Estimation of Weather Noise in Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Systems Using Initialized Simulations

Jieshun Zhu Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China

Search for other papers by Jieshun Zhu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Jagadish Shukla Center for Ocean–Land–Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Earth Sciences, College of Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia

Search for other papers by Jagadish Shukla in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This study presents a new method to estimate atmospheric weather noise from coupled models, which is based on initialized simulations with a CGCM. In this method, the weather noise is estimated by removing the signal part, as determined from the coupled ensemble mean simulations. The weather noise estimated from coupled models is compared with that estimated from uncoupled AGCM simulations. The model used in this study is CFSv2. The initialized simulations start from each April during 1982–2009 paired with four members and extend for 6 months. To make a clear comparison between weather noise in coupled and uncoupled simulations, a set of uncoupled AGCM (the atmospheric component of CFSv2) simulations are conducted, which are forced by the daily mean SSTs from the above initialized CGCM simulations. The comparison indicates that, over the Asia–Pacific monsoon region where the local air–sea coupling is important, the noise variances are generally reduced as a result of air–sea coupling, as are the total and signal variances. This result stands in contrast to the results of previous studies that suggested that the noise variance for coupled and uncoupled models is the same. It is shown that the previous conclusion is simply an artifact of the assumption applied in the AGCM-based approach (i.e., the signal is the same between coupled and uncoupled simulations). In addition, the variance difference also exhibits a clear seasonality, with a larger difference over the monsoon region appearing toward boreal summer. Another set of AGCM experiments forced by the same SST suggests that the CGCM-based method generally remains valid in estimating weather noise within 2 months of its initial start.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0737.s1.

Current affiliation: NOAA/Climate Prediction Center, College Park, Maryland.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Jieshun Zhu, Climate Prediction Center, 5830 University Research Court, College Park, MD 20740. E-mail: jieshun.zhu@noaa.gov

Abstract

This study presents a new method to estimate atmospheric weather noise from coupled models, which is based on initialized simulations with a CGCM. In this method, the weather noise is estimated by removing the signal part, as determined from the coupled ensemble mean simulations. The weather noise estimated from coupled models is compared with that estimated from uncoupled AGCM simulations. The model used in this study is CFSv2. The initialized simulations start from each April during 1982–2009 paired with four members and extend for 6 months. To make a clear comparison between weather noise in coupled and uncoupled simulations, a set of uncoupled AGCM (the atmospheric component of CFSv2) simulations are conducted, which are forced by the daily mean SSTs from the above initialized CGCM simulations. The comparison indicates that, over the Asia–Pacific monsoon region where the local air–sea coupling is important, the noise variances are generally reduced as a result of air–sea coupling, as are the total and signal variances. This result stands in contrast to the results of previous studies that suggested that the noise variance for coupled and uncoupled models is the same. It is shown that the previous conclusion is simply an artifact of the assumption applied in the AGCM-based approach (i.e., the signal is the same between coupled and uncoupled simulations). In addition, the variance difference also exhibits a clear seasonality, with a larger difference over the monsoon region appearing toward boreal summer. Another set of AGCM experiments forced by the same SST suggests that the CGCM-based method generally remains valid in estimating weather noise within 2 months of its initial start.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0737.s1.

Current affiliation: NOAA/Climate Prediction Center, College Park, Maryland.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Jieshun Zhu, Climate Prediction Center, 5830 University Research Court, College Park, MD 20740. E-mail: jieshun.zhu@noaa.gov

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (DOCX 2.13 MB)
Save
  • Balmaseda, M., K. Mogensen, and A. Weaver, 2013: Evaluation of the ECMWF ocean reanalysis ORAS4. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 11321161, doi:10.1002/qj.2063.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barsugli, J. J., and D. S. Battisti, 1998: The basic effects of atmosphere–ocean thermal coupling on midlatitude variability. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 477493, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<0477:TBEOAO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, G., and H. Qin, 2016: Strong ocean–atmosphere interactions during a short-term hot event over the western Pacific warm pool in response to El Niño. J. Climate, 29, 38413865, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0595.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, H., E. K. Schneider, B. P. Kirtman, and I. Colfescu, 2013: Evaluation of weather noise and its role in climate model simulations. J. Climate, 26, 37663784, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00292.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eckert, C., and M. Latif, 1997: Predictability of a stochastically forced hybrid coupled model of El Niño. J. Climate, 10, 14881504, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<1488:POASFH>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fan, M., and E. K. Schneider, 2012: Observed decadal North Atlantic tripole SST variability. Part I: Weather noise forcing and coupled response. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3550, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-018.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frankignoul, C., 1999: A cautionary note on the use of statistical atmospheric models in the middle latitudes: Comments on “Decadal variability in the North Pacific as simulated by a hybrid coupled model.” J. Climate, 12, 18711872, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1871:ACNOTU>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frankignoul, C., and K. Hasselmann, 1977: Stochastic climate models, Part II. Application to sea-surface temperature anomalies and thermocline variability. Tellus, 29A, 289305, doi:10.1111/j.2153-3490.1977.tb00740.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hasselmann, K., 1976: Stochastic climate models. Part I: Theory. Tellus, 28A, 473485, doi:10.1111/j.2153-3490.1976.tb00696.x.

  • Kirtman, B. P., and J. Shukla, 2002: Interactive coupled ensemble: A new coupling strategy for CGCMs. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1367, doi:10.1029/2002GL014834.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kleeman, R., and A. M. Moore, 1997: A theory for the limitation of ENSO predictability due to stochastic atmospheric transients. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 753767, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<0753:ATFTLO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saha, S., and Coauthors, 2010: The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 10151057, doi:10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saha, S., and Coauthors, 2014: The NCEP Climate Forecast System version 2. J. Climate, 27, 21852208, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00823.1.

  • Sarachik, E. S., M. Winton, and F. L. Yin, 1996: Mechanisms for decadal-to-centennial climate variability. Decadal Climate Variability: Dynamics and Predictability, D. L. T. Anderson and J. Willebrand, Eds., NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series, Vol. 44, Springer, 158–210.

  • Schneider, E. K., and M. Fan, 2007: Weather noise forcing of surface climate variability. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 32653280, doi:10.1175/JAS4026.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shukla, R., and J. Zhu, 2014: Simulations of boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation with the Climate Forecast System, version 2, over India and the western Pacific: Role of air–sea coupling. Atmos.–Ocean, 52, 321330, doi:10.1080/07055900.2014.939575.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, B., Q. Ding, X. Fu, I.-S. Kang, K. Jin, J. Shukla, and F. Doblas-Reyes, 2005: Fundamental challenge in simulation and prediction of summer monsoon rainfall. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L15711, doi:10.1029/2005GL022734.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, R., and B. P. Kirtman, 2004: Impacts of the Indian Ocean on the Indian summer monsoon–ENSO relationship. J. Climate, 17, 30373054, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3037:IOTIOO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, R., and B. P. Kirtman, 2007: Regimes of local air–sea interactions and implications for performance of forced simulations. Climate Dyn., 29, 393410, doi:10.1007/s00382-007-0246-9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhu, J., and J. Shukla, 2013: The role of air–sea coupling in seasonal prediction of Asia–Pacific summer monsoon rainfall. J. Climate, 26, 56895697, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00190.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhu, J., B. Huang, L. Marx, J. L. Kinter III, M. A. Balmaseda, R.-H. Zhang, and Z.-Z. Hu, 2012: Ensemble ENSO hindcasts initialized from multiple ocean analyses. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L09602, doi:10.1029/2012GL051503.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhu, J., B. Huang, M. A. Balmaseda, J. L. Kinter III, P. Peng, Z.-Z. Hu, and L. Marx, 2013: Improved reliability of ENSO hindcasts with multi-ocean analyses ensemble initialization. Climate Dyn., 41, 27852795, doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1965-8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 365 245 24
PDF Downloads 85 30 3