The Transient Circulation Response to Radiative Forcings and Sea Surface Warming

Paul W. Staten Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

Search for other papers by Paul W. Staten in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Thomas Reichler Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

Search for other papers by Thomas Reichler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jian Lu Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

Search for other papers by Jian Lu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Tropospheric circulation shifts have strong potential to impact surface climate. However, the magnitude of these shifts in a changing climate and the attending regional hydrological changes are difficult to project. Part of this difficulty arises from the lack of understanding of the physical mechanisms behind the circulation shifts themselves. To better delineate circulation shifts and their respective causes the circulation response is decomposed into 1) the “direct” response to radiative forcings themselves and 2) the “indirect” response to changing sea surface temperatures. Using ensembles of 90-day climate model simulations with immediate switch-on forcings, including perturbed greenhouse gas concentrations, stratospheric ozone concentrations, and sea surface temperatures, this paper documents the direct and indirect transient responses of the zonal-mean general circulation, and investigates the roles of previously proposed mechanisms in shifting the midlatitude jet. It is found that both the direct and indirect wind responses often begin in the lower stratosphere. Changes in midlatitude eddies are ubiquitous and synchronous with the midlatitude zonal wind response. Shifts in the critical latitude of wave absorption on either flank of the jet are not indicted as primary factors for the poleward-shifting jet, although some evidence for increasing equatorward wave reflection over the Southern Hemisphere in response to sea surface warming is seen. Mechanisms for the Northern Hemisphere jet shift are less clear.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00035.s1.

Corresponding author address: Paul W. Staten, NASA JPL/Caltech, M/S 233-304, 4800 Oak Grove Rd., Pasadena, CA 91109. E-mail: paul.w.staten@jpl.nasa.gov

Abstract

Tropospheric circulation shifts have strong potential to impact surface climate. However, the magnitude of these shifts in a changing climate and the attending regional hydrological changes are difficult to project. Part of this difficulty arises from the lack of understanding of the physical mechanisms behind the circulation shifts themselves. To better delineate circulation shifts and their respective causes the circulation response is decomposed into 1) the “direct” response to radiative forcings themselves and 2) the “indirect” response to changing sea surface temperatures. Using ensembles of 90-day climate model simulations with immediate switch-on forcings, including perturbed greenhouse gas concentrations, stratospheric ozone concentrations, and sea surface temperatures, this paper documents the direct and indirect transient responses of the zonal-mean general circulation, and investigates the roles of previously proposed mechanisms in shifting the midlatitude jet. It is found that both the direct and indirect wind responses often begin in the lower stratosphere. Changes in midlatitude eddies are ubiquitous and synchronous with the midlatitude zonal wind response. Shifts in the critical latitude of wave absorption on either flank of the jet are not indicted as primary factors for the poleward-shifting jet, although some evidence for increasing equatorward wave reflection over the Southern Hemisphere in response to sea surface warming is seen. Mechanisms for the Northern Hemisphere jet shift are less clear.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00035.s1.

Corresponding author address: Paul W. Staten, NASA JPL/Caltech, M/S 233-304, 4800 Oak Grove Rd., Pasadena, CA 91109. E-mail: paul.w.staten@jpl.nasa.gov

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 793.71 KB)
Save
  • Anderson, J. L., and Coauthors, 2004: The new GFDL global atmosphere and land model AM2-LM2: Evaluation with prescribed SST simulations. J. Climate, 17, 46414673, doi:10.1175/JCLI-3223.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Andrews, T., J. M. Gregory, M. J. Webb, and K. E. Taylor, 2012: Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett.,39, L09712, doi:10.1029/2012GL051607.

  • Barnes, E. A., and D. L. Hartmann, 2011: Rossby wave scales, propagation, and the variability of eddy-driven jets. J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 28932908, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-039.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Charney, J. G., and P. G. Drazin, 1961: Propagation of planetary-scale disturbances from the lower into the upper atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 66, 83109, doi:10.1029/JZ066i001p00083.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, G., and I. M. Held, 2007: Phase speed spectra and the recent poleward shift of Southern Hemisphere surface westerlies. Geophys. Res. Lett.,34, L21805, doi:10.1029/2007GL031200.

  • Chen, G., J. Lu, and L. Sun, 2013: Delineating the eddy–zonal flow interaction in the atmospheric circulation response to climate forcing: Uniform SST warming in an idealized aquaplanet model. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 22142233, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-12-0248.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Delworth, T. L., and Coauthors, 2006: GFDL’s CM2 global coupled climate models. Part I: Formulation and simulation characteristics. J. Climate, 19, 643674, doi:10.1175/JCLI3629.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deser, C., and A. S. Phillips, 2009: Atmospheric circulation trends, 1950–2000: The relative roles of sea surface temperature forcing and direct atmospheric radiative forcing. J. Climate, 22, 396413, doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2453.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dunkerton, T., 1980: A Lagrangian mean theory of wave, mean-flow interaction with applications to nonacceleration and its breakdown. Rev. Geophys., 18, 387400, doi:10.1029/RG018i002p00387.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eliassen, A., and E. Palm, 1961: On the transfer of energy in stationary mountain waves. Geofys. Publ., 22, 123.

  • Hansen, J., and Coauthors, 2005: Efficacy of climate forcings. J. Geophys. Res.,110, D18104, doi:10.1029/2005JD005776 .

  • Harnik, N., and R. S. Lindzen, 2001: The effect of reflecting surfaces on the vertical structure and variability of stratospheric planetary waves. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 28722894, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<2872:TEORSO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kang, S. M., and L. M. Polvani, 2011: The interannual relationship between the latitude of the eddy-driven jet and the edge of the Hadley cell. J. Climate, 24, 563568, doi:10.1175/2010JCLI4077.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kidston, J., and G. K. Vallis, 2012: The relationship between the speed and the latitude of an eddy-driven jet in a stirred barotropic model. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 32513263, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-0300.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kidston, J., G. K. Vallis, S. M. Dean, and J. A. Renwick, 2011: Can the increase in the eddy length scale under global warming cause the poleward shift of the jet streams? J. Climate, 24, 37643780, doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3738.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kushner, P. J., and L. M. Polvani, 2004: Stratosphere–troposphere coupling in a relatively simple AGCM: The role of eddies. J. Climate, 17, 629639, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0629:SCIARS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lorenz, D. J., 2014a: Understanding midlatitude jet variability and change using Rossby wave chromatography: Methodology. J. Atmos. Sci., doi:10.1175/JAS-D-13-0199.1, in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lorenz, D. J., 2014b: Understanding midlatitude jet variability and change using Rossby wave chromatography: Poleward-shifted jets in response to external forcing. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 23702389, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-13-0200.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lorenz, D. J., 2014c: Understanding midlatitude jet variability and change using Rossby wave chromatography: Wave–mean flow interaction. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 36843705, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-13-0201.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Polvani, L. M., M. Previdi, and C. Deser, 2011a: Large cancellation, due to ozone recovery, of future Southern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation trends. Geophys. Res. Lett.,38, L04707, doi:10.1029/2011GL046712.

  • Polvani, L. M., D. W. Waugh, G. J. P. Correa, and S.-W. Son, 2011b: Stratospheric ozone depletion: The main driver of twentieth-century atmospheric circulation changes in the Southern Hemisphere. J. Climate, 24, 795812, doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3772.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Randel, W. J., and I. M. Held, 1991: Phase speed spectra of transient eddy fluxes and critical layer absorption. J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 688697, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<0688:PSSOTE>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Randel, W. J., and F. Wu, 2007: A stratospheric ozone profile data set for 1979-2005: Variability, trends, and comparisons with column ozone data. J. Geophys. Res.,112, D06313, doi:10.1029/2006JD007339.

  • Simpson, I. R., M. Blackburn, and J. D. Haigh, 2009: The role of eddies in driving the tropospheric response to stratospheric heating perturbations. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 13471365, doi:10.1175/2008JAS2758.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simpson, I. R., M. Blackburn, J. D. Haigh, and S. N. Sparrow, 2010: The impact of the state of the troposphere on the response to stratospheric heating in a simplified GCM. J. Climate, 23, 61666185, doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3792.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simpson, I. R., M. Blackburn, and J. D. Haigh, 2012: A mechanism for the effect of tropospheric jet structure on the annular mode–like response to stratospheric forcing. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 21522170, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-0188.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H. L. Miller Jr., Eds., 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, 996 pp.

  • Song, Y., and W. A. Robinson, 2004: Dynamical mechanisms for stratospheric influences on the troposphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 17111725, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1711:DMFSIO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Staten, P. W., and T. Reichler, 2013: On the ratio between shifts in the eddy-driven jet and the Hadley cell edge. Climate Dyn., 42,12291242, doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1905-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Staten, P. W., J. J. Rutz, T. Reichler, and J. Lu, 2012: Breaking down the tropospheric circulation response by forcing. Climate Dyn., 39, 23612375, doi:10.1007/s00382-011-1267-y.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wittman, M. A. H., L. M. Polvani, R. K. Scott, and A. J. Charlton, 2004: Stratospheric influence on baroclinic lifecycles and its connection to the Arctic Oscillation. Geophys. Res. Lett.,31, L16113, doi:10.1029/2004GL020503.

  • Wu, Y., R. Seager, M. Ting, N. Naik, and T. A. Shaw, 2012: Atmospheric circulation response to an instantaneous doubling of carbon dioxide. Part I: Model experiments and transient thermal response in the troposphere. J. Climate, 25, 28622879, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00284.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, Y., R. Seager, T. A. Shaw, M. Ting, and N. Naik, 2013: Atmospheric circulation response to an instantaneous doubling of carbon dioxide. Part II: Atmospheric transient adjustment and its dynamics. J. Climate, 26, 918935, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00104.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 128 57 2
PDF Downloads 69 23 1