and seasonal thaw depth in the JULES land surface scheme. Cryosphere, 5, 773–790, doi:10.5194/tc-5-773-2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dutta, K., E. A. G. Schuur, J. C. Neff, and S. A. Zimov, 2006: Potential carbon release from permafrost soils of northeastern Siberia. Global Change Biol., 12, 2336–2351.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Falloon, P. D., P. Smith, K. Coleman, and S. Marshall, 1998: Estimating the size of the inert organic matter pool from total soil organic carbon content for use in the Rothamsted carbon model. Soil Biol. Biochem., 30, 1207–1211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Friedlingstein, P., and Coauthors, 2006: Climate–carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J. Climate, 19, 3337–3353.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gregory, J. M., C. D. Jones, P. Cadule, and P. Friedlingstein, 2009: Quantifying carbon cycle feedbacks. J. Climate, 22, 5232–5250.

  • Harden, J. W., and Coauthors, 2012: Field information links permafrost carbon to physical vulnerabilities of thawing. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L15704doi:10.1029/2012GL051958.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Keuper, F., P. M. van Bodegom, E. Dorrepaal, J. T. Weedon, J. van Hal, R. S. P. van Logtestijn, and R. Aerts, 2012: A frozen feast: Thawing permafrost increases plant-available nitrogen in subarctic peatlands. Global Change Biol., 18, 1998–2007, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02663.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koven, C. D., B. Ringeval, P. Friedlingstein, P. Ciais, P. Cadule, D. Khvorostyanov, G. Krinner, and C. Tarnocai, 2011: Permafrost carbon–climate feedbacks accelerate global warming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 14 769–14 774, doi:10.1073/pnas.1103910108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koven, C. D., W. J. Riley, and A. Stern, 2013: Analysis of permafrost thermal dynamics and response to climate change in the CMIP5 earth system models. J. Climate,26, 1877–1900.

  • MacDougall, A. H., C. A. Avis, and A. J. Weaver, 2012: Significant contribution to climate warming from the permafrost carbon feedback. Nat. Geosci., 5, 719–721, doi:10.1038/ngeo1573.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McKay, M. D., R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover, 1979: A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 21, 239–245, doi:10.2307/1268522.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moss, R. H., and Coauthors, 2010: The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature, 463, 747–756, doi:10.1038/nature08823.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Qian, H., R. Joseph, and N. Zeng, 2010: Enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake in the northern high latitudes in the 21st century from the Coupled Carbon Cycle Climate Model Intercomparison Project model projections. Global Change Biol., 16, 641–656, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01989.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schaefer, K., T. Zhang, L. Bruhwiler, and A. P. Barrett, 2011: Amount and timing of permafrost carbon release in response to climate warming. Tellus, 63B, 165–180, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00527.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schneider von Deimling, T., M. Meinshausen, A. Levermann, V. Huber, K. Frieler, D. M. Lawrence, and V. Brovkin, 2012: Estimating the permafrost–carbon feedback on global warming. Biogeosciences, 9, 649–665, doi:10.5194/bg-9-649-2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schuur, E. A. G., and B. Abbott, 2011: Climate change: High risk of permafrost thaw. Nature, 480, 32–33, doi:10.1038/480032a.

  • Schuur, E. A. G., and Coauthors, 2008: Vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change: Implications for the global carbon cycle. Bioscience, 58, 701–714, doi:10.1641/B580807.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schuur, E. A. G., J. G. Vogel, K. G. Crummer, H. Lee, J. O. Sickman, and T. E. Osterkamp, 2009: The effect of permafrost thaw on old carbon release and net carbon exchange from tundra. Nature, 459, 556–559, doi:10.1038/nature08031.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Slater, A. G., and D. M. Lawrence, 2013: Diagnosing present and future permafrost from climate models. J. Climate, in press.

  • Tarnocai, C., J. G. Canadell, E. A. G. Schuur, P. Kuhry, G. Mazhitova, and S. Zimov, 2009: Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 23, GB2023, doi:10.1029/2008GB003327.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weedon, G. P., and Coauthors, 2011: Creation of the WATCH forcing data and its use to assess global and regional reference crop evaporation over land during the twentieth century. J. Hydrometeor., 12, 823–848.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, T., R. G. Barry, K. Knowles, F. Ling, and R. L. Armstrong, 2003: Distribution of seasonally and perennially frozen ground in the Northern Hemisphere. Permafrost, M. Phillips, S. M. Springman, and L. U. Arenson, Eds., Swets and Zeitlinger, 1289–1294.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1495 554 65
PDF Downloads 811 191 36