An Evaluation of the National Meteorological Center Weekly Hindcast of Upper-Ocean Temperature along the Eastern Pacific Equator in January 1992

David Halpern Earth and Space Sciences Division, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

Search for other papers by David Halpern in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Ming Ji Coupled Model Project, National Meteorological Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.

Search for other papers by Ming Ji in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The upper-ocean temperature distribution along the Pacific equator from 139° to 103°W was observed in January 1992 with temperature profiles recorded from a ship and inferred from an ocean general circulation model calculation involving data assimilation (i.e., hindcast). An El Niño episode was in progress. The 100-m-thick mixed layer depth, the mixed-layer temperature, and the depth-averaged temperature below the thermocline were similar in both data products. Considerable differences occurred in the representation of the 15°−25°C thermocline, such as the depth-averaged temperatures above and below the 20°C isotherm, the cast-west slope of the 20°C isotherm, and a 1000-km-wide depression. The longitudinal-averaged root-mean-square difference between the hindcast and observed depths of the center of the thermocline was 17 m. Most of the disparities could be attributed to a high wavenumber transient event that the model-based assimilation system was not intended to resolve.

Abstract

The upper-ocean temperature distribution along the Pacific equator from 139° to 103°W was observed in January 1992 with temperature profiles recorded from a ship and inferred from an ocean general circulation model calculation involving data assimilation (i.e., hindcast). An El Niño episode was in progress. The 100-m-thick mixed layer depth, the mixed-layer temperature, and the depth-averaged temperature below the thermocline were similar in both data products. Considerable differences occurred in the representation of the 15°−25°C thermocline, such as the depth-averaged temperatures above and below the 20°C isotherm, the cast-west slope of the 20°C isotherm, and a 1000-km-wide depression. The longitudinal-averaged root-mean-square difference between the hindcast and observed depths of the center of the thermocline was 17 m. Most of the disparities could be attributed to a high wavenumber transient event that the model-based assimilation system was not intended to resolve.

Save