Ocean–Land Teleconnections and Chaotic Atmospheric Variability

Randal D. Koster Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by Randal D. Koster in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Siegfried D. Schubert Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, Maryland

Search for other papers by Siegfried D. Schubert in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anthony M. DeAngelis Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, Maryland

Search for other papers by Anthony M. DeAngelis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yehui Chang Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for other papers by Yehui Chang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Adam A. Scaife Met Office Hadley Centre, Met Office, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Adam A. Scaife in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A large ensemble of multidecadal atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) simulations is examined to determine a quantity central to the model’s potential predictability—the fraction of the simulated monthly air temperature (T2M) variability that is tied to the imposed sea surface temperature (SST) boundary conditions as opposed to the background atmospheric noise. Combining this information with ensemble simulation data from other AGCMs in turn allows an intermodel comparison of two separate quantities: model potential T2M predictability and the underlying (in the absence of noise) teleconnections between SSTs and continental T2M. To a large extent, the models tend to agree with each other regarding both—they all show, for example, the expected highest predictability in the tropics as well as low potential predictability in central Asia, and, particularly for DJF and MAM, they show very similar ocean–land teleconnections throughout the Americas. However, the models do show some differences in teleconnections, indicating room for model improvement that could, in principle, lead to benefits for long-term prediction. Importantly, by combining the model results with observational temperature data, we provide a new estimation of real-world predictability, a property of Nature that is not directly observable. The latter results suggest, with caveats, that for monthly T2M in the tropics, AGCMs tend to overestimate the ratio of predictable variance to noise-derived variance.

© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Randal Koster, randal.koster@gmail.com.

Abstract

A large ensemble of multidecadal atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) simulations is examined to determine a quantity central to the model’s potential predictability—the fraction of the simulated monthly air temperature (T2M) variability that is tied to the imposed sea surface temperature (SST) boundary conditions as opposed to the background atmospheric noise. Combining this information with ensemble simulation data from other AGCMs in turn allows an intermodel comparison of two separate quantities: model potential T2M predictability and the underlying (in the absence of noise) teleconnections between SSTs and continental T2M. To a large extent, the models tend to agree with each other regarding both—they all show, for example, the expected highest predictability in the tropics as well as low potential predictability in central Asia, and, particularly for DJF and MAM, they show very similar ocean–land teleconnections throughout the Americas. However, the models do show some differences in teleconnections, indicating room for model improvement that could, in principle, lead to benefits for long-term prediction. Importantly, by combining the model results with observational temperature data, we provide a new estimation of real-world predictability, a property of Nature that is not directly observable. The latter results suggest, with caveats, that for monthly T2M in the tropics, AGCMs tend to overestimate the ratio of predictable variance to noise-derived variance.

© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Randal Koster, randal.koster@gmail.com.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 2.4887 MB)
Save
  • Athanasiadis, P. J., and Coauthors, 2017: A multisystem view of wintertime NAO seasonal predictions. J. Climate, 30, 14611475, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0153.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bernhardt, J., A. M. Carleton, and C. LaMagna, 2018: A comparison of daily temperature-averaging methods: Spatial variability and recent change for the CONUS. J. Climate, 31, 979996, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0089.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bethke, I., and Coauthors, 2021: NorCPM1 and its contribution to CMIP6 DCPP. Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 70737116, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7073-2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boucher, O., and Coauthors, 2020: Presentation and evaluation of the IPSL‐CM6A‐LR climate model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 12, e2019MS002010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bretherton, C. S., and D. S. Battisti, 2000: An interpretation of the results from atmospheric general circulation models forced by the time history of the observed sea surface temperature distribution. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 767770, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010910.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chang, Y., S. D. Schubert, R. D. Koster, A. M. Molod, and H. Wang, 2019: Tendency bias correction in coupled and uncoupled global climate models with a focus on impacts over North America. J. Climate, 32, 639661, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0598.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, H., and E. K. Schneider, 2014: Comparison of the SST-forced responses between coupled and uncoupled climate simulations. J. Climate, 27, 740756, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00092.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Copsey, D., R. Sutton, and J. R. Knight, 2006: Recent trends in sea level pressure in the Indian Ocean region. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L19712, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027175.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cottrell, F. M., J. A. Screen, and A. A. Scaife, 2024: Signal-to-noise errors in free-running atmospheric simulations and their dependence on model resolution. Atmos. Sci. Lett., 25, e1212, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1212.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Danabasoglu, G., and Coauthors, 2020: The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2). J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 12, e2019MS001916, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001916.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eade, R., D. Smith, A. Scaife, E. Wallace, N. Dunstone, L. Hermanson, and N. Robinson, 2014: Do seasonal-to-decadal climate predictions underestimate the predictability of the real world? Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 56205628, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eyring, V., S. Bony, G. A. Meehl, C. A. Senior, B. Stevens, R. J. Stouffer, and K. E. Taylor, 2016: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 19371958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gates, W. L., 1992: An AMS continuing series: Global change—AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 73, 19621970, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1992)073<1962:ATAMIP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gelaro, R., and Coauthors, 2017: The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Climate, 30, 54195454, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koenigk, T., and U. Mikolajewicz, 2009: Seasonal to interannual climate predictability in mid and high northern latitudes in a global coupled model. Climate Dyn., 32, 783798, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0419-1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., M. J. Suarez, and M. Heiser, 2000: Variance and predictability of precipitation at seasonal-to-interannual timescales. J. Hydrometeor., 1, 2646, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2000)001<0026:VAPOPA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., and Coauthors, 2004: Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science, 305, 11381140, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100217.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., and Coauthors, 2011: The second phase of the global land–atmosphere coupling experiment: Soil moisture contributions to subseasonal forecast skill. J. Hydrometeor., 12, 805822, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1365.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kumar, A., M. Chen, and W. Wang, 2013: Understanding prediction skill of seasonal mean precipitation over the tropics. J. Climate, 26, 56745681, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00731.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kushnir, Y., and Coauthors, 2019: Towards operational predictions of the near-term climate. Nat. Climate Change, 9, 94101, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0359-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lorenz, E. N., 1963: Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 130141, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020%3C0130:DNF%3E2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mehta, V. M., M. J. Suarez, J. V. Manganello, and T. L. Delworth, 2000: Oceanic influence on the North Atlantic Oscillation and associated Northern Hemisphere climate variations: 1959–1993. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 121124, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL002381.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Molod, A., L. Takacs, M. Suarez, and J. Bacmeister, 2015: Development of the GEOS-5 atmospheric general circulation model: Evolution from MERRA to MERRA2. Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 13391356, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1339-2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Murphy, J. M., 1990: Assessment of the practical utility of extended range ensemble forecasts. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 116, 89125, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711649105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rodwell, M. J., D. P. Rowell, and C. K. Folland, 1999: Oceanic forcing of the wintertime North Atlantic Oscillation and European climate. Nature, 398, 320323, https://doi.org/10.1038/18648.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scaife, A. A., and D. Smith, 2018: A signal-to-noise paradox in climate science. npj Climate Atmos. Sci., 1, 28, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0038-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scaife, A. A., and Coauthors, 2009: The CLIVAR C20C project: Selected twentieth century climate events. Climate Dyn., 33, 603614, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0451-1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scaife, A. A., and Coauthors, 2014: Skillful long-range prediction of European and North American winters. Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 25142519, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059637.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scaife, A. A., and Coauthors, 2017: Tropical rainfall, Rossby waves and regional winter climate predictions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143 (702), 111, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2910.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Siegert, S., D. B. Stephenson, P. G. Sansom, A. A. Scaife, R. Eade, and A. Arribas, 2016: A Bayesian framework for verification and recalibration of ensemble forecasts: How uncertain is NAO predictability? J. Climate, 29, 9951012, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0196.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, D. M., A. A. Scaife, and B. P. Kirtman, 2012: What is the current state of scientific knowledge with regard to seasonal and decadal forecasting? Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 015602, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/015602.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tatebe, H., and Coauthors, 2019: Description and basic evaluation of simulated mean state, internal variability, and climate sensitivity in MIROC6. Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 27272765, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2727-2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, W., and B. Kirtman, 2019: Understanding the signal-to-noise paradox with a simple Markov model. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 13 30813 317, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085159.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ziehn, T., and Coauthors, 2020: The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5. J. South. Hemisphere Earth Syst. Sci., 70, 193214, https://doi.org/10.1071/ES19035.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 408 408 1
Full Text Views 394 394 330
PDF Downloads 259 259 175