Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

An Investigation of the Connections among Convection, Clouds, and Climate Sensitivity in a Global Climate Model

Ming Zhao Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory/NOAA, Princeton, New Jersey, and University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Ming Zhao in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Mar 2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00145.1
Page(s):
1845–1862
Restricted access

Abstract

This study explores connections between process-level modeling of convection and global climate model (GCM) simulated clouds and cloud feedback to global warming through a set of perturbed-physics and perturbed sea surface temperature experiments. A bulk diagnostic approach is constructed, and a set of variables is derived and demonstrated to be useful in understanding the simulated relationship. In particular, a novel bulk quantity, the convective precipitation efficiency or equivalently the convective detrainment efficiency, is proposed as a simple measure of the aggregated properties of parameterized convection important to the GCM simulated clouds. As the convective precipitation efficiency increases in the perturbed-physics experiments, both liquid and ice water path decrease, with low and middle cloud fractions diminishing at a faster rate than high cloud fractions. This asymmetry results in a large sensitivity of top-of-atmosphere net cloud radiative forcing to changes in convective precipitation efficiency in this limited set of models.

For global warming experiments, intermodel variations in the response of cloud condensate, low cloud fraction, and total cloud radiative forcing are well explained by model variations in response to total precipitation (or detrainment) efficiency. Despite significant variability, all of the perturbed-physics models produce a sizable increase in precipitation efficiency to warming. A substantial fraction of the increase is due to its convective component, which depends on the parameterization of cumulus mixing and convective microphysical processes. The increase in convective precipitation efficiency and associated change in convective cloud height distribution owing to warming explains the increased cloud feedback and climate sensitivity in recently developed Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory GCMs. The results imply that a cumulus scheme using fractional removal of condensate for precipitation and inverse calculation of the entrainment rate tends to produce a lower climate sensitivity than a scheme using threshold removal for precipitation and the entrainment rate formulated inversely dependent on convective depth.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Ming Zhao, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory/NOAA, Princeton University Forrestal Campus, 201 Forrestal Road, Princeton, NJ 08540-6649. E-mail: ming.zhao@noaa.gov

Abstract

This study explores connections between process-level modeling of convection and global climate model (GCM) simulated clouds and cloud feedback to global warming through a set of perturbed-physics and perturbed sea surface temperature experiments. A bulk diagnostic approach is constructed, and a set of variables is derived and demonstrated to be useful in understanding the simulated relationship. In particular, a novel bulk quantity, the convective precipitation efficiency or equivalently the convective detrainment efficiency, is proposed as a simple measure of the aggregated properties of parameterized convection important to the GCM simulated clouds. As the convective precipitation efficiency increases in the perturbed-physics experiments, both liquid and ice water path decrease, with low and middle cloud fractions diminishing at a faster rate than high cloud fractions. This asymmetry results in a large sensitivity of top-of-atmosphere net cloud radiative forcing to changes in convective precipitation efficiency in this limited set of models.

For global warming experiments, intermodel variations in the response of cloud condensate, low cloud fraction, and total cloud radiative forcing are well explained by model variations in response to total precipitation (or detrainment) efficiency. Despite significant variability, all of the perturbed-physics models produce a sizable increase in precipitation efficiency to warming. A substantial fraction of the increase is due to its convective component, which depends on the parameterization of cumulus mixing and convective microphysical processes. The increase in convective precipitation efficiency and associated change in convective cloud height distribution owing to warming explains the increased cloud feedback and climate sensitivity in recently developed Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory GCMs. The results imply that a cumulus scheme using fractional removal of condensate for precipitation and inverse calculation of the entrainment rate tends to produce a lower climate sensitivity than a scheme using threshold removal for precipitation and the entrainment rate formulated inversely dependent on convective depth.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Ming Zhao, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory/NOAA, Princeton University Forrestal Campus, 201 Forrestal Road, Princeton, NJ 08540-6649. E-mail: ming.zhao@noaa.gov
Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Anderson, J. L., and Coauthors, 2004: The new GFDL global atmosphere and land model AM2/LM2: Evaluation with prescribed SST simulations. J. Climate, 17, 4641–4673.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Arakawa, A., 2004: The cumulus parameterization problem: Past, present, and future. J. Climate, 17, 2493–2525.

  • Benjamin, M. S., C. Piani, W. Ingram, D. Stone, and M. Allen, 2008: Towards constraining climate sensitivity by linear analysis of feedback patterns in thousands of perturbed-physics GCM simulations. Climate Dyn., 30, 175–190.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bony, S., and J.-L. Dufresne, 2005: Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett.,32, L20806, doi:10.1029/2005GL023851.

  • Bony, S., J.-L. Dufresne, H. Le Treut, J.-J. Morcrette, and C. Senior, 2004: On dynamic and thermodynamic components of cloud changes. Climate Dyn., 22, 71–86.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bretherton, C. S., 2006: The climate process team on low-latitude cloud feedbacks on climate sensitivity. U.S. CLIVAR Variations, No. 4, Washington, D.C., 7–12.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bretherton, C. S., J. R. McCaa, and H. Grenier, 2004: A new parameterization for shallow cumulus convection and its application to marine subtropical cloud-topped boundary layers. Part I: Description and 1D results. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 864–882.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cess, R., and Coauthors, 1990: Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res., 95 (D10), 16 601–16 615.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cess, R., and Coauthors, 1996: Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models: An update. J. Geophys. Res., 101 (D8), 12 791–12 794.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Donner, L. J., and Coauthors, 2011: The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3. J. Climate, 24, 3484–3519.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Emanuel, K. A., 1991: A scheme for representing cumulus convection in large-scale models. J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 2313–2335.

  • Emanuel, K. A., and M. Zivkovic-Rothman, 1999: Development and evaluation of a convection scheme for use in climate models. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1766–1782.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gettelman, A., J. Kay, and K. Shell, 2012: The evolution of climate sensitivity and climate feedback in the Community Atmosphere Model. J. Climate, 25,1453–1469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Golaz, J.-C., M. Salzmann, L. J. Donner, L. W. Horowitz, Y. Ming, and M. Zhao, 2011: Sensitivity of the aerosol indirect effect to subgrid variability in the cloud parameterization of the GFDL atmosphere general circulation model AM3. J. Climate, 24, 3145–3160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Held, I. M., and B. J. Soden, 2006: Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Climate, 19, 5686–5699.

  • Held, I. M., and M. Zhao, 2011: The response of tropical cyclone statistics to an increase in CO2 with fixed sea surface temperatures. J. Climate, 24, 5353–5364.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kain, J. S., and J. M. Fritsch, 1990: A one-dimensional entraining/detraining plume model and its application in convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 2784–2802.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mapes, B., and R. Neale, 2011: Parameterizing convective organization to escape the entrainment dilemma. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst.,3, M06004, doi:10.1029/2011MS000042.

  • Mauritsen, T., and Coauthors, 2012: Tuning the climate of a global model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst.,4, M00A01, doi:10.1029/2012MS000154.

  • Moorthi, S., and M. J. Suarez, 1992: Relaxed Arakawa–Schubert: A parameterization of moist convection for general circulation models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 978–1002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Park, S., and C. S. Bretherton, 2009: The University of Washington shallow convection and moist turbulence schemes and their impact on climate simulations with the Community Atmosphere Model. J. Climate, 22, 3449–3469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Raymond, D. J., and A. M. Blyth, 1986: A stochastic mixing model for nonprecipitating cumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 2708–2718.

  • Soden, B., and I. Held, 2006: An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean–atmosphere models. J. Climate, 19, 3354–3360.

  • Soden, B., A. Broccoli, and R. Hemler, 2004: On the use of cloud forcing to estimate cloud feedback. J. Climate, 17, 3661–3665.

  • Webb, M., and Coauthors, 2006: On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles. Climate Dyn., 27, 17–38.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wyant, M. C., C. S. Bretherton, J. T. Bacmeister, J. T. Kiehl, I. M. Held, M. Zhao, S. A. Klein, and B. J. Soden, 2006: A comparison of low-latitude cloud properties and their response to climate change in three AGCMs sorted into regimes using mid-tropospheric vertical velocity. Climate Dyn., 27, 261–279.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, M., S. Klein, D. Randall, R. Cederwall, and A. Genio, 2005: Introduction to special section on “Toward reducing cloud–climate uncertainties in atmospheric general circulation models.” J. Geophys. Res.,110, D15S01, doi:10.1029/2005JD005923.

  • Zhao, M., and P. H. Austin, 2003: Episodic mixing and buoyancy-sorting representations of shallow convection: A diagnostic study. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 892–912.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhao, M., and I. M. Held, 2012: TC-permitting GCM simulations of hurricane frequency response to sea surface temperature anomalies projected for the late 21st century. J. Climate, 25, 2995–3009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhao, M., I. M. Held, S.-J. Lin, and G. A. Vecchi, 2009: Simulations of global hurricane climatology, interannual variability, and response to global warming using a 50-km resolution GCM. J. Climate, 22, 6653–6678.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhao, M., I. M. Held, and G. A. Vecchi, 2010: Retrospective forecasts of the hurricane season using a global atmospheric model assuming persistence of SST anomalies. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 3858–3868.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 3108 1111 100
PDF Downloads 845 177 17