A New Year-Round Weather Regime Classification for North America

Simon H. Lee aDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Simon H. Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0986-0093
,
Michael K. Tippett aDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Michael K. Tippett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7790-5364
, and
Lorenzo M. Polvani aDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York
bDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York
cLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York

Search for other papers by Lorenzo M. Polvani in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4775-8110
Restricted access

Abstract

Weather regimes defined through cluster analysis concisely categorize the anomalous regional circulation pattern on any given day. Owing to their persistence and low dimensionality, regimes are increasingly used in subseasonal-to-seasonal prediction and in analysis of climate variability and change. However, a limitation of existing regime classifications for North America is their seasonal dependence, with most existing studies defining regimes for winter only. Here, we normalize the seasonal cycle in daily geopotential height variance and use empirical orthogonal function analysis combined with k-means clustering to define a new set of year-round North American weather regimes: the Pacific Trough, Pacific Ridge, Alaskan Ridge, and Greenland High regimes. We additionally define a “No Regime” state to represent conditions close to climatology. To demonstrate the robustness of the classification, a thorough assessment of the sensitivity of the clustering solution to various methodological choices is provided. The median persistence of all four regimes, obtained without imposing a persistence criterion, is found to be one week, approximately 3 times longer than the median persistence of the No Regime state. Regime-associated temperature and precipitation anomalies are reported, together with the relationship between the regimes and modes of climate variability. We also quantify historical trends in the frequency of the regimes since 1979, finding a decrease in the annual frequency of the Pacific Trough regime and an increase in the summertime frequency of the Greenland High regime. This study serves as a foundation for the future use of these regimes in a variety of weather and climate applications.

Significance Statement

Weather regimes provide a simple way of classifying daily large-scale regional weather patterns into a few predefined types. Existing methods usually define regimes for a specific season (typically winter), which limits their use, or provides only a minimal assessment of their robustness. In this study, we objectively quantify four weather regimes for use year-round over North America, while we classify near-normal conditions as No Regime. The four regimes represent persistent large-scale weather types that last for about a week and occasionally much longer. Our new classification can be applied to subseasonal-to-seasonal forecasts and climate model output to diagnose recurrent weather types across the North American continent.

© 2023 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Simon H. Lee, shl2180@columbia.edu

Abstract

Weather regimes defined through cluster analysis concisely categorize the anomalous regional circulation pattern on any given day. Owing to their persistence and low dimensionality, regimes are increasingly used in subseasonal-to-seasonal prediction and in analysis of climate variability and change. However, a limitation of existing regime classifications for North America is their seasonal dependence, with most existing studies defining regimes for winter only. Here, we normalize the seasonal cycle in daily geopotential height variance and use empirical orthogonal function analysis combined with k-means clustering to define a new set of year-round North American weather regimes: the Pacific Trough, Pacific Ridge, Alaskan Ridge, and Greenland High regimes. We additionally define a “No Regime” state to represent conditions close to climatology. To demonstrate the robustness of the classification, a thorough assessment of the sensitivity of the clustering solution to various methodological choices is provided. The median persistence of all four regimes, obtained without imposing a persistence criterion, is found to be one week, approximately 3 times longer than the median persistence of the No Regime state. Regime-associated temperature and precipitation anomalies are reported, together with the relationship between the regimes and modes of climate variability. We also quantify historical trends in the frequency of the regimes since 1979, finding a decrease in the annual frequency of the Pacific Trough regime and an increase in the summertime frequency of the Greenland High regime. This study serves as a foundation for the future use of these regimes in a variety of weather and climate applications.

Significance Statement

Weather regimes provide a simple way of classifying daily large-scale regional weather patterns into a few predefined types. Existing methods usually define regimes for a specific season (typically winter), which limits their use, or provides only a minimal assessment of their robustness. In this study, we objectively quantify four weather regimes for use year-round over North America, while we classify near-normal conditions as No Regime. The four regimes represent persistent large-scale weather types that last for about a week and occasionally much longer. Our new classification can be applied to subseasonal-to-seasonal forecasts and climate model output to diagnose recurrent weather types across the North American continent.

© 2023 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Simon H. Lee, shl2180@columbia.edu
Save
  • Amini, S., and D. M. Straus, 2019: Control of storminess over the Pacific and North America by circulation regimes: The role of large-scale dynamics in weather extremes. Climate Dyn., 52, 47494770, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4409-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bao, M., and J. M. Wallace, 2015: Cluster analysis of Northern Hemisphere wintertime 500-hPa flow regimes during 1920–2014. J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 35973608, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0001.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Black, R. X., B. A. McDaniel, and W. A. Robinson, 2006: Stratosphere–troposphere coupling during spring onset. J. Climate, 19, 48914901, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3907.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Büeler, D., L. Ferranti, L. Magnusson, J. F. Quinting, and C. M. Grams, 2021: Year-round sub-seasonal forecast skill for Atlantic–European weather regimes. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 42834309, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Butler, A. H., and D. I. V. Domeisen, 2021: The wave geometry of final stratospheric warming events. Wea. Climate Dyn., 2, 453474, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-453-2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cassou, C., 2008: Intraseasonal interaction between the Madden–Julian Oscillation and the North Atlantic Oscillation. Nature, 455, 523527, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07286.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cassou, C., L. Terray, J. W. Hurrell, and C. Deser, 2004: North Atlantic winter climate regimes: Spatial asymmetry, stationarity with time, and oceanic forcing. J. Climate, 17, 10551068, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<1055:NAWCRS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Charney, J. G., and J. G. DeVore, 1979: Multiple flow equilibria in the atmosphere and blocking. J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 12051216, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036<1205:MFEITA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cheng, X., and J. M. Wallace, 1993: Cluster analysis of the Northern Hemisphere wintertime 500-hPa height field: Spatial patterns. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 26742696, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<2674:CAOTNH>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christiansen, B., 2007: Atmospheric circulation regimes: Can cluster analysis provide the number? J. Climate, 20, 22292250, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4107.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coe, D., M. Barlow, L. Agel, F. Colby, C. Skinner, and J.-H. Qian, 2021: Clustering analysis of autumn weather regimes in the Northeast United States. J. Climate, 34, 75877605, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0243.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coumou, D., J. Lehmann, and J. Beckmann, 2015: The weakening summer circulation in the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes. Science, 348, 324327, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261768.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davies, D. L., and D. W. Bouldin, 1979: A cluster separation measure. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., PAMI-1, 224227, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766909.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deser, C., J. W. Hurrell, and A. S. Phillips, 2017: The role of the North Atlantic Oscillation in European climate projections. Climate Dyn., 49, 31413157, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3502-z.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dorrington, J., K. Strommen, F. Fabiano, and F. Molteni, 2022: CMIP6 models trend toward less persistent European blocking regimes in a warming climate. Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL100811, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100811.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fabiano, F., V. L. Meccia, P. Davini, P. Ghinassi, and S. Corti, 2021: A regime view of future atmospheric circulation changes in northern mid-latitudes. Wea. Climate Dyn., 2, 163180, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-163-2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fereday, D. R., 2017: How persistent are North Atlantic–European sector weather regimes? J. Climate, 30, 23812394, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0328.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fereday, D. R., J. R. Knight, A. A. Scaife, C. K. Folland, and A. Philipp, 2008: Cluster analysis of North Atlantic–European circulation types and links with tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures. J. Climate, 21, 36873703, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1875.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Francis, J. A., N. Skific, and S. J. Vavrus, 2018: North American weather regimes are becoming more persistent: Is Arctic amplification a factor? Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 11 41411 422, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080252.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grams, C. M., R. Beerli, S. Pfenninger, I. Staffell, and H. Wernli, 2017: Balancing Europe’s wind-power output through spatial deployment informed by weather regimes. Nat. Climate Change, 7, 557562, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3338.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grams, C. M., L. Ferranti, and L. Magnusson, 2020: How to make use of weather regimes in extended-range predictions for Europe. ECMWF Newsletter, No. 165, ECMWF, Reading, United Kingdom, 14–19, www.ecmwf.int/en/newsletter/165/meteorology/how-make-use-weather-regimes-extended-range-predictions-europe.

  • Hannachi, A., D. M. Straus, C. L. E. Franzke, S. Corti, and T. Woollings, 2017: Low-frequency nonlinearity and regime behavior in the Northern Hemisphere extratropical atmosphere. Rev. Geophys., 55, 199234, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000509.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hersbach, H., and Coauthors, 2020: The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 19992049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hochman, A., G. Messori, J. F. Quinting, J. G. Pinto, and C. M. Grams, 2021: Do Atlantic-European weather regimes physically exist? Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL095574, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095574.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hurrell, J. W., and C. Deser, 2010: North Atlantic climate variability: The role of the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Mar. Syst., 79, 231244, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.11.002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huth, R., C. Beck, A. Philipp, M. Demuzere, Z. Ustrnul, M. Cahynová, J. Kyselý, and O. E. Tveito, 2008: Classifications of atmospheric circulation patterns: Recent advances and applications. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1146, 105152, https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1446.019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kimoto, M., and M. Ghil, 1993: Multiple flow regimes in the Northern Hemisphere winter. Part I: Methodology and hemispheric regimes. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 26252644, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<2625:MFRITN>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lamb, H. H., 1950: Types and spells of weather around the year in the British Isles: Annual trends, seasonal structure of the year, singularities. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 76, 393429, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707633005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, R. W., S. J. Woolnough, A. J. Charlton-Perez, and F. Vitart, 2019: ENSO modulation of MJO teleconnections to the North Atlantic and Europe. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 13 53513 545, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084683.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, S. H., J. C. Furtado, and A. J. Charlton-Perez, 2019: Wintertime North American weather regimes and the Arctic stratospheric polar vortex. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 14 89214 900, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085592.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, S. H., A. J. Charlton-Perez, S. J. Woolnough, and J. C. Furtado, 2022a: How do stratospheric perturbations influence North American weather regime predictions? J. Climate, 35, 59155932, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0413.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, S. H., L. M. Polvani, and B. Guan, 2022b: Modulation of atmospheric rivers by the Arctic stratospheric polar vortex. Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL100381, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100381.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lembo, V., F. Fabiano, V. M. Galfi, R. G. Graversen, V. Lucarini, and G. Messori, 2022: Meridional-energy-transport extremes and the general circulation of Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes: Dominant weather regimes and preferred zonal wavenumbers. Wea. Climate Dyn., 3, 10371062, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1037-2022.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Levick, R. B. M., 1949: Fifty years of English weather. Weather, 4, 206211, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1477-8696.1949.tb05487.x.

  • Levick, R. B. M., 1950: Fifty years of British weather. Weather, 5, 245247, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1477-8696.1950.tb01207.x.

  • Mariotti, A., and Coauthors, 2020: Windows of opportunity for skillful forecasts subseasonal to seasonal and beyond. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 101, E608E625, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0326.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matsueda, M., and T. N. Palmer, 2018: Estimates of flow-dependent predictability of wintertime Euro-Atlantic weather regimes in medium-range forecasts. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 10121027, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3265.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Messori, G., M. Kretschmer, S. H. Lee, and V. Wendt, 2022: Stratospheric downward wave reflection events modulate North American weather regimes and cold spells. Wea. Climate Dyn., 3, 12151236, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1215-2022.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Michelangeli, P.-A., R. Vautard, and B. Legras, 1995: Weather regimes: Recurrence and quasi stationarity. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 12371256, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<1237:WRRAQS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, D. E., Z. Wang, R. J. Trapp, and D. S. Harnos, 2020: Hybrid prediction of weekly tornado activity out to Week 3: Utilizing weather regimes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087253, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Millin, O. T., J. C. Furtado, and J. B. Basara, 2022: Characteristics, evolution, and formation of cold air outbreaks in the Great Plains of the United States. J. Climate, 35, 45854602, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0772.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Molina, M. J., J. H. Richter, A. A. Glanville, K. Dagon, J. Berner, A. Hu, and G. A. Meehl, 2023: Subseasonal representation and predictability of North American weather regimes using cluster analysis. Artif. Intell. Earth Syst., 2, e220051, https://doi.org/10.1175/AIES-D-22-0051.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Molteni, F., L. Ferranti, T. Palmer, and P. Viterbo, 1993: A dynamical interpretation of the global response to equatorial Pacific SST anomalies. J. Climate, 6, 777795, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<0777:ADIOTG>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nabizadeh, E., S. W. Lubis, and P. Hassanzadeh, 2022: The summertime Pacific-North American weather regimes and their predictability. Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL099401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099401.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neal, R., D. Fereday, R. Crocker, and R. E. Comer, 2016: A flexible approach to defining weather patterns and their application in weather forecasting over Europe. Meteor. Appl., 23, 389400, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1563.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Palmer, T. N., 1999: A nonlinear dynamical perspective on climate prediction. J. Climate, 12, 575591, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0575:ANDPOC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pasquier, J. T., S. Pfahl, and C. M. Grams, 2019: Modulation of atmospheric river occurrence and associated precipitation extremes in the North Atlantic region by European weather regimes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 10141023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081194.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pedregosa, F., and Coauthors, 2011: Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 28252830.

  • Pinto, J. G., and C. C. Raible, 2012: Past and recent changes in the North Atlantic Oscillation. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Climate Change, 3, 7990, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.150.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ralph, F. M., M. D. Dettinger, J. J. Rutz, and D. E. Waliser, 2020: Atmospheric Rivers. 1st ed. Springer, 252 pp.

  • Reusch, D. B., R. B. Alley, and B. C. Hewitson, 2007: North Atlantic climate variability from a self-organizing map perspective. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D02104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007460.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rex, D. F., 1951: The effect of Atlantic blocking action upon European climate. Tellus, 3, 100112, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v3i2.8617.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Riboldi, J., R. Leeding, A. Segalini, and G. Messori, 2023: Multiple large-scale dynamical pathways for Pan–Atlantic compound cold and windy extremes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2022GL102528, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL102528.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robertson, A. W., N. Vigaud, J. Yuan, and M. K. Tippett, 2020: Toward identifying subseasonal forecasts of opportunity using North American weather regimes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 18611875, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0285.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ross, T., N. Lott, S. McCown, and D. Quinn, 1998: The El Nino winter of ’97-’98. NCDC Tech. Rep. 98-02, 28 pp., https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/13823.

  • Rousi, E., F. Selten, S. Rahmstorf, and D. Coumou, 2021: Changes in North Atlantic atmospheric circulation in a warmer climate favor winter flooding and summer drought over Europe. J. Climate, 34, 22772295, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0311.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schumacher, D. L., M. Hauser, and S. I. Seneviratne, 2022: Drivers and mechanisms of the 2021 Pacific Northwest heatwave. Earth’s Future, 10, e2022EF002967, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002967.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sheridan, S. C., 2002: The redevelopment of a weather-type classification scheme for North America. Int. J. Climatol., 22, 5168, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.709.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Son, S.-W., H. Kim, K. Song, S.-W. Kim, P. Martineau, Y.-K. Hyun, and Y. Kim, 2020: Extratropical prediction skill of the subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) prediction models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 125, e2019JD031273, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031273.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spensberger, C., and Coauthors, 2020: Dynamics of concurrent and sequential Central European and Scandinavian heatwaves. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 29983013, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3822.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stephenson, D. B., A. Hannachi, and A. O’Neill, 2004: On the existence of multiple climate regimes. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 583605, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Straus, D. M., S. Corti, and F. Molteni, 2007: Circulation regimes: Chaotic variability versus SST-forced predictability. J. Climate, 20, 22512272, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4070.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tippett, M. K., and A. G. Barnston, 2008: Skill of multimodel ENSO probability forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 39333946, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2431.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vautard, R., 1990: Multiple weather regimes over the North Atlantic: Analysis of precursors and successors. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 20562081, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<2056:MWROTN>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vigaud, N., A. W. Robertson, and M. K. Tippett, 2018: Predictability of recurrent weather regimes over North America during winter from submonthly reforecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 25592577, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0058.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vitart, F., and A. W. Robertson, 2018: The sub-seasonal to seasonal prediction project (S2S) and the prediction of extreme events. npj Climate Atmos. Sci., 1, 3, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0013-0.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vitart, F., M. A. Balmaseda, L. Ferranti, and M. Fuentes, 2022: The next extended-range configuration for IFS Cycle 48r1. ECMWF Newsletter, No. 173, ECMWF, Reading, United Kingdom, 21–26, https://www.ecmwf.int/en/newsletter/173/earth-system-science/next-extended-range-configuration-ifs-cycle-48r1.

  • Wallace, J. M., Y. Zhang, and K.-H. Lau, 1993: Structure and seasonality of interannual and interdecadal variability of the geopotential height and temperature fields in the Northern Hemisphere troposphere. J. Climate, 6, 20632082, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<2063:SASOIA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • White, C. J., and Coauthors, 2021: Advances in the application and utility of subseasonal-to-seasonal predictions. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 103, E1448E1472, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0224.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wills, R. C. J., Y. Dong, C. Proistosecu, K. C. Armour, and D. S. Battisti, 2022: Systematic climate model biases in the large-scale patterns of recent sea-surface temperature and sea-level pressure change. Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL100011, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wolter, K., and M. S. Timlin, 1998: Measuring the strength of ENSO events: How does 1997/98 rank? Weather, 53, 315324, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1477-8696.1998.tb06408.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, W., and G. Villarini, 2019: On the weather types that shape the precipitation patterns across the U.S. Midwest. Climate Dyn., 53, 42174232, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04783-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, W., V. Hari, S. S.-Y. Wang, M. D. LaPlante, G. Garfin, G. Affram, and R. Kumar, 2022: Fewer troughs, not more ridges, have led to a drying trend in the western United States. Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097089, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097089.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1123 1123 330
Full Text Views 262 262 84
PDF Downloads 320 320 100