• Ronalds, B., E. Barnes, and P. Hassanzadeh, 2018: A barotropic mechanism for the response of jet stream variability to Arctic amplification and sea ice loss. J. Climate, 31, 70697085, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0778.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Downloads 3 3 3

CORRIGENDUM

View More View Less
  • 1 Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
Restricted access

The authors of Ronalds et al. (2018) have discovered an error (or “bug”) in one of the computer codes used in the wavebreaking analysis, which had shifted the results toward waves with shorter wavelengths, that is, larger zonal wavenumbers k. As a result, the representative wavenumbers used in Figs. 3, 6, 9, 10b, 11, and 12b in that paper were too large. Those figures have been reproduced with the correct wavenumbers, and Figs. 3, 6, 9, and 11, for which

The authors of Ronalds et al. (2018) have discovered an error (or “bug”) in one of the computer codes used in the wavebreaking analysis, which had shifted the results toward waves with shorter wavelengths, that is, larger zonal wavenumbers k. As a result, the representative wavenumbers used in Figs. 3, 6, 9, 10b, 11, and 12b in that paper were too large. Those figures have been reproduced with the correct wavenumbers, and Figs. 3, 6, 9, and 11, for which

Current affiliation: Rice University, Houston, Texas.

© 2018 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Bryn Ronalds, bryn.ronalds@colostate.edu

The authors of Ronalds et al. (2018) have discovered an error (or “bug”) in one of the computer codes used in the wavebreaking analysis, which had shifted the results toward waves with shorter wavelengths, that is, larger zonal wavenumbers k. As a result, the representative wavenumbers used in Figs. 3, 6, 9, 10b, 11, and 12b in that paper were too large. Those figures have been reproduced with the correct wavenumbers, and Figs. 3, 6, 9, and 11, for which

The authors of Ronalds et al. (2018) have discovered an error (or “bug”) in one of the computer codes used in the wavebreaking analysis, which had shifted the results toward waves with shorter wavelengths, that is, larger zonal wavenumbers k. As a result, the representative wavenumbers used in Figs. 3, 6, 9, 10b, 11, and 12b in that paper were too large. Those figures have been reproduced with the correct wavenumbers, and Figs. 3, 6, 9, and 11, for which

Current affiliation: Rice University, Houston, Texas.

© 2018 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Bryn Ronalds, bryn.ronalds@colostate.edu
Save