Arctic September Sea Ice Concentration Biases in CMIP6 Models and Their Relationships with Other Model Variables

Claude Frankignoul aUMR LOCEAN, Sorbonne Université, IRD, MNHM, CNRS, IPSL, Paris, France
bWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Claude Frankignoul in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7038-1839
,
Lea Raillard cLaboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, IPSL, Paris, France

Search for other papers by Lea Raillard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Brady Ferster aUMR LOCEAN, Sorbonne Université, IRD, MNHM, CNRS, IPSL, Paris, France
dDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

Search for other papers by Brady Ferster in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Young-Oh Kwon bWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Young-Oh Kwon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The models that participated in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) exhibit large biases in Arctic sea ice climatology that seem related to biases in seasonal atmospheric and oceanic circulations. Using historical runs of 34 CMIP6 models from 1979 to 2014, we investigate the links between the climatological sea ice concentration (SIC) biases in September and atmospheric and oceanic model climatologies. The main intermodel spread of September SIC is well described by two leading EOFs, which together explain ∼65% of its variance. The first EOF represents an underestimation or overestimation of SIC in the whole Arctic, while the second EOF describes opposite SIC biases in the Atlantic and Pacific sectors. Regression analysis indicates that the two SIC modes are closely related to departures from the multimodel mean of Arctic surface heat fluxes during summer, primarily shortwave and longwave radiation, with incoming Atlantic Water playing a role in the Atlantic sector. Local and global links with summer cloud cover, low-level humidity, upper or lower troposphere temperature/circulation, and oceanic variables are also found. As illustrated for three climate models, the local relationships with the SIC biases are mostly similar in the Arctic across the models but show varying degrees of Atlantic inflow influence. On a global scale, a strong influence of the summer atmospheric circulation on September SIC is suggested for one of the three models, while the atmospheric influence is primarily via thermodynamics in the other two. Clear links to the North Atlantic oceanic circulation are seen in one of the models.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Claude Frankignoul, claude.frankignoul@locean.ipsl.fr

Abstract

The models that participated in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) exhibit large biases in Arctic sea ice climatology that seem related to biases in seasonal atmospheric and oceanic circulations. Using historical runs of 34 CMIP6 models from 1979 to 2014, we investigate the links between the climatological sea ice concentration (SIC) biases in September and atmospheric and oceanic model climatologies. The main intermodel spread of September SIC is well described by two leading EOFs, which together explain ∼65% of its variance. The first EOF represents an underestimation or overestimation of SIC in the whole Arctic, while the second EOF describes opposite SIC biases in the Atlantic and Pacific sectors. Regression analysis indicates that the two SIC modes are closely related to departures from the multimodel mean of Arctic surface heat fluxes during summer, primarily shortwave and longwave radiation, with incoming Atlantic Water playing a role in the Atlantic sector. Local and global links with summer cloud cover, low-level humidity, upper or lower troposphere temperature/circulation, and oceanic variables are also found. As illustrated for three climate models, the local relationships with the SIC biases are mostly similar in the Arctic across the models but show varying degrees of Atlantic inflow influence. On a global scale, a strong influence of the summer atmospheric circulation on September SIC is suggested for one of the three models, while the atmospheric influence is primarily via thermodynamics in the other two. Clear links to the North Atlantic oceanic circulation are seen in one of the models.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Claude Frankignoul, claude.frankignoul@locean.ipsl.fr

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 2.4045 MB)
Save
  • Årthun, M., T. Eldevik, and L. H. Smedsrud, 2019: The role of Atlantic heat transport in future Arctic winter sea ice loss. J. Climate, 32, 33273341, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0750.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baxter, I., and Q. Ding, 2022: An optimal atmospheric circulation mode in the Arctic favoring strong summertime sea ice melting and ice-albedo feedback. J. Climate, 35, 66276645, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0679.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baxter, I., and Coauthors, 2019: How tropical Pacific surface cooling contributed to accelerated sea ice melt from 2007 to 2012 as ice is thinned by anthropogenic forcing. J. Climate, 32, 85838602, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0783.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bethke, I., and Coauthors, 2019: NCC NorCPM1 model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical, version 3.3. Earth System Grid Federation, accessed 3 June 2022, https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.10894.

  • Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., K. C. Armour, C. M. Blitz, and E. DeWeaver, 2011: Persistence and inherent predictability of Arctic sea ice in a GCM ensemble and observations. J. Climate, 24, 231250, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3775.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bonan, D. B., and E. Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, 2020: Nonstationary teleconnections between the Pacific Ocean and Arctic sea ice. Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085666, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085666.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boucher, O., and Coauthors, 2020: Presentation and evaluation of the IPSL-CM6A-LR climate model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 12, e2019MS002010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cox, C., T. Uttal, C. N. Long, M. D. Shupe, R. S. Stone, and S. Starkweather, 2016: The role of springtime clouds in determining autumn sea ice extent. J. Climate, 29, 65816596, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0136.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Danabasoglu, G., and Coauthors, 2020: The Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2). J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 12, e2019MS001916, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001916.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ding, Q., and Coauthors, 2017: Influence of high-latitude atmospheric circulation changes on summertime Arctic sea ice. Nat. Climate Change, 7, 289295, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3241.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ding, Q., and Coauthors, 2019: Fingerprints of internal drivers of Arctic sea ice loss in observations and model simulations. Nat. Geosci., 12, 2833, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0256-8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drijfhout, S., G. J. van Oldenborgh, and A. Cimatoribus, 2012: Is a decline of AMOC causing the warming hole above the North Atlantic in observed and modeled warming patterns? J. Climate, 25, 83738379, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00490.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • England, M., A. Jahn, and L. Polvani, 2019: Nonuniform contribution of internal variability to recent Arctic sea ice loss. J. Climate, 32, 40394053, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0864.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hersbach, H., and Coauthors, 2020: The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 19992049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, J., and Coauthors, 2017: Recently amplified Arctic warming has contributed to a continual global warming trend. Nat. Climate Change, 7, 875879, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0009-5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, Y., Q. Ding, X. Dong, B. Xi, and I. Baxter, 2021: Summertime low clouds mediate the impact of the large-scale circulation on Arctic sea ice. Commun. Earth Environ., 2, 38, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00114-w.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jahn, A., J. E. Kay, M. M. Holland, and D. M. Hall, 2016: How predictable is the timing of a summer ice-free Arctic? Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 91139120, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070067.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kapsch, M.-L., R. G. Graversen, M. Tjernström, and R. Bintanja, 2016: The effect of downwelling longwave and shortwave radiation on Arctic summer sea ice. J. Climate, 29, 11431159, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0238.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kay, J. E., M. M. Holland, and A. Jahn, 2011: Inter-annual to multi-decadal Arctic sea ice extent trends in a warming world. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L15708, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Long, M., L. Zhang, S. Hu, and S. Qian, 2021: Multi-aspect assessment of CMIP6 models for Arctic sea ice simulations. J. Climate, 34, 15151529, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0522.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Luo, R., Q. Ding, I. Baxter, X. Chen, Z. Wu, M. Bushuk, and H. Wang, 2023: Uncertain role in shaping summertime atmosphere-sea ice connections in reanalyses and CMIP6 models. Climate Dyn., 61, 19731994, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06785-9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meier, W. N., F. Fetterer, A. K. Windnagel, and J. S. Stewart, 2021: NOAA/NSIDC climate data record of passive microwave sea ice concentration, version 4. National Snow and Ice Data Center, accessed 5 March 2022, https://doi.org/10.7265/efmz-2t65.

  • Mohino, E., B. Rodriguez-Fonseca, C. R. Mechoso, T. Losada, and I. Polo, 2019: Relationships among intermodel spread and biases in tropical Atlantic sea surface temperatures. J. Climate, 32, 36153635, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0846.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • North, G. R., T. L. Bell, R. F. Cahalan, and F. J. Moeng, 1982: Sampling errors in the estimation of empirical orthogonal functions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 699706, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110<0699:SEITEO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Notz, D., and Sea-Ice Model Intercomparison Project Community, 2020: Arctic sea ice in CMIP6. Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086749, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086749.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Previdi, M., K. L. Smith, and L. M. Polvani, 2021: Arctic amplification of climate change: A review of underlying mechanisms. Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 093003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1c29.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Screen, J. A., and Coauthors, 2018: Consistency and discrepancy in the atmospheric response to Arctic sea-ice loss across climate models. Nat. Geosci., 11, 155163, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0059-y.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Serreze, M. C., A. P. Barrett, J. C. Stroeve, D. N. Kindig, and M. M. Holland, 2009: The emergence of surface-based Arctic amplification. Cryosphere, 3, 1119, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-3-11-2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shen, Z., A. Duan, D. Li, and J. Li, 2021: Assessment and ranking of climate models in Arctic sea ice cover simulations: From CMIP5 to CMIP6. J. Climate, 34, 36093627, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0294.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shu, Q., Q. Wang, M. Årthun, S. Wang, Z. Song, M. Zhang, and F. Qiao, 2022: Arctic Ocean amplification in a warming climate in CMIP6 models. Sci. Adv., 8, eabn9755, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn9755.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Topal, D., Q. Ding, J. Mitchell, I. Baxter, M. Herein, T. Haszpra, R. Luo, and Q. Li, 2020: An internal atmospheric process determining summertime Arctic sea ice melting in the next three decades: Lessons learned from five large ensembles and multiple CMIP5 climate simulations. J. Climate, 33, 74317454, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0803.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wettstein, J. J., and C. Deser, 2014: Internal variability in projections of twenty-first-century Arctic sea ice loss: Role of the large-scale atmospheric circulation. J. Climate, 27, 527550, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00839.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilks, D. S., 2016: “The stippling shows statistically significant grid points”: How research results are routinely overstated and overinterpreted, and what to do about it. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97, 22632273, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00267.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, R., 2015: Mechanisms for low-frequency variability of summer Arctic sea ice extent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 45704575, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422296112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 476 476 104
Full Text Views 154 154 21
PDF Downloads 202 202 30