Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

A Comparison of Atmospheric Reanalysis Products for the Arctic Ocean and Implications for Uncertainties in Air–Sea Fluxes

Ayan H. Chaudhuri Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Lexington, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Ayan H. Chaudhuri in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Rui M. Ponte Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Lexington, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Rui M. Ponte in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
An T. Nguyen Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by An T. Nguyen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
15 Jul 2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00424.1
Page(s):
5411–5421
Restricted access

Abstract

The uncertainties related to atmospheric fields in the Arctic Ocean from commonly used and recently available reanalysis products are investigated. Fields from the 1) ECMWF Interim Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim), 2) Common Ocean–Ice Reference Experiment version 2 (CORE2), 3) Japanese 25-yr Reanalysis Project (JRA-25), 4) NCEP–NCAR reanalysis, 5) NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR), and 6) Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) are evaluated against satellite-derived and in situ observations for zonal and meridional winds, precipitation, specific humidity, surface air temperature, and downwelling longwave and shortwave radiation fluxes. Comparison to reference observations shows that for variables such as air temperature and humidity, all reanalysis products have similar solutions. However, other variables such as winds, precipitation, and radiation show large spreads. The magnitude of uncertainties in all fields is large when compared to the signal. Biases in Arctic cloud parameterizations and predicted temperature and humidity profiles in reanalyses as discussed in other studies are likely common sources of error that affect surface downwelling radiation, air temperature, humidity, and precipitation.

Corresponding author address: Ayan H. Chaudhuri, Atmospheric and Environmental Research, 131 Hartwell Ave., Lexington, MA 02421. E-mail: achaudhu@aer.com

Abstract

The uncertainties related to atmospheric fields in the Arctic Ocean from commonly used and recently available reanalysis products are investigated. Fields from the 1) ECMWF Interim Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim), 2) Common Ocean–Ice Reference Experiment version 2 (CORE2), 3) Japanese 25-yr Reanalysis Project (JRA-25), 4) NCEP–NCAR reanalysis, 5) NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR), and 6) Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) are evaluated against satellite-derived and in situ observations for zonal and meridional winds, precipitation, specific humidity, surface air temperature, and downwelling longwave and shortwave radiation fluxes. Comparison to reference observations shows that for variables such as air temperature and humidity, all reanalysis products have similar solutions. However, other variables such as winds, precipitation, and radiation show large spreads. The magnitude of uncertainties in all fields is large when compared to the signal. Biases in Arctic cloud parameterizations and predicted temperature and humidity profiles in reanalyses as discussed in other studies are likely common sources of error that affect surface downwelling radiation, air temperature, humidity, and precipitation.

Corresponding author address: Ayan H. Chaudhuri, Atmospheric and Environmental Research, 131 Hartwell Ave., Lexington, MA 02421. E-mail: achaudhu@aer.com
Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Adler, R. F., and Coauthors, 2003: The version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979–present). J. Hydrometeor., 4, 1147–1167, doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1147:TVGPCP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Andersson, A., K. Fennig, C. Klepp, S. Bakan, H. Graßl, and J. Schulz, 2010: The Hamburg Ocean Atmosphere Parameters and Fluxes from Satellite Data—HOAPS-3. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 2, 215–234, doi:10.5194/essd-2-215-2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bentamy, A., L.-H. Ayina, W. Drennan, K. Katsaros, A. M. Mestas-Nuñez, and R. T. Pinker, 2008: 15 years of ocean surface momentum and heat fluxes from remotely sensed observations. FLUXNEWS, Vol. 5, WCRP Working Group on Surface Fluxes, 14–16. [Available online athttp://sail.msk.ru/newsletter/fluxnews_5_final.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bosilovich, M. G., J. Chen, F. R. Robertson, and R. F. Adler, 2008: Evaluation of global precipitation in reanalyses. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 2279–2299, doi:10.1175/2008JAMC1921.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bourassa, M. A., and Coauthors, 2013: High-latitude ocean and sea ice surface fluxes: Challenges for climate research. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 403–423, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00244.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chaudhuri, A. H., R. M. Ponte, G. Forget, and P. Heimbach, 2013: A comparison of atmospheric reanalysis surface products over the ocean and implications for uncertainties in air–sea boundary forcing. J. Climate, 26, 153–170, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00090.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Comiso, J. C., C. L. Parkinson, R. Gersten, and L. Stock, 2008: Accelerated decline in the Arctic sea ice cover. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L01703, doi:10.1029/2007GL031972.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Curry, J., W. B. Rossow, D. Randall, and J. L. Schramm, 1996: Overview of Arctic cloud and radiation characteristics. J. Climate, 9, 1731–1764, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<1731:OOACAR>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dee, D. P., and Coauthors, 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, doi:10.1002/qj.828.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dell’Aquila, A., P. M. Ruti, S. Calmanti, and V. Lucarini, 2007: Southern Hemisphere midlatitude atmospheric variability of the NCEP-NCAR and ECMWF reanalyses. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D08106, doi:10.1029/2006JD007376.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Drobot, S. D., J. A. Maslanik, and C. Fowler, 2006: A long-range forecast of Arctic summer sea-ice minimum extent. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L10501, doi:10.1029/2006GL026216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Francis, J. A., 2002: Validation of reanalysis upper-level winds in the Arctic with independent rawinsonde data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1315, doi:10.1029/2001GL014578.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Francis, J. A., E. Hunter, and C.-Z. Zou, 2005: Arctic tropospheric winds derived from TOVS satellite retrievals. J. Climate, 18, 2270–2285, doi:10.1175/JCLI3407.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Griffies, S. M., M. Winton, B. Samuels, G. Danabasoglu, S. Yeager, S. Marsland, and H. Drange, 2012: Datasets and protocol for the CLIVAR WGOMD Coordinated Ocean-Sea Ice Reference Experiments (COREs). 20 pp. [Available online at http://data1.gfdl.noaa.gov/~nnz/mom4/COREv2/doc/CORE_notes_15feb2012.pdf.]

  • Holloway, G., and T. Sou, 2002: Has Arctic sea ice rapidly thinned? J. Climate, 15, 1691–1701, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1691:HASIRT>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Houghton, J. T., G. J. Jenkins, and J. J. Ephraums, 1990: Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press, 365 pp.

  • Houghton, J. T., Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, and D. Xiaosu, Eds., 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, 944 pp.

  • Huffman, G. J., R. F. Adler, D. T. Bolvin, and G. Gu, 2009: Improving the global precipitation record: GPCP version 2.1. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L17808, doi:10.1029/2009GL040000.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hunke, E. C., and M. M. Holland, 2007: Global atmospheric forcing data for Arctic ice-ocean modeling. J. Geophys. Res., 112, C04S14, doi:10.1029/2006JC003640.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jakobson, E., T. Vihma, T. Palo, L. Jakobson, H. Keernik, and J. Jaagus, 2012: Validation of atmospheric reanalyses over the central Arctic Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L10802, doi:10.1029/2012GL051591.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437–471, doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kistler, R., and Coauthors, 2001: The NCEP–NCAR 50-Year Reanalysis: Monthly means CD-ROM and documentation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 82, 247–267, doi:10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0247:TNNYRM>2.3.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Large, W., and S. G. Yeager, 2004: Diurnal to decadal global forcing for ocean and sea-ice models: The data sets and flux climatologies. NCAR Tech. Rep. TN-460+STR, 105 pp, doi:10.5065/D6KK98Q6.

  • Onogi, K., and Coauthors, 2005: Japanese 25-Year Re-Analysis Project—Progress and status. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 3259–3268, doi:10.1256/qj.05.88.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Proshutinsky, A., and Coauthors, 2005: Arctic Ocean study: Synthesis of model results and observations. Eos,Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union,86, 368–371, doi:10.1029/2005EO400003.

  • Rienecker, M. M., and Coauthors, 2011: MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications. J. Climate, 24, 3624–3648, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rigor, I. G., R. L. Colony, and S. Martin, 2000: Variations in surface air temperature observations in the Arctic, 1979–97. J. Climate, 13, 896–914, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<0896:VISATO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Saha, S., and Coauthors, 2010: The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 1015–1057, doi:10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Serreze, M. C., and J. A. Francis, 2006: The Arctic amplification debate. Climatic Change, 76, 241–264, doi:10.1007/s10584-005-9017-y.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Serreze, M. C., A. P. Barrett, and J. Stroeve, 2012: Recent changes in tropospheric water vapor over the Arctic as assessed from radiosondes and atmospheric reanalyses. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D10104, doi:10.1029/2011JD017421.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Smith, S. R., P. J. Hughes, and M. A. Bourassa, 2011: A comparison of nine monthly air–sea flux products. Int. J. Climatol., 31, 1002–1027, doi:10.1002/joc.2225.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sorteberg, A., V. Kattsov, J. Walsh, and T. Pavlova, 2007: The Arctic surface energy budget as simulated with the IPCC AR4 AOGCMs. Climate Dyn., 29, 131–156, doi:10.1007/s00382-006-0222-9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Spreen, G., R. Kwok, and D. Menemenlis, 2011: Trends in Arctic sea ice drift and role of wind forcing: 1992–2009. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L19501, doi:10.1029/2011GL048970.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Taylor, K. E., 2001: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in single diagram. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 7183–7192, doi:10.1029/2000JD900719.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tjernström, M., J. Sedlar, and M. D. Shupe, 2008: How well do regional climate models reproduce radiation and clouds in the Arctic? An evaluation of ARCMIP simulations. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 2405–2422, doi:10.1175/2008JAMC1845.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Trenberth, K. E., D. P. Stepaniak, and J. M. Caron, 2000: The global monsoon as seen through the divergent atmospheric circulation. J. Climate, 13, 3969–3993, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<3969:TGMAST>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Uppala, S. M., and Coauthors, 2005: The ERA-40 Re-Analysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 2961–3012, doi:10.1256/qj.04.176.

  • Walsh, J. E., W. L. Chapman, and D. H. Portis, 2009: Arctic cloud fraction and radiative fluxes in atmospheric reanalyses. J. Climate, 22, 2316–2334, doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2213.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wild, M., A. Ohmura, H. Gilgen, J. Morcrette, and A. Slingo, 2001: Evaluation of downward longwave radiation in general circulation models. J. Climate, 14, 3227–3239, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<3227:EODLRI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wilson, A. B., D. H. Bromwich, and K. M. Hines, 2012: Evaluation of Polar WRF forecasts on the Arctic System Reanalysis Domain: 2. Atmospheric hydrologic cycle. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D04107, doi:10.1029/2011JD016765.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, B., J. Wang, and J. E. Walsh, 2006: Dipole anomaly in the winter Arctic atmosphere and its association with Arctic sea ice motion. J. Climate, 19, 210–225, doi:10.1175/JCLI3619.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, B., J. E. Overland, and R. D’Arrigo, 2012: Anomalous Arctic surface wind patterns and their impacts on September sea ice minima and trend. Tellus, 64A, 18590, doi:10.3402/tellusa.v64i0.18590.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, Y., W. B. Rossow, and A. A. Lacis, 1995: Calculation of surface and top-of-atmosphere radiative fluxes from physical quantities based on ISCCP datasets: 1. Method and sensitivity to input data uncertainties. J. Geophys. Res., 100, 1149–1165, doi:10.1029/94JD02747.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, Y., W. B. Rossow, A. A. Lacis, V. Oinas, and M. I. Mishchenko, 2004: Calculation of radiative fluxes from the surface to top of atmosphere based on ISCCP and other global data sets: Refinements of the radiative transfer model and the input data. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D19105, doi:10.1029/2003JD004457.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhu, J., B. Huang, and M. A. Balmaseda, 2012: An ensemble estimation of the variability of upper-ocean heat content over the tropical Atlantic Ocean with multi-ocean reanalysis products. Climate Dyn., 39, 1001–1020, doi:10.1007/s00382-011-1189-8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 722 253 16
PDF Downloads 328 100 9