Spurious Climate Impacts in Coupled Sea Ice Loss Simulations

Mark R. England aDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California
bDepartment of Physics and Physical Oceanography, University of North Carolina, Wilmington, North Carolina
cScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California

Search for other papers by Mark R. England in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3882-872X
,
Ian Eisenman cScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California

Search for other papers by Ian Eisenman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Till J. W. Wagner bDepartment of Physics and Physical Oceanography, University of North Carolina, Wilmington, North Carolina
dDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Till J. W. Wagner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Previous studies have used coupled climate model simulations with perturbed sea ice covers to assess the impact of future Arctic sea ice loss. The results of these studies suggest that Arctic sea ice loss will cause substantial climate impacts in the Arctic and beyond. The approaches used in these simulations can be broadly categorized into three methods: adding a ghost flux to the sea ice module, nudging, and modifying the surface albedo. Here we show that all three methods ultimately add heat to the Arctic in order to melt the sea ice, and that this artificial heating causes a spurious warming signal that is added to the warming that occurs due to sea ice loss alone. We illustrate this using an idealized climate model, which provides a preliminary rough estimate of the effect. In this model, the annual-mean warming due to sea ice loss alone can be directly calculated. We compare this with the warming that would be attributed to sea ice loss using each of the three methods in the idealized model. The results suggest that each method substantially overestimates the warming due to sea ice loss alone, overestimating the surface warming throughout the Northern Hemisphere by a factor of 1.5–2 in the idealized model. Hence, these results suggest that previous coupled climate modeling studies have overestimated the climate response to sea ice loss.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Mark England, markengland@ucsc.edu

Abstract

Previous studies have used coupled climate model simulations with perturbed sea ice covers to assess the impact of future Arctic sea ice loss. The results of these studies suggest that Arctic sea ice loss will cause substantial climate impacts in the Arctic and beyond. The approaches used in these simulations can be broadly categorized into three methods: adding a ghost flux to the sea ice module, nudging, and modifying the surface albedo. Here we show that all three methods ultimately add heat to the Arctic in order to melt the sea ice, and that this artificial heating causes a spurious warming signal that is added to the warming that occurs due to sea ice loss alone. We illustrate this using an idealized climate model, which provides a preliminary rough estimate of the effect. In this model, the annual-mean warming due to sea ice loss alone can be directly calculated. We compare this with the warming that would be attributed to sea ice loss using each of the three methods in the idealized model. The results suggest that each method substantially overestimates the warming due to sea ice loss alone, overestimating the surface warming throughout the Northern Hemisphere by a factor of 1.5–2 in the idealized model. Hence, these results suggest that previous coupled climate modeling studies have overestimated the climate response to sea ice loss.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Mark England, markengland@ucsc.edu

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 649 KB)
Save
  • Aylmer, J., D. Ferreira, and D. Feltham, 2020: Impacts of oceanic and atmospheric heat transports on sea-ice extent. J. Climate, 33, 71977215, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0761.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ayres, H., and J. Screen, 2019: Multimodel analysis of the atmospheric response to Antarctic sea ice loss at quadrupled CO2. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 98619869, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083653.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beer, E., I. Eisenman, and T. Wagner, 2020: Polar amplification due to enhanced heat flux across the halocline. Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086706, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086706.

  • Blackport, R., and P. Kushner, 2016: The transient and equilibrium climate response to rapid summertime sea ice loss in CCSM4. J. Climate, 29, 401417, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0284.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blackport, R., and P. Kushner, 2017: Isolating the atmospheric circulation response to Arctic sea ice loss in the coupled climate system. J. Climate, 30, 21632185, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0257.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blackport, R., J. Screen, K. van der Wiel, and R. Bintanja, 2019: Minimal influence of reduced Arctic sea ice on coincident cold winters in mid-latitudes. Nat. Climate Change, 9, 697704, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0551-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cai, S., P. Hsu, and F. Liu, 2021: Changes in polar amplification in response to increasing warming in CMIP6. Atmos. Oceanic Sci. Lett., 14, 100043, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aosl.2021.100043.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cohen, J., and Coauthors, 2020: Divergent consensuses on Arctic amplification influence on midlatitude severe winter weather. Nat. Climate Change, 10, 2029, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0662-y.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collins, M., and Coauthors, 2013: Long-term climate change: Projections, commitments and irreversibility. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, T. F. Stocker et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 10291136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cvijanovic, I., and K. Caldeira, 2015: Atmospheric impacts of sea ice decline in CO2 induced global warming. Climate Dyn., 44, 11731186, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2489-1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cvijanovic, I., B. Santer, C. Bonfils, D. Lucas, J. Chiang, and S. Zimmerman, 2017: Future loss of Arctic sea ice cover could drive a substantial decrease in California’s rainfall. Nat. Commun., 8, 1947, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01907-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dai, A., D. Luo, M. Song, and J. Liu, 2019: Arctic amplification is caused by sea-ice loss under increasing CO2. Nat. Commun., 10, 121, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07954-9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deser, C., R. Tomas, and L. Sun, 2015: The role of ocean–atmosphere coupling in the zonal-mean atmospheric response to Arctic sea ice loss. J. Climate, 28, 21682186, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00325.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deser, C., L. Sun, R. Tomas, and J. Screen, 2016: Does ocean coupling matter for the northern extratropical response to projected Arctic sea ice loss? Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 21492157, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067792.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eisenman, I., 2010: Geographic muting of changes in Arctic sea ice cover. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L16501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043741.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • England, M., L. Polvani, L. Sun, and C. Deser, 2020a: Tropical climate responses to projected Arctic and Antarctic sea ice loss. Nat. Geosci., 13, 275281, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0546-9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • England, M., L. M. Polvani, and L. Sun, 2020b: Robust Arctic warming caused by projected Antarctic sea ice loss. Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 104005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abaada.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Feldl, N., and T. Merlis, 2021: Polar amplification in idealized climates: The role of ice, moisture, and seasons. Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL094130, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094130.

  • Fetterer, F., W. Meier, M. Savoie, and A. Windnagel, 2017: Sea ice index, version 3. NSIDC, accessed 22 March 2022, https://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index.

  • Francis, J., 2017: Why are Arctic linkages to extreme weather still up in the air? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 98, 25512557, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0006.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Graversen, R., and M. Wang, 2009: Polar amplification in a coupled climate model with locked albedo. Climate Dyn., 33, 629643, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0535-6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, A., 2004: The role of surface albedo feedback in climate. J. Climate, 17, 15501568, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<1550:TROSAF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koll, D., and T. Cronin, 2018: Earth’s outgoing longwave radiation linear due to H2O greenhouse effect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 10 29310 298, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809868115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kwok, R., 2018: Arctic sea ice thickness, volume, and multiyear ice coverage: Losses and coupled variability (1958–2018). Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 105005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae3ec.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kwok, R., and N. Untersteiner, 2011: The thinning of Arctic sea ice. Phys. Today, 64, 3641, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3580491.

  • Langen, P., R. Graversen, and T. Mauritsen, 2012: Separation of contributions from radiative feedbacks to polar amplification on an aquaplanet. J. Climate, 25, 30103024, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00246.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, W., and A. Fedorov, 2019: Global impacts of Arctic sea ice loss mediated by the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 944952, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080602.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCusker, K., P. Kushner, J. Fyfe, M. Sigmond, V. Kharin, and C. Bitz, 2017: Remarkable seperability of circulation response to Arctic sea ice loss and greenhouse gas forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 79557964, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074327.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merlis, T., and M. Henry, 2018: Simple estimates of polar amplification in moist diffusive energy balance models. J. Climate, 31, 58115824, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0578.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mori, M., Y. Kosaka, M. Watanabe, H. Nakamura, and M. Kimoto, 2019: A reconciled estimate of the influence of Arctic sea ice loss on recent Eurasian cooling. Nat. Climate Change, 9, 123129, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0379-3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Notz, D., and Coauthors, 2020: Arctic sea ice in CMIP6. Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086749, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086749.

  • Oudar, T., E. Sanchez-Gomez, F. Chauvin, J. Cattiaux, L. Terray, and C. Cassou, 2017: Respective roles of direct GHG radiative forcing and induced Arctic sea ice loss on the Northern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation. Climate Dyn., 49, 36933717, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3541-0.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Overland, J., and Coauthors, 2021: How do intermittency and simultaneous processes obfuscate the Arctic influence on midlatitude winter extreme weather events. Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 043002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abdb5d.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peings, Y., Z. Labe, and G. Magnusdottir, 2021: Are 100 ensemble members enough to capture the remote atmospheric response to +2°C Arctic sea ice loss? J. Climate, 34, 37513769, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0613.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petrie, R., L. Shaffrey, and R. Sutton, 2015: Atmospheric impact of Arctic sea ice loss in a coupled ocean–atmosphere simulation. J. Climate, 28, 96069622, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0316.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ramaswamy, V., and Coauthors, 2001: Radiative forcing of climate change. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, J. T. Houghton et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 349416.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ringgaard, I., S. Yang, E. Kaas, and J. Christensen, 2020: Barents–Kara sea ice and European winters in EC-Earth. Climate Dyn., 54, 33233338, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05174-w.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roach, L., I. Eisenman, T. Wagner, E. Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, and C. Bitz, 2022: Asymmetry in the seasonal cycle of Antarctic sea ice driven by insolation. Nat. Geosci., 15, 277281, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00913-6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ronalds, B., E. Barnes, and P. Hassanzadeh, 2018: A barotropic mechanism for the response of jet stream variability to Arctic amplification and sea ice loss. J. Climate, 31, 70697085, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0778.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rose, B., K. Armour, D. Battisti, N. Feldl, and D. Koll, 2014: The dependence of transient climate sensitivity and radiative feedbacks on the spatial pattern of ocean heat uptake. Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 10711078, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058955.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Russotto, R., and M. Biasutti, 2020: Polar amplification as an inherent response of a circulating atmosphere: Results from the TRACMIP aquaplanets. Geophys. Res. Lett., 57, e2019GL086771, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086771.

  • Scinocca, J., M. Reader, D. Plummer, M. Sigmond, P. Kushner, T. Shepherd, and A. Ravishankara, 2009: Impact of sudden Arctic sea ice loss on stratospheric polar ozone recovery. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L24701, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Screen, J., and R. Blackport, 2019: How robust is the atmospheric response to projected Arctic sea ice loss across climate models? Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 11 40611 415, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084936.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Screen, J., and Coauthors, 2018: Consistency and discrepancy in the atmospheric response to Arctic sea-ice loss across climate models. Nat. Geosci., 11, 155163, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0059-y.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Semmler, T., L. Stulic, T. Jung, N. Tilinina, C. Campos, S. Gulev, and D. Koracin, 2016: Seasonal atmospheric responses to reduced Arctic sea ice in an ensemble of coupled model simulations. J. Climate, 29, 58935913, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0586.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Senftleben, D., A. Lauer, and A. Karpechko, 2020: Constraining uncertainties in CMIP5 projections of September Arctic sea ice extent with observations. J. Climate, 33, 14871503, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0075.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sévellec, F., A. Fedorov, and W. Liu, 2017: Arctic sea-ice decline weakens the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Nat. Climate Change, 7, 604610, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3353.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shaw, T., and Z. Smith, 2022: The midlatitude response to polar sea ice loss: Idealized slab-ocean aquaplanet experiments with thermodynamic sea ice. J. Climate, 35, 26332649, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0508.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sherwood, S. C., and Coauthors, 2020: An assessment of Earth’s climate sensitivity using multiple lines of evidence. Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000678, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000678.

  • Sime, L., P. Hopcroft, and R. Rhodes, 2019: Impact of abrupt sea ice loss on Greenland water isotopes during the last glacial period. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 40994104, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807261116.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simon, A., G. Gastineau, C. Frankignoul, C. Rousset, and F. Codron, 2021: Transient climate response to Arctic sea ice loss with two ice-constraining methods. J. Climate, 34, 32953310, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0288.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, D., N. Dunstone, A. Scaife, E. Fiedler, D. Copsey, and S. Hardiman, 2017: Atmospheric response to Arctic and Antarctic sea ice: The importance of ocean–atmosphere coupling and the background state. J. Climate, 30, 45474565, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0564.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, D., and Coauthors, 2019: The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: Investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification. Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 11391164, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1139-2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sun, L., M. Alexander, and C. Deser, 2018: Evolution of the global coupled climate response to Arctic sea ice loss during 1990–2090 and its contribution to climate change. J. Climate, 31, 7823–7843, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0134.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sun, L., C. Deser, and M. Alexander, 2020: Global coupled climate response to polar sea ice loss: Evaluating the effectiveness of different ice-constraining approaches. Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085788, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085788.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tomas, R., C. Deser, and L. Sun, 2016: The role of ocean heat transport in the global climate response to projected Arctic sea ice loss. J. Climate, 29, 68416859, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0651.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wagner, T., and I. Eisenman, 2015a: How climate model complexity influences sea ice stability. J. Climate, 28, 39984014, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00654.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wagner, T., and I. Eisenman, 2015b: False alarms: How early warning signals falsely predict abrupt sea ice loss. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 10 33310 341, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wagner, T., I. Eisenman, and H. Mason, 2021: How sea ice drift influences sea ice area and volume. Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL093069, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093069.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, K., C. Deser, L. Sun, and R. Tomas, 2018: Fast response of the tropics to an abrupt loss of Arctic sea ice via ocean dynamics. Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 42644272, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zappa, G., F. Pithan, and T. Shepherd, 2018: Multimodel evidence for an atmospheric circulation response to Arctic sea ice loss in the CMIP5 future projections. Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 10111019, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076096.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 911 753 25
Full Text Views 510 357 20
PDF Downloads 561 393 25